e. pod update If any of the pods are using HealthKit internally, updating is not sufficient and you may need to remove them. You might be able to check if your app binary contains HK- or Health-something in the similar way as shown in this post.

You can use toggle() on Bool, because Bool has a method named toggle(): toggle() As far as I checked, EditMode does not have a method named toggle() nor any other method of similar functionalities. EditMode If you do want it, you can define your own extension for EditMode: struct ContentView: View { @State var users = ["Susan", "Kate", "Natalie", "Kimberly", "Taylor", "Sarah", "Nancy", "Katherine", "Nicole", "Linda", "Jane", "Mary", "Olivia", "Barbara"] @State var editMode: EditMode = .inactive var body: some View { NavigationView { List { ForEach(users, id: \.self) { user in Text(user) } } .navigationBarTitle("Friends") .environment(\.editMode, $editMode) .navigationBarItems(leading: Button("Edit", action: { self.editMode.toggle() })) } } } extension EditMode { mutating func toggle() { if self.isEditing { self = .inactive } else { self = .active } } }

I use this if condition inside of didSelectRowAt method That seems to be the critical part of your code. In your code, item is a local variable. Changing the property of it does not affect the instance property food. Please try something like this: override func tableView(_ tableView: UITableView, didSelectRowAt indexPath: IndexPath) { foods[indexPath.row].isSelected.toggle() tableView.reloadRows(at: [indexPath], with: .automatic) } UITableView manages cell selection internally. So, you may need to add some code to make your isSelected work with such internal selection management, but anyway, please try the code above and tell us what happens.

@blaine l, thanks for clarifying. And that is the one I was to propose to you. I will take time to check it on some actual devices. You should better send a bug report to Apple, attaching a project which reproduces the issue and the precise condition and steps-to-reproduce may be needed.

Yes. The ones I showed in the video were all initialized. I cannot find anything in the video which confirms all the static let variables are initialized. Do you know how to check static let variable is initialized?

Hard to say something sure with just shown EXC_BAD_ACCESS. Check all the info shown in Xcode, stack traces, debug prints and logs, all such things.

static let variables (or you want to call them constants) are initialized dynamically on the first use. Did you check them in the debugger after all of them are initialized?

You are putting completion() at the wrong place: func first(completion: @escaping ()->()) { //<- let url = URL(string: "https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/users")! URLSession.shared.dataTask(with: url) { data, _, _ in if let data = data { let result = try? JSONDecoder().decode([User].self, from: data) self.result2 = result![0].name completion() //<- here } }.resume() //completion() //<- Not here }

Can you show a complete code to reproduce the issue?

I'm guessing due to the idiosyncratic implementation of the underlying BOOL-returning NSError-taking method on the Objective-C side? Your guess seems to be right. The original method isMemberRecord:error: does not follow the convention of error throwing functions. To import error throwing functions correctly in Swift, the original Objective-C method should return false or nil only when error is thrown. You should better send a bug report to Apple. To work this around, you may need to write some Objective-C wrapper, something like this: ODRecord+hasMember.h #import <OpenDirectory/OpenDirectory.h> #import <Foundation/Foundation.h> NS_ASSUME_NONNULL_BEGIN @interface ODRecord (hasMember) - (NSNumber * _Nullable)hasMember: (ODRecord *)record error: (NSError **)error; @end NS_ASSUME_NONNULL_END ODRecord+hasMember.m #include "ODRecord+hasMember.h" @implementation ODRecord (hasMember) - (NSNumber * _Nullable)hasMember: (ODRecord *)record error: (NSError **)error { NSError *resultError = nil; BOOL result = [self isMemberRecord:record error:&resultError]; if( resultError != nil ) { if( error != nil ) { *error = resultError; } return nil; } return [NSNumber numberWithBool:result]; } @end {YourProjectName}-Bridging-Header.h #include "ODRecord+hasMember.h" And you can use it like this: func myIsMember_attempt3(_ r: ODRecord, ofGroup g: ODRecord) -> Bool? { do { let isM = try g.hasMember(r).boolValue return isM } catch { print("Error: \(error)") return nil } }

Your save(_:) does not make sense considering the fact prefArr is made of fetched results. Please clarify what you expect on calling save(_:)?

Can you share the image which causes the issue?

According to the doc, SectionedFetchResults is a RandomAccessCollection of Section and Section is a RandomAccessCollection of Result (Result == CoreDataEntityClass, in your case). So, Please try something like this to get the total count: items.reduce(0, {$0 + $1.count})

You can try something like this: struct ContentView: View { @State private var users = ["George", "Kenny", "Susan", "Natalie"] @State var editMode: EditMode = .inactive //<- var body: some View { NavigationView { List { ForEach(users, id: \.self) { user in Text(user) } .onDelete(perform: delete) } .environment(\.editMode, $editMode) //<- .navigationBarTitle("My family") .navigationBarItems(trailing: Button(action: { print("Edit button pressed...") self.editMode = .active //<- }) { Text("Edit") } ) } } func delete(at offsets: IndexSet) { users.remove(atOffsets: offsets) } } Create a state representing EditMode and pass the Binding of it to the environment \.editMode of the inner view (List). You may want to add animating or change the button to Done, but I think you can do it yourself.

As you know, Unicode consortium will add many emojis every year. https://unicode.org/emoji/charts/emoji-list.html I can find some more characters in range U+1FAD3...U+1FAD6. I'm not sure how many of them are already include in the Apple's emoji font, but eventually Apple may cover all. Which means, you may need to update the range list every time Unicode emojis are updated. One more, the code you found in the linked thread is far from complete. As you see in the whole list of emojis, some emojis are made of multiple code points. But the method isEmoji(_:) detects all the variation selectors as emoji, although there are many cases non-emoji character having variation selector. Find a better solution which detects emojis more completely, and which will be updated when Unicode standard is updated.