Hi everyone, I’m running a dual-homed IPv6-mostly LAN where two on-link routers advertise distinct global Provider-Assigned prefixes (one per ISP). On Linux, the host stack appears to follow RFC 8028. It keeps one default route per prefix, and packets appear to leave through a router that recognises their source address and pass ISP BCP 38 (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp38/) checks. On macOS Sequoia, I'm only seeing a single un-scoped default route. As a result, traffic sourced from prefix B often exits via router A and is dropped upstream. Questions: Is the single-default-per-interface model in macOS an intentional design choice or simply legacy behaviour that has not yet been updated to RFC 8028? Does the kernel perform any hidden next-hop selection that isn’t reflected in netstat -rn output? Are there any road-map items for fully adopting RFC 8028 in macOS? As a bonus, I'd be very interested in any info you might be able to provide on the status of implementation/support for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8978 (Reaction of IPv6 Stateless Address Autoconfiguration (SLAAC) to Flash-Renumbering Events).