Hi there, We’re using APNs Push delivery metrics, which provide a breakdown including metrics like Received by APNs, Delivered to Device, and Discarded - Token Unregistered. To track unregistered tokens on our end, we also monitor the 410 error responses from APNs, which typically indicate that a token is no longer valid. However, we’ve noticed a discrepancy: the number of 410 errors we receive is much lower than the Discarded - Token Unregistered count shown in the APNs console. Is this difference expected? Specifically, does APNs sometimes know that a token is unregistered but still return a success status to us when we attempt to send a push to that token? Thank you for any insights you can provide!

We are observing an weird behaviour where a user uninstalled the app back in February (more than a month ago) but APNs is still accepting push notifications are returning success responses. We know that using APNs response codes for uninstall tracking is not reliable and that Apple will use fuzzy schedule to invalidate tokens. However, showing successful responses for month+ old tokens seems a bit misleading and results in wasted token processing for both us and Apple. Could you please confirm that invalidation (or fuzzy schedule) could take more than months to invalidate tokens on the APNs side? Is that expected or is this a bug somewhere?

Hi there, we noticed high volume of 410 responses from APNs. It started on July 19th and we see it across multiple apps. Is there some sort of mass token invalidation/removal that's happening on APNs?

Docs mention the following about the timestamp field returned by APNs: "The time, represented in milliseconds since Epoch, at which APNs confirmed the token was no longer valid for the topic. This key is included only when the error in the :status field is 410." We would like to clarify whether this timestamp is subject to the fuzzy schedule or whether it represent the accurate time of when APNs knew that the token became invalid? We understand that using 410 for tracking purposes is off label. However we still would like to have the most accurate information in regards to when token became invalid. This will help us debug user issues better in cases when they re-install, uninstall, change permission settings, etc.