Hello, We are implementing a Transparent Proxy using NETransparentProxyProvider and configuring NETransparentProxyNetworkSettings with NENetworkRule. Currently, NENetworkRule requires: NENetworkRule( destinationHost: NWHostEndpoint(hostname: String, port: String), protocol: .TCP / .UDP / .any ) NWHostEndpoint.port accepts only a single port value (as a String) or an empty string for all ports. At present, we are creating a separate NENetworkRule for each port in the range (ex for range 49152–65535 approximately 16,384 rules). After deploying this configuration, we observe the following behavior: nesessionmanager starts consuming very high CPU (near 100%) The system becomes unresponsive The device eventually hangs and restarts automatically The behavior resembles a kernel panic scenario This strongly suggests that creating thousands of NENetworkRule entries may not be a supported or scalable approach. Questions: Is there any officially supported way to specify a port range in NENetworkRule? Is creating thousands of rules (one per port) considered acceptable or supported? Is the recommended design to intercept broadly (e.g., port = "") and filter port ranges inside handleNewTCPFlow / handleNewUDPFlow instead? Are there documented system limits for the number of NENetworkRule entries allowed in NETransparentProxyNetworkSettings?

I am seeing an issue with NETransparentProxyProvider where the extension successfully transitions from sleep to wake, but stops receiving handleNewFlow(_:) calls. Only below two methods gets called, We don't apply rules in these methods: override func wake() override func sleep(completionHandler: @escaping () -> Void) This breaking complete proxy workflow as it stops intercepting traffics. We are not observing this issues always. FYI: com.apple.developer.endpoint-security.client is not present in .entitlement file. I am not sure adding this will help. Any possibilities nesessionmanager might fail to re-bind the traffic rules for this extensions? Any thing we can do to avoid this issues?