Post

Replies

Boosts

Views

Activity

A wrinkle converting a UIKit Document-based app to SwiftUI Document Group
The app I'm converting includes two unique document types. UI-wise they have key similarities (eg contents are password protected) But serialization/model - wise. they are different documents. I have not been able to find any documentation on options for implementing this (eg use a (abstract?) base class derived from FileDocument, with two concrete sub classes? maybe just a single subclass of FileDocument that contains model details for both file types?) Stepping back from implementation options, am I crazy for attempting to use DocumentGroup to create a single app that would need to be able to open/modify/save multiple unique document types? any/all guidance much appreciated.
Topic: UI Frameworks SubTopic: SwiftUI
0
0
61
May ’25
Seeing some behaviour in Swift that I don't understand...
It's related to the passByValue nature of structs. In the sample code below, I'm displaying a list of structs (and I can add instances to my list using Int.random(1..<3) to pick one of two possible predefined versions of the struct). I also have a detail view that can modify the details of a single struct. However when I run this code, it will instead modify all the instances (ie either Sunday or Monday) in my list. To see this behaviour, run the following code and: tap New Trigger enough times that there are multiple of at least one of the sunday/monday triggers tap one of the matching trigger rows modify either the day, or the int expected: only one of the rows will reflect the edit actual: all the matching instances will be updated. This suggests to me that my Sunday and Monday static instances are being passed by reference when they get added to the array. But I had thought structs were strictly pass by value. What am I missing? thanks in advance for any wisdom, Mike struct ContentView: View { @State var fetchTriggers: [FetchTrigger] = [] var body: some View { NavigationView { VStack { Button("New Trigger") { fetchTriggers.append(Int.random(in: 1..<3) == 1 ? .sunMorning : .monEvening) } List($fetchTriggers) { fetchTrigger in NavigationLink(destination: FetchTriggerDetailView(fetchTrigger: fetchTrigger) .navigationBarTitle("Back", displayMode: .inline)) { Text(fetchTrigger.wrappedValue.description) .padding() } } } } } } struct FetchTrigger: Identifiable { static let monEvening: FetchTrigger = .init(dayOfWeek: .monday, hour: 6) static let sunMorning: FetchTrigger = .init(dayOfWeek: .sunday, hour: 3) let id = UUID() enum DayOfWeek: Int, Codable, CaseIterable, Identifiable { var id: Int { self.rawValue } case sunday = 1 case monday case tuesday var description: String { switch self { case .sunday: return "Sunday" case .monday: return "Monday" case .tuesday: return "Tuesday" } } } var dayOfWeek: DayOfWeek var hour: Int var description: String { "\(dayOfWeek.description), \(hour):00" } } struct FetchTriggerDetailView: View { @Binding var fetchTrigger: FetchTrigger var body: some View { HStack { Picker("", selection: $fetchTrigger.dayOfWeek) { ForEach(FetchTrigger.DayOfWeek.allCases) { dayOfWeek in Text(dayOfWeek.description) .tag(dayOfWeek) } } Picker("", selection: $fetchTrigger.hour) { ForEach(1...12, id: \.self) { number in Text("\(number)") .tag(number) } } } } }
Topic: UI Frameworks SubTopic: SwiftUI Tags:
1
0
215
Aug ’25
Calendar's date func is not behaving as I'd expect...
When I run this in a playground: var meDate = Calendar.current.date(from: DateComponents(year: 2024, hour: 7, weekday: 3, weekdayOrdinal: 2))! print(meDate) I see: 2024-01-09 15:00:00 +0000 This seems correct to me. jan 9th is the second Tuesday in 2024 I'm in the pacific TZ, 07:00 PDT matches 15:00GMT But then I do this: meDate = Calendar.current.date(bySetting: .weekday, value: 4, of: meDate)! print(meDate) and I see: 2024-01-10 08:00:00 +0000 I would have expected my hour value (7PST/15GMT) to have been preserved. Is there a way I can update weekday, but not lose my hour?
2
0
363
Oct ’25