I'm trying to understand the behavior I'm seeing here. In the following example, I have a custom @Observable class that adopts RandomAccessCollection and am attempting to populate a List with it. If I use an inner collection property of the instance (even computed as this shows), the top view identifies additions to the list. However, if I just use the list as a collection in its own right, it detects when a change is made, but not that the change increased the length of the list. If you add text that has capital letters you'll see them get sorted correctly, but the lower list retains its prior count. The choice of a List initializer with the model versus an inner ForEach doesn't change the outcome, btw. If I cast that type as an Array(), effectively copying its contents, it works fine which leads me to believe there is some additional Array protocol conformance that I'm missing, but that would be unfortunate since I'm not sure how I would have known that. Any ideas what's going on here? The new type can be used with for-in scenarios fine and compiles great with List/ForEach, but has this issue. I'd like the type to not require extra nonsense to be used like an array here. import SwiftUI fileprivate struct _VExpObservable6: View { @Binding var model: ExpModel @State private var text: String = "" var body: some View { NavigationStack { VStack(spacing: 20) { Spacer() .frame(height: 40) HStack { TextField("Item", text: $text) .textFieldStyle(.roundedBorder) .textContentType(.none) .textCase(.none) Button("Add Item") { guard !text.isEmpty else { return } model.addItem(text) text = "" print("updated model #2 using \(Array(model.indices)):") for s in model { print("- \(s)") } } } InnerView(model: model) OuterView(model: model) } .listStyle(.plain) .padding() } } } // - displays the model data using an inner property expressed as // a collection. fileprivate struct InnerView: View { let model: ExpModel var body: some View { VStack { Text("Model Inner Collection:") .font(.title3) List { ForEach(model.sorted, id: \.self) { item in Text("- \(item)") } } .border(.darkGray) } } } // - displays the model using the model _as the collection_ fileprivate struct OuterView: View { let model: ExpModel var body: some View { VStack { Text("Model as Collection:") .font(.title3) // - the List/ForEach collections do not appear to work // by default using the @Observable model (RandomAccessCollection) // itself, unless it is cast as an Array here. List { // ForEach(Array(model), id: \.self) { item in ForEach(model, id: \.self) { item in Text("- \(item)") } } .border(.darkGray) } } } #Preview { @Previewable @State var model = ExpModel() _VExpObservable6(model: $model) } @Observable fileprivate final class ExpModel: RandomAccessCollection { typealias Element = String var startIndex: Int { 0 } var endIndex: Int { sorted.count } init() { _listData = ["apple", "yellow", "about"] } subscript(_ position: Int) -> String { sortedData()[position] } var sorted: [String] { sortedData() } func addItem(_ item: String) { _listData.append(item) _sorted = nil } private var _listData: [String] private var _sorted: [String]? private func sortedData() -> [String] { if let ret = _sorted { return ret } let ret = _listData.sorted() _sorted = ret return ret } }

I've been working with Swift Concurrency a good bit for about 6 months now and keep bumping into where I need to bridge synchronously between it and other nonisolated system frameworks. I'm curious if there are recommended patterns for this type of interaction. Consider this scenario: I have a @MainActor isolated class that I'm using in my UI and would like to make it Codable. As soon as you add that requirement, the init(from decoder: Decoder) and encode(to encoder Encoder) must each be nonisolated, synchronous calls, which as far as I can tell means that I need an inner lock (NSLock or similar) to guard access to the state of the class. Despite the claim made elsewhere in the forums it is not as simple as adding the async keyword to these methods because it changes their signature. While I agree it is the right thing to encode/decode in the background off the main thread, adding locks every time I need to bridge feels contrary to the spirit of Swift Concurrency. What am I missing?