Thank you for your answers, Argun! While most of the answers are very helpful, I am puzzled by the one regarding duplicated sessions. As you can see in the screenshot, for example, session ID 5B155CE8-6AA9-4A3F-BCD0-9D88AF69F196;1 was linked to all three different classifications (laughter, shouting, speech), which is the opposite of "each sound classification within the same utterance or call will output a separate identifier" explanation. It's the same case for all the other session IDs ; and all these session IDs are linked with the same time stamp and the same start time. And it's not uncommon, below is another example from the same subject. I marked the records with same time with the same name; note that the blue records are again the same session ID linked with three different classifications. And in general why would a same segment be classified to different categories? Does that mean all of them are possible but can't be sure? Therefore, is there any recommended cut-off of the confidence (e.g. 0.5, 0.9, etc.)? As for sending in raw logs I am afraid it's very difficult as the data is from our participants not ourselves. I would assume it's an obstacle for all research teams. Thank you.