I just realized that you didn't understand my first request at the first place. I already wrote in my initial question that I already used custom font that simulates the bitmap look.
The problem is that they are also being anti-aliased (there's no reason they shouldn't) and it introduced artefact on those kind of font.
I was so disappointed at your patronizing answer that I thought you had understood my question and were referring to the anti-aliasing artifacts when you said they wouldn't be visible on high screen resolution
You assumed I wanted to make a bitmap look by using ANY font and removing the anti-alias.
So your answer is even worse because you proudly marked it yourself as the recommended solution while it was what I was doing at the first place... I just needed an improvement to it since the anti-aliasing introduced artifacts on those blocky fonts.
Anyway, that's not even relevant because I don't even need to explain WHY I need the anti-alias. It is not for anyone else to decide. Regardless of why I want to disable it, the technical question should stand on its own.
The question was “Can we disable anti-alias on fonts ?”.
The answer should have been “There's unfortunately no way or trick to remove the anti-aliasing on fonts”. Not the patronizing “Removing the anti-alias is not useful to you”.
I explained the reason why I wanted to disable the anti-alias because I wanted to avoid useless answers asking me “why” I wanted it. What I got in return was even worse.
I really didn't expect this kind of answer from an Apple Engineer on their official forums...
Anyway, I waste my time. I don't expect any other response for you after you dropped “your recommended solution”.