I am using Significant Location Change (SLC) monitoring to relaunch my app after it has been terminated. I have implemented SLC in two separate apps installed on the same device, and I would like to understand how the system delivers SLC events in this scenario. Specifically: Will both apps receive the SLC event at the same time, or can there be differences in the timing of delivery? If there are differences, what factors influence when each app receives the event? What criteria or system conditions determine how and when SLC events are delivered to different apps on the same device? Any clarification on the event delivery behavior would be greatly appreciated.

Recently, we have received continuous feedback from users that the Bluetooth key and digital key are not working properly or are not functioning; Through analysis of App logs, it was found that after the iOS system locks the screen, the iBeacon background keep-alive function fails, Bluetooth connection also fails, and system callbacks cannot be obtained; the digital key also fails, and it fails simultaneously with the Bluetooth key; We have checked the specific permission configuration and it aligns with the recommended configuration in the official documentation, with no abnormalities. Although this type of issue is not a widespread problem, it has been continuously reported by users and is very troublesome. Does the official team have a clear explanation? Why are both Bluetooth keys and digital keys affected after the app is locked? Digital keys should be less affected. The following is a log analysis of a certain user 1: Step 2, the App entered the background; Step 3, the App's Bluetooth was disconnected; 3-4 The App remained in the background for 5 hours before being launched again 2: This type of issue is due to the system disconnecting the Bluetooth connection when the app enters the background; most likely, the app has been killed by the system when the user gets out of the car, and it has not been revived; the car key also does not work; During the time period from 2026-03-23T17:59:33 to 2026-03-23T21:23:49, why didn't carkey work properly 1：2026-03-23T16:52:11.676+08:00 new_carkey: key:, rssi:-89, AUTH_OK 2：2026-03-23T17:55:51.782+08:00 new_carkey: AppMonitor appDidEnterBackground bleStatus: success(Nimbus.NIOCarBLEKey.State.connected) 3：2026-03-23T17:59:33.747+08:00 new_carkey: ibeacon: didExitRegion, vid: NIO BLE Key, uuid: *** bleStatus: failure(Error Domain=CBErrorDomain Code=15 ""Failed to encrypt the connection, the connection has timed out unexpectedly."" UserInfo={key_device_name=NIO Key 0201 , NSLocalizedDescription=Failed to encrypt the connection, the connection has timed out unexpectedly., vehicle_id=}) " 4：2026-03-23T21:23:49.920+08:00 new_carkey: AppMonitor appDidFinishLaunching: [:] bleStatus: success(Nimbus.NIOCarBLEKey.State.disconnected) 5：2026-03-23T22:01:51.235+08:00 new_carkey: key:****, rssi:-90, AUTH_OK

Hey Apple team, I'd love to see a native wind animation layer added to Apple Maps and MapKit. A built-in, system-level wind visualization — similar to the animated weather layers seen in third-party apps — would be an incredibly powerful tool for developers building weather, aviation, marine, outdoor recreation, and navigation apps. Having this baked natively into MapKit would mean smoother performance, better battery efficiency, and a consistent experience across iOS, iPadOS, and macOS — rather than every developer having to reinvent the wheel with custom particle systems or third-party SDKs. Please Apple — this would be a fantastic addition to the Maps ecosystem. 🌬️🗺️

Hello, I am trying to gather information on the global availability of the Apple Find My Network. Specifically, I would like to know: Which countries currently support this feature? Is it available worldwide, with only a few specific countries/regions facing usage restrictions or complete unavailability? I have already reviewed the public Feature Availability page, but was unable to find any documentation addressing regional restrictions. Any clarification or pointers to relevant documentation would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!

I am trying to provide my clients with subscribable calendar link so they can see their schedules from an App I have. I've got the basics working on building out the various fields for the VEVENT, however no matter what I have tried the LOCATION is always showing up as a text and not a location within Apple Maps that I can have them click on from the event. Any idea what the best way to go about this would be, and feeding the ICS an address, Apple Maps URL, GPS coordinates either in the location, Geo or the X-APPLE-STRUCTURED-LOCATION or combinations haven't been working. I am using/hosting on Google Scripts.

Hello, I am currently working with the Nearby Interaction framework on iOS and exploring the capabilities of UWB-based communication. I would like to ask whether Nearby Interaction supports multicast communication over UWB. Specifically, is it possible for one device to interact simultaneously with multiple peer devices using UWB (e.g., broadcasting ranging or spatial information to multiple devices at once), or is the framework strictly limited to one-to-one peer interactions? If multicast is not supported, are there any recommended approaches or best practices for achieving similar functionality using the current APIs? Thank you for your help. Best regards,

Hi, Our Apple Maps integration has been working normally for years, but starting today, newly created Maps tokens suddenly became unusable. Tokens created from the Apple Developer backend now return 401 Unauthorized everywhere we test them. We can reproduce this in: our own code Apple’s Try Maps Server API page MapKit JS So this does not appear to be limited to our app code. We also tested through a US network entry point to rule out a mainland China network issue, but the result was the same. At the moment, Maps tokens created in the backend seem to be unusable in all cases on our side. Has anyone else seen this today, or is there any known issue affecting Maps token creation or validation? Thanks.

Hi, Our Apple Maps integration has been working normally for years, but starting today, newly created Maps tokens suddenly became unusable. Tokens created from the Apple Developer backend now return 401 Unauthorized everywhere we test them. We can reproduce this in: our own code Apple’s Try Maps Server API page MapKit JS So this does not appear to be limited to our app code. We also tested through a US network entry point to rule out a mainland China network issue, but the result was the same. At the moment, Maps tokens created in the backend seem to be unusable in all cases on our side. Has anyone else seen this today, or is there any known issue affecting Maps token creation or validation? Thanks.

Hi everyone, I’m troubleshooting a persistent MapKit JS auth issue and would appreciate any advice. I have: Active Apple Developer account/team Maps configuration created and linked Active Maps-enabled signing key Domain-restricted token setup I tested multiple JWT variants: with origin without origin (basic example style) with and without exp exact domain and wildcard domain variants I also tested using a minimal/basic MapKit JS integration and still got the same result. Bootstrap request: `curl -s --compressed -D - \ 'https://cdn.apple-mapkit.com/ma/bootstrap?apiVersion=2&mkjsVersion=5.81.60&poi=1' \ -H 'Authorization: Bearer <JWT>' \ -H 'Origin: https://<my-domain>' \ -H 'Referer: https://<my-domain>/...' Result is always:` HTTP 401 {"error":{"message":"Not Authorized","details":[]}} Important detail: mapkit.core.js loads successfully (HTTP 200) failure happens only on bootstrap auth Has anyone seen this exact behavior with empty details and found what was wrong? Any checklist for hidden misconfiguration points (key linkage, token generation method, domain restriction behavior, propagation timing) would help.

I'm developing a spatial tracking app using a Qorvo DWM3001CDK (MFi-certified UWB accessory) with NINearbyAccessoryConfiguration. On iPhone 15 (iOS 26.3.1, second-generation UWB chip): supportsDirectionMeasurement = false NINearbyObject.direction is always nil NINearbyObject.distance works correctly (~63Hz) Camera Assistance (isCameraAssistanceEnabled=true) provides horizontalAngle only after ARKit convergence (~10s), and only while the phone is moving On iPhone 12/13 (first-generation UWB chip), direction works correctly with the same accessory. My questions: Is the removal of instantaneous direction measurement for third-party accessories on second-generation UWB devices intentional? Or is this a regression that will be fixed in a future iOS update? If intentional, what is the recommended approach for apps that need real-time direction to a UWB accessory on iPhone 15/16? Camera Assistance requires phone movement and only works with stationary targets, which doesn't work for our use case (tracking a moving object with the phone mounted on a gimbal). Are there any plans to provide instantaneous direction measurement for NINearbyAccessoryConfiguration on second-generation UWB devices? Environment: iPhone 15, iOS 26.3.1 Qorvo DWM3001CDK (FiRa + MFi certified) NINearbyAccessoryConfiguration with isCameraAssistanceEnabled=true Shared ARSession Thank you.

Overview When using SwiftUI Map with .standard(elevation: .realistic) and a globe-style presentation, the map unexpectedly renders as a flat 2D map instead of a 3D globe / realistic terrain view. In the same view, switching to .hybrid(elevation: .realistic) preserves the expected 3D globe behavior. This appears to be a rendering bug or regression specific to the .standard style under globe mode, not an app-level issue. The issue is reproducible in my app’s competition map screen and has also been reported by other developers online. Steps to Reproduce Create a SwiftUI Map. Bind it to a MapCameraPosition. Apply a standard map style with realistic elevation: .mapStyle(.standard(elevation: .realistic)) Configure the UI so the user can switch between: standard + globe hybrid + globe Zoom out / interact with the map in globe mode. Expected Results Map with .standard(elevation: .realistic) should continue to render with globe / 3D realistic terrain behavior, consistent with realistic elevation support and similar to .hybrid(elevation: .realistic). Actual Results When the map style is .standard(elevation: .realistic) in globe mode, the map falls back to a flat 2D-looking representation. Changing the same map to .hybrid(elevation: .realistic) restores the expected 3D globe rendering. Regression Unknown, but this appears to be unintended behavior because: realistic elevation is intended to provide realistic terrain / 3D map rendering, and there are no overlays in this map configuration that should intentionally force the map into a flat representation. Minimal Relevant Code From My App private enum CompetitionMapMode: String, CaseIterable { case satellite case explore func mapStyle(look: CompetitionMapLook) -> MapStyle { switch self { case .satellite: return .hybrid(elevation: look.elevation) case .explore: return .standard(elevation: look.elevation) } } } private enum CompetitionMapLook: String, CaseIterable { case globe case flat var elevation: MapStyle.Elevation { switch self { case .globe: return .realistic case .flat: return .flat } } } Map(position: $cameraPosition, selection: $selectedMapItemID) { UserAnnotation() ForEach(mapDisplayItems) { item in Annotation( item.title, coordinate: item.coordinate, anchor: .bottom ) { mapAnnotationView(for: item) } .tag(item.id) } } .mapStyle(mapModeSelection.mapStyle(look: mapLookSelection)) Why I Believe This Is a Framework Bug The same Map instance renders correctly in 3D when using: .hybrid(elevation: .realistic) but falls back to 2D with: .standard(elevation: .realistic) under globe mode. This suggests the issue is tied specifically to the .standard rendering path in SwiftUI Map / MapKit, rather than camera state, annotations, or location handling. My map does include annotations, but it does not add overlays that would intentionally flatten realistic terrain. Environment Xcode: Xcode 26.4 (17E192) SDK: SDK Version 26.4 (23E237) Device: iPhone 17 Pro iOS version: iOS 26.5 Beta 2 Reproducibility: Always App type: SwiftUI app using MapKit Map Additional Notes The issue is visible in a production app screen, not only a toy sample. The problem appears style-specific: .standard(elevation: .realistic) → incorrect 2D fallback .hybrid(elevation: .realistic) → expected 3D behavior This makes standard map style unusable for globe presentation in my app.

I found this documentation that instructs you how to use CLServiceSession to defer any accidental/premature locacation permission prompts: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/corelocation/suspending-authorization-requests It says "Add the CLRequireExplicitServiceSession property to your app’s Info.plist file to opt into this control behavior." I pretty much followed this example to a T. It seemed to work, however in some cases I still manage to get a location permission prompt on a fresh install before the part of the onboarding where we'd ask the user for location permissions (with CLServiceSession now). Is there any additional information on using CLRequireExplicitServiceSession than this blurb? Googling brings up nothing. I presumed the property is a BOOL but I'm not even sure of that, as it doesn't show up in Info.plist's autocomplete suggestions and I have to manually set the type.

Hello, I have a question similar to this post regarding MapKit JS quota limits. I understand that we can request rate limit increases, but it is not a guaranteed increase. My app is rapidly growing. What if Apple decides to not award the limit increase? Then, the directions service of my app will stop working, which would be catastrophic for my company. I need to know if the rate limit increases are guaranteed. I need to decide early on whether to use MapKit JS or another service on, because the more time that passes, the more entangled my code will get with MapKit JS. Can we get some more information on this?

MapKit offers showsTraffic: Bool, which is great for displaying live traffic data on the map. However, MapPolyline sits above it, which makes it quite useless. Is this the expected behaviour?