General: Forums subtopic: App & System Services > Networking TN3151 Choosing the right networking API Networking Overview document — Despite the fact that this is in the archive, this is still really useful. TLS for App Developers forums post Choosing a Network Debugging Tool documentation WWDC 2019 Session 712 Advances in Networking, Part 1 — This explains the concept of constrained networking, which is Apple’s preferred solution to questions like How do I check whether I’m on Wi-Fi? TN3135 Low-level networking on watchOS TN3179 Understanding local network privacy Adapt to changing network conditions tech talk Understanding Also-Ran Connections forums post Extra-ordinary Networking forums post Foundation networking: Forums tags: Foundation, CFNetwork URL Loading System documentation — NSURLSession, or URLSession in Swift, is the recommended API for HTTP[S] on Apple platforms. Moving to Fewer, Larger Transfers forums post Testing Background Session Code forums post Network framework: Forums tag: Network Network framework documentation — Network framework is the recommended API for TCP, UDP, and QUIC on Apple platforms. Building a custom peer-to-peer protocol sample code (aka TicTacToe) Implementing netcat with Network Framework sample code (aka nwcat) Configuring a Wi-Fi accessory to join a network sample code Moving from Multipeer Connectivity to Network Framework forums post NWEndpoint History and Advice forums post Wi-Fi (general): How to modernize your captive network developer news post Wi-Fi Fundamentals forums post Filing a Wi-Fi Bug Report forums post Working with a Wi-Fi Accessory forums post — This is part of the Extra-ordinary Networking series. Wi-Fi (iOS): TN3111 iOS Wi-Fi API overview technote Wi-Fi Aware framework documentation WirelessInsights framework documentation iOS Network Signal Strength forums post Network Extension Resources Wi-Fi on macOS: Forums tag: Core WLAN Core WLAN framework documentation Secure networking: Forums tags: Security Apple Platform Security support document Preventing Insecure Network Connections documentation — This is all about App Transport Security (ATS). WWDC 2017 Session 701 Your Apps and Evolving Network Security Standards [1] — This is generally interesting, but the section starting at 17:40 is, AFAIK, the best information from Apple about how certificate revocation works on modern systems. WWDC 2025 Session 314 Get ahead with quantum-secure cryptography Available trusted root certificates for Apple operating systems support article Requirements for trusted certificates in iOS 13 and macOS 10.15 support article About upcoming limits on trusted certificates support article Apple’s Certificate Transparency policy support article What’s new for enterprise in iOS 18 support article — This discusses new key usage requirements. Prepare your network environment for stricter security requirements support article — This is primarily of interest to folks developing management software, for example, an MDM server. Technote 2232 HTTPS Server Trust Evaluation Technote 2326 Creating Certificates for TLS Testing QA1948 HTTPS and Test Servers Miscellaneous: More network-related forums tags: 5G, QUIC, Bonjour On FTP forums post Using the Multicast Networking Additional Capability forums post Investigating Network Latency Problems forums post Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = "eskimo" + "1" + "@" + "apple.com" [1] This video is no longer available from Apple, but the URL should help you locate other sources of this info.

I've seen a number of similar posts from other network system extension developers reporting kernel panics on M5 devices in macOS. These kernel panics occur when network system extensions are enabled and are not observed on earlier mac platforms or versions of macOS. Reference: https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/821372 In this post, it appears like Apple is aware of a problem as noted by Kevin Elliott in versions of macOS. Do we know if there is any way to work around this problem (short of not enabling a network filter) until a fix is available?

After an app update replaces our extension with the new version, the XPC connection between the app and the extension fails to work roughly 20% of the time. Once it's broken, it stays broken — our reconnect/retry logic doesn't recover it, stopping and starting the extension doesn't recover it, and the only thing that fixes it is a full machine restart. This obviously isn't ideal. I've seen a few other threads describing the same or a very similar issue: https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/728063 https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/779395 https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/742992 On a broken upgrade cycle, when we run: sudo launchctl print system/NetworkExtension.com.company.example.app.filter.5.5.0.2248 the endpoints entry is missing from the output entirely. On a working upgrade cycle, the same command shows endpoints = {} is present. So it looks like our XPC service isn't actually getting registered with launchd in the broken case. We've tried various changes to our connection logic, but nothing prevents the issue — random upgrades still end up broken with no obvious cause. Is there a known way to recover the XPC registration without requiring a machine restart?

Hello, I am experiencing a specific authorization error on macOS Tahoe when trying to discover all available service types on the local network. While the implementation works perfectly on iOS and macOS Sonoma, it fails on Tahoe with a specific error code. The Issue When calling DNSServiceBrowse with the meta-query string _services._dns-sd._udp, the function immediately returns kDNSServiceErr_NoAuth (-65555). // This call fails on macOS Tahoe DNSServiceErrorType err = DNSServiceBrowse( &ref, 0, kDNSServiceInterfaceIndexAny, "_services._dns-sd._udp", // Meta-query for all services domc, probe_browse_reply, (__bridge void *)self ); Important Findings & Observations Specific Services Work: If I change the service type to a specific one (e.g., _http._tcp or _ssh._tcp) using NWBrowser, it works correctly and returns results. The error only occurs when browsing for _services._dns-sd._udp using DNSServiceBrowse. Local Network Permission: I have confirmed that the Local Network toggle is ON for my app in System Settings > Privacy & Security > Local Network. Entitlements: My app has the com.apple.developer.networking.multicast entitlement. Info.plist: Both NSLocalNetworkUsageDescription and NSBonjourServices (including _services._dns-sd._udp) are properly configured. Sandbox: The issue persists regardless of whether the App Sandbox is enabled (with incoming/outgoing connections) or disabled. Environment Not Working OS: macOS Tahoe 26 Working OS: macOS Sonoma, iOS 26 Question It seems macOS Tahoe has introduced a stricter policy regarding Network Reconnaissance or meta-service browsing. Is there a new requirement or a specific entitlement needed in macOS Tahoe to browse for _services._dns-sd._udp? Any guidance on how to restore this functionality for network utility apps on macOS Tahoe would be greatly appreciated. Best regards.

I've managed to put together a WebSocket client in Swift using NWProtocolWebSocket (though the documentation does not make it easy.) The point I'm stuck on is how to get a meaningful error if the server rejects the HTTP request, for example with a 404 or 403 status. The error reported to my stateUpdateHandler is a low-level POSIXErrorCode(rawValue: 53): Software caused connection abort). Additionally, how can I add custom headers to the HTTP request, like authorization or cookies? (I'm kind of wondering whether good ol' NSURLSession would have been a better choice -- TN3151 says: "Unless you have a specific reason to use URLSession, use Network framework for new WebSocket code", but at this point I feel that's bad advice.)

model : iphone 17 ios version: 26.2 app used: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/wifiaware/building-peer-to-peer-apps Here is our observation when we tried to make wifi aware connection between iphone and our wifi device. note : we used iphone as subscriber ( view simulation) 1.pairing & bootstrapping was successfully done 2.Data path was successfully established between iphone and our device. after data path establishment ,within few seconds , DATA PATH TERMINATION was sent from iphone which leads to pairing verification with new NMI address. Same behaviour is noticed even when we try to establish connection between two iphone devices. Here we have few questions. Once we establish data path , Why iphone initiates data path termination instead using the same service for data path exchange. 2.Why do we go for PAIRING VERIFICATION everytime.

Our business interface requests require disabling HTTP(s) proxies. We configured URLSessionConfiguration.connectionProxyDictionary as before, but found that it does not work on iOS 26 1.Core code: let configuration = URLSessionConfiguration.default configuration.connectionProxyDictionary = [ "HTTPEnable": false, "HTTPSEnable": false, "SOCKSEnable": false, ] let session = URLSession(configuration: configuration) let request = URLRequest(url: URL(string: "https://www.baidu.com")!,timeoutInterval: Double.infinity) // 发送请求 let task = session.dataTask(with: request) { data, response, error in if let error = error { print("网络请求失败: \(error)") } if let data = data { print("网络请求成功，返回数据长度: \(data.count)") if let responseString = String(data: data, encoding: .utf8) { print("返回数据: \(responseString.prefix(100))...") } } } task.resume() 2.Specific steps: We captured traffic using Proxyman and Charles. With the same code, requests cannot be captured on iOS 18 and iOS 16.1, but can be captured on iOS 26.2 and 26.1. Conclusion:Therefore, we suspect there is a bug with URLSessionConfiguration.connectionProxyDictionary on iOS 26.x. Please let us know whether this is a bug. If not, how should we properly disable HTTP(s) proxies? Note: We need to exclude PAC proxies, which are commonly used in corporate internal networks. 3.Devices & Software Xcode 16.4 iPhone 26.2、Simulator 26.1 iPhone 16、Simulator 18.0、Simulator 18.6 Proxyman、Charles

Our business interface requests require disabling HTTP(s) proxies. We configured URLSessionConfiguration.connectionProxyDictionary as before, but found that it does not work on iOS 16.2 and 16.3.1. 1.Core code: let configuration = URLSessionConfiguration.default configuration.connectionProxyDictionary = [ "HTTPEnable": false, "HTTPSEnable": false, "SOCKSEnable": false, ] let session = URLSession(configuration: configuration) let request = URLRequest(url: URL(string: "https://www.baidu.com")!,timeoutInterval: Double.infinity) // 发送请求 let task = session.dataTask(with: request) { data, response, error in if let error = error { print("网络请求失败: \(error)") } if let data = data { print("网络请求成功，返回数据长度: \(data.count)") if let responseString = String(data: data, encoding: .utf8) { print("返回数据: \(responseString.prefix(100))...") } } } task.resume() 2.Specific steps: We captured traffic using Proxyman and Charles. With the same code, requests cannot be captured on iOS 18 and iOS 16.1, but can be captured on iOS 26.2 and 26.1. Conclusion:Therefore, we suspect there is a bug with URLSessionConfiguration.connectionProxyDictionary on iOS 26.x. Please let us know whether this is a bug. If not, how should we properly disable HTTP(s) proxies? Note: We need to exclude PAC proxies, which are commonly used in corporate internal networks. 3.Devices & Soft Xcode 16.4 iPhone 26.2、Simulator 26.1 Proxyman、Charles

We have a Man In The Middle proxy that supports all kind of protocols (http, tls, dns, mail protocols, grpc, etc...)... On apple devices we are running it using the Network Extension framework as a NETransparentProxy. First of all, thank you for the framework, took a while to learn the ins and outs but it works nicely and runs smooth... However now that we start to roll it out to customers we see issues here and there.. For most it works fine, but for some that use other proxy/vpn solutions they run into all kind of "connectivity" issues... E.g. some customers run products from companies like zscaler, fortinet, tailscale etc... First we weren't sure if you could even run multiple TransparentProxy's that have the same network capture rules (e.g. the entire TCP range), but turns out that is fine as we tested it with a demo proxy of ours as well as the product version, both deployed as system extensions NETransparentProxy, and it is all fine.. However also here the ordering is not clear? Traffic seems to flow through both but cannot tell what the order is and if the user or we have any control over it. Now... Our proxy is not a VPN and thus not open a tunnel to a remote location. It is local only there to protect the developer. As such in theory it should be compatible with any other VPN and proxy as any traffic we intercept (all traffic) is still ok to go through their proxy/client-vpn and than through a remote tunnel if desired. So the questions I have is: Is there a way, either from within the code or that our users can configure to, on the order of multiple (network extension or other) proxies? Is TransparentProxy the correct solution if I also want compatibility with these other products and want to MITM the traffic? The flows that current work fine are: ClientApp --> NETransparentProxy[ours] --> remote target server clientApp --> L7 HTTP/SOCKS5 Proxy (system or app-defined) --> NETransparentProxy[ours] --> remote target server clientApp --> L7 HTTP/SOCKS5 Proxy (system or app-defined) --> NETransparentProxy[ours/demo] --> NETransparentProxy[demo/ours] --> remote target server However when people also have products from zscaler, fortinet, tailscale or some others it seems to work sometimes but not always, which makes me think it is order defined? What all of them have in common is that they need to go through a remote tunnel, whereas we do not go through a remote tunnel... Which if I am correct (perhaps I am not) should mean that as long as traffic always goes first via us that it should work? e.g. clientApp --> NETransparentProxy[ours] --> NETransparentProxy/Tunnel/...[third party vpn] --> Vpn Server --> remote target server That should in that case just work. But it does not work in case we are behind the (vpn proxy) client. Please let me know if I provide enough detail and if I'm clear? I am mostly wondering about what I can expect in terms of compatibility if there is anything I (or our company user) can do about ordering/priority/something ?

Hi. I have a private cryptographic key that I want to generate and store for use by the system extension only (a network extension NETransparentProxyProvider). The ideal properties I want is: only accessible by extension never leave extension not be accessible by root user or other apps Here is what I have tried so far (by/within the system extension): app data container / local storage: this works, but is accessible by root user app data shared container (storage): this works, but also acccessible by root user system keyring: works, but also accesible by root user System extension by itself does not seem to be able to store/load secrets in app protected keyring. The host application however can store in app protected keyring.... So I though, let's use an app group (as access group) and have it like this shared between host and (system) extension... but nop... (system) extension cannot access the secret... Ok... so than I thought: manual low-level XPC calls.... Also that doesn't work, got something almost to work but seemed to require an entire 3rd (launchd/daemon) service.... way to complex for what I want... also seems that as a root user I can use debug tools to also access it There is however the SendMessage/HandleMessage thing available for TransparentProxy.... that does work... but (1) also doesn't seem the most secure (2) the docs clearly state cannot rely on that for this state as the system extension can be started while the host app is not active.... (e.g. at startup) So that is not a solution either.... I went in so many different directions and rabbit holes in the last days.... this feels like a lot harder than it should be? How do other VPN/Proxy like solutions store secrets that are unique to an extension???? I am hoping there is something available here that I am simply missing despite all my effort... any guidance greatly appreciated...

Hi All, I am working on a macOS System Extension using Apple’s Network Extension Framework, designed to observe and log network activity at multiple layers. The system extension is currently stable and working as expected for HTTP and DNS traffic with 3 providers, getting Socket, HTTP, and DNS logs. Current Architecture Overview The project consists of two Xcode targets: 1. Main App Process Responsible for: Managing system extension lifecycle (activation, configuration) Establishing IPC (XPC) communication with extensions Receiving structured logs from extensions Writing logs efficiently to disk using a persistent file handle Uses: OSSystemExtensionManager NEFilterManager, NETransparentProxyManager, NEDNSProxyManager NWPathMonitor for network availability handling Persistent logging mechanism (FileHandle) 2. System Extension Process Contains three providers, all running within a single system extension process: a) Content Filter (NEFilterDataProvider) Captures socket-level metadata Extracts: PID via audit token Local/remote endpoints Protocol (TCP/UDP, IPv4/IPv6) Direction (inbound/outbound) Sends structured JSON logs via shared IPC b) Transparent Proxy (NETransparentProxyProvider) Intercepts TCP flows Creates a corresponding NWConnection to the destination Captures both HTTP and HTTPS traffic, sends it to HTTPFlowLogger file which bypasses if it's not HTTP traffic. Uses a custom HTTPFlowLogger: Built using SwiftNIO library (NIO HTTP1) Parses up to HTTP/1.1 traffic Handles streaming, headers, and partial body capture (with size limits) Maintains per-flow state and lifecycle management Logs structured HTTP data via shared IPC c) DNS Proxy (NEDNSProxyProvider) Intercepts UDP DNS traffic Forwards queries to upstream resolver (system DNS or fallback) Maintains shared UDP connection Tracks pending requests using DNS IDs Parses DNS packets (queries + responses) using a custom parser Logs structured DNS metadata via shared IPC Shared Component: IPCConnection Single bidirectional XPC channel used by all providers Handles: App → Extension registration Extension → App logging Uses Mach service defined in system extension entitlements Project Structure NetworkExtension (Project) │ ├── NetworkExtension (Target 1: Main App) │ ├── AppDelegate.swift │ ├── Assets.xcassets │ ├── Info.plist │ ├── NetworkExtension.entitlements │ ├── Main.storyboard │ └──ViewController.swift │ ├── SystemExtensions (Target 2: Extension Process) │ ├── common/ │ │ ├── IPCConnection.swift │ │ └── main.swift │ │ │ ├── DNSProxyProvider/ │ │ ├──DNSDataParser.swift │ │ └──DNSProxyProvider.swift (DNS Proxy) │ │ │ ├── FilterDataProvider/ │ │ └── FilterDataProvider.swift │ │ │ ├── TransparentProxyProvider/ │ │ ├── HTTPLogParser.swift │ │ ├── LogDataModel.swift │ │ └──TransparentProxyProvider.swift │ │ │ ├── Info.plist │ └── SystemExtensions.entitlements │ Current Capabilities Unified logging pipeline across: Socket-level metadata HTTP traffic (HTTP/1.1) DNS queries/responses Efficient log handling using persistent file descriptors Stable IPC communication between app and extensions Flow-level tracking and lifecycle management Selective filtering (e.g., bypass rules for specific IPs) What's the best approach to add TLS Inspection with MITM proxy setup? Some context and constraints: Existing implementation handles HTTP parsing and should remain unchanged (Swift-based). I’m okay with bypassing apps/sites that use certificate pinning (e.g., banking apps) and legitimate sites. Performance is important — I want to avoid high CPU utilization. I’m relatively new to TLS inspection and MITM proxy design. Questions Is it a good idea to implement TLS inspection within a system extension, or does that typically introduce significant complexity and performance overhead? As NETransparentProxyProvider already intercepting HTTPS traffic, can we redirect it to a separate processing pipeline (e.g., another file/module), while keeping the existing HTTP parser(HTTPFlowLogger - HTTP only parser) intact? What are the recommended architectural approaches for adding HTTPS parsing via MITM in a performant way? Are there best practices for selectively bypassing pinned or sensitive domains while still inspecting other traffic? Any guidance on avoiding common pitfalls (e.g., certificate handling, connection reuse, latency issues)? I’m looking for a clean, maintainable approach to integrate HTTPS inspection into my existing system without unnecessary complexity or performance degradation. Please let me know if any additional details from my side would help in suggesting the most appropriate approach. Thanks in advance for your time and insights—I really appreciate it.

Hi Apple team, Could you please let us know the estimated timeline for approval of our OHTTP relay request? We’d appreciate any updates on the current status or next steps from your side. My request number is GZ8425KHD9. Thanks in advance.

Here’s the formatted summary in English for your issue submission: Issue Summary We are activating a Network Extension system extension (filter-data) from a signed and notarized macOS app. Activation consistently fails with the following error: Error Message: OSSystemExtensionErrorDomain code=4 Extension not found in App bundle. Unable to find any matched extension with identifier: com.seaskylight.yksmacos.ExamNetFilter.data At the same time, sysextd logs show: no policy, cannot allow apps outside /Applications However, our host app and executable paths are already under /Applications, and the extension bundle physically exists in the expected app bundle location. Environment Information macOS: Darwin 25.4.0 Host App: /Applications/xxx.app Host Bundle ID: com.seaskylight.yksmacos System Extension Bundle ID: com.seaskylight.yksmacos.ExamNetFilter.data Team ID: BVU65MZFLK Device Management: Enrolled via DEP: No MDM Enrollment: No Reproduction Steps Install the host app to /Applications. Launch the host app via Finder or using the command: open -a "/Applications/xxx.app" Trigger OSSystemExtensionRequest activationRequestForExtension for: com.seaskylight.yksmacos.ExamNetFilter.data. Observe failure callback (code=4). Collect logs: log show --last 2m --style compact --info --debug --predicate 'process == "sysextd"' Check extension status using: systemextensionsctl list (shows 0 extension(s)) Observed Results sysextd client activation request for com.seaskylight.yksmacos.ExamNetFilter.data attempts to realize extension with identifier com.seaskylight.yksmacos.ExamNetFilter.data. Log indicates: no policy, cannot allow apps outside /Applications App-side Diagnostics (captured at failure) PID: 3249 Bundle Path: /Applications/xxx.app Real Path: /Applications/xxx.app Exec Path: /Applications/xxx.app/Contents/MacOS/xxx Real Exec Path: /Applications/xxx.app/Contents/MacOS/xxx Ext Path: /Applications/xxx.app/Contents/Library/SystemExtensions/ExamNetFilterData.systemextension Ext Exists: true Running From Helper: false Error Callback: NSError{domain=OSSystemExtensionErrorDomain code=4 desc=Extension not found in App bundle...} Additional Validation We reproduced the same failure using a minimal native host app (SysExtProbe) in /Applications that only submits the activation request for the same extension identifier. It also fails with OSSystemExtensionErrorDomain code=4, indicating this is not specific to Electron app logic. Signing / Packaging Notes Host app and system extension are signed with the same Team ID (BVU65MZFLK). System extension bundle exists under: /Applications/xxx.app/Contents/Library/SystemExtensions/ExamNetFilterData.systemextension Extension Info.plist contains bundle id: com.seaskylight.yksmacos.ExamNetFilter.data Host app includes NSSystemExtensionUsageDescription. Questions for DTS In non-MDM personal-device scenarios, what exact conditions trigger sysextd to emit: no policy, cannot allow apps outside /Applications even when both bundlePath and realpath are in /Applications? Can code=4 (“Extension not found in App bundle”) be returned for policy/state reasons even when the extension bundle is present and the identifier matches? Are there known sysextd policy/cache states that cause this behavior, and what is the recommended recovery procedure? Feel free to copy and paste this summary for your submission. If you need any further modifications or assistance, let me know!

Summary We are activating a Network Extension system extension (filter-data) from a signed and notarized macOS app. Activation consistently fails with: OSSystemExtensionErrorDomain code=4 Extension not found in App bundle. Unable to find any matched extension with identifier: com.seaskylight.yksmacos.ExamNetFilter.data At the same time, sysextd logs: no policy, cannot allow apps outside /Applications However, our host app and executable real paths are already under /Applications, and the extension bundle physically exists in the expected app bundle location. Environment macOS: Darwin 25.4.0 Host app: /Applications/xxx.app Host bundle id: com.seaskylight.yksmacos System extension bundle id: com.seaskylight.yksmacos.ExamNetFilter.data Team ID: BVU65MZFLK Device management: Enrolled via DEP: No MDM enrollment: No Reproduction Steps Install host app to /Applications. Launch host app via Finder or: open -a "/Applications/xxx.app" Trigger OSSystemExtensionRequest activationRequestForExtension for: com.seaskylight.yksmacos.ExamNetFilter.data Observe failure callback (code=4). Collect logs: log show --last 2m --style compact --info --debug --predicate 'process == "sysextd"' systemextensionsctl list (shows 0 extension(s)) Observed Results sysextd client activation request for com.seaskylight.yksmacos.ExamNetFilter.data attempting to realize extension with identifier com.seaskylight.yksmacos.ExamNetFilter.data no policy, cannot allow apps outside /Applications App-side diagnostics (captured at failure) pid=3249 bundlePath=/Applications/xxx.app bundlePathReal=/Applications/xxx.app execPath=/Applications/xxx.app/Contents/MacOS/xxx execPathReal=/Applications/xxx.app/Contents/MacOS/xxx extPath=/Applications/xxx.app/Contents/Library/SystemExtensions/ExamNetFilterData.systemextension extExists=true runningFromHelper=false Error callback NSError{domain=OSSystemExtensionErrorDomain code=4 desc=Extension not found in App bundle...} Additional Validation We reproduced the same failure using a minimal native host app (SysExtProbe) in /Applications that only submits the activation request for the same extension identifier. It also fails with OSSystemExtensionErrorDomain code=4, indicating this is not specific to Electron app logic. Signing / Packaging Notes Host app and system extension are signed with the same Team ID (BVU65MZFLK). System extension bundle exists under: /Applications/xxx.app/Contents/Library/SystemExtensions/ExamNetFilterData.systemextension Extension Info.plist contains bundle id: com.seaskylight.yksmacos.ExamNetFilter.data Host app includes NSSystemExtensionUsageDescription. Questions for DTS In non-MDM personal-device scenarios, what exact conditions trigger sysextd to emit: no policy, cannot allow apps outside /Applications even when both bundlePath and realpath are in /Applications? Can code=4 (“Extension not found in App bundle”) be returned for policy/state reasons even when extension bundle is present and identifier matches? Are there known sysextd policy/cache states that cause this behavior, and what is the recommended recovery procedure?

Hi I tried to follow this guide https://developer.apple.com/documentation/networkextension/filtering-traffic-by-url I downloaded the sample app and put our pir service server address in the app. The service is already running and the app is connected to the pir service but the url is still not blocked. We tried to block example.com. Is there anything that we need to do in iOS code? This is the sample when there's dataset This is the sample when there's no dataset

Hi We are modifying the official Wi‑Fi Aware sample app to integrate QUIC for transmission speed testing. Unfortunately, we have been unable to establish a successful QUIC connection between two iOS devices. Could you provide a correct implementation example of using QUIC over Wi‑Fi Aware? I have attached the iOS system logs and our modified app project for your reference in case FB22499984 . Thanks

We are building a VPN using NEPacketTunnelProvider where the intent is to route HTTP/S traffic through a local proxy server, while non-HTTP/S traffic flows directly to the network without being tunnelled at the IP layer. The configuration claims no included IP routes — it relies entirely on NEProxySettings to intercept HTTP/S traffic via the URL loading layer. private func configureIPSettings(_ settings: NEPacketTunnelNetworkSettings) { settings.ipv4Settings = NEIPv4Settings( addresses: ["192.168.1.1"], subnetMasks: ["255.255.255.255"] ) // No includedRoutes set — no IP traffic enters the tunnel } private func configureProxySettings(_ settings: NEPacketTunnelNetworkSettings) { let proxySettings = NEProxySettings() proxySettings.httpEnabled = true proxySettings.httpServer = NEProxyServer(address: "127.0.0.1", port: 9000) proxySettings.httpsEnabled = true proxySettings.httpsServer = NEProxyServer(address: "127.0.0.1", port: 9000) proxySettings.matchDomains = [""] settings.proxySettings = proxySettings } When matchDomains is nil or not set, HTTP/S traffic does not reach the local proxy in this configuration. Setting matchDomains = [""] makes it work correctly. The matchDomains documentation states: "If the destination host name of a HTTP connection shares a suffix with one of these strings then the proxy settings will be used." An empty string is a suffix of every string, so [""] matching all hostnames follows from that definition. But this isn't explicitly documented. Questions: Is matchDomains = [""] a supported and stable way to apply proxy settings to all HTTP/S traffic when no IP routes are claimed, or is this an unintended side-effect? Why does matchDomains = nil not apply the proxy globally in this configuration? The documentation doesn't describe its behaviour relative to IP routing. NEDNSSettings.matchDomains explicitly documents an empty string as matching all domains — is the same semantics intended for NEProxySettings.matchDomains?

Hello, I am currently developing a PIR server using the pir-server-example repository. We are anticipating a total of 10 million URLs for our dataset. In this context, what would be the optimal shard size (number of records per shard) to balance computational latency and communication overhead? Any advice or best practices for handling a dataset of this scale would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.

Hi, I see an interaction issue between a DNS Proxy system extension and MDM on macOS: after some time the device stops processing MDM commands until reboot, while DNS filtering continues to work. Environment: macOS: 15.x / 26.x (reproduced on multiple minor versions) App: /Applications/MyMacProxy.app System extension: NEDNSProxyProvider as system extension Bundle id: com.company.agent.MyMacProxy.dnsProxy Deployment: MDM (SimpleMDM) DNS proxy config via com.apple.dnsProxy.managed Devices: supervised Macs Steps to reproduce: Enrol Mac into MDM. Install MyMacProxy app + DNS proxy system extension via pkg and apply com.apple.dnsProxy.managed profile. DNS proxy starts, DNS is filtered correctly, user network works normally. After some hours, try to manage the device from MDM: push a new configuration profile, remove an existing profile, or install / remove an app. 5.MDM server shows commands as pending / not completed. On the Mac, DNS is still filtered via our DNS proxy, and general network access (Safari etc.) continues to work. After reboot, pending MDM commands are processed and we can remove the app, profile and system extension normally. This is reproducible on our test machines. What I see on the Mac in the “stuck” state apsd is running: sudo launchctl print system/com.apple.apsd # job state = running com.apple.mdmclient.daemon exists as a job but is not running: sudo launchctl print system/com.apple.mdmclient.daemon Abbreviated output: system/com.apple.mdmclient.daemon = { ... state = not running job state = exited runs = 5 last exit code = 0 ... } So the MDM client daemon has exited cleanly (exit code 0) and is currently not running; its APS endpoints are configured. Our DNS proxy system extension is still processing flows: we see continuous logging from our NEDNSProxyProvider, and DNS filtering is clearly active (requests go through our upstream). systemextensionsctl list still shows our DNS proxy system extension as active. From the user’s perspective, everything works (with filtered DNS). From the MDM server’s perspective, commands stay pending until the next reboot. After reboot, MDM behaviour is normal again. Uninstall / cleanup (current approach, simplified) We currently use an MDM‑delivered shell script that: disables our DNS proxy configuration for the console user by editing ~/Library/Preferences/com.apple.networkextension.plist and setting Enabled = false for our DNSProxyConfigurations entries; flushes DNS cache and restarts mDNSResponder; unloads our LaunchDaemon / LaunchAgent for the host app; kills the system extension process using pgrep -f "com.company.agent.MyMacProxy.dnsProxy" | xargs kill -9; removes the extension binary from /Library/SystemExtensions/.../com.company.agent.MyMacProxy.dnsProxy.systemextension; removes /Applications/MyMacProxy.app and related support files. We currently do not call systemextensionsctl uninstall <TEAMID> com.company.agent.MyMacProxy.dnsProxy from MDM, mainly because of SIP and because we understand that fully silent system extension uninstall is constrained. The MDM responsiveness issue, however, can appear even if we don’t run this aggressive uninstall script and just let the extension run for some hours. Questions Is it expected that a DNS Proxy system extension (managed via com.apple.dnsProxy.managed) can leave a device in a state where: apsd is running, com.apple.mdmclient.daemon is not running (last exit code 0), DNS proxy continues to filter traffic, but MDM commands remain pending until reboot? Are there known best practices or pitfalls when combining: DNS Proxy system extensions (NEDNSProxyProvider), MDM‑distributed com.apple.dnsProxy.managed profiles, and MDM app / profile management on recent macOS versions? For uninstall in an MDM environment, what pattern do you recommend? For example, is it better to: disable / remove the DNS proxy profile, stop the NE configuration via NEDNSProxyManager from the app, avoid killing the system extension or removing files from /Library/SystemExtensions immediately, and instead require a reboot for full removal? I can provide a sysdiagnose and unified logs (including nesessionmanager, mdmclient and our logs) from an affected machine if that would be helpful.

Hello! I have an accessory, which is paired already with an iPhone, and am attempting to upgrade its SSID permission to Wi-Fi Aware. In ideal conditions, it works perfectly. However, if I dismiss the picker at the time of pin-code entry, I am unable to re-initialize an upgrade authorization picker. Even though the authorization is not completed a WAPairedDeviceID is assigned to the object of 18446744073709551615. Any subsequent attempts to start the picker up again spits out when treated as a failure serves: [ERROR] updateAuthorization error=Error Domain=ASErrorDomain Code=450 "No new updates detected from existing accessory descriptor." Attempting with a mutated descriptor serves: [ERROR] updateAuthorization error=Error Domain=ASErrorDomain Code=450 "Accessory cannot be upgraded with given descriptor." If I try using failAuthorization i get a 550 "Invalid State" error and furthermore if I try finishAuthorization to attempt to clear the descriptor/paired device ID it fails to clear it. If I could be pointed to the intended behavior on how to handle this, or this can be acknowledged as a bug, that would be incredibly appreciated. Thank you!

We observed intermittent failures when iOS devices repeatedly attempt to connect to an AP via NEHotspotConfiguration. When sniffing the packets, most failures occur before the WPA 4‑way handshake, with a smaller number happening during the handshake itself. SSID and Password were verified to be correct. Root Causes Association fails before handshake (primary issue) iOS often fails at the association phase (Apple80211AssociateAsync errors such as -3905 / -3940). These attempts never reach the WPA 4‑way handshake. iOS auto‑join suppression amplifies the problem After a single association failure, iOS marks the network as failed and blocks retry attempts. Subsequent attempts are rejected by policy (Already failed to auto-join known network profile) without new radio activity. This makes one real failure appear as many repeated failures. 4‑Way handshake failures (secondary) In some cases, association succeeds but the connection drops during WPA setup (Join Failure(6)). The error (if received, not always) is Internal Error - 8. Could we inquire on what might be the best steps to resolve this issue?