I am working on adding synchronized physical properties to EntityEquipment in TableTopKit, allowing seamless coordination during GroupActivities sessions between players. Treating EntityEquipment's state to DieState is not a way, because it doesn't support custom collision shapes. I have also tried adding PhysicsBodyComponent and CollisionComponent to EntityEquipment's Entity. However, the main issue is that the position of EntityEquipment itself does not synchronize with the Entity's physics body, resulting in two separate instances of one object. struct PlayerPawn: EntityEquipment { let id: ID let entity: Entity var initialState: BaseEquipmentState init(id: ID, entity: Entity) { self.id = id let massProperties = PhysicsMassProperties(mass: 1.0) let material = PhysicsMaterialResource.generate(friction: 0.5, restitution: 0.5) let shape = ShapeResource.generateBox(size: [0.4, 0.2, 0.2]) let physicsBody = PhysicsBodyComponent(massProperties: massProperties, material: material, mode: .dynamic) let collisionComponent = CollisionComponent(shapes: [shape]) entity.components.set(physicsBody) entity.components.set(collisionComponent) self.entity = entity initialState = .init(parentID: .tableID, pose: .init(position: .init(), rotation: .zero), entity: self.entity) } } I’d appreciate any guidance on the recommended approach to adding synchronized physical properties to EntityEquipment.

Hey! I'm facing an issue with Equipment collision when adding and moving TabletopKit equipment with different pose rotations. Let me share a very simple TabletopKit setup as an example: Table struct Table: Tabletop { var shape: TabletopShape = .rectangular(width: 1, height: 1, thickness: 0.01) var id: EquipmentIdentifier = .tableID } Board struct Board: Equipment { let id: EquipmentIdentifier = .boardID var initialState: BaseEquipmentState { .init( parentID: .tableID, seatControl: .restricted([]), pose: .init(position: .init(), rotation: .zero), boundingBox: .init(center: .zero, size: .init(1.0, 0, 1.0)) ) } } Equipment struct Object: EntityEquipment { var id: ID var size: SIMD2<Float> var position: SIMD2<Double> var rotation: Float var entity: Entity var initialState: BaseEquipmentState init(id: Int, size: SIMD2<Float>, position: SIMD2<Double>, rotation: Float) { self.id = EquipmentIdentifier(id) self.size = size self.position = position self.rotation = rotation self.entity = objectEntity self.initialState = .init( parentID: .boardID, seatControl: .any, pose: .init( position: .init(x: position.x, z: position.y), rotation: .degrees(Double(rotation)) ), entity: entity ) } } Setup class GameSetup { var setup: TableSetup init(root: Entity) { setup = TableSetup(tabletop: Table()) setup.add(equipment: Board()) setup.add(seat: PlayerSeat()) let object1 = Object( id: 2, size: .init(x: 0.1, y: 0.1), position: .init(x: 0.1, y: -0.1), rotation: 0 ) let object2 = Object( id: 3, size: .init(x: 0.2, y: 0.1), position: .init(x: -0.1, y: -0.1), rotation: 90 ) setup.add(equipment: object1) setup.add(equipment: object2) } } ‎ The issue When I add two equipment entities with different rotation poses, the collisions between them behave oddly. If one is 90º and the other 0º, for example, the former will intersect with the latter as if its bounding box was not rotated as you can see below: But if both equipment have the example rotation (e.g. 0 or 90º), though, then there's no collision issue at all, which seems to indicate their bounding box were correctly rotated: ‎‎ I'd really appreciate some help understanding if this is a bug or if I'm just missing something. Thanks in advance!