Because you can't, the notion of a namespace as implemented in other languages like Java, C++, and C# is non-existent in Swift and SwiftUI. What you're doing is nesting value types and not creating namespaces. Nesting views in SwiftUI: https://luomein.medium.com/composable-generic-swiftui-view-part-2-d695d87b0f96

That is most likey a private API and a user-controlled action.

You must request Entitlements from Apple.

Some banks such as RBC offer open banking API services and soon a few institutions are going to follow this format. What is Apple going to do? Reject all these apps when the banks are beginning to offer open access to the services.

Once again you're are misinterpreting the concept of a namespace as it pretains to other Object Orient Languages. Continue on your merry way and all the best.

File a bug with sample code.

You will have to readjust your dependencies. |--DynamicFramework1 | --DynamicFramework2 | --StaticLibrary Or Readjust your dependencies by responsibility. |--DynamicFramework1 |--StaticLibrary_A |--DynamicFramework2 |--StaticLibrary_B Where the public APIs of StaticLibrary_A and StaticLibrary_B are mutually exclusive. Or Create an Xcode project for each framework.

Removing this line printf("\nInsert element (%d,%d):\n", i,j); solves the problem.

Switching your code to use pointers yields the same outcome. You can't simultaneously have both the printf and scanf in the nested for-loop. It's one or the other. The best bet is to file a bug report. #include <stdlib.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <malloc/malloc.h> #define N 3 #define M 3 int Peak(float *a); int main(int argc, const char * argv[]) { int i, j, k; float *matrix = (float*)malloc((N * M) * sizeof(float)); printf("\nInitialising [%d][%d] matrix\n", N, M); for(i=0;i<N;i++) for(j=0;j<M;j++) { printf("\nInsert element (%d,%d)", i,j); scanf("%f", (matrix+i)+j); } k = Peak(matrix); free(matrix); printf("\nNumber of peaks: %d\n", k); return (0); } int Peak(float *a) { int i, j, varbool, peaks=0; float x; for(i=0;i<N;i++) for(j=0;j<M;j++) { varbool=1; x = *((a+i)+j)/2.0; if(j-1>=0){ if(x<=*((a+i)+j-1)) varbool=0; } else if(j+1<M) { if(x<=*((a+i)+j+1)) varbool=0; } else if(i-1>=0) { if(x<=*((a+i-1)+j)) varbool=0; } else if(i+1<N) { if(x<=*((a+i+1)+j)) varbool=0; } if(varbool) peaks++; } return peaks; } Sean.

In reality, no one will pass one million items to a List.

This is a known issue, with all VPN software, so it is not just CISCO-related but all software VPN-related products which means this is an Apple issue if all prior versions of iOS previously worked on VPN while debugging. The quickest fix for this is @Apple. Cisco reported bug https://bst.cisco.com/quickview/bug/CSCwf98780

When a view disappears in UIKIt or SwiftUI it is torn down by the view life cycle and is no longer active nor alive to respond to anything. To see the transition from MyBar to Progress the View will have to be active. Read up on the view lifecycle for UIKit as it is the under pinnings of SwiftUI. https://developer.apple.com/documentation/uikit/uiviewcontroller

Ninja is not an Apple product.

If you're already using SwiftData, why rely on userdefaults? Store the last user in a swift data model and fetch it from there instead.

Begin here -> https://developer.apple.com/xcode/swiftui/