Will do!

But for AppIntents that don't fit any schema domains, then the integration with Siri is through AppShortcutsProvider. With Siri AI, the AppIntent can be triggered with similar sounding phrases to the trigger phrases provided; my question is, how good is this natural language understanding? I haven't been able to test it out as I don't have the iPhone capable of Apple Intelligence. Is it possible to effectively train Siri AI to understand the AppIntent by giving it many different trigger phrases?

You mentioned [quote='896703022, DTS Engineer, /thread/837204?answerId=896703022#896703022'] ... Siri ... recognize phrases similar to those defined in your code without requiring every variation to be explicitly programmed. This capability is enabled by default when you rebuild your app with the latest SDKs [/quote] My understanding is that if the AppIntent fits a schema domain, such as Calendar, Mail, Messages, then Siri AI can understand it and trigger it using natural language.

For App Intents that don't conform to any of the schemas provided by the framework, how well does Siri AI do on natural language understanding?

Can the documentation for the attributedstring be updated? It currently says otherwise.

I'm not entirely sure what you are saying, but I am just surprised because for api such as onChange the reference to sequence would update. I could have used onChange with @Published property for the double instead which would have expressed what I am trying to achieve the same. It seems like using .task is less convenient as I would need to mark the property as State; although now I am wondering if all properties of a type that contains state need to be marked as such.

oh i need to read more on these. im just looking to see how an image would look in the ui if it were displaying on a real device.

and yes before i was using the filemanager api not the url one

in my case when i use this api, it's ALWAYS returning completeFileProtectionUntilFirstUserAuthentication. no matter what I set. Could you try setting something else in your test code?

did I reply correctly?

Im just wondering about potential for the sdk to accidentally overwrite your files or delete them. afterall , we share the same file system right

I feel like we should try to at least self sandbox by creating separate sub folders under the shared directory so that theres less chance the host and sdks clash.

Im just wondering about potential for the sdk to accidentally overwrite your files or delete them. afterall , we share the same file system right

I meant NSDocumentsDirectory not cache

we're using 10.21.0. the privacy stuff i added in 10.22.0. thats why we were concerned why there was no notification from apple...