Thank you Albert, this is very helpful — especially the point about providing an actionable item, which I had not understood that way before. One data point that may be useful for others reading this: submissions through websitereview.apple.com do produce an automated acknowledgement by email. I received a message titled "Your review request was received" for each submission I made on 11 August 2026. So receipt can at least be confirmed that way, even if there are no status updates afterwards. That leads to my follow-up question. In my case nothing in the site content ever caused the flag. The sites were flagged while hosted with a provider whose IP ranges had reputation problems, and the very same content, on the same server and the same IP, is not flagged for domains that were created after I migrated away on 20 July 2026. So there is no content change I can point to as "corrected" — what was corrected is the hosting. What would count as an actionable item in a case like this? Is stating the migration date and the new IP sufficient, or is there something specific the review team looks for when the cause is infrastructure reputation rather than page content? Thanks again for taking the time.