Post

Replies

Boosts

Views

Activity

Reply to macOS application renaming
@Etresoft, @DTS Engineer, thank you for your answers 🙏 At current moment I am gathering information about what we can technically make and achieve) Based on your answers I understand next (please correct me if I am wrong in any point): If we need to change a team (legally) and DeveloperId certificate - that's exactly whole new app (no options there). As @DTS Engineer said - if we legally should change everything and stop using previous brand name anywhere (including bundle ids) it's also here - whole new app release is required Whole new app release requires user approvals for System Extension/Proxy Configuration for nonMDM installation - we will not transfer user consent from old app - platform technical limitation. Without new app release and using existing DeveloperId certificate in fact we have got an option to make a superficial branding without changing app/bundle ids Without new app release and using existing DeveloperId certificate I guess I solved almost all issues and got positive results those could be applied by our company. But I suppose that proxy configuration will continue using bundle ID = com.myApp1.osx.proxy. Is it possible to make visible part (for Activity Monitor app at least) with another name for proxy, like MyNewAppProxy? Because by default it's using bundleId as a title in processes list as far as I remember.
Topic: App & System Services SubTopic: General Tags:
1w
Reply to Exploit CVE-2022-46689 for development
Thank you so much for full answer. Yes, we are distributing our application using Developer ID certificate with notarization. PKG passed notarization process successfully. We have solved the problem - 3rd party vendor confirmed that it was a false positive decision from their side. Right now the problem has beed solved. Thanks for your help 🙏
Topic: Programming Languages SubTopic: Swift Tags:
Feb ’23
Reply to Notarizing System Extension
Thanks a lot for your explanation and all answers. I got it - so only one way to avoid Blocked System Extension popup it distribute application only via MDM - company admin should install app using MDM system and whitelist required system extension. Now it's clear. 🤝
Topic: App & System Services SubTopic: Core OS Tags:
Dec ’21
Reply to macOS application renaming
@Etresoft, @DTS Engineer, thank you for your answers 🙏 At current moment I am gathering information about what we can technically make and achieve) Based on your answers I understand next (please correct me if I am wrong in any point): If we need to change a team (legally) and DeveloperId certificate - that's exactly whole new app (no options there). As @DTS Engineer said - if we legally should change everything and stop using previous brand name anywhere (including bundle ids) it's also here - whole new app release is required Whole new app release requires user approvals for System Extension/Proxy Configuration for nonMDM installation - we will not transfer user consent from old app - platform technical limitation. Without new app release and using existing DeveloperId certificate in fact we have got an option to make a superficial branding without changing app/bundle ids Without new app release and using existing DeveloperId certificate I guess I solved almost all issues and got positive results those could be applied by our company. But I suppose that proxy configuration will continue using bundle ID = com.myApp1.osx.proxy. Is it possible to make visible part (for Activity Monitor app at least) with another name for proxy, like MyNewAppProxy? Because by default it's using bundleId as a title in processes list as far as I remember.
Topic: App & System Services SubTopic: General Tags:
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
1w
Reply to Exploit CVE-2022-46689 for development
Thank you so much for full answer. Yes, we are distributing our application using Developer ID certificate with notarization. PKG passed notarization process successfully. We have solved the problem - 3rd party vendor confirmed that it was a false positive decision from their side. Right now the problem has beed solved. Thanks for your help 🙏
Topic: Programming Languages SubTopic: Swift Tags:
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Feb ’23
Reply to Exploit CVE-2022-46689 for development
About the links - I got it 🙏. Thank you Regarding technical question - my question is incorrect, or this vulnerability doesn't related to Apps or it's a secret by Apple)? Right now it doesn't totally clear, if you can elaborate more I'll really appreciate it
Topic: Programming Languages SubTopic: Swift Tags:
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Feb ’23
Reply to Notarizing System Extension
Thanks a lot for your explanation and all answers. I got it - so only one way to avoid Blocked System Extension popup it distribute application only via MDM - company admin should install app using MDM system and whitelist required system extension. Now it's clear. 🤝
Topic: App & System Services SubTopic: Core OS Tags:
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Dec ’21