Hi, We successfully migrated to the new AppIcon from Icon Composer. Everything works great on simulator and on real devices. We also released a manually generated build that works great. However when we build the same project from Xcode Cloud we get the following error: None of the input catalogs contained a matching stickers icon set, app icon set, or icon stack named "AppIcon" The previous line seems to indicate that no icon is passed: /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/usr/bin/actool /Volumes/workspace/repository/Mail/Assets.xcassets --compile /Volumes/workspace/DerivedData/Build/Intermediates.noindex/ArchiveIntermediates/Infomaniak\ Mail/IntermediateBuildFilesPath/Mail.build/Release-iphoneos/Infomaniak\ Mail.build/assetcatalog_output/thinned --output-format human-readable-text --notices --warnings --export-dependency-info /Volumes/workspace/DerivedData/Build/Intermediates.noindex/ArchiveIntermediates/Infomaniak\ Mail/IntermediateBuildFilesPath/Mail.build/Release-iphoneos/Infomaniak\ Mail.build/assetcatalog_dependencies_thinned --output-partial-info-plist /Volumes/workspace/DerivedData/Build/Intermediates.noindex/ArchiveIntermediates/Infomaniak\ Mail/IntermediateBuildFilesPath/Mail.build/Release-iphoneos/Infomaniak\ Mail.build/assetcatalog_generated_info.plist_thinned --app-icon AppIcon --accent-color AccentColor --compress-pngs --enable-on-demand-resources YES --development-region en --target-device iphone --target-device ipad --minimum-deployment-target 15.0 --platform iphoneos However when I archive locally, the icon seems correctly referenced: /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/usr/bin/actool /Users/<my name>/Developer/ios/infomaniak/apps/ios-kMail/Mail/Resources/AppIcon.icon /Users/<my name>/Developer/ios/infomaniak/apps/ios-kMail/Mail/Resources/Assets.xcassets --compile /Users/<my name>/Library/Developer/Xcode/DerivedData/Mail-fbgflwyftafvlmezepjlymckizhg/Build/Intermediates.noindex/ArchiveIntermediates/Infomaniak\ Mail/IntermediateBuildFilesPath/Mail.build/Release-iphoneos/Infomaniak\ Mail.build/assetcatalog_output/thinned --output-format human-readable-text --notices --warnings --export-dependency-info /Users/<my name>/Library/Developer/Xcode/DerivedData/Mail-fbgflwyftafvlmezepjlymckizhg/Build/Intermediates.noindex/ArchiveIntermediates/Infomaniak\ Mail/IntermediateBuildFilesPath/Mail.build/Release-iphoneos/Infomaniak\ Mail.build/assetcatalog_dependencies_thinned --output-partial-info-plist /Users/<my name>/Library/Developer/Xcode/DerivedData/Mail-fbgflwyftafvlmezepjlymckizhg/Build/Intermediates.noindex/ArchiveIntermediates/Infomaniak\ Mail/IntermediateBuildFilesPath/Mail.build/Release-iphoneos/Infomaniak\ Mail.build/assetcatalog_generated_info.plist_thinned --app-icon AppIcon --accent-color AccentColor --compress-pngs --enable-on-demand-resources YES --development-region en --target-device iphone --target-device ipad --minimum-deployment-target 15.0 --platform iphoneos Has anyone encountered a similar issue ?

Hello, I’m trying to upload the user’s entire photo library to a server so this can mean thousands of files. To achieve this task I'm trying to use a background URLSessionConfiguration with the following steps: Fetch all the phassetid For each phassetid, export the asset to my container Create a file upload task using the background session However I read some post on the forum which discourage using a background session for this kind of task (Moving to Fewer, Larger Transfers) - https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/14853 and according to this post BackgroundTasks could be a better fit. I also noticed that it looks like I’m hitting some kind of rate limiter. Even with the app in the foreground, the transfers stop reporting progress after some time and then start reporting again after a small amount of time. This doesn't happen with a normal URLSessionConfiguration. So I was wondering if it was indeed the way to go or if there was some better/other way to do it ?

Hi, We have an app that is a default mail client, so it has this entry in its entitlements file: com.apple.developer.mail-client. This seems to create issues with ad-hoc distribution. We can distribute the app on App Store Connect without any issues and have been doing so for a while. We wanted to try using Xcode Cloud to manage our releases. The app export works fine for both App Store Distribution and Development Distribution. However, the ad-hoc distribution step fails. (We don't need ad-hoc distribution, but Xcode Cloud seems to prevent us from removing this step.) I tried building and releasing the app locally for ad-hoc distribution and encountered the same error as on Xcode Cloud. When Xcode tries to generate the profile, it outputs the following error: Provisioning profile "iOS Team Ad Hoc Provisioning Profile: com.infomaniak.mail" failed qualification checks: Profile doesn't support Default Mail App. Profile doesn't include the com.apple.developer.mail-client entitlement. Is it something broken with our config ? What are we missing ? Local error in Xcode Organizer: Remote error on Xcode cloud:

HI, I'm trying to deeplink from my widget to a view in my app. I'm using the "SwiftUI app lifecycle". This the code I'm currently using: var body: some Scene { WindowGroup { RootView() .onContinueUserActivity("NextDeparturesWidgetConfigurationIntent") { userActivity in guard let configuration: NextDeparturesWidgetConfigurationIntent = userActivity .widgetConfigurationIntent(), let stationEntity = configuration.stationEntity else { return } NotificationCenter.default.post(name: .onOpenStation, object: stationEntity.id) } } } It is working fine when the app is already running (in the background). However when the app is "cold starting" (ie. not in memory) onContinueUserActivity is never called. I tried adding a UIApplicationDelegateAdaptor: func application( _ application: UIApplication, configurationForConnecting connectingSceneSession: UISceneSession, options: UIScene.ConnectionOptions ) -> UISceneConfiguration { if let userActivity = options.userActivities.first { let configuration: NextDeparturesWidgetConfigurationIntent? = userActivity.widgetConfigurationIntent() // casting fails } return UISceneConfiguration( name: nil, sessionRole: connectingSceneSession.role ) } I can see that the activity is received but it is never casted to NextDeparturesWidgetConfigurationIntent. What am I missing ?

Hi, I want to display a sheet bound to an object using .sheet(item: $someObject content: <#T##(Identifiable) -> View#>) However if item is a class we can't use @StateObject var someObject: SomeObject? because an optional cannot conform to observable object. As I don't have any changing property and do not need the view to be refreshed once passed to the sheet I used @State and it seems to be working fine. Here is a minimal example of what I'm doing. import SwiftUI class SomeObject: Identifiable {   let id = 1   let content = "Hello world" } class SomeObjectStore {   static let shared = SomeObjectStore()   var objects = [SomeObject()]   private init() {} } struct ContentView: View {   @State private var someSheetPresentedObject: SomeObject?   var body: some View {     Button("Open view") {       someSheetPresentedObject = SomeObjectStore.shared.objects.first     }     .sheet(item: $someSheetPresentedObject) { someObject in       Text(someObject.content)     }   } } It seems okay because SwiftUI only needs to know if there is a reference to someSheetPresentedObject or not to present the sheet. I know that the Text won't be updated if SomeObject.content changes but I'm only displaying it once so it's not an issue. My question is: is it okay to do this for this specific case ?

We are using WKWebView to render local files that we load using WKWebView loadFileURL's method. We use the webview to render "rich text" files like docx, xlsx. Until then we disabled js. However we discovered that disabling js also disabled the ability to switch pages in an xlsx document. Enabling js should be safe as js should be escaped in a correctly formatted xlsx file but we were wondering if it would be a security risk if someone managed to craft an xlsx which would potentially execute malicious js ?