On macOS 26, how do you support the Preferred Text Size value as defined in the Accessibility Settings? Historically, "Dynamic Type" has not been available on macOS. However, the user has some control over text size through the Accessibility Settings. On macOS 26, a small subset of applications are honouring changes to that value include Finder, Mail, and sidebars in many applications. Dynamic sizing in table views has been available on macOS for awhile. But Mail.app, in particular, is also adjusting the font sizes used in the message's body pane while the Finder is adjusting font sizes used for Desktop icons. I can't find an NSNotification that is fired when the user adjusts the Accessibility Text Size slider, nor can I find an API to read the current value. NSFont.preferredFont(forTextStyle:options:) looks promising but the fonts returned do not appear to take the user's Accessibility setting into account. (Nor do they update dynamically.) SwiftUI's Text("Apple").font(.body) performs similarly to NSFont in that it does respect the style, but it does not honour dynamic sizing. NSFontDescriptor has a bunch of interesting methods, but none that seem to apply to Accessibility Text Size. Given an AppKit label: let label = NSTextField(labelWithString: "AppKit") label.font = NSFont.preferredFont(forTextStyle: .body) Or a SwiftUI label: Text("SwiftUI").font(.body) How do I make either of them responsive to the user's Text Size setting under Accessibility? Note this is on macOS 26 / Xcode 26. I realize there have been some previous forum posts related to this issue but hoping that things might have improved since then.

In the attached screenshot, we have an NSSplitViewController with three split view items. The first two are viewController split view items, while the third is an inspector split view item. The NSWindow is configured for full screen content so that the inspector split view items is full height itself. However, when we enable full height content view, AppKit is automatically adding a tracking separator into the toolbar when we don't want one. (Neither of the two split views are sidebars.) This tracking separator is out of place, cannot be dragged itself, and is drawn under the center aligned segmented control. We've tried a multitude of permutations to configure the NSWindow, NSToolbar and NSSplitViewItem but to no avail. Surely we're just missing the magic combo but a lot of the properties appear to be no-ops in macOS 26. How do we use an NSSplitViewController, in a full screen content window, such that we get a full height inspector but we don't get tracking separators for the main split view divider?

In SwiftUI for macOS, how do I configure a Picker as a segmented control to have a flexible width? This design pattern is present in Xcode 26 at the top of the sidebar and inspector panel. I can't figure out the combination of view modifiers to achieve a similar look. import SwiftUI struct ContentView: View { @State private var selection = 0 var body: some View { VStack { Picker("", selection: $selection) { Image(systemName: "doc") Image(systemName: "folder") Image(systemName: "gear") Image(systemName: "globe") .frame(maxWidth: .infinity) // Doesn't do anything. } .labelsHidden() .pickerStyle(.segmented) .frame(maxWidth: .infinity) // Doesn't affect segment sizes. Spacer() } } } I want the entire Picker to fill the width and for each segment to be of equal widths. How? In AppKit I would use AutoLayout for the flexible width and NSSegmentedControl.segmentDistribution for the segment widths. Is there a SwiftUI equivalent? macOS 26 / Xcode 26.3

In macOS 26, there is a new property on NSControl called .borderShape. The WWDC 2025-310 video says it can be used to "Override preferred shape of control to suit your design." and that it's available on NSButton, NSPopUpButton and NSSegmentedControl. Is there an equivalent to that property for SwiftUI? For example, given the following SwiftUI code: Button("Eject") { } .borderShape(...) <-- ? How can I apply a .borderShape that would match those on controls created in AppKit? I'm aware that SwiftUI offers a plethora of ways to custom design a button such that it can have rounded corners, but I'm interested in this particular property so that SwiftUI buttons and AppKit buttons in the same app have the same look-and-feel.

On macOS 26.3, Xcode 26.3, why does a labelStyle of titleAndIcon not show both the title and the icon of a label? The label styles iconOnly and titleOnly behave as expected. Picker("Label Demo", selection: $selectedItem) { Label { Text("File") } icon: { Image(systemName: "doc") } Label { Text("Folder") } icon: { Image(systemName: "folder") } } .labelStyle(.titleAndIcon) .pickerStyle(.segmented) Note that there is no icon shown. Placing the .labelStyle modifier in different places has no effect. The icon is correctly shown when the labelStyle is set to .iconOnly. An NSSegmentedControl created with AppKit and presented in an NSViewRepresentable does correctly show titles and icons if configured appropriately. Tested on: macOS 26.3 (25D125) Xcode 26.3 (17C519) A brand new SwiftUI "macOS App" project.

Using SwiftUI on macOS, how can I add a toolbar item on the right-most (trailing) edge of the window's toolbar when an Inspector is used? At the moment, the toolbar items are all left-of (leading) the split view tracking separator. I want the inspector toolbar item to be placed similar to where Xcode's Inspector toolbar item is placed: always as far right (trailing) as possible. NavigationSplitView { // ... snip } detail: { // ... snip } .inspector(isPresented: $isInspectorPresented) { InspectorContentView() } .toolbar { // What is the correct placement value here? ToolbarItem(placement: .primaryAction) { Button { isInspectorPresented.toggle() } label: { Label("Toggle Inspector", systemImage: "sidebar.trailing") } } } See the attached screenshot. When the InspectorView is toggled open, the toolbar item tracks leading the split view tracking separator, which is not consistent with how Xcode works.

I'm looking for clarification on a SwiftUI performance point mentioned in the recent Optimize your app's speed and efficiency | Meet with Apple video. (YouTube link not allowed, but the video is available on the Apple Developer channel.) At the 1:48:50 mark, the presenter says: Writing a value to the Environment doesn't only affect the views that read the key you're updating. It updates any view that reads from any Environment key. [abbreviated quote] That statement seems like a big deal if your app relies heavily on Environment values. Context I'm building a macOS application with a traditional three-panel layout. At any given time, there are many views on screen, plus others that exist in the hierarchy but are currently hidden (for example, views inside tab views or collapsed splitters). Nearly every major view reads something from the environment—often an @Observable object that acts as a service or provider. However, there are a few relatively small values that are written to the environment frequently, such as: The selected tab index The currently selected object on a canvas The Question Based on the presenter's statement, I’m wondering: Does writing any value to the environment really cause all views in the entire SwiftUI view hierarchy that read any environment key to have their body re-evaluated? Do environment writes only affect child views, or do they propagate through the entire SwiftUI hierarchy? Example: View A └─ View B ├─ View C └─ View D If View B updates an environment value, does that affect only C and D, or does it also trigger updates in A and B (assuming each view has at least one @Environment property)? Possible Alternative If all views are indeed invalidated by environment writes, would it be more efficient to “wrap” frequently-changing values inside an @Observable object instead of updating the environment directly? // Pseudocode @Observable final class SelectedTab { var index: Int } ContentView() .environment(\.selectedTab, selectedTab) struct TabView: View { @Environment(\.selectedTab) private var selectedTab var body: some View { Button("Action") { // Would this avoid invalidating all views using the environment? selectedTab.index = 1 } } } Summary From what I understand, it sounds like the environment should primarily be used for stable, long-lived objects—not for rapidly changing values—since writes might cause far more view invalidations than most developers realize. Is that an accurate interpretation? Follow-Up In Xcode 26 / Instruments, is there a way to monitor writes to @Environment?

NSVisualEffectView in AppKit has two main properties: material and blendingMode. Material is well supported in SwiftUI, but I can't seem to find an equivalent for blendingMode. What is the SwiftUI equivalent to NSVisualEffect.BlendingMode?

I am using an NSOutlineView via NSViewRepresentable in a SwiftUI application running on macOS. Everything has been working fine. Up until lately, I've been returning a custom NSView for each item using the standard: func outlineView(_ outlineView: NSOutlineView, viewFor tableColumn: NSTableColumn?, item: Any) -> NSView? { // View recycling omitted. return MyItemView(item) } Now I want to explore using a little bit more SwiftUI and returning an NSHostingView from this delegate method. func outlineView(_ outlineView: NSOutlineView, viewFor tableColumn: NSTableColumn?, item: Any) -> NSView? { // View recycling omitted. let rootView = MySwiftUIView(item) let hostingView = NSHostingView(rootView: rootView) return hostingView } For the most part, this appears to be working fine. NSOutlineView is even correctly applying highlight styling, so that's great. But there's one small glitch. The outline view's disclosure triangles do not align with the hosting view's content. The disclosure triangles appear to just be pinned to the top. Perhaps they can't find a baseline constraint or something? Is there any SwiftUI modifier or AppKit/SwiftUI technique I can apply here to get the disclosure button to appear in the right place? Here is what the SwiftUI + NSHostingView version looks like: Note the offset disclosure indicators. (Image spacing is a bit off as well using Label, but fixable. Here is what an NSView with NSTextFields looks like: Disclosure indicators are correctly aligned, as you would expect.

Is there a way to configure the style and toolbar of the macOS window that Xcode uses in #Preview? I am working on a macOS application and want to preview some SwiftUI views within different window styles, toolbar styles and window title/subtitle visibilities. Some of the modifiers to control the look-and-feel of a window are actually Scene Modifiers, not View Modifiers: .windowStyle .windowToolbarLabelStyle .windowToolbarStyle But #Preview does not accept Scenes, so I can't apply these modifiers: // Error, not a view modifier. #Preview { ContentView() .windowStyle(...) } // Error, Window is not supported in #Preview. #Preview { Window("Browser", id: "browser") { ContentView() } } If I give my ContentView a .toolbar(...), Xcode's Preview will correctly show a window with a toolbar, but not necessarily in the style I want. Is there a way to apply the Scene Modifiers to #Preview so that I can see how they affect the window's chrome and toolbar?

In SwiftUI for macOS, when implementing a DragGesture inside a ScrollVIew, how can I implement auto-scrolling when the mouse is not actively moving? In AppKit, this would normally be done with a periodic event so that auto-scrolling continues to take place even if the user isn't actively moving the mouse. This is essential behaviour when implementing something like a drag-to-select gesture. NSView.autoscroll(with: NSEvent) -> Bool Is there anything in SwiftUI or ScrollView to accomplish this behaviour?

If you create a NavigationSplitView, then the sidebar is automatically adorned with a sidebar material effect. This affects the views background as well as any controls that are in the view. What is the correct way to disable this behaviour so that I can use a NavigationSplitView without the material effects being applied? The best I've come up with so far is to explicitly set the background on the sidebar but I'm curious if that's the correct way or I'm just getting lucky. struct ContentView: View { var body: some View { NavigationSplitView { // This works, but is it correct? SidebarView() .background(.windowBackground) } detail: { DetailView() } } }

What is the correct way to track the number of items in a relationship using SwiftData and SwiftUI? Imagine a macOS application with a sidebar that lists Folders and Tags. An Item can belong to a Folder and have many Tags. In the sidebar, I want to show the name of the Folder or Tag along with the number of Items in it. I feel like I'm missing something obvious within SwiftData to wire this up such that my SwiftUI views correctly updated whenever the underlying modelContext is updated. // The basic schema @Model final class Item { var name = "Untitled Item" var folder: Folder? = nil var tags: [Tag] = [] } @Model final class Folder { var name = "Untitled Folder" var items: [Item] = [] } @Model final class Tag { var name = "Untitled Tag" var items: [Item] = [] } // A SwiftUI view to show a Folder. struct FolderRowView: View { let folder: Folder // Should I use an @Query here?? // @Query var items: [Item] var body: some View { HStack { Text(folder.name) Spacer() Text(folder.items.count.formatted()) } } } The above code works, once, but if I then add a new Item to that Folder, then this SwiftUI view does not update. I can make it work if I use an @Query with an #Predicate but even then I'm not quite sure how the #Predicate is supposed to be written. (And it seems excessive to have an @Query on every single row, given how many there could be.) struct FolderView: View { @Query private var items: [Item] private var folder: Folder init(folder: Folder) { self.folder = folder // I've read online that this needs to be captured outside the Predicate? let identifier = folder.persistentModelID _items = Query(filter: #Predicate { link in // Is this syntax correct? The results seem inconsistent in my app... if let folder = link.folder { return folder.persistentModelID == identifier } else { return false } }) } var body: some View { HStack { Text(folder.name) Spacer() // This mostly works. Text(links.count.formatted()) } } } As I try to integrate SwiftData and SwiftUI into a traditional macOS app with a sidebar, content view and inspector I'm finding it challenging to understand how to wire everything up. In this particular example, tracking the count, is there a "correct" way to handle this?

When performing custom layout in AppKit, it's essential that you pixel align frames using methods like backingAlignedRect. The alignment differs depending on the backingScaleFactor of the parent window. When building custom Layouts in SwiftUI, how should you compute the alignment of a subview.frame in placeSubviews() before calling subview.place(...)? Surprisingly, I haven't seen any mention of this in the WWDC videos. However, if I create a Rectangle of width 1px and then position it on fractional coordinates, I get a blurry view, as I would expect. Rounding to whole numbers works, but on Retina screens you should be able to round to 0.5 as well. func placeSubviews( in bounds: CGRect, proposal: ProposedViewSize, subviews: Subviews, cache: inout Void ) { // This should be backing aligned based on the parent window's backing scale factor. var frame = CGRect( x: 10.3, y: 10.8, width: 300.6, height: 300.1 ) subview.place( at: frame.origin, anchor: .topLeading, proposal: ProposedViewSize(frame.size) ) }

Given a View in SwiftUI for macOS, how can I tell if that view is hidden either because it, or any of its ancestor's opacity is 0.0 or the .hidden modifier has been applied? Presumably I can manually do this with an Environment value on the ancestor view, but I'm curious if this can be done more idiomatically. An example use case: I have views that run long-running Tasks via the .task(id:) modifier. These tasks only need to be running if the View itself is visible to the user. When the View is hidden, the task should stop. When the View reappears, the Task should restart. This happens automatically when Views are created and destroyed, but does not happen when a view is only hidden.