Makes sense. If your approach changes and you want one more random opinion on your API, let me know. Best of luck with debugging the issue, and with the project in general.

Thanks for the response, and I apologize for missing the response when you posted it. I have submitted some feedback related to the issue (FB20960606). I'll read more about query generations. The ideal solution here would just be a way to just ignore the instance if the record has been deleted, but I haven't found an approach for that yet. Thanks again, and I'll follow up here if I find a solution.