This will be the initial production schema for this container. When I attempt to start deployment, the Confirm Deployment dialog appears and spins for a while. It then reports "There was a problem loading the environment's status." When I clear the error the Confirm Deployment dialog reports: "No Changes to Deploy" "The schema in the development environment is the same as production." (spoiler, they are not the same) Any suggestions?

I've created a UserDefaults extension to generate custom bindings. extension UserDefaults { func boolBinding(for defaultsKey: String) -> Binding<Bool> { return Binding ( get: { return self.bool(forKey: defaultsKey) }, set: { newValue in self.setValue(newValue, forKey: defaultsKey) }) } func cardPileBinding(for defaultsKey: String) -> Binding<CardPile> { return Binding ( get: { let rawValue = self.object(forKey: defaultsKey) as? String ?? "" return CardPile(rawValue: rawValue) ?? .allRandom }, set: { newValue in self.setValue(newValue.rawValue, forKey: defaultsKey) }) } } For the sake of completeness, here is my enum enum CardPile: String, CaseIterable { case allRandom case numbers case numbersRandom case daysMonths case daysMonthsRandom } I've also created UI elements that use these bindings: var body: some View { VStack { Toggle("Enable", isOn: UserDefaults.standard.boolBinding(for: "enable")) Picker("Card Pile", selection: UserDefaults.standard.cardPileBinding(for: "cardPile")) { ForEach(CardPile.allCases, id: \.self) { Text("\($0.rawValue)") .tag($0.rawValue) } } } } When I tap the toggle, it updates correctly. However when I tap the picker and select a different value, the binding setter gets called, but the view does not refreshed to reflect the change in value. (If I force quit the app and re-run it, the I see the change.) I would like to find out why the Binding works as I'd expected (ie updates the UI when the value changes) but the Binding behaves differently. any/all guidance very much appreciated. Note: I get the same behavior when the enum use Int as its rawValue

I have a view containing either a TextField or a SecureField. I'm hoping I can use a single FocusState value that will apply to either the TextField or SecureField. (I'm using FocusState to ensure the cursor will be in the field when it initially loads) I've verified this works in a sample project when the view is in a WindowGroup. But when I instead use a DocumentGroup ~50% of the time when the view loads/launches, it does not have focus. Here is my ContentView: struct ContentView: View { let coinFlip: Bool = .random() // used to choose between the TextField and the SecureField @State var fieldContent: String = "" // bound to the Field value @FocusState var focus: Bool var body: some View { VStack { Text("Coin Flip: \(coinFlip)") actualField .focused($focus, equals: true) } .onAppear() { focus = true } } @ViewBuilder var actualField: some View { if coinFlip { TextField("Enter text here", text: $fieldContent) } else { SecureField("Enter secure text here", text: $fieldContent) } } } and here is my App swift file @main struct ModernTurtleApp: App { var body: some Scene { // WindowGroup { // ContentView() // } DocumentGroup(newDocument: ModernTurtleDocument()) { file in ContentView() } } } When this code runs, the Field has focus about 50% of the time on initial launch. When I uncomment the WindowGroup and comment the DocumentGroup, the field always has focus on initial launch. I realize I can work around this behaviour by using an optional enum for FocusState. I would be ok going this route, but I first want to try to understand the behaviour I'm seeing, and possibly keep my simpler FocusState implementation. Thanks, in advance for any help.

In Xcode Version 16.1 Create a new Project, choose Multiplatform, App For testing system, choose XCTest and UI Tests In the project, open the newly generated template Unit test file Click either of the diamonds in the left margin (either to run the example test or the entire file) Expected Result: Code compiles and then Runs the test/tests Actual Result: Code compiles, but then never completes testing (the top status bar is stuck saying "Testing..." forever.) Am I missing something?

The app I'm converting includes two unique document types. UI-wise they have key similarities (eg contents are password protected) But serialization/model - wise. they are different documents. I have not been able to find any documentation on options for implementing this (eg use a (abstract?) base class derived from FileDocument, with two concrete sub classes? maybe just a single subclass of FileDocument that contains model details for both file types?) Stepping back from implementation options, am I crazy for attempting to use DocumentGroup to create a single app that would need to be able to open/modify/save multiple unique document types? any/all guidance much appreciated.

I have a SwiftUI app with a List displaying an array of model objects. When the user taps a list item we see its detail view. I want to add previous and next buttons to my detail view, but I'm not sure what needs to happen when previous/next are tapped. (see code below for what I'm looking to do) My first thought is to make the model variable in the DetailView be a binding, but I'm not sure how this would tie in with the NavigationLink 'stuff' any/all suggestions appreciated. thanks! class Model: Identifiable {     var modelValue: Int     init(modelValue: Int) {         self.modelValue = modelValue     }     static let testData = [Model(modelValue: 3), Model(modelValue: 7), Model(modelValue: 31)] } class ModelManager {     static let shared = ModelManager()     let modelList = Model.testData     func previous(for model: Model) - Model? {         if let index = modelList.firstIndex(where: {$0.modelValue == model.modelValue}) {             if index 0 {                 return modelList[index - 1]             }         }         return nil     }     func next(for model: Model) - Model? {         if let index = modelList.firstIndex(where: {$0.modelValue == model.modelValue}) {             if index modelList.count - 1  {                 return modelList[index + 1]             }         }         return nil     } } struct ContentView: View {     let manager:ModelManager = ModelManager.shared     var body: some View {         NavigationView {             List(manager.modelList) { object in                 NavigationLink(                     destination: DetailView(model: object, previous: manager.previous(for: object), next: manager.next(for: object)),                     label: {                         Text("fred \(object.modelValue)")                     })             }         }     } } struct DetailView: View {     var model: Model     var previous: Model?     var next: Model?     var body: some View {         VStack {             HStack {                 if previous != nil {                     Button("Previous") {                         // goto previous                     }                 }                 Spacer()                 if next != nil {                     Button("Next") {                         // goto next                     }                 }             }             Text("value: \(model.modelValue)")             Spacer()         }     } }

See sample code below... Basically it's a galleryView with a dataSource that can add/remove items dynamically. It works as expected when GalleryView's dataSource variable has a type (that conforms to ObservableObject) However when I change dataSource's type to be a protocol, I can't seem to get my code to compile. Any guidance on how to use a protocol in GalleryView, and continue to keep the UI updating when the model object's item list changes? thanks! Mike protocol GalleryDataSource: ObservableObject {     var itemCount: Int { get }     func item(for index: Int) - String } class GalleryModel: ObservableObject {     static let test1: GalleryModel = GalleryModel(items: ["A","B","C"])     @Published var items: [String]     init(items: [String]) {         self.items = items     } } extension GalleryModel: GalleryDataSource {     var itemCount: Int {         return items.count     }     func item(for index: Int) - String {         return items[index]     } } struct ContentView: View {     var model: GalleryModel = GalleryModel.test1     var body: some View {         VStack {             GalleryView(dataSource: model)             Button("Add Item") {                 model.items.append("\(model.items.count)")             }         }     } } struct GalleryView: View {     @ObservedObject var dataSource: GalleryModel //GalleryDataSource     var body: some View {         ScrollView(.horizontal, content: {             HStack {                 ForEach(0..self.dataSource.itemCount, id:\.self) { index in                     Text(dataSource.item(for: index))                         .padding()                 }             }         })     } }

I'm trying to find a syntactically correct way to put the contents of a Container in a separate variable (or function). Can anyone steer me in the right direction? thanks, in advance, mike struct ContentView: View { var body: some View { VStack(content: containerContent) .padding() } var containerContent: () -> Content { return { Image(systemName: "globe") .imageScale(.large) .foregroundStyle(.tint) Text("Hello, world!") } } }

When I: open a simulator (eg iPhone 15, iOS 17.0) open the Photos app tap on an image (either one that comes included, or something I've saved to PhotoRoll) tap Edit I see the typical Photos Edit view with two key differences. the image is not visible, the middle of the view is all black there are now Cancel/Done/Dismiss buttons. I need to force quit to get back to the Springboard (Is that still the correct term?) Am I doing something wrong, or should the simulator's Photo's app be providing a better edit experience?

When I: open an existing project create a new PhotoExtensions target run the new target in an iOS simulator (eg iPhone 15, iOS 17.0) Select photos as the app to run Open a photo Tap the ... button at the top right I see: Copy, Duplicate, Hide, etc. But I do not see my new Extension. Is there something else I need to be doing in order to see my new Extension in 'action'?

It feels like this should be easy, but I'm having conceptual problems about how to do this. Any help would be appreciated. I have a sample app below that works exactly as expected. I'm able to use the Slider and Stepper to generate inputs to a function that uses CoreImage filters to manipulate my input image. This all works as expected, but it's doing some O(n) CI work on the main thread, and I want to move it to a background thread. I'm pretty sure this can be done using combine, here is the pseudo code I imagine would work for me: func doStuff() { // subscribe to options changes // .receive on background thread // .debounce // .map { model.inputImage.combine(options: $0) // return an object on the main thread. // update an @Published property? } Below is the POC code for my project. Any guidance as to where I should use combine to do this would be greatly appreciate. (Also, please let me know if you think combine is not the best way to tackle this. I'd be open to alternative implementations.) struct ContentView: View { @State private var options = CombineOptions.basic @ObservedObject var model = Model() var body: some View { VStack { Image(uiImage: enhancedImage) .resizable() .aspectRatio(contentMode: .fit) Slider(value: $options.scale) Stepper(value: $options.numberOfImages, label: { Text("\(options.numberOfImages)")}) } } private var enhancedImage: UIImage { return model.inputImage.combine(options: options) } } class Model: ObservableObject { let inputImage: UIImage = UIImage.init(named: "IMG_4097")! } struct CombineOptions: Codable, Equatable { static let basic: CombineOptions = .init(scale: 0.3, numberOfImages: 10) var scale: Double var numberOfImages: Int }

In V 0.1 of my app, I went with a simple option for a piece of business logic in my app. I then changed something else that caused my simplified business logic to now crash the app at startup. Excellent, a chance to use Test. Driven Design to replace my flawed business logic. So I wrote my first test TDD test, but when I tried to run the test... It doesn't run because running the test target seems to start by actually running my full app (which as I described in chapter 1 is currently crashing) Have I configured something incorrectly? or is it normal that when I attempt to run a single test, step 1 is running the full app? (note: it is very easy for me to disable/avoid the business logic causing my crash. This question is more about my lack of understanding of what it means to run a test target.) thanks in advance for any and all responses. Mike

is now broken. (but definitely worked when I originally wrote my Document-based app) It's been a few years. DocumentBrowserViewController's delegate implements the following func. func documentBrowser(_ controller: UIDocumentBrowserViewController, didRequestDocumentCreationWithHandler importHandler: @escaping (URL?, UIDocumentBrowserViewController.ImportMode) -> Void) { let newDocumentURL: URL? = Bundle.main.url(forResource: "blankFile", withExtension: "trtl2") // Make sure the importHandler is always called, even if the user cancels the creation request. if newDocumentURL != nil { importHandler(newDocumentURL, .copy) } else { importHandler(nil, .none) } } When I tap the + in the DocumentBrowserView, the above delegate func is called (my breakpoint gets hit and I can step through the code) newDocumentURL is getting defined successfully and importHandler(newDocumentURL, .copy) gets called, but returns the following error: Optional(Error Domain=com.apple.DocumentManager Code=2 "No location available to save “blankFile.trtl2”." UserInfo={NSLocalizedDescription=No location available to save “blankFile.trtl2”., NSLocalizedRecoverySuggestion=Enable at least one location to be able to save documents.}) This feels like something new I need to set up in the plist, but so far haven't been able to discover what it is. perhaps I need to update something in info.plist? perhaps one of: CFBundleDocumentTypes UTExportedTypeDeclarations Any guidance appreciated. thanks :-)

I thought the following code would allow me to have focus in the TextField when the app loads. Is there something else/different that I need to do? struct ContentView: View { enum FocusField { case password } @State var fieldContent: String = "" @FocusState var focus: FocusField? var body: some View { VStack { TextField("Enter text here", text: $fieldContent) .focused($focus, equals: .password) Text("Hello, world!") } .padding() .defaultFocus($focus, .password) } }

For my app I've created a Dictionary that I want to persist using AppStorage In order to be able to do this, I added RawRepresentable conformance for my specific type of Dictionary. (see code below) typealias ScriptPickers = [Language: Bool] extension ScriptPickers: @retroactive RawRepresentable where Key == Language, Value == Bool { public init?(rawValue: String) { guard let data = rawValue.data(using: .utf8), let result = try? JSONDecoder().decode(ScriptPickers.self, from: data) else { return nil } self = result } public var rawValue: String { guard let data = try? JSONEncoder().encode(self), // data is Data type let result = String(data: data, encoding: .utf8) // coerce NSData to String else { return "{}" // empty Dictionary represented as String } return result } } public enum Language: String, Codable, { case en = "en" case fr = "fr" case ja = "ja" case ko = "ko" case hr = "hr" case de = "de" } This all works fine in my app, however trying to run any tests, the build fails with the following: Conflicting conformance of 'Dictionary<Key, Value>' to protocol 'RawRepresentable'; there cannot be more than one conformance, even with different conditional bounds But then when I comment out my RawRepresentable implementation, I get the following error when attempting to run tests: Value of type 'ScriptPickers' (aka 'Dictionary<Language, Bool>') has no member 'rawValue' I hope Joseph Heller is out there somewhere chuckling at my predicament any/all ideas greatly appreciated