I have the same problem. Simulator works as expected and the keyboard button shows, but when I test the build on a device it isn't visible.

Hello Appeloper! First I just want to say I really do enjoy this approach versus MVVM. Being new to SwiftUI and seeing the MVVM approach it seemed so bloated and incredibly counter to what I saw in WWDC talks in their more simple demos (very much draw the rest of the owl). I want to ask about what is the best approach for a Store approach when you have an Account object that retrieves information about a user (in my case firebase auth) and then uses an identifier in that auth information as a path identifier for another store (e.g. firestore). I have a collection for say Books/<userId>/ and want to have a bookstore as you've described. Do you simply pass in the userId to the .loadStore function? Or should the BookStore contain a reference itself to the underlying auth provider? @MainActor class Account: ObservableObject { @Published var isLogged: Bool = false @Published var userDetails: UserDetails? = nil @Published var error: Error? = nil private var firebaseUser: User? private var authStateChangeHandler: AuthStateChangeHandler? private var userService: UserService = UserService.shared private var authService: AuthenticationService = AuthenticationService.shared private let logger = Logger(subsystem: "...", category: "Account") init() { authService.subscribeAuthStateChange { [weak self] (user: User?) in guard let self = self else { return } if let user = user { firebaseUser = user isLogged = true } else { firebaseUser = nil isLogged = false } } } func login(email: String, password: String) async { do { try await authService.login(email: email, password: password) } catch { self.error = error } } func register(email: String, password: String) async { do { try await authService.register(email: email, password: password) } catch { self.error = error } } func loadUser() async { do { guard let firebaseUser = firebaseUser else { throw UserError.noUserId } userDetails = try await userService.fetchUser(with: firebaseUser.uid) error = nil logger.info("User loaded \(firebaseUser)") } catch { self.error = error } } } class FirebaseAuthProvider: AuthenticationProvider { private let auth = Auth.auth() // <- should this become shared and used inside the stores? }

I'm honestly lost on the automatic inverse relationships. I've reviewed the SampleTrips project and followed what they do there and it doesn't work. From what I can see, you don't need to do anything other than mark the inverse and then: let item = BucketListItem( title: "A bucket list item title", details: "Details of my bucket list item", hasReservation: true, isInPlan: true) item.trip = .preview but when I review the code of the project in the section where they add bucket list items, they do set the inverse? private func addItem() { withAnimation { let newItem = BucketListItem(title: title, details: details, hasReservation: hasReservations, isInPlan: isInPlan) modelContext.insert(newItem) newItem.trip = trip trip.bucketList.append(newItem) } } this doesn't seem to make sense to me?