It appears Apple have indefinitely delayed Swift Assist @willoughby. Possibly due to the severe technical challenges they’re facing with Apple Intelligence as a whole (which includes features like Swift Assist). They won’t respond, so, don’t count on them. Swift Assist is currently a broken promise and they didn’t even bother to update/delete their own Newsroom article about it. They haven’t responded to my/anyone’s emails about this either. They also officially mentioned in the Daring Fireball podcast that they were training Swift Assist with licensed publicly available Swift code. Not internal code which should have better coding practices. Meaning, given their poor quality homegrown LLM as of now, Swift Assist will be inferior to existing players like Claude. The only advantage that Swift Assist will have is that they promised it will immediately know any SDK changes Apple makes internally, which third party LLMs like Claude cannot know until they’ve retrained to bring forth knowledge cutoff. Again, Claude is better than ChatGPT for Swift code. ChatGPT is well-known due to it being the first of its kind, but it is now fully established that it is not the best of its kind. For AI search, it's Perplexity AI > Copilot >= SearchGPT > Gemini. For Swift code, it's Claude >>>>> ChatGPT > Gemini >= Meta, etc.
Topic:
Machine Learning & AI
SubTopic:
General
Tags: