Hello, How long does it usually take for a URL Filter request to be reviewed? It's been 2.5 weeks since we submitted the request form but we haven't received any feedback yet. Just in case, the request ID is D3633USVZZ

I'm developing an application using the accessory setup kit (BLE) on iOS 18+. An important aspect of the connection process is being able to find and choose the correct device. I noticed on iOS 18.2 that I was able to both scroll through the discovered accessories as well as view the advertised name. However, after upgrading to 18.7.2, only a single device is viewable and the advertised name is no longer available. Is there a trigger for this feature that I need to enable or was this "multiple discovery" feature removed? If so, why?

This is a topic that’s come up a few times on the forums, so I thought I’d write up a summary of the issues I’m aware of. If you have questions or comments, start a new thread in the App & System Services > Networking subtopic and tag it with Network Extension. That way I’ll be sure to see it go by. Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = "eskimo" + "1" + "@" + "apple.com" Network Extension Provider Packaging There are two ways to package a network extension provider: App extension ( appex ) System extension ( sysex ) Different provider types support different packaging on different platforms. See TN3134 Network Extension provider deployment for the details. Some providers, most notably packet tunnel providers on macOS, support both appex and sysex packaging. Sysex packaging has a number of advantages: It supports direct distribution, using Developer ID signing. It better matches the networking stack on macOS. An appex is tied to the logged in user, whereas a sysex, and the networking stack itself, is global to the system as a whole. Given that, it generally makes sense to package your Network Extension (NE) provider as a sysex on macOS. If you’re creating a new product that’s fine, but if you have an existing iOS product that you want to bring to macOS, you have to account for the differences brought on by the move to sysex packaging. Similarly, if you have an existing sysex product on macOS that you want to bring to iOS, you have to account for the appex packaging. This post summarises those changes. Keep the following in mind while reading this post: The information here applies to all NE providers that can be packaged as either an appex or a sysex. When this post uses a specific provider type in an example, it’s just an example. Unless otherwise noted, any information about iOS also applies to iPadOS, tvOS, and visionOS. Process Lifecycle With appex packaging, the system typically starts a new process for each instance of your NE provider. For example, with a packet tunnel provider: When the users starts the VPN, the system creates a process and then instantiates and starts the NE provider in that process. When the user stops the VPN, the system stops the NE provider and then terminates the process running it. If the user starts the VPN again, the system creates an entirely new process and instantiates and starts the NE provider in that. In contrast, with sysex packaging there’s typically a single process that runs all off the sysex’s NE providers. Returning to the packet tunnel provider example: When the users starts the VPN, the system instantiates and starts the NE provider in the sysex process. When the user stops the VPN, the system stops and deallocates the NE provider instances, but leaves the sysex process running. If the user starts the VPN again, the system instantiates and starts a new instances of the NE provider in the sysex process. This lifecycle reflects how the system runs the NE provider, which in turn has important consequences on what the NE provider can do: An appex acts like a launchd agent [1], in that it runs in a user context and has access to that user’s state. A sysex is effectively a launchd daemon. It runs in a context that’s global to the system as a whole. It does not have access to any single user’s state. Indeed, there might be no user logged in, or multiple users logged in. The following sections explore some consequences of the NE provider lifecycle. [1] It’s not actually run as a launchd agent. Rather, there’s a system launchd agent that acts as the host for the app extension. App Groups With an app extension, the app extension and its container app run as the same user. Thus it’s trivial to share state between them using an app group container. Note When talking about extensions on Apple platforms, the container app is the app in which the extension is embedded and the host app is the app using the extension. For network extensions the host app is the system itself. That’s not the case with a system extension. The system extension runs as root whereas the container app runs an the user who launched it. While both programs can claim access to the same app group, the app group container location they receive will be different. For the system extension that location will be inside the home directory for the root user. For the container app the location will be inside the home directory of the user who launched it. This does not mean that app groups are useless in a Network Extension app. App groups are also a factor in communicating between the container app and its extensions, the subject of the next section. IMPORTANT App groups have a long and complex history on macOS. For the full story, see App Groups: macOS vs iOS: Working Towards Harmony. Communicating with Extensions With an app extension there are two communication options: App-provider messages App groups App-provider messages are supported by NE directly. In the container app, send a message to the provider by calling sendProviderMessage(_:responseHandler:) method. In the appex, receive that message by overriding the handleAppMessage(_:completionHandler:) method. An appex can also implement inter-process communication (IPC) using various system IPC primitives. Both the container app and the appex claim access to the app group via the com.apple.security.application-groups entitlement. They can then set up IPC using various APIs, as explain in the documentation for that entitlement. With a system extension the story is very different. App-provider messages are supported, but they are rarely used. Rather, most products use XPC for their communication. In the sysex, publish a named XPC endpoint by setting the NEMachServiceName property in its Info.plist. Listen for XPC connections on that endpoint using the XPC API of your choice. Note For more information about the available XPC APIs, see XPC Resources. In the container app, connect to that named XPC endpoint using the XPC Mach service name API. For example, with NSXPCConnection, initialise the connection with init(machServiceName:options:), passing in the string from NEMachServiceName. To maximise security, set the .privileged flag. Note XPC Resources has a link to a post that explains why this flag is important. If the container app is sandboxed — necessary if you ship on the Mac App Store — then the endpoint name must be prefixed by an app group ID that’s accessible to that app, lest the App Sandbox deny the connection. See the app groups documentation for the specifics. When implementing an XPC listener in your sysex, keep in mind that: Your sysex’s named XPC endpoint is registered in the global namespace. Any process on the system can open a connection to it [1]. Your XPC listener must be prepared for this. If you want to restrict connections to just your container app, see XPC Resources for a link to a post that explains how to do that. Even if you restrict access in that way, it’s still possible for multiple instances of your container app to be running simultaneously, each with its own connection to your sysex. This happens, for example, if there are multiple GUI users logged in and different users run your container app. Design your XPC protocol with this in mind. Your sysex only gets one named XPC endpoint, and thus one XPC listener. If your sysex includes multiple NE providers, take that into account when you design your XPC protocol. [1] Assuming that connection isn’t blocked by some other mechanism, like the App Sandbox. Inter-provider Communication A sysex can include multiple types of NE providers. For example, a single sysex might include a content filter and a DNS proxy provider. In that case the system instantiates all of the NE providers in the same sysex process. These instances can communicate without using IPC, for example, by storing shared state in global variables (with suitable locking, of course). It’s also possible for a single container app to contain multiple sysexen, each including a single NE provider. In that case the system instantiates the NE providers in separate processes, one for each sysex. If these providers need to communicate, they have to use IPC. In the appex case, the system instantiates each provider in its own process. If two providers need to communicate, they have to use IPC. Managing Secrets An appex runs in a user context and thus can store secrets, like VPN credentials, in the keychain. On macOS this includes both the data protection keychain and the file-based keychain. It can also use a keychain access group to share secrets with its container app. See Sharing access to keychain items among a collection of apps. Note If you’re not familiar with the different types of keychain available on macOS, see TN3137 On Mac keychain APIs and implementations. A sysex runs in the global context and thus doesn’t have access to user state. It also doesn’t have access to the data protection keychain. It must use the file-based keychain, and specifically the System keychain. That means there’s no good way to share secrets with the container app. Instead, do all your keychain operations in the sysex. If the container app needs to work with a secret, have it pass that request to the sysex via IPC. For example, if the user wants to use a digital identity as a VPN credential, have the container app get the PKCS#12 data and password and then pass that to the sysex so that it can import the digital identity into the keychain. Memory Limits iOS imposes strict memory limits an NE provider appexen [1]. macOS imposes no memory limits on NE provider appexen or sysexen. [1] While these limits are not documented officially, you can get a rough handle on the current limits by reading the posts in this thread. Frameworks If you want to share code between a Mac app and its embedded appex, use a structure like this: MyApp.app/ Contents/ MacOS/ MyApp PlugIns/ MyExtension.appex/ Contents/ MacOS/ MyExtension … Frameworks/ MyFramework.framework/ … There’s one copy of the framework, in the app’s Frameworks directory, and both the app and the appex reference it. This approach works for an appex because the system always loads the appex from your app’s bundle. It does not work for a sysex. When you activate a sysex, the system copies it to a protected location. If that sysex references a framework in its container app, it will fail to start because that framework isn’t copied along with the sysex. The solution is to structure your app like this: MyApp.app/ Contents/ MacOS/ MyApp Library/ SystemExtensions/ MyExtension.systemextension/ Contents/ MacOS/ MyExtension Frameworks/ MyFramework.framework/ … … That is, have both the app and the sysex load the framework from the sysex’s Frameworks directory. When the system copies the sysex to its protected location, it’ll also copy the framework, allowing the sysex to load it. To make this work you have to change the default rpath configuration set up by Xcode. Read Dynamic Library Standard Setup for Apps to learn how that works and then tweak things so that: The framework is embedded in the sysex, not the container app. The container app has an additional LC_RPATH load command for the sysex’s Frameworks directory (@executable_path/../Library/SystemExtensions/MyExtension.systemextension/Contents/Frameworks). The sysex’s LC_RPATH load command doesn’t reference the container app’s Frameworks directory (@executable_path/../../../../Frameworks) but instead points to the sysex’s Framweorks directory (@executable_path/../Frameworks). Entitlements When you build an app with an embedded NE extension, both the app and the extension must be signed with the com.apple.developer.networking.networkextension entitlement. This is a restricted entitlement, that is, it must be authorised by a provisioning profile. The value of this entitlement is an array, and the values in that array differ depend on your distribution channel: If you distribute your app directly with Developer ID signing, use the values with the -systemextension suffix. Otherwise — including when you distribute the app on the App Store and when signing for development — use the values without that suffix. Make sure you authorise these values with your provisioning profile. If, for example, you use an App Store distribution profile with a Developer ID signed app, things won’t work because the profile doesn’t authorise the right values. In general, the easiest option is to use Xcode’s automatic code signing. However, watch out for the pitfall described in Exporting a Developer ID Network Extension. Revision History 2025-11-06 Added the Entitlements section. Explained that, with sysex packaging, multiple instances of your container app might connect simultaneously with your sysex. 2025-09-17 First posted.

IMPORTANT The resume rate limiter is now covered by the official documentation. See Use background sessions efficiently within Downloading files in the background. So, the following is here purely for historical perspective. NSURLSession’s background session support on iOS includes a resume rate limiter. This limiter exists to prevent apps from abusing the background session support in order to run continuously in the background. It works as follows: nsurlsessiond (the daemon that does all the background session work) maintains a delay value for your app. It doubles that delay every time it resumes (or relaunches) your app. It resets that delay to 0 when the user brings your app to the front. It also resets the delay to 0 if the delay period elapses without it having resumed your app. When your app creates a new task while it is in the background, the task does not start until that delay has expired. To understand the impact of this, consider what happens when you download 10 resources. If you pass them to the background session all at once, you see something like this: Your app creates tasks 1 through 10 in the background session. nsurlsessiond starts working on the first few tasks. As tasks complete, nsurlsessiond starts working on subsequent ones. Eventually all the tasks complete and nsurlsessiond resumes your app. Now consider what happens if you only schedule one task at a time: Your app creates task 1. nsurlsessiond starts working on it. When it completes, nsurlsessiond resumes your app. Your app creates task 2. nsurlsessiond delays the start of task 2 a little bit. nsurlsessiond starts working on task 2. When it completes, nsurlsessiond resumes your app. Your app creates task 3. nsurlsessiond delays the start of task 3 by double the previous amount. nsurlsessiond starts working on task 3. When it completes, nsurlsessiond resumes your app. Steps 8 through 11 repeat, and each time the delay doubles. Eventually the delay gets so large that it looks like your app has stopped making progress. If you have a lot of tasks to run then you can mitigate this problem by starting tasks in batches. That is, rather than start just one task in step 1, you would start 100. This only helps up to a point. If you have thousands of tasks to run, you will eventually start seeing serious delays. In that case it’s much better to change your design to use fewer, larger transfers. Note All of the above applies to iOS 8 and later. Things worked differently in iOS 7. There’s a post on DevForums that explains the older approach. Finally, keep in mind that there may be other reasons for your task not starting. Specifically, if the task is flagged as discretionary (because you set the discretionary flag when creating the task’s session or because the task was started while your app was in the background), the task may be delayed for other reasons (low power, lack of Wi-Fi, and so on). Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = "eskimo" + "1" + "@" + "apple.com" (r. 22323366)

I was trying to log the flow description using control filter and data filter. But when I am trying to log the proc ID in control filter, it is always 0, but in data filter, it logs some value. Same goes with the eproc ID. I want to use the flow description data in some other target so I will be sending the data using sockets and I cannot share data from data filter due to its restrictions and control filter isn't providing the proc ID. What should I do?

We are a Layer 3 VPN provider offering a comprehensive SASE (Secure Access Service Edge) solution that includes TLS inspection, threat protection, granular access control, and secure access to private resources. One of the key challenges we face involves TLS inspection. Many mobile applications, especially on iOS, implement certificate pinning, which causes them to fail when TLS inspection is applied. These apps expect connections to be secured with a specific certificate or trusted certificate authority, and inspection disrupts this trust model. On iOS, the current limitation is that the Packet Tunnel Provider extension does not provide visibility into the originating application (i.e., there is no API to obtain the app’s bundle ID or package name associated with a given network connection). Due to this, we are unable to dynamically determine whether TLS inspection should be bypassed for a particular app. While Apple’s Per-App VPN is one possible solution, it introduces a significant drawback: any applications that are excluded from the VPN configuration are entirely outside the VPN tunnel. This means they do not benefit from any of our SASE features — including secure access to internal resources, DNS/web content filtering, or threat detection. This limits the effectiveness of our solution in environments where both inspection and secure access are critical. We would like to understand whether iOS has any current or planned capabilities to associate a network flow (e.g., a 5-tuple: source IP, destination IP, source port, destination port, and protocol) with the originating app. Such a capability would allow us to programmatically identify certificate-pinned apps and selectively disable TLS inspection without excluding them entirely from the VPN, thereby preserving the full set of SASE protections. Is there any guidance or roadmap update from Apple that addresses this use case?

Hi! I've noticed that the IP_RECVIF socket option, i.e.: int y = 1; setsockopt(fd, IPPROTO_IP, IP_RECVIF, &y, sizeof(y)); does not seem to work if the socket is proxied by a NETransparentProxyProvider type network extension: there's no ancillary data in messages received with recvmsg. As soon as I disable the network extension, recvmsg starts returning ancillary data containing the interface name. This seems to break some applications which rely on IP_RECVIF in the presence of a transparent proxy, making it, in fact, not transparent. One such example is Apple's own libresolv, which relies on IP_RECVIF and breaks if there's no ancillary data in the recvmsg result. I don't think that this is the intended behaviour, since IPV6_PKTINFO seems to work fine. I've filed a bug report (FB17586550) about this, however, I would greatly appreciate if someone could point me in the direction of a workaround.

I am trying to commission an ESP32-H2 Matter device using the chip-tool. It's running the Light Switch sample. I can commissioning it using the iOS Home App, so I know the code on it's working okay. I would like to understand more about the Fabric process, so I'd like to use the Home Pod powered Thread network rather than setting up an instance of Open Thread Border Router. I have created a simple iOS app and can fetch the activeOperationalDataSet from the Preferred network using func obtainPreferredNetworkCredentials() async -> (Void) { let client = THClient() let bIsPreferredAvailable = await client.isPreferredAvailable() if bIsPreferredAvailable == true { var credential: THCredentials? do { credential = try await client.preferredCredentials() if let dataset = credential?.activeOperationalDataSet { print(dataset.hexDescription) } } catch { print("Failed to get the credentials") } } } The hexDescription comes from this extension extension Data { var hexDescription: String { return reduce("") {$0 + String(format: "%02x", $1)} } } I am decoding the Data and displaying it as a hex string. It looks something like this: 0e080000000000000000000300001935060004001fffc002089f651677026f48070708fd9f65167702000ee90914b5d1097de9bb0818dc94690c0402a0f7f8 However, when I attempt to commission the device, it fails during ThreadSetup. Googling the issue says most likely the Operational Dataset is wrong in some way. Before I spend too much time on this, I want to make sure I'm doing the right thing in terms of getting the Operational Dataset to use with the chip-tool. Any help is appreciated!

Hi everyone, I'm currently experimenting with building a simple DNS filter using Apple's Packet Tunnel framework. Here's the flow I'm trying to implement: Create a TUN interface Set up a UDP socket Read packets via packetFlow.readPackets Parse the raw IP packet Forward the UDP payload through the socket Receive the response from the server Reconstruct the IP packet with the response Write it back to the TUN interface using packetFlow.writePackets Here’s an example of an intercepted IP packet (DNS request): 45 00 00 3c 15 c4 00 00 40 11 93 d1 c0 a8 00 64 08 08 08 08 ed 6e 00 35 00 28 e5 c9 7f da 01 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 04 74 69 6d 65 05 61 70 70 6c 65 03 63 6f 6d 00 00 01 00 01 And here’s the IP packet I tried writing back into the TUN interface (DNS response): 45 00 00 89 5e 37 40 00 40 11 0b 11 08 08 08 08 c0 a8 00 64 00 35 ed 6e 00 75 91 e8 7f da 81 80 00 01 00 04 00 00 00 00 04 74 69 6d 65 05 61 70 70 6c 65 03 63 6f 6d 00 00 01 00 01 c0 0c 00 05 00 01 00 00 0c fb 00 11 04 74 69 6d 65 01 67 07 61 61 70 6c 69 6d 67 c0 17 c0 2c 00 01 00 01 00 00 03 04 00 04 11 fd 74 fd c0 2c 00 01 00 01 00 00 03 04 00 04 11 fd 74 7d c0 2c 00 01 00 01 00 00 03 04 00 04 11 fd 54 fb Unfortunately, it seems the packet is not being written back correctly to the TUN interface. I'm not seeing any expected DNS response behavior on the device. Also, I noticed that after creating the TUN, the interface address shows up as 0.0.0.0:0 in Xcode. The system log includes this message when connecting the VPN: NWPath does not have valid interface: satisfied (Path is satisfied), interface: utun20[endc_sub6], ipv4, dns, expensive, uses cellular Does anyone know how to properly initialize the TUN so that the system recognizes it with a valid IP configuration? Or why my written-back packet might be getting ignored? Any help would be appreciated!

Sometimes when adding a VPN configuration, it just redirects to the Settings app and doesn’t continue with the rest of the configuration process like prompting for passcode. But it proceeds as normal after the 2nd or 3rd try. This issue is occurring on iOS 18.5 build 22F5068a but it has been a problem over several versions now. Feedback ID: FB17458055

I am working on watch os project. I need to check network connectivity when user turn on and off the network. I am using NWPathMonitor for check network availability. I am connected with wifi but it still showing unsatisfied not real device but it's working perfect on simulator.

I added a Content Filter to my app, and when running it in Xcode (Debug/Release), I get the expected permission prompt: "Would like to filter network content (Allow / Don't Allow)". However, when I install the app via TestFlight, this prompt doesn’t appear at all, and the feature doesn’t work. Is there a special configuration required for TestFlight? Has anyone encountered this issue before? Thanks!

I develop a terminal app with c++. Everything was fin until i upgraded to Sequoia. If i debug my program with Xcode, all requests to a local network like MQTT fails. How can i grant XCODE the privilege to access the local network?

What I want to do? I want to completely block network traffic for installed iOS apps. Hence, I need to filter network traffic based on the app, which executes this network request. Note that my app is created for personal use and learning purposes. How is this possible on iOS. Could you kindly point me into the right direction? What I don't want to do? Block network requests just by using the given domain names or using local VPNs. What I did? I skimmed through the Network Extension documentation and this forum. https://developer.apple.com/documentation/networkextension/content-filter-providers?language=objc https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/692597 Thank you! BR, Markus

I am working on a macos application that uses NetworkExtension and works fine in the debug environment. However, when I use the Release package, I am always prompted that my description file does not contain NetworkExtension. I am sure that my description file does contain NetworkExtension. How to solve this problem

At WWDC 25, Dr. Swetank mentioned, “DeviceDiscoveryUI is for making connections between apps and from an app to another device. It supports pairing with both Apple and third-party devices.” I find the pairing process in DeviceDiscoveryUI via Wi-Fi Aware intriguing. I have two questions: Can we pair devices via Bluetooth first and then establish a Wi-Fi Aware connection? If I use DeviceDiscoveryUI, how should I write an Android program to correspond with it and achieve iPhone-Android pairing? The app is an official Apple app: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/wifiaware/building-peer-to-peer-apps.

For our outdoor power supply company that builds public WiFi networks at camping sites, we want to implement the following features in our app: Scan surrounding WiFi networks When detecting specific public WiFi SSIDs, provide users with corresponding passwords Automatically connect to those WiFi networks Regarding the NEHotspotHelper API permission application, when I clicked on https://developer.apple.com/contact/request/network-extension, it redirected me to https://developer.apple.com/unauthorized/. I'm not sure where to properly apply for this permission now.

On iOS 18.3, I noted that partition "HTTPCookiePropertyKey: StoragePartition" is not observed to be set for cookies returned from the wkwebview cookie store. Now on 18.4 beta 4 we are now seeing those same cookies are populated with a partition property. Is there documentation for this change? Is it intended to be suddenly populated in 18.4? Now that partition property is set, HTTPCookieStorage.shared.cookies(for: serverUri) doesn't seem to return the expected cookies correctly. For context, we are using the cookies extracted from wkwebview, setting them in HTTPCookieStorage.shared and using URLSession to make network calls outside the webivew. Works fine once I forcefully set partition on the cookie to nil. More details on what the cookie looks like here: https://feedbackassistant.apple.com/feedback/16906526 Hopefully this is on your radar?

Hello, I have been implementing NEAppPushProvider class to establish my own protocol to directly communicate with our provider server without the need to rely on APNs for background push notifications. I am at a stage where I am able to establish a tcp communicator and receive messages back and forth but I noticed that when I disconnect from the WIFI I've set up by setting a given SSID, I am not getting hit on the Stop method. Below is briefly how I load and save preferences. NEAppPushManager appPushManager = new NEAppPushManager(); appPushManager.LoadFromPreferences((error) => { if (error != null) { Console.WriteLine($"Error loading NEAppPushManager preferences: {error.LocalizedDescription}"); return; } if (!enable) { Console.WriteLine("Disabling Local Push Provider..."); appPushManager.Enabled = false; // ✅ Immediately update UserDefaults before saving preferences userDefaults.SetBool(false, Constants.IsLocalPushEnabled); userDefaults.Synchronize(); appPushManager.SaveToPreferences((saveError) => { if (saveError != null) { Console.WriteLine($"Error disabling Local Push: {saveError.LocalizedDescription}"); } else { Console.WriteLine("Local Push successfully disabled."); } }); return; } // ✅ Now we can safely enable Local Push Console.WriteLine($"Enabling Local Push for SSID: {_currentSSID}"); appPushManager.MatchSsids = new string[] { _currentSSID }; appPushManager.LocalizedDescription = "LocalPushProvider"; appPushManager.ProviderBundleIdentifier = Constants.LocalPushExtensionBundleId; appPushManager.Enabled = true; appPushManager.SaveToPreferences((saveError) => { if (saveError != null) { Console.WriteLine($"Error saving Local Push settings: {saveError.LocalizedDescription}"); } else { Console.WriteLine("✅ Local Push successfully registered."); userDefaults.SetBool(true, Constants.IsLocalPushEnabled); userDefaults.Synchronize(); } }); }); I've read through documentation and was expecting the Stop method to be hit when I turn off Wifi. Am I missing anything? Please let me know if I should provide more info. Currently I just have a console writeline method inside the Stop method to see if it actually gets hit.

Hi, I’m urgently seeking assistance with an issue in my app development. The app allows users to control which domains are routed through my relay servers (six server URLs). However, I’ve encountered a problem: When a single relay configuration (for a single server URL) contains more than 70 domains, only one configuration can be active at a time. If I manually activate another relay configuration (for another server URL), the previously activated one automatically deactivates. Is there a way to overcome this limitation? Also, is there a maximum amount of domains that can exist across the per-app relays? I’m referencing the Apple documentation here: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/networkextension/relays Any guidance or insights into resolving this issue would be greatly appreciated! Thank you in advance :)