At WWDC25 we launched a new type of Lab event for the developer community - Group Labs. A Group Lab is a panel Q&A designed for a large audience of developers. Group Labs are a unique opportunity for the community to submit questions directly to a panel of Apple engineers and designers. Here are the highlights from the WWDC25 Group Lab for Machine Learning and AI Frameworks. What are you most excited about in the Foundation Models framework? The Foundation Models framework provides access to an on-device Large Language Model (LLM), enabling entirely on-device processing for intelligent features. This allows you to build features such as personalized search suggestions and dynamic NPC generation in games. The combination of guided generation and streaming capabilities is particularly exciting for creating delightful animations and features with reliable output. The seamless integration with SwiftUI and the new design material Liquid Glass is also a major advantage. When should I still bring my own LLM via CoreML? It's generally recommended to first explore Apple's built-in system models and APIs, including the Foundation Models framework, as they are highly optimized for Apple devices and cover a wide range of use cases. However, Core ML is still valuable if you need more control or choice over the specific model being deployed, such as customizing existing system models or augmenting prompts. Core ML provides the tools to get these models on-device, but you are responsible for model distribution and updates. Should I migrate PyTorch code to MLX? MLX is an open-source, general-purpose machine learning framework designed for Apple Silicon from the ground up. It offers a familiar API, similar to PyTorch, and supports C, C++, Python, and Swift. MLX emphasizes unified memory, a key feature of Apple Silicon hardware, which can improve performance. It's recommended to try MLX and see if its programming model and features better suit your application's needs. MLX shines when working with state-of-the-art, larger models. Can I test Foundation Models in Xcode simulator or device? Yes, you can use the Xcode simulator to test Foundation Models use cases. However, your Mac must be running macOS Tahoe. You can test on a physical iPhone running iOS 18 by connecting it to your Mac and running Playgrounds or live previews directly on the device. Which on-device models will be supported? any open source models? The Foundation Models framework currently supports Apple's first-party models only. This allows for platform-wide optimizations, improving battery life and reducing latency. While Core ML can be used to integrate open-source models, it's generally recommended to first explore the built-in system models and APIs provided by Apple, including those in the Vision, Natural Language, and Speech frameworks, as they are highly optimized for Apple devices. For frontier models, MLX can run very large models. How often will the Foundational Model be updated? How do we test for stability when the model is updated? The Foundation Model will be updated in sync with operating system updates. You can test your app against new model versions during the beta period by downloading the beta OS and running your app. It is highly recommended to create an "eval set" of golden prompts and responses to evaluate the performance of your features as the model changes or as you tweak your prompts. Report any unsatisfactory or satisfactory cases using Feedback Assistant. Which on-device model/API can I use to extract text data from images such as: nutrition labels, ingredient lists, cashier receipts, etc? Thank you. The Vision framework offers the RecognizeDocumentRequest which is specifically designed for these use cases. It not only recognizes text in images but also provides the structure of the document, such as rows in a receipt or the layout of a nutrition label. It can also identify data like phone numbers, addresses, and prices. What is the context window for the model? What are max tokens in and max tokens out? The context window for the Foundation Model is 4,096 tokens. The split between input and output tokens is flexible. For example, if you input 4,000 tokens, you'll have 96 tokens remaining for the output. The API takes in text, converting it to tokens under the hood. When estimating token count, a good rule of thumb is 3-4 characters per token for languages like English, and 1 character per token for languages like Japanese or Chinese. Handle potential errors gracefully by asking for shorter prompts or starting a new session if the token limit is exceeded. Is there a rate limit for Foundation Models API that is limited by power or temperature condition on the iPhone? Yes, there are rate limits, particularly when your app is in the background. A budget is allocated for background app usage, but exceeding it will result in rate-limiting errors. In the foreground, there is no rate limit unless the device is under heavy load (e.g., camera open, game mode). The system dynamically balances performance, battery life, and thermal conditions, which can affect the token throughput. Use appropriate quality of service settings for your tasks (e.g., background priority for background work) to help the system manage resources effectively. Do the foundation models support languages other than English? Yes, the on-device Foundation Model is multilingual and supports all languages supported by Apple Intelligence. To get the model to output in a specific language, prompt it with instructions indicating the user's preferred language using the locale API (e.g., "The user's preferred language is en-US"). Putting the instructions in English, but then putting the user prompt in the desired output language is a recommended practice. Are larger server-based models available through Foundation Models? No, the Foundation Models API currently only provides access to the on-device Large Language Model at the core of Apple Intelligence. It does not support server-side models. On-device models are preferred for privacy and for performance reasons. Is it possible to run Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) using the Foundation Models framework? Yes, it is possible to run RAG on-device, but the Foundation Models framework does not include a built-in embedding model. You'll need to use a separate database to store vectors and implement nearest neighbor or cosine distance searches. The Natural Language framework offers simple word and sentence embeddings that can be used. Consider using a combination of Foundation Models and Core ML, using Core ML for your embedding model.

there was a beta version. after the update it worked just like regular Siri. this message has been there for two days now but there is no loading.

I am using gemini2.5-flash with SwiftUI. How can I receive a response in JSON?

Hello, I have a question regarding hybrid execution for deep learning models on Apple's Neural Engine and CPU. I am aware that setting the precision of some layers to 32-bit allows hybrid execution across both the Neural Engine and the CPU. However, I would like to know if it is possible to achieve the same with 16-bit precision. Is there any specific configuration or workaround to enable hybrid execution in this case? Any guidance or documentation references would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!

My app used app intents. And when user said "Prüfung der Bluetooth Funktion", screen can show the whole words. But in my app, it only can get "Bluetooth Funktion". This behaviour only happened in German version. In English version, everything worked well. Is anyone can support me? Why German version siri cut my words?

I followed below url for converting Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct model but always fails even i have 64GB of free space after downloading model from huggingface. https://machinelearning.apple.com/research/core-ml-on-device-llama Also tried with other models Llama-3.1-1B-Instruct & Llama-3.1-3B-Instruct models those are converted but while doing performance test in xcode fails for all compunits. Is there any source code to run llama models in ios app.

I'm using a custom create ML model to classify the movement of a user's hand in a game, The classifier has 3 different spell movements, but my code constantly predicts all of them at an equal 1/3 probability regardless of movement which leads me to believe my code isn't correct (as opposed to the model) which in CreateML at least gives me a heavily weighted prediction My code is below. On adding debug prints everywhere all the data looks good to me and matches similar to my test CSV data So I'm thinking my issue must be in the setup of my model code? /// Feeds samples into the model and keeps a sliding window of the last N frames. final class WandGestureStreamer { static let shared = WandGestureStreamer() private let model: SpellActivityClassifier private var samples: [Transform] = [] private let windowSize = 100 // number of frames the model expects /// RNN hidden state passed between inferences private var stateIn: MLMultiArray /// Last transform dropped from the window for continuity private var lastDropped: Transform? private init() { let config = MLModelConfiguration() self.model = try! SpellActivityClassifier(configuration: config) // Initialize stateIn to the model’s required shape let constraint = self.model.model.modelDescription .inputDescriptionsByName["stateIn"]! .multiArrayConstraint! self.stateIn = try! MLMultiArray(shape: constraint.shape, dataType: .double) } /// Call once per frame with the latest wand position (or any feature vector). func appendSample(_ sample: Transform) { samples.append(sample) // drop oldest frame if over capacity, retaining it for delta at window start if samples.count > windowSize { lastDropped = samples.removeFirst() } } func classifyIfReady(threshold: Double = 0.6) -> (label: String, confidence: Double)? { guard samples.count == windowSize else { return nil } do { let input = try makeInput(initialState: stateIn) let output = try model.prediction(input: input) // Save state for continuity stateIn = output.stateOut let best = output.label let conf = output.labelProbability[best] ?? 0 // If you’ve recognized a gesture with high confidence: if conf > threshold { return (best, conf) } else { return nil } } catch { print("Error", error.localizedDescription, error) return nil } } /// Constructs a SpellActivityClassifierInput from recorded wand transforms. func makeInput(initialState: MLMultiArray) throws -> SpellActivityClassifierInput { let count = samples.count as NSNumber let shape = [count] let timeArr = try MLMultiArray(shape: shape, dataType: .double) let dxArr = try MLMultiArray(shape: shape, dataType: .double) let dyArr = try MLMultiArray(shape: shape, dataType: .double) let dzArr = try MLMultiArray(shape: shape, dataType: .double) let rwArr = try MLMultiArray(shape: shape, dataType: .double) let rxArr = try MLMultiArray(shape: shape, dataType: .double) let ryArr = try MLMultiArray(shape: shape, dataType: .double) let rzArr = try MLMultiArray(shape: shape, dataType: .double) for (i, sample) in samples.enumerated() { let previousSample = i > 0 ? samples[i - 1] : lastDropped let model = WandMovementRecording.DataModel(transform: sample, previous: previousSample) // print("model", model) timeArr[i] = NSNumber(value: model.timestamp) dxArr[i] = NSNumber(value: model.dx) dyArr[i] = NSNumber(value: model.dy) dzArr[i] = NSNumber(value: model.dz) let rot = model.rotation rwArr[i] = NSNumber(value: rot.w) rxArr[i] = NSNumber(value: rot.x) ryArr[i] = NSNumber(value: rot.y) rzArr[i] = NSNumber(value: rot.z) } return SpellActivityClassifierInput( dx: dxArr, dy: dyArr, dz: dzArr, rotation_w: rwArr, rotation_x: rxArr, rotation_y: ryArr, rotation_z: rzArr, timestamp: timeArr, stateIn: initialState ) } }

I am trying to create a Pipeline with 3 sub-models: a Feature Vectorizer -> a NN regressor converted from PyTorch -> a Feature Extractor (to convert the output tensor to a Double value). The pipeline works fine when I use just a Vectorizer and an Extractor, this is the code: vectorizer = models.feature_vectorizer.create_feature_vectorizer( input_features=["windSpeed", "theoreticalPowerCurve", "windDirection"], # Multiple input features output_feature_name="input" ) preProc_spec = vectorizer[0] ct.utils.convert_double_to_float_multiarray_type(preProc_spec) extractor = models.array_feature_extractor.create_array_feature_extractor( input_features=[("input",datatypes.Array(3,))], # Multiple input features output_name="output", extract_indices = 1 ) ct.utils.convert_double_to_float_multiarray_type(extractor) pipeline_network = pipeline.PipelineRegressor ( input_features = ["windSpeed", "theoreticalPowerCurve", "windDirection"], output_features=["output"] ) pipeline_network.add_model(preProc_spec) pipeline_network.add_model(extractor) ct.utils.convert_double_to_float_multiarray_type(pipeline_network.spec) ct.utils.save_spec(pipeline_network.spec,"Final.mlpackage") This model works ok. I created a regression NN using PyTorch and converted to Core ML either import torch import torch.nn as nn class TurbinePowerModel(nn.Module): def __init__(self): super().__init__() self.linear1 = nn.Linear(3, 4) self.activation1 = nn.ReLU() #self.linear2 = nn.Linear(5, 4) #self.activation2 = nn.ReLU() self.output = nn.Linear(4, 1) def forward(self, x): #x = F.normalize(x, dim = 0) x = self.linear1(x) x = self.activation1(x) # x = self.linear2(x) # x = self.activation2(x) x = self.output(x) return x def forward_inference(self, windSpeed,theoreticalPowerCurve,windDirection): input_tensor = torch.tensor([windSpeed, theoreticalPowerCurve, windDirection], dtype=torch.float32) return self.forward(input_tensor) model = torch.load('TurbinePowerRegression-1layer.pt', weights_only=False) import coremltools as ct print(ct.__version__) import pandas as pd from sklearn.preprocessing import StandardScaler df = pd.read_csv('T1_clean.csv',delimiter=';') X = df[['WindSpeed','TheoreticalPowerCurve','WindDirection']] y = df[['ActivePower']] scaler = StandardScaler() X = scaler.fit_transform(X) y = scaler.fit_transform(y) X_tensor = torch.tensor(X, dtype=torch.float32) y_tensor = torch.tensor(y, dtype=torch.float32) traced_model = torch.jit.trace(model, X_tensor[0]) mlmodel = ct.convert( traced_model, inputs=[ct.TensorType(name="input", shape=X_tensor[0].shape)], classifier_config=None # Optional, for classification tasks ) mlmodel.save("TurbineBase.mlpackage") This model has a Multiarray(Float 32 3) as input and a Multiarray(Float32 1) as output. When I try to include it in the middle of the pipeline (Adjusting the output and input types of the other models accordingly), the process runs ok, but I have the following error when opening the generated model on Xcode: What's is missing on the models. How can I set or adjust this metadata properly? Thanks!!!

Hi all! Nice to meet you., I am planning to build an iOS application that can: Capture an image using the camera or select one from the gallery. Remove the background and keep only the detected main object. Add a border (outline) around the detected object’s shape. Apply an animation along that border (e.g., moving light or glowing effect). Include a transition animation when removing the background — for example, breaking the background into pieces as it disappears. The app Capword has a similar feature for object isolation, and I’d like to build something like that. Could you please provide any guidance, frameworks, or sample code related to: Object segmentation and background removal in Swift (Vision or Core ML). Applying custom borders and shape animations around detected objects. Recognizing the object name (e.g., “person”, “cat”, “car”) after segmentation. Thank you very much for your support. Best regards, SINN SOKLYHOR

I got 3203.23 GFLOPS (FP16) on the M3 Macbook Pro and only 2833.24 GFLOPS (FP16) on the M4 Macbook Air for 4096x4096 matrix multiplications for a PyTorch MPS FP16 Benchmark. Wasn't the performance supposed to be twice as high on the M4 compared to the M3 even with the termal throtling on the Macbook Air? What went wrong?

In the play ground I'm trying to bias my LanguageModel to use a tool I registered, but I don't see it actually calling the tool. I'm following the developer video on landmarks itinerary generation tutorial almost verbatim. Is this a prompt engineering thing I'm missing? Or is it possible that I'm injecting my tool wrong?

@Generable enum Breakfast { case waffles case pancakes case bagels case eggs } do { let session = LanguageModelSession() let userInput = "I want something sweet." let prompt = "Pick the ideal breakfast for request: (userInput)" let response = try await session.respond(to: prompt,generating: Breakfast.self) print(response.content) } catch let error { print(error) } i want to test the @Generable demo but get error with below:decodingFailure(FoundationModels.LanguageModelSession.GenerationError.Context(debugDescription: "Failed to convert text into into GeneratedContent\nText: waffles", underlyingErrors: [Swift.DecodingError.dataCorrupted(Swift.DecodingError.Context(codingPath: [], debugDescription: "The given data was not valid JSON.", underlyingError: Optional(Error Domain=NSCocoaErrorDomain Code=3840 "Unexpected character 'w' around line 1, column 1." UserInfo={NSJSONSerializationErrorIndex=0, NSDebugDescription=Unexpected character 'w' around line 1, column 1.})))]))

Is it possible to train a model using CreateML to infer a relevance numeric score of a news article based on similar trained data, something like a sentiment score ? I created a Text Classifier that assigns a category label which works perfect but I would like a solution that calculates a numeric value, not a label.

During testing the “Bringing advanced speech-to-text capabilities to your app” sample app demonstrating the use of iOS 26 SpeechAnalyzer, I noticed that the language model for the English locale was presumably already downloaded. Upon checking the documentation of AssetInventory, I found out that indeed, the language model can be preinstalled on the system. Can someone from the dev team share more info about what assets are preinstalled by the system? For example, can we safely assume that the English language model will almost certainly be already preinstalled by the OS if the phone has the English locale?

I am running some experiments with WebGPU using the wgpu crate in rust. I have some Buffers already allocated in the GPU. Is it possible to use those already existing buffers directly as inputs to a predict call in CoreML? I want to prevent gpu to cpu download time as much as possible. Or are there any other ways to do something like this. Is this only possible using the latest Tensor object which came out with Metal 4 ?

I am follwing this tutorial: https://apple.github.io/coremltools/docs-guides/source/convert-a-torchvision-model-from-pytorch.html I have obtained simialr result using the python code. However when I view it in Xcode, the preview prediction percentage confidence is way off I suspect it is due the the output of the model, which is in percentage already and in Xcode it multiply 100 again leading to this result. Please give me any feedback to fix this, thank you.

I’m keep looking around documentation and some sample codes but still haven’t found example of how was used this type of Network Regressor . Does it take some special parameters to perform on ANE , what size,format of DataFrame ?

While runninf Apple Foundation Model in iPhone simulator, I got this error: IPC error: Underlying connection interrupted What does this mean? Related to foundation model?

I'm implementing an LLM with Metal Performance Shader Graph, but encountered a very strange behavior, occasionally, the model will report an error message as this: LLVM ERROR: SmallVector unable to grow. Requested capacity (9223372036854775808) is larger than maximum value for size type (4294967295) and crash, the stack backtrace screenshot is attached. Note that 5th frame is mlir::getIntValues<long long> and 6th frame is llvm::SmallVectorBase<unsigned int>::grow_pod It looks like mlir mistakenly took a 64 bit value for a 32 bit type. Unfortunately, I could not found the source code of mlir::getIntValues, maybe it's Apple's closed source fork of llvm for MPS implementation? Anyway, any opinion or suggestion on that?

In an under-development MacOS & iOS app, I need to identify various measurements from OCR'ed text: length, weight, counts per inch, area, percentage. The unit type (e.g. UnitLength) needs to be identified as well as the measurement's unit (e.g. .inches) in order to convert the measurement to the app's internal standard (e.g. centimetres), the value of which is stored the relevant CoreData entity. The use of NLTagger and NLTokenizer is problematic because of the various representations of the measurements: e.g. "50g.", "50 g", "50 grams", "1 3/4 oz." Currently, I use a bespoke algorithm based on String contains and step-wise evaluation of characters, which is reasonably accurate but requires frequent updating as further representations are detected. I'm aware of the Python SpaCy model being capable of NER Measurement recognition, but am reluctant to incorporate a Python-based solution into a production app. (ref [https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/30092]) My preference is for an open-source NER Measurement model that can be used as, or converted to, some form of a Swift compatible Machine Learning model. Does anyone know of such a model?

In my quantization code, the line: compressed_model_a8 = cto.coreml.experimental.linear_quantize_activations( model, activation_config, [{'img':np.random.randn(1,13,1024,1024)}] ) has taken 90 minutes to run so far and is still not completed. From debugging, I can see that the line it's stuck on is line 261 in _model_debugger.py: model = ct.models.MLModel( cloned_spec, weights_dir=self.weights_dir, compute_units=compute_units, skip_model_load=False, # Don't skip model load as we need model prediction to get activations range. ) Is this expected behaviour? Would it be quicker to run on another computer with more RAM?