Post

Replies

Boosts

Views

Activity

Reply to Terminated under 3.2(f) with no warning and no specific reason. Petition under review. Team ID S9D9F72QF8, Case 20000145868954
Update, one week later: Our reinstatement petition (Case 20000145868954) was denied on September 3. The response states the decision is final and that subsequent appeals will not be processed. Through the entire process, from the termination notice to the final denial, the specific conduct was never identified: not which app, not which action, not which finding. Our offer of supporting documentation, including trade registry records and a notarized declaration regarding our account history, was never taken up. We accept that the appeal process has concluded. We are leaving this thread here for two reasons: If anyone from Apple sees this: we are still only asking to be told what we were found to have done. We would correct any real issue immediately and prove the fix. For other developers: if you have been through a 3.2(f) termination where the reason was never stated, and you found any path that led to an actual explanation, we would be grateful to hear it. Thank you.
1d
Reply to Terminated under 3.2(f) with no warning and no specific reason. Petition under review. Team ID S9D9F72QF8, Case 20000145868954
Update, one week later: Our reinstatement petition (Case 20000145868954) was denied on September 3. The response states the decision is final and that subsequent appeals will not be processed. Through the entire process, from the termination notice to the final denial, the specific conduct was never identified: not which app, not which action, not which finding. Our offer of supporting documentation, including trade registry records and a notarized declaration regarding our account history, was never taken up. We accept that the appeal process has concluded. We are leaving this thread here for two reasons: If anyone from Apple sees this: we are still only asking to be told what we were found to have done. We would correct any real issue immediately and prove the fix. For other developers: if you have been through a 3.2(f) termination where the reason was never stated, and you found any path that led to an actual explanation, we would be grateful to hear it. Thank you.
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
1d