Hi Ziqiao, thanks for the reply. Let me explain the situation I'm facing with my CloudKit-powered app. Device A and B are both fully synced with the cloud. On Device A, the user deletes a bunch of records and continues to use the app, letting the app sync in the background. The user waits a few weeks before opening the app on Device B. When they open the app, it attempts to sync. The change token is expired, so it retrieves all of the records on the server. My app is designed to treat this as if this is the user's first sync (a "unify" sync), so it compares all records on the server with all local records, then uploads any local records missing from the cloud and downloads any cloud records missing from the local database. At this point, all of the items deleted in step 2 have been re-downloaded onto Device B. Currently, my app never checks deletedRecordIDs on a unify sync. An easy fix would be to start processing this array even on unify syncs. But from your reply, it sounds like this will be an empty array on Device B because the deletions happened on Device A. Is that true? If so, how can I resolve this problem? Unfortunately, it's somewhat common for my users to have a second device that they use very infrequently, and they get annoyed when previously deleted records re-appear on their second device. To make my question more concrete, here's some CloudKit code demonstrating the scenario: // device A let newRecord = CKRecord(recordType: "Entry", recordID: CKRecord.ID(recordName: "test")) newRecord["name"] = "Length" try await self.database.save(newRecord) // device B let (_, _, savedChangeToken, _) = try await self.database.recordZoneChanges(inZoneWith: self.zoneID, since: nil) // successfully receives the Entry record with id "test" and saves locally // we also persist savedChangeToken somewhere on device B // device A try await self.database.deleteRecord(withID: CKRecord.ID(recordName: "test")) // several weeks pass // device B (uses savedChangeToken from above, which has now expired) let (_, deletions, _, _) = try await self.database.recordZoneChanges(inZoneWith: self.zoneID, since: savedChangeToken) // is the following true or false? deletions.map(\.recordID).contains(CKRecord.ID(recordName: "test")) If it's false, how do I resolve the problem described above (deleted records re-appearing on the rarely-used device)?

Thanks, that's great to know! Just to understand it better: it will usually return all deleted records since the last change token, but if I pass nil, then which deleted records will I get: all deleted records ever? all deleted records since device last received data? something else? Just want to anticipate how many record ID's I should expect.

Answering my own question: I was able to do this by downloading LM Studio and installing a Devstral model from Mistral. Just start the server for that model and then set up a local model in Xcode. It's a local model, and works even with wifi turned off. I found the model didn't work nearly as well at understanding even medium-sized codebases and making changes. It was better suited for writing small snippets of code or maybe analyzing a single file.

Thanks, Quinn. I think I normally wouldn't have worried too much about this, but since I'm in the midst of the Swift 6 concurrency migration, I was worried it was related to something in my code. I think the message should state more clearly that it's an internal speech synthesizer issue, not really a "structural Swift Concurrency issue". I filed FB20484368. Thanks again for your help!

This is resolved in beta 4 - thanks!

Seeing this too - I filed FB18022139

Use CKContainer.publicCloudDatabase when running CloudKit operations. It sounds like you're using the private database. If this doesn't resolve your problem, include some relevant code or pseudocode in your post.

Thanks for the response. I'm aware of share extensions, but they appear above the sharing app and are totally separate from the main app's data. Using a share extension is going to require breaking down my code into frameworks and also finding ways to update shared data that the share extension can use from my main app. If I can simply open the image in my app (as in the example apps I mentioned above, like Instagram, Obsidian, etc), then all of that complexity is gone. However, it seems like CFBundleDocumentTypes (at least as I've configured it) will only achieve what I want when sharing a single photo from the Photos app. It doesn't work in Safari or Mail, or if I've selected multiple photos in the Photos app. These other apps are able to do all of those things, and yet they switch control to the receiving app instead of just appearing over the sending app like a share extension. How can I do the same thing?

This is an old question, but I'm having similar issues: changes to CFBundleDocumentTypes in my Info.plist just don't take effect, even after re-installing the app, cleaning and re-building, etc.

None of these solutions helped me (though I didn't try erasing my phone). I know this post is about a year old, but if you're encountering this same issue today with Xcode 16 and the iPhone 16, the following post from an Apple engineer contains a solution: https://forums.developer.apple.com/forums/thread/764196?answerId=804884022#804884022

In case anyone comes across this topic in the future, CKRecord is now officially Sendable (source). I believe this change was made in iOS 17.

I don't see that page anymore, but keep in mind that that pricing is only for usage of the public database. Usage of the private database comes out of the user's iCloud quota.

This happens if the interaction doesn't have an associated view. I think this should probably emit some kind of warning, but instead it just returns (0,0,0,0) as the bounds. To fix it, you need someImageView.addInteraction(interaction) before you access the subjects array.

Try using a didSet on each of the AppStorage fields. This can either: immediately call updateAvailableWords whenever there's a change set a flag indicating that availableWords is out of date; make availableWords a computed property that updates itself only if that flag is true Also, I would make availableWords private(set) - external clients should not be manipulating it directly.

I know this is an old question, but you can test this kind of error-handling logic by temporarily adding code to throw these errors, e.g.: throw CKError(.requestRateLimited, [CKErrorRetryAfterKey: NSNumber(value: 10)