Still waiting, lol.

Still waiting, lol.

Still waiting, lol.

Still waiting, lol.

Still waiting, lol.

Still waiting, lol.

Still waiting, lol.

Still waiting, lol.

Oops, looks like a glitch! Sorry for the multiple posts.

Hi again, I noticed one more detail that might cause a 5.6 rejection: 4 . Misleading Price Presentation On the Yearly plan, having the monthly equivalent ($1.99) on the right directly above the $9.99 Monthly plan can be confusing. I feel users might just compare those two numbers and overlook the actual $23.90 yearly charge. I think making the total yearly cost the main price is a better way to avoid misunderstanding. For example: Yearly $23.90 / year (Equivalent to $1.99 / month)

Since others suggested reading the official documentation, I’d recommend looking at App Store Review Guideline 3.1.2(c) and especially Section 3.8(b) of Schedule 2. Comparing your screen against the specific requirements listed in those documents should help you figure out what the reviewers think is missing.