I recently had to make a change to my Mac app where I need to add a special "Contact Notes" entitlement, so that means that I can't rely on "Automatic Code Signing" anymore. So here are the steps I took to build and distribute the app with manual code signing: from "Certificates, Identifiers & Profiles" from the Developer, I added entitlement to my app identifier, and then created new manual provisioning profiles (one for "macOS App Development" under Development, and one for "Mac App Store" under Distribution) in Xcode, added the entitlement to the Entitlements files in Xcode, in Signing & Capabilities, unselected the checkbox for "Automatically manage signing", and under "Provisioning Profile", for both Debug and Release builds, I chose to import the new provisioning profiles that were created I can build and run in debug mode, and it works fine. I then created an 'archive' of the app, which also built fine, and opened up Organizer. In Organizer, I choose the "Distribute" button, select "App Store Connect" as the distribution method, and choose "Upload" as the destination. After it prepares the archive, it shows the usual two checkboxes for "upload app symbols" and "manage version and build number", and I select Next. Till now, everything works as expected. Now I get the "Select certificates and Mac App Store profiles" page ... here, for the dropdowns for my app's targets, I select the correct provisioning profiles. BUT .. the "Next" button never next gets enabled, so I can't move forward! There's no error message, or anything in Console that makes sense to me. But I just can't seem to be able to select "Next" to the final step before uploading the build to App Store Connect. When I went back and selected "Automatically manage signing" again, and build and archive, the new archive doesn't have this step again, so it works fine and goes to the final upload page. What can I do to find out the issue that's causing this page to not validate? Can I upload the archive build through some other way (like from Terminal) that might give more information? NEVERMIND: turns out, I needed to "Mac Installer Distribution" Certificate, which I generated from the dropbox.

I have been using CLGeocoder’s “geocodePostalAddress” API for many years, and it’s been working just fine. Since yesterday, a lot of users have started complaining that they are getting “no results” for their geocoding requests, and I have also confirmed this case. It seems like the “geocodePostalAddress” returns “No Result” in many cases where it used to work correctly before, even though the “geocodeAddressString” API still works correctly. Has anyone else noticed this problem? Has there been some server change that is causing this? Here's a unit test I wrote to test this out: import CoreLocation final class CJTestCLGeocoderRequests: XCTestCase { func testGeocoderWithCNPostalAddressBerkeley() async throws {         let geocoder = CLGeocoder()         do {             let postalAddress = CNMutablePostalAddress()                         postalAddress.street = "2300 College Ave"             postalAddress.city = "Berkeley"             postalAddress.state = "CA"             postalAddress.postalCode = "94108"             postalAddress.country = "United States"             let placemarks3 = try await geocoder.geocodePostalAddress(postalAddress)             XCTAssertTrue(placemarks3.count > 0, "Geocoder works and gets an placemark")             XCTAssertTrue(placemarks3.first?.postalCode == "94108", "Geocode placemark has right postal code")         } catch {             XCTFail("Geocoder failed: placemarks = \(error).") // get failure here, with error code 8 (         }         do {             let collegeAveString = "2300 College Ave, Berkeley, CA, 94704, United States"             let placemarksString = try await geocoder.geocodeAddressString(collegeAveString)             XCTAssertTrue(placemarksString.count > 0, "Geocoder works and gets an placemark")             XCTAssertTrue(placemarksString.first?.postalCode == "94704", "Geocode placemark has right postal code")         } catch {             XCTFail("Geocoder failed: placemark string = \(error).")         }     } Would love any help regarding this.

I want to test my UNUserNotificationCenter authorization workflow for my MacOS app. I can't seem to find a way to reset the authorization status to notDetermined again. tccutil doesn't seem to contain any options for this. Any suggestions?

Hi, I have been using the BackgroundTasks API on iOS for a while, and it works great. I want to do something similar on macOS, where I can easily run some background process from my app every X minutes, even if the app is closed. My Mac app runs in the sandbox, and isn't Catalyst-based, so I can't run the UIKit 'BackgroundTasks' API, and I haven't found anything similar on macOS. Does something like that exist, that is easy to adopt?

Hi, I have a paid macOS app available in the Mac App Store for the past few years, and I'm looking into converting it into a freemium app. I wanted to add a check to see if the app was purchased legitimately or not, since I know there's a lot of pirated copies available on the internet. I just did some basic analytics with the app already on the store, the app receipt validation fails because there's no file found at the receipt URL location. I'm just doing this basic check and it fails for a lot of the cases ....     NSURL *receiptURL = [NSBundle mainBundle].appStoreReceiptURL;     BOOL exists = [[NSFileManager defaultManager] fileExistsAtPath:receiptURL.path isDirectory:nil]; Does this signify that the user has a non-AppStore copy of the app? Or could the receipt be missing for other legitimate reasons? Do I have to make a call to refresh the receipt to confirm this (as I would on iOS)? Again, this is for an existing app on the Mac App Store, not testing for sandbox users. Thanks.

Hi, I plan to use the new AppTransaction.shared API in StoreKit2 to find the user's original purchase date and version for my macOS app. However, when testing this running in the debugger, the app shows up with an App Store login prompt, asking for my login and password, which is undesirable. I wanted to know if this is just a sandbox quirk, or is the "AppTransaction.shared" API supposed to trigger this prompt for all users, even in production? In that case, is it like the old "Refresh receipt" API where we shouldn't trigger this automatically when a user opens the app, and instead have a button somewhere that triggers the call? Thanks.

Hi, I am developing a 'framework' for a client so they can embed some of my code into their own custom app. I'm confused a bit about the best option to distribute this. I have created an iOS 'framework' within my Xcode project and added all the necessary files there. Can I just build the framework and send them the build folder for the framework? Or is it better to generate an .xcframework that I read about somewhere? I'm just not completely sure about the benefits for distributing an .xcframework file (which there doesn't seem to be an option to generate from Xcode) over just the .framework folder from the built products? Thanks.

Hi, I am working on distributing a 'framework' I made to a client. The framework itself has a couple of dependencies on a couple of 3rd-party frameworks. Also, I don't want to disclose my source code to the client. So after doing some research, it seems like the best way to do this would be to use Swift Packages, and make it a binary distribution, which would basically wrap a .xcframework (which I would generate with my source code). But I'm confused about the next steps ... how would I go about sharing the 'package' with the client? Would I just zip up the 'package' folder and email it to them, and they can unzip it on their end, and add it to their project by using "Add local package"? Or is there a more elegant way to do this, which doesn't require publishing a package publicly?

I am trying to create a Swift Package for a custom framework I'm building for a client. The framework has a dependency on a couple of 3rd party frameworks. I've read about how even though binary frameworks don't support dependencies directly, there is way to do this with a 'wrapper' target, so this is what I came up with for Package.swift: let package = Package( name: "SBCardScannerFramework", platforms: [ .iOS(.v16) ], products: [ // Products define the executables and libraries a package produces, and make them visible to other packages. .library( name: "SBCardScannerFramework", targets: ["SBCardScannerFramework-Target"]), ], dependencies: [ // Dependencies declare other packages that this package depends on. .package(url: "https://github.com/apple/swift-algorithms.git", from: "1.0.0"), .package(url: "https://github.com/marmelroy/PhoneNumberKit.git", from: "3.3.3") ], targets: [ .target(name: "SBCardScannerFramework-Target", dependencies: [ .target(name: "SBCardScannerFramework", condition: .when(platforms: [.iOS])), .product(name: "Algorithms", package: "swift-algorithms"), .product(name: "PhoneNumberKit", package: "PhoneNumberKit") ] ), .binaryTarget(name: "SBCardScannerFramework", path: "SBCardScannerFramework.xcframework") ] ) This works, and I can add the package to my test project and import the framework and it links against the dependancies as well, and works correctly. The problem is that every time I run the app, it also shows these messages in the Xcode console: objc[845]: Class _TtC14PhoneNumberKitP33_0FE53357E470A64027C8F0CAF7B114C812BundleFinder is implemented in both /private/var/containers/Bundle/Application/EEE0C0A6-4FF5-44BC-B81A-F95401219D32/TestSBCardScannerFrameworkImport.app/Frameworks/SBCardScannerFramework.framework/SBCardScannerFramework (0x100f4aaf0) and /private/var/containers/Bundle/Application/EEE0C0A6-4FF5-44BC-B81A-F95401219D32/TestSBCardScannerFrameworkImport.app/TestSBCardScannerFrameworkImport (0x10069b778). One of the two will be used. Which one is undefined. There's multiple lines for different classes that show the "Class X is implemented in both [.../MyApp.app/Frameworks/MyFramework.frameworkMyFramework/] and [.../MyApp.app/MyApp]". I'm not sure how to avoid this problem, and whether this could cause a problem down the line. The framework that is the basis for this Swift Package is linked against the two dependencies, because I wouldn't be able to build the framework without them. But they also need to be added to the app target (at least, and if I don't, I get a run-time crash when using the PhoneNumberKit initializer. PhoneNumberKit/resource_bundle_accessor.swift:40: Fatal error: unable to find bundle named PhoneNumberKit_PhoneNumberKit Is there a good way to resolve this issue? I'm worried this will could be a problem for the client when they integrate it into their app, and the app is deployed to 1000s of devices.

Hi, I am getting a linking error when building my app to run against an iOS17 device, using Xcode15. Same project builds and runs fine with Xcode 14 and iOS16. The linking error just says: clang: error: unable to execute command: Segmentation fault: 11 clang: error: linker command failed due to signal (use -v to see invocation) Not sure what I should try to overcome this. I can't run my app on an iOS17 device. It builds, links and runs just fine on a simulator.

Hi, I need to keep supporting iOS16 for my widgets. I'm having a problem using the iOS17 'containerBackground' API. Ideally I would use a view extension: extension View { func adoptableWidgetBackground(_ color: Color) -> some View { if #available(iOS 17.0, *) { containerBackground(for: .widget) { color } } else { background(color) } } } But this gives an error: Branches have mismatching types 'some View' (result of 'Self.containerBackground(for:alignment:content:)') and 'some View' (result of 'Self.background(_:alignment:)') If I try to use this directly on the 'body' view modifier like this: if #available(iOS 17.0, *) { .containerBackground(for: .widget) { ContainerRelativeShape().fill(Color.init(UIColor.quaternarySystemFill)) } } else { .background(ContainerRelativeShape().fill(Color.init(UIColor.quaternarySystemFill))) } This doesn't work either. Instance member 'containerBackground' cannot be used on type 'View' How do I use this correctly?

Hi, Is there a way to take a screenshot of just your widget, in code or even some user action? Thanks.

Hi, My iOS app includes 4 dependencies added through SPM, and a xcframework file from an external source. When I build the iOS app for the visionOS simulator, it works fine, and it runs in the compatibility mode. When I try to build for the new visionOS SDK, I get build errors related to these external dependencies, like "When building for visionOS Simulator, no library for this platform was found ..." How do I remove these dependencies for just the visionOS SDK? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.

When I build my iOS app for the visionOS simulator, it works fine, and it runs in the compatibility mode. When I try to build against the new visionOS SDK, I get build errors related to the bridging header: SimpleList-Bridging-Header.h:5:9: error: 'MyFramework/MyFramework.h' file not found #import <MyFramework/MyFramework.h> ^ 1 error generated. :0: error: failed to emit precompiled header '...DerivedData/CJ-bkylkdabwgxlstdympoknglfewum/Build/Intermediates.noindex/PrecompiledHeaders/SimpleList-Bridging-Header-swift_3HAL1I7NW16O7-clang_3RN0BYG6SZHIS.pch' for bridging header '.../SimpleList/Classes/SimpleList-Bridging-Header.h' 2 errors generated. I don't know why it's not finding my framework for the visionOS SDK, while it works fine for the iOS SDK. The framework is included in the project itself (i.e. it's not an external dependency). Any tips?

Hi, I am testing out an update for my app in macOS Sonoma. I first installed the App Store version of my app on the device running macOS Sonoma, and it ran fine. I then installed an updated version of my app through TestFlight (built with macOS Ventura SDK), but when I run this updated version, I get prompted ”MyApp differs from previously opened versions. Are you sure you want to open it?". Why is this happening? Is this warning only because the app is updated through TestFlight, or do I need to do something to prevent this warning from happening when I update my app through the App Store? I see this mentioned in an Apple security update:: App Sandbox now associates your macOS app with its sandbox container using its code signature. The operating system asks the person using your app to grant permission if it tries to access a sandbox container associated with a different app. For more information, see Accessing files from the macOS App Sandbox. My app is already sandboxed, and I'm not trying to access a different app's sandbox container, just my own. For the TestFlight build, it probably also uses the same Release configuration that the App Store build uses. I might have changed my provisioning profiles recently because they expired. Would that affect this and cause a prompt to be showed? Would love to know more about this prompt and how to avoid it. Thanks.