Thank you! This poses a highly dangerous monopoly, and I hope the governments of different countries will address and eliminate it in the future.

@App Review Could you please explain why app rejections under Guideline 4.3(a) Design – Spam come without any specific details? I have asked for clarification multiple times, yet I continue to receive the same generic response. I would appreciate a clear and detailed explanation of what exactly needs to be changed to ensure my app complies with Apple's guidelines. Instead of providing details you propose a meeting with an apple experts who obviously won't be able to provide details by phone.

@App Review Why do your colleagues reject apps under Guideline 4.3(a) – Design – Spam without providing any real details? I ask specific questions, yet all I get is the same robotic, useless response. Do actual people review these apps, or is this just an automated system blindly rejecting submissions? If a real reviewer is involved, I expect a proper explanation of what exactly needs to be changed to meet Apple's guidelines. Or the only way to move forward is to submite an appeal?

Could you please clarify why app rejections under Guideline 4.3(a) – Design – Spam come with only generic responses? I provide detailed information and ask for specifics, yet the replies are always the same standard message without any useful details. Is the review process entirely automated, or can I receive a meaningful response to understand what exactly needs to be changed for my app to comply with Apple's guidelines?