Could you please clarify why app rejections under Guideline 4.3(a) – Design – Spam come with only generic responses? I provide detailed information and ask for specifics, yet the replies are always the same standard message without any useful details. Is the review process entirely automated, or can I receive a meaningful response to understand what exactly needs to be changed for my app to comply with Apple's guidelines?

@App Review Why do your colleagues reject apps under Guideline 4.3(a) – Design – Spam without providing any real details? I ask specific questions, yet all I get is the same robotic, useless response. Do actual people review these apps, or is this just an automated system blindly rejecting submissions? If a real reviewer is involved, I expect a proper explanation of what exactly needs to be changed to meet Apple's guidelines. Or the only way to move forward is to submite an appeal?

@App Review Could you please explain why app rejections under Guideline 4.3(a) Design – Spam come without any specific details? I have asked for clarification multiple times, yet I continue to receive the same generic response. I would appreciate a clear and detailed explanation of what exactly needs to be changed to ensure my app complies with Apple's guidelines. Instead of providing details you propose a meeting with an apple experts who obviously won't be able to provide details by phone.

Thank you! This poses a highly dangerous monopoly, and I hope the governments of different countries will address and eliminate it in the future.