Revisit the design of your data model. Does it represent the state of each question as in being answered or not answered in addition to the question being answered? So when the table view is reloaded it takes into the various states persisted in the data model as it renders the cell.

The system sometimes does this.

Well both can't be presented at the same time. When $isPresente1 is set true always set $isPresente2 to false and vice versa. The correct thing to will be to use only one fullScreenCover and based on some other state show the appropriate view. Something like below but you will have to work out the details. content .fullScreenCover(isPresented: $isPresente1 || $isPresente2, content: { if isPresente1 { return SOMEView() } else if isPresente2 { return SomeView2() } else { EmptyView() } })

You might have better luck using one of your Code Level Support Tickets where Apple can investigate directly & discreetly.

It's very real for US-based developers. https://smallappdeveloperassistance.com Here is the actual federal court record: https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-cand-4_19-cv-03074 One of the four law firms: https://www.hbsslaw.com/press/apple-ios-app-developers/us-ios-developers-to-benefit-from-100-million-apple-small-developer-assistance-fund-and-changes-to-app-store-policies-in-developer-antitrust-class-action-settlement Important Dates March 21, 2022 — Exclusion Deadline March 21, 2022 — Objection Deadline May 20, 2022 — Claim Deadline June 7, 2022, at 2 P.M. — Final Approval Hearing Do your due diligence in finding the three law firms but this is one of the four law firms that handled the case for the various plaintiffs and mentions the same site above responsible for dispursing the funds. The Canadian Developers are probably sleeping on this one

Do you see the ability to do so anywhere in the API frameworks, app-purchase setups or anywhere else unless you only permit your in the target stores?

What specific App technology of the device will your app be implementing? If none then stick to a website?

Are the sandbox entitlements under capabilities enabled and any permission request implemented?

If running on the simulator the MacBook must be equipped with a touch bar or touch id otherwise should be supported on an A7 or later A-series CPU. To prevent the crash on a sim with a touch bar or touch id remove kSecAttrTokenID as String: kSecAttrTokenIDSecureEnclave, or exclude it from sim builds. https://developer.apple.com/documentation/security/certificate_key_and_trust_services/keys/storing_keys_in_the_secure_enclave

Please post your issue on the React Native github site: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/issues

Xamarin is not an Apple product please post your question at microsoft.

Post your question here https://github.com/facebook/react-native/issues react is not an apple product.

Ask this question on the React Native github project.

It still has to find the broadcaster by mac-address by asking who is the broadcaster.

This example shows that it does print on the first selection: import SwiftUI struct ContentView: View {     @State var fruitName: String = "none"     var body: some View {         VStack {             Menu {                 PickFruit(fruitName: $fruitName)             } label: {Text("Select A Fruit")}             Text(fruitName)         }         .onChange(of: fruitName) { [fruitName] newValue in // move onchange to here             print(newValue)             print(fruitName)         }     } } struct PickFruit: View {     let myFruits: [String] = ["Apple","Banana","Grape","Peach"]     @Binding var fruitName: String     var body: some View {         VStack {             Text(fruitName)             Picker("Select", selection: $fruitName) {                 ForEach(myFruits, id: \.self) { myFruits in                     Text(myFruits)                 }             }         }     } }