Post

Replies

Boosts

Views

Activity

Reply to 4.2.2 Design: Minimum Functionality
You are right that it is always hazardous to try to guess the full rational of rejection, and hence difficult to identify what to prioritize from the roadmap. I can safely say that it is not a repackaged website, so this what is somewhat frustrating. Your suggestion is similar to what is in the roadmap: allow the user to discover more topics about the book and create a conversation type interaction with a specific AI. Thank you for your suggestion.
Dec ’24
Reply to 4.2.2 Design: Minimum Functionality
Thank you very much for your replies and your consideration.
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Dec ’24
Reply to 4.2.2 Design: Minimum Functionality
You are right that it is always hazardous to try to guess the full rational of rejection, and hence difficult to identify what to prioritize from the roadmap. I can safely say that it is not a repackaged website, so this what is somewhat frustrating. Your suggestion is similar to what is in the roadmap: allow the user to discover more topics about the book and create a conversation type interaction with a specific AI. Thank you for your suggestion.
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Dec ’24
Reply to App rejected without violating any Guidelines
Hi! I am in the same situation! My app is not violating any guidelines. it has some Christian content, very mild, and I honestly think that some people in the review team are prejudiced. They complained that the app has in app donation, but it does not. Is there someone one can complain to? Ana
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Oct ’24