I spent 20 minutes trying to figure out why codesigning was failing -- I had the pf block set up correctly, my keychains were unlocked, and then, eventually, it occurred to me, hey, maybe an IP address changed, so I disabled IPv6 except for link local, and then amazingly, it went back to working. I filed FB13706261 over a year ago. This is ridiculous.

This has happened a few times, including out in the field; it's happened on macOS 14 and 15 I think. "This" is: our app runs, activates the extension, it has to get user approval, and... the system dialogue window never appears. The extension stays waiting for user approval. I've got sysdiagnose from one of the systems, and I see the system log about it going into the user approval needed state, and... nothing else. It's there in Settings, and can be approved then. Has anyone run into this? Ever?

On one test machine, our extension wouldn't load, because [NETransparentProxyManager loadAllFromPreferencesWithCompletionHandler] can't find a manager, saying Skipping configuration appname because it is of the wrong type. This is the first time I've seen this behaviour. (The containing app tries to find a configuration, if it can't find it it creates one, then modifies whatever it found or created, then stores it. I don't have the right logging yet for that, so I can't see the error messages. [NSLog instead of os_log_error.])

Clearly not percentage, but the units don't seem to be specified... The real problem we have right now is that, with macOS 15.5, our suite gets a huge amount of "energy impact" points, even though diving into it, it doesn't seem to do that. The most telling example I have of that is: I ran each of our daemons from Terminal, unplugged my laptop, closed the lid, and let it stay there for 8 or 9 hours. When I woke it back up, Activity Monitor claimed it had 2,000 units or so, but after opening all of the disclosure triangles, none of the processes (including the hand-started daemons) used anything close to that. Also, the battery had almost no drain on it. We're getting complaints about this, so I'm trying to figure out what, exactly is going on, but I never looked at the power stuff internally so I don't know how to read the diagnostic files.

For login purposes, we may want to try automatically checking to see if an email address is set up in certain databases. It looks like the preferred way to do this is via ABAddressBook.shared().me(), then get the right key via in the properties? This, however, is treated as accessing the whole address book and brings up a confirmation dialogue. However, as I thought about it, that might not be the real way we'd want -- we'd want to go through Active Directory, perhaps? Am I making any sense, or just being incoherent? 😄

The stuff I've found by searching has confused me, so hopefully someone can help simplify it for me? I have an app (I use it for logging which books I've given away), and I could either add a bunch of things to the app, or I could have another app (possibly a CLI tool) to generate some reports I'd like.

It looks like, for some reason, our apps are using a bunch of power sometimes. sysdiagnose has this in the power log: Never mind. Including the output of sysdiagnose has "sensitive language," and it won't tell me what is sensitive, making this a waste of my time. ETA: Ok, I I can attach the file: power.log I've gone through the energy documentation, but it seems geared towards embedded, not macOS, so I'm not sure how I can figure this out more. The extra problem, of course, is that we have a network extension, two daemons, and a GUI app. 😄

% mkdir /tmp/test % cd /tmp/test % touch {a,b,c}{1,2,3,4,5,6}.txt % lf a1.txt a3.txt a5.txt b1.txt b3.txt b5.txt c1.txt c3.txt c5.txt a2.txt a4.txt a6.txt b2.txt b4.txt b6.txt c2.txt c4.txt c6.txt % echo [b-z]*.txt a1.txt a2.txt a3.txt a4.txt a5.txt a6.txt b1.txt b2.txt b3.txt b4.txt b5.txt b6.txt c1.txt c2.txt c3.txt c4.txt c5.txt c6.txt I filed FB16715590 about this. I have a vague memory this might be related to some code to pretend to be case insensitive, but I can't find it now.

* [Error] Failed to stop recording session: Failed stoping ktrace session. (xcode-select version 2409) So why can't it stop the ktrace session? And how long has that typo been around? 😄 (Look, I've kept typos in log messages for years because it differentiated that message from other messages.)

My load average on a largely idle system is around 22, going up to 70 or so periodically; SSMenuAgent seems to be consuming lots of CPU (and, looking at spindump, it certainly seems busy), but... it's not happening on any other system whose screens I am observing. (Er, I know about load average limitations, the process is also consuming 70-98% CPU according to both top and Activity Monitor.) Since this machine (although idle) has our network extension, I'm trying to figure out if this is due to that, or of this is generally expected. Anyone?

I have this code: var eventIn = kevent(ident: UInt(self.socket), filter: Int16(EVFILT_WRITE), flags: UInt16((EV_ADD | EV_ENABLE)), fflags: 0, data: 0, udata: nil ) I looked at it and thought why do I have those extra parentheses? So I changed it to var eventIn = kevent(ident: UInt(self.socket), filter: Int16(EVFILT_WRITE), flags: UInt16(EV_ADD | EV_ENABLE), // changed line! fflags: 0, data: 0, udata: nil ) and then kevent gave me EBADF. Does this make sense to anyone?

A few hours ago, it took 3 minutes to get the notarization phase of our build done... now I've got one that's been running for 25 minutes and hasn't finished yet. The last time this happened, the waits got up to multiple hours, and the status page didn't get updated.

This has been going on for at least a couple of hours for us: notarizing doesn't complete. Our last job ran for over 90 minutes before CircleCI timed it out. We're using xcrun notarytool submit with the --wait option; it contined to say "Current status: In Progress" for, as I said, 90 minutes or so. (Normally it takes about 70 seconds.) https://developer.apple.com/system-status/ says everything is normal. This does not seem to be the case for us. 😄

I added ES_EVENT_TYPE_AUTH_SIGNAL to the event list, and added logging: os_log_debug(esfLogger, "antitampering signal %d from process %{public}s to process %{public}s", esm.signal, signing.UTF8String, targetSigning.UTF8String); I get some logs, such as 2024-12-09 10:21:47.668034+0000 0xc2c562 Debug 0x0 29448 0 DopeMonitorService: [security.dope:anti-tamper] antitampering signal 0 from process com.apple.spindump to process com.apple.mds_stores But when I do sudo kill -9 ${ourappprocess}, the proess dies with no log generated. (This is a different process than the one using ESF; the goal is, obviously, to keep our processes from being killed, but I'm only at the logging stage so far.) sudo kill -INFO ${ourappprocess} works: 2024-12-09 10:21:38.410851+0000 0xc2c562 Debug 0x0 29448 0 Monitor: [debug:anti-tamper] antitampering signal 29 from process com.apple.csh to process Worker So it is getting through to the monitoring process. But kill -9 ... isn't. Am I missing something obvious again?

Multiple times a day, every time I open a new window for forums.developer.apple.com, if I'm signed in, it asks me if I want to opt in to notifications. Even if I click on the opt in button. I've just reproduced it five times in a row here. What is going on?