We're using this (on a mac) to do 3rd party authentication. The completion handler is getting Authentication session got error: [The operation couldn’t be completed. (com.apple.AuthenticationServices.WebAuthenticationSession error 1.)], in domain: [com.apple.AuthenticationServices.WebAuthenticationSession] That seems to be generated if the auth window is closed. However... it's not being closed, so we end up spawning a second one to do it, and this one seems to work.

Since we've had a lot of problems with XPC (bad design on my part, I'm sure), I tried changing the data communications between the TPP and the userland proxy to use sockets -- in this case (I've so many, many cases), I am trying to do an http proxy (so the TPP connects to, say, port 12345, sends CONNECT ${host}:${port} HTTP/1.0 X-Proxy-Host: ${host}:${port} It then reads a response, looking for a 200. So that part works -- once I added the networking client entitlement, I could connect and write that and read the response. Now we are cooking with gas, right? The application doing the connection (eg, curl) then sends the normal HTTP request, the TPP gets it, it writes it to the socket it created, the write succeeds (that is, returns the number of bytes in the request), and... it doesn't show up on the interface. (Using tcpdump -i lo0 -s 0 -vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv -A port 12345.) Since it doesn't show up on the interface, the user-land proxy doesn't get it, and things are very confused for everyone. If the connect() failed, I'd say, ah yes, sandboxed to heck and back, even with the entitlement can't do it. Or if the first write() or read() failed. But they don't fail, and the first round works. If the second write() failed, I could see that. But it both succeeds and doesn't succeed, and quantum confuses the heck out of me.

I was trying to check the documentation for handleNewUDPFlow over at https://developer.apple.com/documentation/networkextension/neappproxyprovider/3192017-handlenewudpflow and... it says it's deprecated on everything. Retroactively.

I have var idleScanTimer = DispatchSource.makeTimerSource() as a class ivar. When the object is started, I have self.idleScanTimer.schedule(deadline: .now(), repeating: Double(5.0*60)) (and it sets an event handler, that checks some times.) When the object is stopped, it calls self.idleScanTimer.cancel(). At some point, the object containing it is deallocated, and ... sometimes, I think, not always, it crashes: Crashed Thread: 61 Dispatch queue: NEFlow queue [...] Application Specific Information: BUG IN CLIENT OF LIBDISPATCH: Release of an inactive object [...] Thread 61 Crashed:: Dispatch queue: NEFlow queue 0 libdispatch.dylib 0x7ff81c1232cd _dispatch_queue_xref_dispose.cold.2 + 24 1 libdispatch.dylib 0x7ff81c0f84f6 _dispatch_queue_xref_dispose + 55 2 libdispatch.dylib 0x7ff81c0f2dec -[OS_dispatch_source _xref_dispose] + 17 3 com.kithrup.simpleprovider 0x101df5fa7 MyClass.deinit + 87 4 com.kithrup.simpleprovider 0x101dfbdbb MyClass.__deallocating_deinit + 11 5 libswiftCore.dylib 0x7ff829a63460 _swift_release_dealloc + 16 6 com.kithrup.simpleprovider 0x101e122f4 0x101de7000 + 176884 7 libswiftCore.dylib 0x7ff829a63460 _swift_release_dealloc + 16 8 libsystem_blocks.dylib 0x7ff81bfdc654 _Block_release + 130 9 libsystem_blocks.dylib 0x7ff81bfdc654 _Block_release + 130 10 libdispatch.dylib 0x7ff81c0f3317 _dispatch_client_callout + 8 11 libdispatch.dylib 0x7ff81c0f9317 _dispatch_lane_serial_drain + 672 12 libdispatch.dylib 0x7ff81c0f9dfd _dispatch_lane_invoke + 366 13 libdispatch.dylib 0x7ff81c103eee _dispatch_workloop_worker_thread + 753 14 libsystem_pthread.dylib 0x7ff81c2a7fd0 _pthread_wqthread + 326 15 libsystem_pthread.dylib 0x7ff81c2a6f57 start_wqthread + 15 I tried changing it to an optional and having the deinit call .cancel() and set it to nil, but it still crashes. I can't figure out how to get it deallocated in a small, standalone test program.

That's pretty much it -- I can increase memory, file descriptor, etc., but can I increase the number of threads? (I've got a case where, in an error condition, my threads block [still trying to figure out why] and new ones are still being generated, until I hit a limit of 512 threads.)

That's probably a bad title, let's try with specifics: we have a network extension, it has some classes / functions of its own, and they, when push comes to build, depend on (for example) NEAppProxyFlow and its subclasses. The code is written in Swift, since it is the language of the future. If I want to do a unit test for my code, I need to provide something that at least looks like NEAppProxyFlow, since I can't otherwise create one. I thought I could provide my own NetworkExtension module for test case, but that... did not work well, and I still don't understand why. On the other hand, I'm really bad at making unit tests, so the odds that I'm missing something fairly obvious to most other people are pretty high.

I have this in my start code: for p in [4500] + Array(3478...3497) + Array(16384...16387) + Array(16393...16402) { // According to the documentation, I *should* be able to // use "" for the hostname, and prefix:0, but it complained // about the prefix length, so we use the top bit for ipv4 // and ipv6. let port = "\(p)" os_log(.debug, log: Self.log, "Setting up to exclude port %{public}s", port) let host_1 = NWHostEndpoint(hostname:"0.0.0.0", port: port) let host_2 = NWHostEndpoint(hostname:"255.0.0.0", port: port) let host_3 = NWHostEndpoint(hostname:"0::0", port: port) let host_4 = NWHostEndpoint(hostname:"ffff::0", port: port) for host in [host_1, host_3] { let udpPortRule = NENetworkRule(destinationNetwork: host, prefix:1, protocol: .UDP) excludeRules.append(udpPortRule) } } settings.excludedNetworkRules = excludeRules This produces the log message 2024-07-23 11:16:38.335649+0100 0x901984 Debug 0x0 20686 0 com.kithrup.SimpleTPP.Provider: [com.kithrup:Provider] Setting up to exclude port 3483 Later on, when running, I log the new flows in handleNewUDPFlow(:,initialRemoteEndpoint:), and it produces 2024-07-23 11:17:05.712055+0100 0x901984 Debug 0x0 20686 0 com.kithrup.SimpleTPP.Provider: [com.kithrup:Provider] handleNewUDPFlow(_:initialRemoteEndpoint:): new UDP flow for host 17.252.13.7:3483 app com.apple.identityservicesd So port 3483 is definitely in the excludedRules array, but it's not being excluded. (All of this is because I still can't figure out why FaceTime isn't working with us.)

BUG IN CLIENT OF LIBDISPATCH: Unexpected EV_VANISHED (do not destroy random mach ports or file descriptors) Which, ok, clear: somehow a file descriptor is being closed before DispatchIO.close() is called, yes? Only I can't figure out where it is being closed. I am currently using change_fdguard_np() to prevent closes anywhere else, and every single place where I call Darwin.close() is preceded by another call to change_fdguard_npand thenDispatchIO.close()`. eg self.unguardSocket() self.readDispatcher?.close() Darwin.close(self.socket) self.socket = -1 self.completion(self)

Using our transparent proxy provider, I noticed that the mbuf usage was... weird: 15839/750028 mbufs in use: 15810 mbufs allocated to data 29 mbufs allocated to packet headers 734189 mbufs allocated to caches The amount allocated to caches does go down a bit, but nothing significantly. I started looking into this because I've had a couple of panics from remoted not checking in enough, and it was (as I recall, I can't find the crash logs now) mbuf-related. I've looked through an older version of the xnu source, and nothing jumped out, but that doesn't have the code for the network extension support. I hate mbufs and always have.

The archive build part works, and uses the correct entitlements file: [Key] com.apple.developer.networking.networkextension [Value] [Array] [String] app-proxy-provider-systemextension That's from codesign -dv --entitlements - ...../NetworkExtensionExperiment.app However, the distribution log shows "Error Domain=DVTPortalProfileErrorDomain Code=4 \"Cannot create a Developer ID provisioning profile for \"com.kithrup.NetworkExtensionExperiment\".\" UserInfo={NSLocalizedDescription=Cannot create a Developer ID provisioning profile for \"com.kithrup.NetworkExtensionExperiment\"., IDEDistributionIssueSeverity=3, NSLocalizedRecoverySuggestion=The Network Extensions capability is not available for Developer ID provisioning profiles. Disable this feature and try again., NSUnderlyingError=0x600013e719b0 {Error Domain=DVTPortalProfileTypeErrorDomain Code=0 \"Cannot create a Developer ID provisioning profile.\" UserInfo={UnsupportedFeatureNames=(\n \"Network Extensions\"\n), NSLocalizedDescription=Cannot create a Developer ID provisioning profile., NSLocalizedRecoverySuggestion=The Network Extensions capability is not available for Developer ID provisioning profiles. Disable this feature and try again.}}}", "Error Domain=IDEProfileLocatorErrorDomain Code=1 \"No profiles for 'com.kithrup.NetworkExtensionExperiment' were found\" UserInfo={IDEDistributionIssueSeverity=3, NSLocalizedDescription=No profiles for 'com.kithrup.NetworkExtensionExperiment' were found, NSLocalizedRecoverySuggestion=Xcode couldn't find any Developer ID provisioning profiles matching 'com.kithrup.NetworkExtensionExperiment'.}" which, given that I was able to build a signed version with the entitlement as shown first, seems to be a problem. All my years of hating xcode are coming back to haunt me, I can tell.

I create a DispatchIO object (in Swift) from a socketpair, set the low/high water marks to 1, and then call read on it. Elsewhere (multi-threaded, of course), I get data from somewhere, and write to the other side of it. Then when my data is done, I call dio?.close() The cleanup handler never gets called. What am I missing? (ETA: Ok, I can get it to work by calling dio?.close(flags: .stop) so that may be what I was missing.) (Also, I really wish it would get all the data available at once for the read, rather than 1 at a time.)

I'd like to be able to do the equivalent of getrusage(3) for some of our other processes. These are daemons, so they're not connected in any way. Obviously, Activity Monitor and top can do the things I want, but I'm not Apple. 😄 I went down a maze of twisty APIs, all a-Mach, and have decided to ask. (We're trying to keep track of the processes in the field. We also want to know what's going on if a process has stopped responding but hasn't died. I suppose I could, absolute worst case, periodically send getrusage(3) info to the monitoring process.)

Multiple times a day, every time I open a new window for forums.developer.apple.com, if I'm signed in, it asks me if I want to opt in to notifications. Even if I click on the opt in button. I've just reproduced it five times in a row here. What is going on?

I added ES_EVENT_TYPE_AUTH_SIGNAL to the event list, and added logging: os_log_debug(esfLogger, "antitampering signal %d from process %{public}s to process %{public}s", esm.signal, signing.UTF8String, targetSigning.UTF8String); I get some logs, such as 2024-12-09 10:21:47.668034+0000 0xc2c562 Debug 0x0 29448 0 DopeMonitorService: [security.dope:anti-tamper] antitampering signal 0 from process com.apple.spindump to process com.apple.mds_stores But when I do sudo kill -9 ${ourappprocess}, the proess dies with no log generated. (This is a different process than the one using ESF; the goal is, obviously, to keep our processes from being killed, but I'm only at the logging stage so far.) sudo kill -INFO ${ourappprocess} works: 2024-12-09 10:21:38.410851+0000 0xc2c562 Debug 0x0 29448 0 Monitor: [debug:anti-tamper] antitampering signal 29 from process com.apple.csh to process Worker So it is getting through to the monitoring process. But kill -9 ... isn't. Am I missing something obvious again?

For login purposes, we may want to try automatically checking to see if an email address is set up in certain databases. It looks like the preferred way to do this is via ABAddressBook.shared().me(), then get the right key via in the properties? This, however, is treated as accessing the whole address book and brings up a confirmation dialogue. However, as I thought about it, that might not be the real way we'd want -- we'd want to go through Active Directory, perhaps? Am I making any sense, or just being incoherent? 😄