Hi, thank you for your reply. I've double-checked the notifications received over the last two years, but I've only received REFUND and REVOKE notifications for non-consumable in-app purchases. Do you think it's safer not to block content for the end user when the revocation date is missing? If the user regains access, wouldn't they receive a different transaction ID? It seems that REVOKE transactions with the 'FAMILY_SHARED' ownership type don't have a revocation date unless they were revoked because the family member the made the purchase obtained a REFUND. If the user simply exits the family, the date is never included.
Topic:
App & System Services
SubTopic:
StoreKit
Tags: