Hi Quinn,
Thank you for your response and for clearly outlining the current situation. Although I appreciate the information, I must say that the outcome is quite disappointing.
The guidelines introduced around macOS 10.7.3 effectively create a perpetual non‑compete for existing window‑manager applications, giving those apps an almost monopoly in this niche. It’s hard to believe that this aligns with Apple’s stated commitment to an open market and product diversity.
I have no intention of selling my app outside the App Store; on the contrary, I consider the App Store to be the premier distribution channel for macOS software. Most Mac users I know turn to it first because of its convenience and the trust it inspires. The “tax” that developers pay to sell through the store is a reasonable price for the exposure and credibility it provides.
That said, I understand the rationale behind sandboxing, but I don’t think this should be the final word on the matter. Either existing non‑sandboxed window managers should also be required to conform, or the sandbox rules need to be adjusted to permit fair competition.
I recognize that you are not the sole decision‑maker here, but I would appreciate any contact information for the team or individual who handles policy decisions so that I can raise these concerns directly.
Over the past six months I have built a competitive window‑manager solution that, in my view, adds value to the App Store ecosystem and could generate revenue for both developers and Apple. As an Apple developer, I expect to enjoy the same rights and treatment as any other developer. Being told that my product cannot be published while similar products are allowed is difficult to understand and accept.
Thank you again for your assistance.
Best regards,
Denis Steinhorst
