I'm trying to let a few teammates build and run my app on their own devices, and I'd like to understand the correct approach for our situation. Setup We are a small team. Each of us uses a free personal Apple Developer team (individual Apple IDs, no paid membership yet). The app (an iOS app with a Watch app and a WidgetKit extension) uses App Groups and HealthKit. Bundle IDs: com.example.MyApp, com.example.MyApp.watchkitapp, com.example.MyApp.Widget. App Group: group.example.MyApp. It builds fine for me. When a teammate opens the project and tries to run on device, they get: Failed Registering Bundle Identifier The app identifier "com.example.MyApp" cannot be registered to your development team because it is not available. Change your bundle dentifier to a unique string to try again. What I've observed My other apps that have no entitlements build fine for every teammate. Looking at their embedded profiles, those sign with a wildcard profile (TEAMID.*). This app signs with an explicit profile (TEAMID.com.example.MyApp). If a teammate removes HealthKit and App Groups from all targets, the app builds for them under their own team using the same bundle ID. My understanding (please correct me) App Groups and HealthKit require an explicit App ID, which can only be registered to one team. Since I registered com.example.MyApp first, no other personal team can register the same explicit App ID hence the error. My questions Is that understanding correct — that an entitled (explicit) App ID can only ever belong to a single team? Is there any supported way to keep the same bundle identifier and keep App Groups + HealthKit while teammates build under their own separate personal teams? Or is moving to an Organization account (everyone as members of one shared team) the only way to share an entitled bundle ID across multiple developers? For free personal-team development, is the recommended pattern to give each developer a unique bundle ID + App Group (e.g. via per-developer .xcconfig), keeping entitlements intact? Just want to confirm I'm choosing the right approach before committing to it. Thanks!

While attempting to read a user’s daily step history spanning backward to the last 7 days, a small but consistent subset of users encounter Error Code 3 with the underlying error description: Error Code 3 "Unable to invalidate interval: no data source available." When this error occurs, we are entirely unable to read their step history. We have received ~10 direct user reports of this within the last couple of weeks.

I've noticed that the Fitness app on the iPhone can rapidly detect the presence of an Apple Watch or External Heart Rate Monitor (e.g., AirPods Pro 3) so that it can adjust the availability of certain exercise types. Is this done through an API that is public? Can third party fitness apps access similar functionality so users can be pre-alerted to the availability of workout types that require a heart rate sensor of some sort?

Hello, I'm experiencing a bug on iOS 26.5 RC1/RC2 where the Blood Pressure option is silently excluded from the HealthKit permission dialog (when requesting HKQuantityTypeIdentifierBloodPressureSystolic and HKQuantityTypeIdentifierBloodPressureDiastolic). This does not reproduce on iOS 26.4.2 or earlier. What happens: When BP types are requested alone, a blank white modal slides up and immediately dismisses — no permission UI is shown. When BP is requested alongside other types, a normal dialog appears for those other types, but Blood Pressure is simply absent from the list. The completion handler returns success = YES, error = nil in both cases, but BP permission is never granted. The result: Settings → Privacy & Security → Health → [app] shows Blood Pressure as requested but not granted getRequestStatusForAuthorizationToShareTypes for the BP types keeps returning ShouldRequest indefinitely HealthKit queries for BP samples return no data Workaround: Manually toggling Blood Pressure to ON in Settings → Privacy & Security → Health → [app name] fixes everything - queries work, notifications fire, and getRequestStatusForAuthorizationToShareTypes correctly returns HKAuthorizationRequestStatusUnnecessary. Environment: Confirmed broken: iOS 26.5 RC1 (23F75) and RC2 (23F77), iPhone 11; iOS 26.5 RC1 (23F73), simulator Confirmed working: iOS 26.4.2 (device), iOS 26.4.1 (simulator) Feedback filed as FB22735935.

I would like to create an Apple Watch only app that queries data such as blood oxygenation, heart varibility, number of steps, energy consumed, and other data of a similar nature recorded over the past month and performs calculations on them. I read from the HealthKit documentation that Apple Watch synchronizes data with iPhone and periodically deletes older data, and that I can get the date from which the data is available with earliestPermittedSampleDate(). Is there a risk that in general, by making queries to retrieve data up to a month old, the data will no longer be available? I need the app to work properly without needing an iPhone.

Hello everyone, We are encountering a critical regression introduced in iOS 26.4 that results in permanent workout data loss for users. When invoking HKWorkoutBuilder.finishWorkout(completion:) while the iOS device is locked, the save operation fails completely. However, it fails silently: the completion handler executes but returns both a nil workout and a nil error. Expected Behavior: Before iOS 26.4 finishWorkout resulted in a workout id, and correctly stored the workout data in HealthKit. According to HealthKit data protection documentation, saving data when the device is locked should either succeed (writing to a temporary journal file to be merged upon unlock) or explicitly throw an error such as HKError.Code.errorDatabaseInaccessible. Actual Behavior: Because the framework returns nil for both the object and the error, the application has no way to detect that the save failed. We cannot implement a retry mechanism or queue the save, resulting in silent data loss. Steps to Reproduce: We have built a Minimal Reproducible Example (MRE) that reliably triggers this: Initialize an HKWorkoutBuilder and call beginCollection(withStart:) followed by endCollection(withEnd:). Wrap the finishWorkout call in a short 5-second asynchronous delay, protected by a UIBackgroundTask to prevent app suspension. Lock the physical device during this 5-second window. The finishWorkout completion handler will execute while the device is locked, returning workout == nil and error == nil. Existing Reports: We have filed this via Feedback Assistant (a month ago) and opened a TSI (a week ago), providing the MRE project and a sysdiagnose captured at the time of failure: Feedback ID: FB22396180 TSI Case-ID: 19755043 As we have not yet received a response or a suggested workaround through these official channels, we are reaching out to the community. Has anyone else encountered this silent failure with HKWorkoutBuilder recently? Any insights or escalation help would be greatly appreciated.

In the Fitness app under iOS 26, each workout location is displayed on a small map. For workouts with routes, I can already successfully read out the route and thus also determine the starting point. So that works. For indoor workouts such as yoga or indoor rowing, the exact location is also displayed in the Fitness app. I would now also like to read out this location for these indoor workouts in my app. Does anyone know how to do this?

I created an app that connects to HealthKit and also to Clinical Health Records and in my review I am told to get the regulatory approval. I am not looking to get into that rabbit hole so was wondering how can I strip my app so that that I do not have to get the regulatory approvals. If anyone has any idea about that please let me know.

Hello Apple Developer Support / Community, I would like clarification regarding HealthKit data access behavior when an iPhone is locked. We are building an app that uses: HKObserverQuery enableBackgroundDelivery HKAnchoredObjectQuery Background execution to sync HealthKit data to our server Our specific question is: When the device is locked with passcode/Face ID protection enabled, can an app launched in the background through HKObserverQuery or other background mechanisms reliably access and read HealthKit data? We would like to understand the expected Apple-supported behavior for the following scenarios: If new HealthKit samples are written while the phone is locked, will HKObserverQuery still trigger immediately? If the observer callback is invoked while locked, can HKAnchoredObjectQuery successfully read the new samples? Is HealthKit data inaccessible while locked due to Data Protection / encrypted store behavior? Should developers expect delivery or data reads to be deferred until the user unlocks the device? We are trying to set correct expectations for background syncing and would appreciate official clarification on whether near real-time HealthKit sync is possible while the device remains locked. Relevant documentation mentions HealthKit store encryption, but we would appreciate direct confirmation for production behavior. Thank you.

Hello Apple Developer Support / Community, I would like clarification regarding HealthKit observer behavior when comparing a Flutter-based iOS app with a fully native iOS app. We are using HealthKit background delivery with: HKObserverQuery enableBackgroundDelivery HKAnchoredObjectQuery We have observed that in a Flutter-based app, HKObserverQuery callbacks appear to execute multiple times or more frequently than expected for a single data update. In comparison, a native iOS implementation using similar HealthKit logic appears more stable and predictable. We would like to understand the expected platform behavior and whether there are any known considerations from Apple’s perspective. Specific questions: Does iOS treat HealthKit observer delivery differently for apps built with Flutter versus fully native UIKit / Swift apps? Are there known issues where app lifecycle handling, Flutter engine initialization, method channels, isolates, or plugin architecture could cause repeated observer callbacks? Can repeated HKObserverQuery executions occur if queries are registered multiple times during app launches or engine restarts? Does Apple recommend any specific observer management pattern for cross-platform frameworks such as Flutter? From the HealthKit system side, should observer callback frequency be identical regardless of whether the app is Flutter or native, assuming the same iOS code is used? We are trying to determine whether this behavior is due to HealthKit delivery semantics, duplicate observer registration, Flutter lifecycle integration, or framework-related limitations. Any guidance from Apple or developers who have implemented HealthKit successfully in Flutter would be appreciated. Thank you.

I am building an iOS mobile application using Flutter, with native Swift integration for accessing Apple HealthKit instead of a Flutter plugin. The primary goal is to capture and sync specific HealthKit data types, namely Respiratory Rate and Sleeping Wrist Temperature, and send this data to a backend API as close to real-time as possible after it is written to HealthKit. The application needs to support both foreground and background syncing. Data should be synced when the app is opened, but also in the background when the device is locked. Additionally, there are reliability constraints to consider: the user may not open the app for extended periods, the device may remain locked, and Low Power Mode or other system restrictions may impact background execution. I have explored a few possible approaches. One option is using BGTaskScheduler to periodically fetch and sync data. However, based on my understanding, background tasks are not guaranteed to execute frequently and may be throttled or stopped by the system after some time. Another approach is to use HKObserverQuery along with HKAnchoredObjectQuery. In this setup, observer queries would be registered for the required data types, background delivery would be enabled, and whenever triggered, anchored queries would fetch incremental updates which would then be sent to the backend. This seems closer to a real-time model, but I am unsure how reliable and timely these background updates are in practice. I have also looked into newer APIs like HKQueryDescriptor, but it is not clear whether they provide any advantage over the observer plus anchored query approach for this use case. My main questions are: what is the recommended architecture for achieving near real-time syncing of HealthKit data for these metrics? Does HealthKit background delivery provide any guarantees or expectations around delivery timing, or can updates be significantly delayed depending on system conditions? How should edge cases be handled, such as when the device remains locked for long durations or when Low Power Mode is enabled? Would it be advisable to combine observer queries with BGTaskScheduler as a fallback mechanism? Finally, apps like Athlytic appear to show updated data immediately when opened. I am curious whether this is primarily achieved through background delivery or by fetching data on demand when the app becomes active. The goal is to design a system that is as close to real-time as possible while remaining reliable and compliant with iOS background execution constraints. Any recommended patterns, best practices, or references would be greatly appreciated.

Hello, I've been trying the last week trying to get my app approved for the App Store. It's my first app and I'm not really sure what's going on. My app is getting rejected due to "App Completeness". Here's the rejection message: App Review Guideline Issue This is an automated message. The review of this submission cannot proceed. See below for more information. The app crashed after the initial launch. Apps that crash negatively impact users. Test the app on supported devices to identify and resolve crashes and stability issues before resubmitting for review. Learn more about testing a release build. When we submitted the first time we got rejected because our Apple sign in did not auto fill the user's name and we didn't have the EULA Link in the description. So the app didn't crash here as a tester sent screenshots and was in our app. We resubmitted and then we started getting these crashes. I examined the code we added from the first revision and tested the start up and everything worked fine on ours and our 30+ beta testers end. The thing is we're not getting a crash log from Apple testers or Apple's automated tester (if automated testing exists?). We are creating a fitness app that implements HealthKit. We have the required HealthShare and HealthUpdate messages in the signing and capabilities of our target. I'm not sure this would be the issue since the app actually executed the first run though. I've researched and some articles did say long load times on bad internet could make iOS terminate an app. So we worked to get our initial load network calls down from 10 seconds to about 1-2 seconds. This did not work either. We are using SwiftData to cache exercises fetched from our backend locally but we haven't made any changes to the entity's. So I wouldn't expect bad data to cause a crash especially because we flush even if it were bad data anyway. I've ran with instruments to see if this was a memory issue: With an Authed User with data loaded it gets to about 33MiB With a fresh install memory usage is about 17MiB I did have a point of interest in my profile: api.revenuecat.com is not listed in your app’s NSPrivacyTrackingDomain key in any privacy manifest. It may be following users across multiple apps and websites to create a profile about users of apps that contact this domain. I don't use revenue cat for tracking for Ads so I probably shouldn't add it to the NSPrivacyTrackingDomain right? I'm really lost here any advice would be much appreciated. I guess my questions are if Apple has an automating testing environment how can I closely match that for testing on my end? If this is an actual tester why am I not getting a crash log or steps to repeat this issue? Has anyone else experienced the pain I'm currently suffering?

Hello, I'm seeing an inconsistency in how HKAnchoredObjectQuery applies predicates between its initial results handler and its update handler. Specifically, predicates that filter quantity samples by correlation membership - using either HKQuery.predicateForObjectsWithNoCorrelation() or NSPredicate(format: "%K == nil", HKPredicateKeyPathCorrelation) - are respected in the resultsHandler but silently ignored in the updateHandler. Setup I have three long-running HKAnchoredObjectQuery instances: One for HKCorrelationType(.bloodPressure) - no predicate One for HKQuantityType(.bloodPressureSystolic) - predicate: HKQuery.predicateForObjectsWithNoCorrelation() One for HKQuantityType(.bloodPressureDiastolic) - predicate: HKQuery.predicateForObjectsWithNoCorrelation() The intent of the predicate on the systolic/diastolic queries is to capture only standalone quantity samples written directly by third-party apps - not the constituent sub-samples of an HKCorrelation. The correlation query handles correlated samples. Expected behavior When a BloodPressure correlation is saved to the store, only the correlation query's updateHandler should fire, with 1 new sample. The systolic and diastolic updateHandlers should not fire, since those samples have correlation != nil which is excluded by the predicate. Actual behavior After saving one BloodPressure correlation, all three updateHandlers fire with 1 new object each. The systolic and diastolic update handlers receive the correlated sub-samples despite the predicateForObjectsWithNoCorrelation() predicate. The same predicate correctly filters those kinds of samples out of the initial resultsHandler. Additionally, the same predicate applied in a one-shot HKSampleQuery for the systolic or diastolic type correctly returns 0 results when only correlated readings exist. The problem is only experienced in updateHandler of a long-running HKAnchoredObjectQuery. Tested iOS versions iOS 26.3 iOS 18.7.6 Workaround When an HKAnchoredObjectQuery updateHandler fires with systolic or diastolic samples, I fire a one-shot HKSampleQuery with a compound predicate using the sample UUIDs and predicateForObjectsWithNoCorrelation. Any samples that are part of a correlation are not returned in the HKSampleQuery resultsHandler.

Hi Team, We are implementing HealthKit data sync using HKObserverQuery along with enableBackgroundDelivery and BGTaskScheduler for fallback processing. However, we are observing inconsistent behavior and would like clarification on expected system behavior: For HKObserverQuery: When using enableBackgroundDelivery with frequency .immediate, we sometimes receive updates promptly, but other times we do not receive any trigger at all. Similarly, when using .hourly, our expectation was that updates would be delivered approximately once per hour, but in practice, triggers are delayed, batched, or skipped. For BGTaskScheduler: We are scheduling BGAppRefreshTask with earliestBeginDate set (e.g., 1 hour), but tasks are sometimes delayed by several hours or not triggered predictably. In some cases, tasks are not executed even after extended periods. We would like to understand: Are HKObserverQuery delivery frequencies (.immediate, .hourly, .daily) strictly best-effort hints rather than guaranteed intervals? Under what conditions can observer updates be skipped or significantly delayed? Is there any recommended approach to ensure more reliable periodic syncing of HealthKit data? For BGTaskScheduler, what factors most strongly influence scheduling delays or missed executions? Our goal is to design a reliable sync mechanism, but the lack of deterministic behavior is making it difficult to define expected system behavior. Any clarification or recommended best practices would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance!

I'm developing a watchOS nap app that detects when the user falls asleep by monitoring heart rate changes. == Technical Implementation == HKWorkoutSession (.mindAndBody) for background execution HKAnchoredObjectQuery for real-time heart rate data CoreMotion for movement detection == Battery Considerations == Heart rate monitoring ONLY active when user explicitly starts a session Monitoring continues until user is awakened OR 60-minute limit is reached If no sleep detected within 60 minutes, session auto-ends (user may have abandoned or forgotten to stop) App displays clear UI indicating monitoring is active Typical session: 15-30 minutes, keeping battery usage minimal == The Problem == HKWorkoutSession affects Activity Rings during the session. Users receive "Exercise goal reached" notifications while resting — confusing. == What I've Tried == Not using HKLiveWorkoutBuilder → Activity Rings still affected Using builder but not calling finishWorkout() (per https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/780220) → Activity Rings still affected WKExtendedRuntimeSession (self-care type) (per https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/721077) → Only ~10 min runtime, need up to 60 min HKObserverQuery + enableBackgroundDelivery (per https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/779101) → ~4 updates/hour, too slow for real-time detection Audio background session for continuous processing (suggested in https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/130287) → Concerned about App Store rejection for non-audio app; if official approves this technical route, I can implement in this direction Some online resources mention "Health Monitoring Entitlement" from WWDC 2019 Session 251, but I could not find any official documentation for this entitlement. Apple Developer Support also confirmed they cannot locate it? == My Question == Is there any supported way to: Monitor heart rate in background for up to 60 minutes WITHOUT affecting Activity Rings or creating workout records? If this requires a special entitlement or API access, please advise on the application process. Or allow me to submit a code-level support request. Any guidance would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!

Has anyone actually managed to read the free-text note/context from Apple Health State of Mind entries? I’m building an iOS app that reads HKStateOfMind data from HealthKit. I can get the expected stuff fine: valence labels associations But in the Health app, users can also add extra context text to a mood entry, like: Tasks, Weather - Great work-life balance From my app, I can read Tasks and Weather, but I can’t find the Great work-life balance part anywhere. I already checked: public HKStateOfMind properties metadata debug description / object description attachment-ish routes Nothing so far. So before I spend more time chasing this: is that text just not exposed to third-party apps? Or is there some weird HealthKit path I’m missing? If anyone has actually pulled this off, I’d love to know how.

I have a watchOS app with a connected iOS app using Swift and SwiftUI. The watchOS app should read heart rate date in the background using HKOberserQuery and enableBackgroundDelivery(), send the data to the iPhone app via WCSession. The iPhone app then sends the data to a Firebase project. The issue I am facing now it that the app with the HKObserverQuery works fine when the app is in the foreground, but when the app runs in the background, the observer query gets triggered for the first time (after one hour), but then always get terminated from the watchdog timeout with the following error message: CSLHandleBackgroundHealthKitQueryAction scene-create watchdog transgression: app<app.nanacare.nanacare.nanaCareHealthSync.watchkitapp((null))>:14451 exhausted real (wall clock) time allowance of 15.00 seconds I am using Xcode 16.3 on MacOS 15.4 The App is running on iOS 18.4 and watchOS 11.4 What is the reason for this this issue? I only do a simple SampleQuery to fetch the latest heart rate data inside the HKObserverQuery and then call the completionHandler. The query itself takes less than one second. Or is there a better approach to read continuously heart rate data from healthKit in the background on watchOS? I don't have an active workout session, and I don't need all heart rate data. Once every 15 minutes or so would be enough.

I'm building an app with a leaderboard based on users' step counts, so I need the data to sync in real time at minimum. The problem is that when the app is terminated, steps don't seem to be counted at all, so if a user hasn't opened the app in 5 days, the leaderboard ends up completely out of sync. Is it even possible to retrieve this data when the app has been terminated and hasn't been opened? I'm currently using Background Fetch, which works when the app is suspended, slowly, but it does work. However, it does not sync when the app is fully terminated.

Hi, I'm having the same issue described in https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/690974?page=2. When connected to Xcode or when the app is in the foreground, HKObserverQuery fires correctly and my app processes step updates. But once disconnected from Xcode, background delivery stops completely and the observer callback is never called. My setup: com.apple.developer.healthkit.background-delivery entitlement is present and in the provisioning profile enableBackgroundDelivery(for: .stepCount, frequency: .immediate) returns success = true HKObserverQuery is registered on every launch including background launches I also have CMPedometer.startEventUpdates running as a supplemental trigger Background Modes includes "Background fetch" and "Background processing" Device: iPhone, iOS 17.4+ App type: App uses Screen Time / Family Controls (ManagedSettings) to block apps until a step goal is met Has anyone found a reliable fix? Any feedback from Apple engineers would be appreciated.

Any plans to be able to allow to store Uric Acid (UA) and Ketones readings in Apple Health with HealthKit? There are now many blood test strips in the market that allow to read Glucose, UA and Ketones and currently only Glucose seems to be supported by HealthKit. Thank you