Hi everyone,
We are facing a frustrating and seemingly automated rejection process under Guideline 4.3(a) – Spam, despite providing clear and transparent proof that our app, Minglr, is unique and originally designed.
The Issue:
Our app has been approved multiple times since May 2024, with four previous updates passing without issue.
Now, it is suddenly being flagged as similar to other apps, despite the fact that it has a completely unique concept, UI, and functionality—which we have repeatedly demonstrated.
We even provided full access to our Figma design files to prove that our UI/UX was built from scratch by our Art Director.
Despite all of this, we keep receiving the same generic rejection response with no real explanation or actionable feedback.
Our Concerns:
The Review Process Feels Automated – We provide detailed responses, yet we receive the same copy-pasted reply without any acknowledgment of the evidence we submit.
Lack of Transparency – If there is a real issue, we are more than willing to address it, but we are not being told what exactly violates the guideline.
Discriminatory Treatment?
– There are many identical apps in the App Store that follow the same mechanics and UI structure, yet they continue to be approved. Meanwhile, our original app is facing rejection for vague reasons.
No Path to Resolution – We have asked for an escalation to a senior reviewer, but we are still receiving the same automatic responses without meaningful engagement.
Has Anyone Else Experienced This?
Have you managed to successfully appeal a 4.3(a) rejection?
What is the best way to ensure Apple actually reviews the evidence provided instead of sending the same automated response?
Is there a higher-level Apple Developer Support contact that can properly evaluate the situation?
We are reaching out in hopes of finding a fair resolution because this process is discouraging and feels highly unjustified. Any advice or similar experiences would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks,
minglr team