The product ID entered has already been used by other in-app purchases associated with this team. I previously used fortune_pay_1, but not apple_pay_1 or apple_pays_1 How can this be solved

I'm developing a spatial tracking app using a Qorvo DWM3001CDK (MFi-certified UWB accessory) with NINearbyAccessoryConfiguration. On iPhone 15 (iOS 26.3.1, second-generation UWB chip): supportsDirectionMeasurement = false NINearbyObject.direction is always nil NINearbyObject.distance works correctly (~63Hz) Camera Assistance (isCameraAssistanceEnabled=true) provides horizontalAngle only after ARKit convergence (~10s), and only while the phone is moving On iPhone 12/13 (first-generation UWB chip), direction works correctly with the same accessory. My questions: Is the removal of instantaneous direction measurement for third-party accessories on second-generation UWB devices intentional? Or is this a regression that will be fixed in a future iOS update? If intentional, what is the recommended approach for apps that need real-time direction to a UWB accessory on iPhone 15/16? Camera Assistance requires phone movement and only works with stationary targets, which doesn't work for our use case (tracking a moving object with the phone mounted on a gimbal). Are there any plans to provide instantaneous direction measurement for NINearbyAccessoryConfiguration on second-generation UWB devices? Environment: iPhone 15, iOS 26.3.1 Qorvo DWM3001CDK (FiRa + MFi certified) NINearbyAccessoryConfiguration with isCameraAssistanceEnabled=true Shared ARSession Thank you.

I am currently developing an app for MacOS that needs to control HomeKit devices like lights. However, it seems like MacOS is supported on the official documentation, but not when I try to create an app ID on developer.apple.com. On the link https://developer.apple.com/apple-home/, MacOS is clearly showed as supported for MacOS. But when I try to create an app ID, it shows that it is only compatible for iOS, VisionOS and WatchOS. Could this be clarified? Best regards, orangeidle25

Hello, I've run into an issue where AssetPacks being served locally are downloading but unable to complete. try await AssetPackManager .shared .ensureLocalAvailability(of: assetPack) This method is called but never appears to complete. Even 10 minutes after the download is finished. <NSProgress: 0x10fb4fc80> : Parent: 0x0 (portion: 0) / Fraction completed: 1.0000 / Completed: 2462633379 of 2462633379 This however does not appear to be an issue in production, as the method completes 30-60 seconds after the download has finished. Issue happens across multiple devices running 26.4.1

Hi everyone, I'm looking for clarity on the NFC HCE entitlement process for third-party apps in the EEA. I've built an alternative client for Milan's public transport app (ATM Milano) on Android by reverse engineering the original app. It offers the same core functionality(users still need a valid transit subscription) just with a different UI and better UX. I'd now like to port it to iOS. According to Apple's documentation, NFC HCE was opened to third parties in the EEA starting with iOS 17.4. However, the API requires an entitlement from Apple. I have a few questions: Is the entitlement required regardless of distribution method? Even if I distribute through a third-party marketplace like AltStore PAL rather than the App Store, do I still need Apple to grant the HCE entitlement? Are third-party/alternative clients eligible for the entitlement? My app isn't a competing transit provider, it's an alternative frontend for an existing service. Users must hold a valid subscription with the official provider. Is there anything in the entitlement criteria that would disqualify this kind of app? What's the correct process to apply?Developer Support directed me here, so I'm hoping someone from Apple engineering or someone who has gone through the process can share the steps. Thanks!

Hello community, I am implementing a Live Activity for my existing App Store app. The Live Activity works perfectly on the iOS Simulator, but it completely fails to appear on the physical device's lock screen. When I call Activity.request, it succeeds and returns a valid Activity ID, but the physical device's console immediately outputs the following errors from liveactivitiesd: liveactivitiesd is not entitled to specify a scene target. Defaulting containingProcess target to liveactivitiesd No asset provider bundle ID provided I have spent days debugging this and have tried every known workaround. Here is the comprehensive list of what I have already verified and attempted: Environment: Xcode: 16.4 iOS Device: iPhone 13 mini, iOS 26.3.1 macOS: Sequoia 15.6 What I have verified/tried (to avoid duplicate suggestions): NSSupportsLiveActivities: It is set to YES in the main app's Info.plist. I also tried adding it to the Widget Extension's Info.plist just in case. App Icons: The main app has a valid AppIcon set in Assets.xcassets. The Primary App Icon Set Name in Build Settings is correctly set to AppIcon. Bundle IDs: They match perfectly (com.mycompany.app and com.mycompany.app.MyWidget). Version & Build Numbers: The main app and the Widget Extension have exactly the same Version and Build numbers. App Groups & Entitlements: Checked and perfectly synced between the main app and the extension. Dummy Widget: Since it's a Live-Activity-only extension, I added a standard static DummyWidget to the WidgetBundle to prevent the known iOS 17 bug where the system ignores extensions without home screen widgets. Memory/Sanitizers: Ensured Address Sanitizer and Zombie Objects are completely disabled in the Scheme to prevent the 30MB memory limit crash on the device. Nuclear Option: Completely deleted the Widget Extension target, wiped DerivedData, restarted the Mac and iPhone, and recreated the extension from scratch. Minimal UI Test: Replaced the widget's UI with a simple Text("Test") to rule out any SwiftUI rendering crashes. Device Settings: Verified that "Live Activities" is enabled under "Face ID & Passcode" settings on the physical iPhone. Despite all of this, the Simulator works flawlessy, while the device throws No asset provider bundle ID provided and shows nothing. Does anyone know what specific condition causes liveactivitiesd to fail to find the asset provider (the parent app) on a physical device for an existing app? Are there any undocumented provisioning profile quirks or obscure Build Settings I might be missing? Any insights would be deeply appreciated. Thank you!

I recently noticed a UX inconsistency while using the battery charge limit feature on my MacBook with a MagSafe charger. With the optimized charging feature, users can set a custom maximum charging limit (for example, 95%) to improve battery health. However, the MagSafe LED indicator continues to show the charging state (amber) even after the device reaches this user-defined limit. Previously, the LED would turn green when charging reached 100%, clearly indicating a “fully charged” state. But now, when charging stops at a user-defined limit, there is no clear visual feedback that charging has effectively completed based on the user’s preference. This creates confusion, as the LED suggests that charging is still ongoing even though the system has stopped charging at the configured limit. A possible approach to improve this could be to treat the user-defined limit as an effective “fully charged” state during charging. For example: if is_charging: if battery_percentage < user_defined_limit: LED = AMBER else: LED = GREEN This would align the physical LED indicator with the system’s charging behavior and improve clarity for users without requiring hardware changes. Has anyone else observed this behavior, or is there any existing workaround?

Hello! I have an accessory, which is paired already with an iPhone, and am attempting to upgrade its SSID permission to Wi-Fi Aware. In ideal conditions, it works perfectly. However, if I dismiss the picker at the time of pin-code entry, I am unable to re-initialize an upgrade authorization picker. Even though the authorization is not completed a WAPairedDeviceID is assigned to the object of 18446744073709551615. Any subsequent attempts to start the picker up again spits out when treated as a failure serves: [ERROR] updateAuthorization error=Error Domain=ASErrorDomain Code=450 "No new updates detected from existing accessory descriptor." Attempting with a mutated descriptor serves: [ERROR] updateAuthorization error=Error Domain=ASErrorDomain Code=450 "Accessory cannot be upgraded with given descriptor." If I try using failAuthorization i get a 550 "Invalid State" error and furthermore if I try finishAuthorization to attempt to clear the descriptor/paired device ID it fails to clear it. If I could be pointed to the intended behavior on how to handle this, or this can be acknowledged as a bug, that would be incredibly appreciated. Thank you!

I'm working with an Espressif ESP32-C5 device. The firmware on the device is based on Espressif's base software, which provides Wifi provisioning services via Bluetooth. My firmware also provides its own Bluetooth services too. When the Espressif part of the firmware connects to Wifi, it re-initializes the entire Bluetooth stack, eliminating all of its own services. Mine get added back, but my app starts failing and doing weird things at this point. I believe it is due to iOS caching the GATT configuration and not recognizing that it has changed. If I restart my phone, the problem is cleared. But this is not a good solution to the problem. I need a way to let iOS know that it should clear any cached information related to this device. How can I do that?

Overview I'm developing a document-based app for macOS using SwiftData. When I undo/redo changes using Command-Z/Command-Shift-Z, the app reliably crashes with the following error: SwiftData/ModelSnapshot.swift:46: Fatal error: Unexpected backing data for snapshot creation: SwiftData._FullFutureBackingData<DocumentTest.ChildItem> And before the app crashes, what always happens is that UndoManager stops removing/restoring instances of ChildItem (but continues to remove/restore instances of ParentItem). The issue goes away when I enclose the relevant code in ModelContext.transaction(block:). However, this shouldn't be necessary, as ModelContext.autosaveEnabled is true by default. The issues are occurring with Xcode 26.4 (17E192) and macOS Tahoe 26.4 (25E246). I have modified the macOS Document App project template to showcase the issue. The sample project, along with a screen recording of the crash, can be downloaded from here: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/13bCB1qRZ6273BI81zW2zUUBraSvv6p5w?usp=share_link Is this expected behavior or should I file a bug report in Feedback Assistant? Steps to Reproduce To recreate the issue, follow these steps: Download and extract the "Xcode Project.zip" file linked above. Open the extracted "DocumentTest" project in Xcode. Build and run the "DocumentTest" app. In the document selection window, click "New Document" at the bottom-left. In the app, click the "+" button at the top-right to add a ParentItem with ChildItems. Click on the added ParentItem's button to add another ChildItem to it. Repeat steps 5–6 until you have 5 ParentItems with an additional ChildItem. Press Command-Z 10 times to undo all the changes. Press Command-Shift-Z 10 times to redo all the changes. Repeat steps 8–9 until UndoManager stops removing/restoring the additional ChildItem, and continue repeating them until the app eventually crashes (you may have to repeat them 5–10 times before the issue occurs). If you uncomment the ModelContext.transaction(block:) at line 13 of ContentView.swift and repeat the same steps above, no ChildItems will go missing and the app will not crash. Code ParentItem Model @Model final class ParentItem { var timestamp: Date @Relationship( deleteRule: .cascade, inverse: \ChildItem.parentItem ) var childItems: [ChildItem] = [] init(timestamp: Date) { self.timestamp = timestamp } } ChildItem Model @Model final class ChildItem { var index: Int var parentItem: ParentItem? init(index: Int) { self.index = index } } Creating, Inserting, and Linking ParentItem and ChildItem // Create and insert ParentItem let newParentItem = ParentItem( timestamp: Date() ) modelContext.insert(newParentItem) // Create and insert ChildItems var newChildItems: [ChildItem] = [] for index in 0..<Int.random(in: 2...8) { let newChildItem = ChildItem(index: index) newChildItems.append(newChildItem) modelContext.insert(newChildItem) } /* Establish relationship between ParentItem and ChildItems */ for newChildItem in newChildItems { newParentItem.childItems.append( newChildItem ) newChildItem.parentItem = newParentItem } Adding an Additional ChildItem to ParentItem // Uncommenting this block fixes the crash // try! modelContext.transaction { // Create and insert the new ChildItem let newChildItem = ChildItem( index: parentItem.childItems.count ) modelContext.insert(newChildItem) // Establish relationship to parentItem parentItem.childItems.append(newChildItem) newChildItem.parentItem = parentItem // }

Overview I'm developing a document-based app for macOS using SwiftData. When I undo/redo changes using Command-Z/Command-Shift-Z, the app reliably crashes with the following error: SwiftData/ModelSnapshot.swift:46: Fatal error: Unexpected backing data for snapshot creation: SwiftData._FullFutureBackingData<DocumentTest.ChildItem> And before the app crashes, what always happens is that UndoManager stops removing/restoring instances of ChildItem (but continues to remove/restore instances of ParentItem). The issue goes away when I enclose the relevant code in ModelContext.transaction(block:). However, this shouldn't be necessary, as ModelContext.autosaveEnabled is true by default. The issues are occurring with Xcode 26.4 (17E192) and macOS Tahoe 26.4 (25E246). I have modified the macOS Document App project template to showcase the issue. The sample project, along with a screen recording of the crash, can be downloaded from here: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/13bCB1qRZ6273BI81zW2zUUBraSvv6p5w?usp=share_link Is this expected behavior or should I file a bug report in Feedback Assistant? Steps to Reproduce To recreate the issue, follow these steps: Download and extract the "Xcode Project.zip" file linked above. Open the extracted "DocumentTest" project in Xcode. Build and run the "DocumentTest" app. In the document selection window, click "New Document" at the bottom-left. In the app, click the "+" button at the top-right to add a ParentItem with ChildItems. Click on the added ParentItem's button to add another ChildItem to it. Repeat steps 5–6 until you have 5 ParentItems with an additional ChildItem. Press Command-Z 10 times to undo all the changes. Press Command-Shift-Z 10 times to redo all the changes. Repeat steps 8–9 until UndoManager stops removing/restoring the additional ChildItem, and continue repeating them until the app eventually crashes (you may have to repeat them 5–10 times before the issue occurs). If you uncomment the ModelContext.transaction(block:) at line 13 of ContentView.swift and repeat the same steps above, no ChildItems will go missing and the app will not crash. Code ParentItem Model @Model final class ParentItem { var timestamp: Date @Relationship( deleteRule: .cascade, inverse: \ChildItem.parentItem ) var childItems: [ChildItem] = [] init(timestamp: Date) { self.timestamp = timestamp } } ChildItem Model @Model final class ChildItem { var index: Int var parentItem: ParentItem? init(index: Int) { self.index = index } } Creating, Inserting, and Linking ParentItem and ChildItem // Create and insert ParentItem let newParentItem = ParentItem( timestamp: Date() ) modelContext.insert(newParentItem) // Create and insert ChildItems var newChildItems: [ChildItem] = [] for index in 0..<Int.random(in: 2...8) { let newChildItem = ChildItem(index: index) newChildItems.append(newChildItem) modelContext.insert(newChildItem) } /* Establish relationship between ParentItem and ChildItems */ for newChildItem in newChildItems { newParentItem.childItems.append( newChildItem ) newChildItem.parentItem = newParentItem } Adding an Additional ChildItem to ParentItem // Uncommenting this block fixes the crash // try! modelContext.transaction { // Create and insert the new ChildItem let newChildItem = ChildItem( index: parentItem.childItems.count ) modelContext.insert(newChildItem) // Establish relationship to parentItem parentItem.childItems.append(newChildItem) newChildItem.parentItem = parentItem // }

According to this comment in the sample project on GitHub and this answer by Apple Staff, CKSyncEngine should be re-initialized after signing out or switching accounts so that "CKSyncEngine schedules a new fetch on init." But according to my tests, CKSyncEngine will schedule a fetch after having a signed out and signed in again, without me ever having to reset the serialized sync state. The documentation doesn't mentioned anywhere that CKSyncEngine should be re-initialized after an account change. In fact, it states that CKSyncEngine will reset its state internally on account changes. So if that's the case, then I'm very confused as to why the "official" recommendation is to re-initialize CKSyncEngine after receiving .signOut or .accountSwitch. Can someone please clarify the correct approach here?

我是开发者，日常工作会同时打开大量终端（tmux、多项目、自动化脚本、node‑pty 等）。在这种现代开发场景下，511 的 PTY 上限明显过低，而且这个默认值对顶配机器（128GB RAM）和低配机器是一样的，没有随硬件规格调整，这不合理。 我尝试过使用 tmux control mode 来减少 PTY 占用，但它会导致终端输出对齐错乱，影响可用性，所以必须继续使用 PTY 模式。这意味着只要终端数量稍多，就很容易触及 511 上限，导致系统层面无法创建新终端，影响全局稳定性。 总结： 511 作为默认值在过去或许合理，但对现代开发者明显不足； 顶配机器和低配机器同一上限不合理； control mode 有输出对齐问题，无法作为现实替代方案。 谢谢！ Apple 支持社区工作人员

I'm developing an accessory that communicates with iOS/iPadOS via Bluetooth Low Energy and observed some odd behavior. My accessory (peripheral) requests more forgiving BLE connection parameters from the OS (central). The request is initially accepted, but then immediately overwritten by the central with the default parameters. This ultimately leads to a an endless loop of negotiating parameters that eventually results in the peripheral getting overwhelmed and disconnecting. The first solution I tried was simply going along with the central's parameters, but this proved to be less than optimal, as there were still sporadic disconnects. As best as I can tell, the parameters I'm requesting are compliant with Apple's spec (please correct me if I'm wrong): Minimum Connection Interval: 30ms Maximum Connection Interval: 60ms Peripheral Latency: 30 Supervisory Timeout: 6s So my question is this: Is there some mechanism that's causing the central to continuously renegotiate connection parameters, and is there anything I can do inside my accessory to avoid it?

Environment: Apple sandbox environment Test card number: 4622 9431 2318 9343 Phone models: iPhone 17 Pro Max, iPhone 16 Pro ios version: 26.3.1(a) Problem Description: After biometric verification passed, the Apple-provided JS method onpaymentauthorized was not called. Instead, the session.oncancel method was triggered directly. session.completeMerchantValidation(session): The session is as follows { epochTimestamp: 1774586541529, expiresAt: 1774590141529, merchantSessionIdentifier: 'SSH172FFE4410DA4F4E9C52E66AD440E472_A0E617ED4A56A343E07C6E1255BD4098423B3A8E1243236462D07B14B4A0F7C3', nonce: 'db797548', merchantIdentifier: '8D78418145EFBC98571CE62A98832FC4286A5F465FA1B0570919E156E901D33F', domainName: 'bifrost.lianlianpay-inc.com', displayName: '', signature: '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', operationalAnalyticsIdentifier: ':8D78418145EFBC98571CE62A98832FC4286A5F465FA1B0570919E156E901D33F', retries: 0, pspId: '8D78418145EFBC98571CE62A98832FC4286A5F465FA1B0570919E156E901D33F' } code-block

Environment: Apple sandbox environment Test card number: 4622 9431 2318 9343 Phone models: iPhone 17 Pro Max, iPhone 16 Pro ios version: 26.3.1(a) Problem Description: After biometric verification passed, the Apple-provided JS method onpaymentauthorized was not called. Instead, the session.oncancel method was triggered directly. session.completeMerchantValidation(session): { epochTimestamp: 1774586541529, expiresAt: 1774590141529, merchantSessionIdentifier: 'SSH172FFE4410DA4F4E9C52E66AD440E472_A0E617ED4A56A343E07C6E1255BD4098423B3A8E1243236462D07B14B4A0F7C3', nonce: 'db797548', merchantIdentifier: '8D78418145EFBC98571CE62A98832FC4286A5F465FA1B0570919E156E901D33F', domainName: 'bifrost.lianlianpay-inc.com', displayName: '', signature: '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', operationalAnalyticsIdentifier: ':8D78418145EFBC98571CE62A98832FC4286A5F465FA1B0570919E156E901D33F', retries: 0, pspId: '8D78418145EFBC98571CE62A98832FC4286A5F465FA1B0570919E156E901D33F' }

Hi everyone, I’m troubleshooting a persistent MapKit JS auth issue and would appreciate any advice. I have: Active Apple Developer account/team Maps configuration created and linked Active Maps-enabled signing key Domain-restricted token setup I tested multiple JWT variants: with origin without origin (basic example style) with and without exp exact domain and wildcard domain variants I also tested using a minimal/basic MapKit JS integration and still got the same result. Bootstrap request: `curl -s --compressed -D - \ 'https://cdn.apple-mapkit.com/ma/bootstrap?apiVersion=2&mkjsVersion=5.81.60&poi=1' \ -H 'Authorization: Bearer <JWT>' \ -H 'Origin: https://<my-domain>' \ -H 'Referer: https://<my-domain>/...' Result is always:` HTTP 401 {"error":{"message":"Not Authorized","details":[]}} Important detail: mapkit.core.js loads successfully (HTTP 200) failure happens only on bootstrap auth Has anyone seen this exact behavior with empty details and found what was wrong? Any checklist for hidden misconfiguration points (key linkage, token generation method, domain restriction behavior, propagation timing) would help.

I am getting InvalidProviderToken for every APNs key I create under my team. This has persisted for over a week across 3 different fresh keys. Setup: Team ID: QJLCAXKWMB Bundle ID: com.trackntakeit.app All keys: Team Scoped, All Topics, Sandbox & Production JWT: ES256, correct kid and iss fields Tested directly from Mac via curl with fresh tokens The key file is a valid EC 256-bit private key. JWT is correctly formed. Both production and sandbox endpoints return InvalidProviderToken. Case number with Apple Developer Support: 102857626802 Has anyone seen all APNs keys for an entire team being rejected? Could there be an account-level block on APNs?

Hi, Our Apple Maps integration has been working normally for years, but starting today, newly created Maps tokens suddenly became unusable. Tokens created from the Apple Developer backend now return 401 Unauthorized everywhere we test them. We can reproduce this in: our own code Apple’s Try Maps Server API page MapKit JS So this does not appear to be limited to our app code. We also tested through a US network entry point to rule out a mainland China network issue, but the result was the same. At the moment, Maps tokens created in the backend seem to be unusable in all cases on our side. Has anyone else seen this today, or is there any known issue affecting Maps token creation or validation? Thanks.

I haven't been able to find the exact name for this. In iOS 26, there's a widget called "New Reminder" in Reminders app among the Control Center widgets(Action Button also). In the Shortcuts app, name is “Show quick reminder.” It doesn't seem to be either the input window that appears when requesting parameters or the snippet view. Is it possible to implement the sheet that appears after tap this widget button? I've looked through the relevant documentation and WWDC videos but haven't found anything.