Explore the various UI frameworks available for building app interfaces. Discuss the use cases for different frameworks, share best practices, and get help with specific framework-related questions.

All subtopics
Posts under UI Frameworks topic

Post

Replies

Boosts

Views

Activity

Creating UTImportedTypeDeclarations entries yields duplicate Open menu entry
My iPadOS app can open .xml files. In my XMLApp.swift, I hooked up a: var body: some Scene { WindowGroup(id: "main") { .commands CommandGroup(replacing: .newItem) { ... Button(.openDot) { openXMLFile() } ... Next, I entered a new UTImportedTypeDeclarations / UTExportedTypeDeclarations in Project Settings -> Target -> Info -> Document Types, Exported Type Identifiers, Imported Type Identifiers, for the XML file-type: ... <key>UTImportedTypeDeclarations</key> <array> <dict> <key>UTTypeConformsTo</key> <array> <string>public.data</string> <string>public.xml</string> <string>public.content</string> </array> ... As soon as I do that, Xcode creates an additional Open... menu entry all the way at the bottom of the File menu. I cannot get rid of this additional menu entry. Its state is disabled (grayed out). I have my own Open (per the code above), which also responds to ⌘ - O. My menu entry works fine, as long as I disable the same keyboard shortcut so they don't collide. The extra Open entry is also displayed on the matching iPadOS simulator. From the same codebase, the Open is not displayed on the Mac (targeting macOS, not Catalyst). On macOS, only my Open is in the File menu, as expected. Why is there a duplicate Open menu entry and how do I get rid of it?
0
0
157
2w
Toolbar Display Bug When Using Zoom NavigationTransition with Swipe-Back Gesture
Could anyone help confirm if this is a bug and suggest possible solutions? Thanksssss In iOS 18, when using Zoom NavigationTransition, the toolbar from the destination view may randomly appear on the source view after navigating back with the swipe-back gesture. Re-entering the destination view and navigating back again can temporarily resolve the issue, but it may still occur intermittently. This bug only happens with Zoom NavigationTransition and does not occur when using a button tap to navigate back. import SwiftUI struct test: View { @Namespace private var namespace var body: some View { NavigationStack { NavigationLink { Image("img1") .resizable() .navigationTransition(.zoom(sourceID: 1, in: namespace)) .toolbar { ToolbarItem(placement: .bottomBar) { Text("destination noDisappear") } } } label: { Image("img1") .resizable() .frame(width: 100, height: 100) .matchedTransitionSource(id: 1, in: namespace) .toolbar { ToolbarItem(placement: .bottomBar) { Text("source toolbar") } } } } } }
2
0
349
2w
SearchFieldPlacement.navigationBarDrawer in NavigationSplitView detail ignores sidebar width on first rendering.
When a NavigationSplitView detail column shows a View that uses .searchable(text: $searchText, placement: .navigationBarDrawer), the search bar extends under the sidebar region, on the first View render only. After any event that triggers a View refresh (such as switching away and back to the View, editing the search text, or resizing the window) the search field is positioned correctly in the detail column’s navigation area. var body: some View { NavigationSplitView { List { Text("Sidebar") } .navigationTitle("Sidebar") } detail: { Text("Detail") .navigationTitle("List") .searchable( text: $searchText, placement: .navigationBarDrawer ) } } FB22559713 has been opened.
0
0
71
2w
-applicationDockMenu: method on NSApplicationDelegate doesn't work when attached to debugger
When I add a simple menu to the dock via the NSApplicationDelegate method -applicationDockMenu: and run the app from Xcode it doesn't work. -(NSMenu*)applicationDockMenu:(NSApplication*)sender { NSMenu *dockMenu = [self buildDockMenu]; if (dockMenu != nil) { NSLog(@"Returning dock menu."); return dockMenu; } else { NSLog(@"Not ready to build dock menu"); return nil; } } When I run the app, my main app window shows up but nothing logs out in -applicationDockMenu: until I click outside my app's window (so if I click the desktop background, or a Finder window, or whatever). Then after I click outside my app's main window this logs out: Returning dock menu. The "Not ready to build dock menu" message does not log out. But...when I right click on the dock icon, the menu doesn't show up. But if I stop the app from Xcode and just run it not attached to the debugger, the dock menu does show up. But this makes the debugging/testing situation not ideal.
4
0
255
2w
Increase Contrast reduces List selection contrast in dark appearance in SwiftUI NavigationSplitView
[Submitted as FB22200608] With Increase Contrast turned on, the selected row highlight in a List behaves inconsistently between light and dark appearance on iPad. In light appearance the blue selection highlight correctly becomes darker, but in dark appearance it becomes lighter instead. The text contrast ratio drops from about 3:1 to about 1.5:1, well below accessibility guidelines. This reproduces both in the simulator and on a physical device. The sample uses a standard SwiftUI List inside NavigationSplitView with built-in selection styling. No custom colors or styling are applied. REPRO STEPS Create a new Multiplatform project. Replace ContentView with code below. Build and run on iPad. Select an item in the list. Turn on Dark appearance (Cmd-Shift-A in Simulator). Turn on Increase Contrast (Cmd-Control-Shift-A in Simulator). Observe the selected row highlight. ACTUAL In light appearance, the blue selection highlight becomes darker when Increase Contrast is on, improving contrast as expected. In dark appearance, the blue selection highlight becomes lighter when Increase Contrast is on, reducing contrast between the selection background and the white text. EXPECTED Increase Contrast should consistently increase contrast. In dark appearance, the selection highlight should become darker—or otherwise increase contrast with the foreground text—not lighter. SAMPLE CODE struct ContentView: View { @State private var selection: String? var body: some View { NavigationSplitView { Text("Sidebar") } content: { List(selection: $selection) { Text("Item One") .tag("One") Text("Item Two") .tag("Two") } } detail: { if let selection { Text(selection) } else { Text("Select an item") } } } } SCREEN RECORDING CONTACTS The Contacts app behaves correctly. When Increase Contrast is turned on, the selection blue becomes darker, improving contrast. PASSWORDS The Passwords app, however, exhibits the issue. With Increase Contrast turned on, the selection blue becomes lighter instead of darker, reducing contrast.
5
1
442
2w
SwiftUI View Not Initialized on Background Relaunch (CoreBluetooth / Cold Start?)
I have a question regarding cold start and pre-warming behavior on iOS. I’m developing a SwiftUI app that continuously receives data from a BLE device in the background. We’ve observed that after the BLE stream stops, the OS often terminates our app. Later, when the sensor comes back into range, iOS appears to relaunch (or reinitialize) the app. In our app, we use a WindowGroup like this: WindowGroup { AppView(store: store) } We’ve placed our BLE reconnection logic inside a .task modifier in AppView. What’s confusing is this: Most of the time, when the app is relaunched, AppView is created and the .task runs as expected. However, in about 1 out of 10 cases, AppView is not created at all, so the .task does not execute. I’m trying to understand: Under what conditions does iOS relaunch an app without fully initializing the SwiftUI view hierarchy? Is this related to pre-warming or background relaunch mechanisms (e.g., CoreBluetooth state restoration)? What determines whether the WindowGroup and root view are actually instantiated? Any insight into the system’s relaunch behavior or lifecycle in this scenario would be greatly appreciated.
2
0
150
2w
TipKit: showing a popover tip on a SwiftUI toolbar button
Hi folks, there's currently a known issue in TipKit due to which it won't show popover tips on buttons that are inside a SwiftUI ToolbarItem. For example, if you try this code, the popover tip will not appear: ToolbarItem { Button(action: {...}) { Label("Tap here", systemImage: "gear") } .popoverTip(sampleTip) } There's an easy workaround for this issue. Just apply a style to the button. It can be any style. Some examples are bordered, borderless, plain and borderedProminent. Here's a fixed version of the above code: ToolbarItem { Button(action: {...}) { Label("Tap here", systemImage: "gear") } .buttonStyle(.plain) // Adding this line fixes the issue. .popoverTip(sampleTip) } Hope this helps anyone running into this issue.
11
11
6k
2w
SwiftUI Catalyst Resizable Sheet
I am porting a macOS app to SwiftUI Catalyst and have run into a usability issue. On macOS, presented sheets are user resizable. On SwiftUI macOS, they are also resizable, but on Catalyst, they are not. Does anyone have a good reference on how to make a sheet resizable under SwiftUI Catalyst?
Topic: UI Frameworks SubTopic: SwiftUI
0
0
166
2w
NSOutlineView / NSTableView's Setting lineScroll to a somewhat absurd value of 304 in -tile
So I'm working on adding another component to my app that uses NSOutlineView, as we do in AppKit. There will probably always be less than 25 rows here. One row is much larger than the others. Not sure if any of this matters. What I know is I noticed scrolling it is very jank. It's going way too fast. So I took a peek and see lineScroll is getting is 304 in Interface Builder. Not sure how that happened. I changed it to like 24. Then Interface Builder automatically changes it back to 304. So in -viewDidLoad I just set it: NSScrollView *scrollView = self.outlineView.enclosingScrollView; scrollView.verticalLineScroll = 24.0; scrollView.lineScroll = 24.0; But scrolling still is busted. So I subclass NSScrollView and override the setters. For some reason, NSTableView's -tile method is deciding to change the lineScroll to 304, all on its own. So every time tile is called. line scrolls get reset to 304.
1
0
212
2w
View Navigation Title Disappears on watchOS Target When Built With Xcode 26+
I have a SwiftUI view in a watch companion app, and when I build my app with Xcode 26.2 or 26.3, the navigation title on a presented screen disappears after the watch screen goes dark. So, the navigation title is only visible when the screen is first presented and not again after the watch screen goes dark, for example when the user lowers their arm. Please see the screenshots for a better understanding. Notice that the "Bench Press" text is not visible in the third image. Also, I’ve confirmed that this does not happen when the app is built with Xcode 16.4. First Image (initial presentation of the screen): Second Image (watch screen goes dark): Third Image (watch screen goes back on, title missing): Although I've confirmed that this is related to Xcode versioning, and it happens on multiple screens, here is the redacted version of this SwiftUI view that is shown in the screenshots, in case it helps: var body: some View { NavigationStack(path: $viewModel.pushedViews) { TabView(selection: $selectedTab) { ... ZStack { List { ForEach(Array(viewModel.setModels.enumerated()), id: \.element) { index, setModel in VStack(spacing: 8.0) { SetContentView() } } ... } .listStyle(.plain) .buttonStyle(.plain) VStack { WatchRestTimerView(viewModel: viewModel.restTimerViewModel) Spacer() } } .tag(WatchExerciseLoggingTab.logExercise) // HERE IS THE TITLE SET .navigationTitle(viewModel.name) NowPlayingView().tag(WatchExerciseLoggingTab.nowPlaying) } .tabViewStyle(PageTabViewStyle()) .navigationDestination(for: WatchWeightAndSetExerciseSummaryPushedView.self, destination: { _ in RedactedView() }) } } This prevents me from migrating to Xcode 26, I would also appreciate if anyone has a work around until there is a fix for this, I mean I can stop using navigation title and add a Text at the top but it is not quite the same UI experience we get from the navigation title in a watch app.
0
0
44
2w
Embedded Collection View in SwiftUI offset issue
I have a collection view that covers all the screen and it is scrolling behavior is paging. This collection view is embedded in a UIViewRepresentable and used in a SwiftUI app. The issue is that when users rotate the devices, sometimes the CollectionView.contentOffset get miscalculated and shows 2 pages. This is the code that I'm using for the collectionView and collectionViewLayout: class PageFlowLayout: UICollectionViewFlowLayout { override class var layoutAttributesClass: AnyClass { UICollectionViewLayoutAttributes.self } private var calculatedAttributes: [UICollectionViewLayoutAttributes] = [] private var calculatedContentWidth: CGFloat = 0 private var calculatedContentHeight: CGFloat = 0 public weak var delegate: PageFlowLayoutDelegate? override var collectionViewContentSize: CGSize { return CGSize(width: self.calculatedContentWidth, height: self.calculatedContentHeight) } override init() { super.init() self.estimatedItemSize = .zero self.scrollDirection = .horizontal self.minimumLineSpacing = 0 self.minimumInteritemSpacing = 0 self.sectionInset = .zero } required init?(coder: NSCoder) { fatalError("init(coder:) has not been implemented") } override func prepare() { guard let collectionView = collectionView, collectionView.numberOfSections > 0, calculatedAttributes.isEmpty else { return } estimatedItemSize = collectionView.bounds.size for item in 0..<collectionView.numberOfItems(inSection: 0) { let indexPath = IndexPath(item: item, section: 0) let attributes = UICollectionViewLayoutAttributes(forCellWith: indexPath) let itemOrigin = CGPoint(x: CGFloat(item) * collectionView.frame.width, y: 0) attributes.frame = .init(origin: itemOrigin, size: collectionView.frame.size) calculatedAttributes.append(attributes) } calculatedContentWidth = collectionView.bounds.width * CGFloat(calculatedAttributes.count) calculatedContentHeight = collectionView.bounds.size.height } override func layoutAttributesForElements(in rect: CGRect) -> [UICollectionViewLayoutAttributes]? { return calculatedAttributes.compactMap { return $0.frame.intersects(rect) ? $0 : nil } } override func layoutAttributesForItem(at indexPath: IndexPath) -> UICollectionViewLayoutAttributes? { return calculatedAttributes[indexPath.item] } override func shouldInvalidateLayout(forBoundsChange newBounds: CGRect) -> Bool { guard let collectionView else { return false } if newBounds.size != collectionView.bounds.size { return true } if newBounds.size.width > 0 { let pages = calculatedContentWidth / newBounds.size.width // If the contentWidth matches the number of pages, // if not it requires to layout the cells let arePagesExact = pages.truncatingRemainder(dividingBy: 1) == 0 return !arePagesExact } return false } override func invalidateLayout() { calculatedAttributes = [] super.invalidateLayout() } override func shouldInvalidateLayout(forPreferredLayoutAttributes preferredAttributes: UICollectionViewLayoutAttributes, withOriginalAttributes originalAttributes: UICollectionViewLayoutAttributes) -> Bool { guard let collectionView, #available(iOS 18.0, *) else { return false } return preferredAttributes.size != collectionView.bounds.size } override func invalidateLayout(with context: UICollectionViewLayoutInvalidationContext) { guard let customContext = context as? UICollectionViewFlowLayoutInvalidationContext else { return } if let collectionView, let currentPage = delegate?.currentPage() { let delta = (CGFloat(currentPage) * collectionView.bounds.width) - collectionView.contentOffset.x customContext.contentOffsetAdjustment.x += delta } calculatedAttributes = [] super.invalidateLayout(with: customContext) } override func prepare(forAnimatedBoundsChange oldBounds: CGRect) { super.prepare(forAnimatedBoundsChange: oldBounds) guard let collectionView else { return } if oldBounds.width != collectionView.bounds.width { invalidateLayout() } } override func targetContentOffset(forProposedContentOffset proposedContentOffset: CGPoint) -> CGPoint { guard let collectionView, let currentPage = delegate?.currentPage() else { return .zero } let targetContentOffset = super.targetContentOffset(forProposedContentOffset: proposedContentOffset) let targetPage = targetContentOffset.x / collectionView.frame.width if targetPage != CGFloat(currentPage) { let xPosition = CGFloat(currentPage) * collectionView.frame.width return CGPoint(x: xPosition, y: 0) } return targetContentOffset } // This function updates the contentOffset in case is wrong override func finalizeCollectionViewUpdates() { guard let collectionView, let currentPage = delegate?.currentPage() else { return } let xPosition = CGFloat(currentPage) * collectionView.bounds.width if xPosition != collectionView.contentOffset.x { let offset = CGPoint(x: xPosition, y: 0) collectionView.setContentOffset(offset, animated: false) } } } The full implementation is attached in the .txt file: RotationTestView.txt
6
0
182
2w
EXC_BAD_ACCESS in drawHierarchy(in:afterScreenUpdates:) on iOS 26.3.1+ — IOSurface CIF10 decompression crash
We're experiencing an EXC_BAD_ACCESS (SIGSEGV) crash in UIView.drawHierarchy(in:afterScreenUpdates: false) that occurs only on iOS 26.3.1 and later. It does not reproduce on iOS 26.3.0 or earlier. Crash Stack Thread 0 (Main Thread) — EXC_BAD_ACCESS KERN_INVALID_ADDRESS 0 libvDSP.dylib vConvert_XRGB2101010ToARGB8888_vec 1 ImageIO IIOIOSurfaceWrapper_CIF10::CopyImageBlockSetWithOptions 2 ImageIO IIOImageProviderInfo::CopyImageBlockSetWithOptions 3 ImageIO CGImageReadGetBytesAtOffset 4 CoreGraphics CGAccessSessionGetBytes 5 CoreGraphics img_data_lock 6 CoreGraphics CGSImageDataLock 7 CoreGraphics ripc_AcquireImage 8 CoreGraphics ripc_DrawImage 9 CoreGraphics CGContextDrawImage 10 UIKitCore -[UIView(Rendering) drawHierarchy:afterScreenUpdates:] The crash occurs during 10-bit CIF10 → 8-bit ARGB8888 pixel conversion when the IOSurface backing a UIImageView in the view hierarchy is deallocated mid-render. How to Reproduce Display a scrollable list with multiple UIImageViews loaded via an async image library Call drawHierarchy(in: bounds, afterScreenUpdates: false) on visible cells periodically Scroll to trigger image recycling Crash occurs sporadically — more likely under memory pressure or rapid image recycling What We've Tried Both UIKit off-screen rendering approaches crash on iOS 26.3.1: Approach Result drawHierarchy(afterScreenUpdates: false) EXC_BAD_ACCESS in CIF10 IOSurface decompression view.layer.render(in:) EXC_BAD_ACCESS in Metal (agxaAssertBufferIsValid) iOS Version Correlation iOS 26.3.0 and earlier: No crash iOS 26.3.1 (23D8133)+: Crash occurs (~5 events per 7 days) We suspect the ImageIO security patches in iOS 26.3 (CVE-2026-20675, CVE-2026-20634) may have changed IOSurface lifecycle timing, exposing a race condition between drawHierarchy's composited buffer read and asynchronous IOSurface reclamation by the OS. Crash Data We sampled 3 crash events: Event 1 (iOS 26.3.1): 71 MB free memory — memory pressure Event 2 (iOS 26.3.1): 88 MB free memory — memory pressure Event 3 (iOS 26.3.2): 768 MB free memory — NOT memory pressure Event 3 shows this isn't purely a low-memory issue. The IOSurface can be reclaimed even with ample free memory, likely due to async image recycling. Question Is this a known regression in iOS 26.3.1? Is there a safe way to snapshot a view hierarchy containing IOSurface-backed images without risking EXC_BAD_ACCESS? Should drawHierarchy gracefully handle the case where an IOSurface backing store is reclaimed during the render? Any guidance or workarounds would be appreciated. We've also filed this as Feedback (will update with FB number after submission).
2
0
287
2w
AppKit - Legal to Change a View's Frame in -viewDidLayout?
I have (had) a view controller that does a bit of manual layout in a -viewDidLayout override. This was pretty easy to manage - however since introducing NSGlassEffectView into the view hierarchy I sometimes am getting hit with "Unable to simultaneously satisfy constraints" and Appkit would break a constraint to 'recover.' It appears translatesAutoresizingMaskIntoConstraints is creating some really weird fixed width and height constraints. Here I wasn't doing any autolayout - just add the glass view and set its frame in -viewDidLayout. At runtime since I do manual layout in -viewDidLayout the frames are fixed and there is no real "error" in my app in practice though I wanted to get rid of the constraint breaking warning being logged because I know Autolayout can be aggressive about 'correctness' who knows if they decide to throw and not catch in the future. In my perfect world I would probably just prefer a view.doesManualLayout = YES here - the subviews are big containers no labels so localization is not an issue for me. Rather than playing with autoresizing masks to get better translated constraints I decided to set translatesAutoresizingMaskIntoConstraints to NO and make the constraints myself. Now I get hit with the following exception: "The window has been marked as needing another Layout Window pass, but it has already had more Layout Window passes than there are views in the window" So this happens because the view which now has constraints -- I adjusted the frame of it one point in -viewDidLayout. My question is - is not legal to make changes in -viewDidLayout - which seems like the AppKit version of -viewDidLayoutSubviews. In UIKit I always thought it was fine to make changes in -viewDidLayoutSubviews to frames - even if constraints were used - this is a place where you could override things in complex layouts that cannot be easily described in constraints. But in AppKit if you touch certain frames in -viewDidLayout it can now cause this exception (also related: https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/806471) I will change the constant of one of the constraints to account for the 1 point adjustment but my question still stands - is it not legal to touch frames in -viewDidLayout when autolayout constraints are used on that subview? It is (or at least was if I remember correctly) permitted to change the layout in -viewDidLayoutSubviews in UIKit but AppKit seems to be more aggressive in its checking for layout correctness). What about calling -sizeToFit on a control in viewDidLayout or some method that has side effect of invalidating layout in a non obvious way, is doing things like this now 'dangerous?' Shouldn't AppKit just block the layout from being invalidated from within -viewDidLayout - and leave whatever the layout is as is when viewDidLayout returns (thus making -viewDidLayout a useful place to override layout in the rare cases where you need a sledgehammer?)
4
0
514
2w
Technical risks of swapping between UITableViewDiffableDataSource and UITableViewDataSource on UITableView
I am currently migrating an app from the classic UITableViewDataSource to UITableViewDiffableDataSource. In certain complex cases, I find myself needing to toggle between the UITableViewDataSource and UITableViewDiffableDataSource on a single UITableView instance. Apple's official documentation for UITableViewDiffableDataSource contains a strict warning: "Do not change the dataSource on the table view after you configure it with a diffable data source. If the table view needs a new data source after you configure it initially, create and configure a new table view and diffable data source." I’m seeking clarification on: Internal State: What specific UIKit caching or internal state is corrupted if we nil out the diffable source and re-assign a classic one? Background Processes: Does the background diffing engine pose a risk (race conditions/crashes) if the source is swapped while a diff is calculating? The "Safe" Reset: If swapping is truly necessary, is there a verified cleanup sequence (e.g., clearing snapshots first) that avoids the need to recreate the UITableView entirely?
0
0
94
2w
TabView's Tab Label Image symbolEffect not allowed?
Hi, I'm using a TabView and for a given case I wish to have the icon of the Tab animated by symbolEffect to signify a state. The symbolEffect however doesn't seem to have an effect when used on a tab's label image. Is it really not possible? Tab(value: .hello) { EmptyView() } label: { Image(systemName: "hand.wave.fill") .symbolEffect(.wiggle, options: .repeating) } I still wish to use the TabView because it's amazing.
2
0
96
2w
macOS 26: NSTokenField crashes due to NSGenericException caused by too many Update Constraints
This example application crashes when entering any text to the token field with FAULT: NSGenericException: The window has been marked as needing another Update Constraints in Window pass, but it has already had more Update Constraints in Window passes than there are views in the window. The app uses controlTextDidChange to update a live preview where it accesses the objectValue of the token field. If one character is entered, it also looks like the NSTokenFieldDelegate methods tokenField(_:styleForRepresentedObject:) tokenField(_:editingStringForRepresentedObject:) tokenField(_:representedObjectForEditing:) are called more than 10000 times until the example app crashes on macOS Tahoe 26 beta 6. I've reported this issue with beta 1 as FB18088608, but haven't heard back so far. I have multiple occurrences of this issue in my app, which is working fine on previous versions of macOS. I haven't found a workaround yet, and I’m getting anxious of this issue persisting into the official release.
5
1
439
2w
Keyboard Toolbar Padding iOS26
When I create a SwiftUI toolbar item with placement of .keyboard on iOS 26, the item appears directly on top of and in contact with the keyboard. This does not look good visually nor does it match the behavior seen in Apple's apps, such as Reminders. Adding padding to the contents of the toolbar item only expands the size of the item but does not separate the capsule background of the item from the keyboard. How can I add vertical padding or spacing to separate the toolbar item capsule from the keyboard?
Topic: UI Frameworks SubTopic: SwiftUI
10
8
1.2k
2w
iOS 26 UITabBar Layout Glitch: Custom Appearance vs. Liquid Glass Effects during Rotation
Hello, I am encountering a UI layout issue on iOS 26 where UITabBar items become squashed or overlapping during device rotation (from Portrait to Landscape). This glitch occurs specifically when a custom UITabBarAppearance is applied. 1. "Liquid Glass" and UITabBar Customization According to TN3106, Apple states: "Starting in iOS 26, reduce your use of custom backgrounds in navigation elements and controls. While the techniques in this document remain valid for iOS 18 and earlier, prefer to remove custom effects and let the system determine the navigation bar background appearance. Any custom backgrounds and appearances you use in the navigation bar might overlay or interfere with Liquid Glass or other effects that the system provides, such as the scroll edge effect." Does this guidance also apply to UITabBar? Specifically, could setting a custom background color via UITabBarAppearance interfere with internal layout constraints required for the Liquid Glass effect to adapt correctly during orientation changes? It appears that the internal UIStackView may fail to recalculate width in time when these system effects are active. 2. Validation of the Layout Workaround To maintain our app's visual identity while resolving this squashing issue, I implemented the following fix within the transition coordinator of my UITabBarController: Code Implementation (Objective-C) [coordinator animateAlongsideTransition:^(id<UIViewControllerTransitionCoordinatorContext> _Nonnull context) { // Forcing a layout refresh to synchronize with the rotation animation [weakSelf.tabBar invalidateIntrinsicContentSize]; [weakSelf.tabBar setNeedsLayout]; [weakSelf.tabBar layoutIfNeeded]; } completion:nil]; Is manually invalidating the intrinsic content size an acceptable practice for iOS 26? Or is there a more "system-native" approach to ensure UITabBar layout remains stable and compatible with Liquid Glass, especially when custom appearances are necessary?
Topic: UI Frameworks SubTopic: UIKit Tags:
1
0
254
2w
Creating UTImportedTypeDeclarations entries yields duplicate Open menu entry
My iPadOS app can open .xml files. In my XMLApp.swift, I hooked up a: var body: some Scene { WindowGroup(id: "main") { .commands CommandGroup(replacing: .newItem) { ... Button(.openDot) { openXMLFile() } ... Next, I entered a new UTImportedTypeDeclarations / UTExportedTypeDeclarations in Project Settings -> Target -> Info -> Document Types, Exported Type Identifiers, Imported Type Identifiers, for the XML file-type: ... <key>UTImportedTypeDeclarations</key> <array> <dict> <key>UTTypeConformsTo</key> <array> <string>public.data</string> <string>public.xml</string> <string>public.content</string> </array> ... As soon as I do that, Xcode creates an additional Open... menu entry all the way at the bottom of the File menu. I cannot get rid of this additional menu entry. Its state is disabled (grayed out). I have my own Open (per the code above), which also responds to ⌘ - O. My menu entry works fine, as long as I disable the same keyboard shortcut so they don't collide. The extra Open entry is also displayed on the matching iPadOS simulator. From the same codebase, the Open is not displayed on the Mac (targeting macOS, not Catalyst). On macOS, only my Open is in the File menu, as expected. Why is there a duplicate Open menu entry and how do I get rid of it?
Replies
0
Boosts
0
Views
157
Activity
2w
Toolbar Display Bug When Using Zoom NavigationTransition with Swipe-Back Gesture
Could anyone help confirm if this is a bug and suggest possible solutions? Thanksssss In iOS 18, when using Zoom NavigationTransition, the toolbar from the destination view may randomly appear on the source view after navigating back with the swipe-back gesture. Re-entering the destination view and navigating back again can temporarily resolve the issue, but it may still occur intermittently. This bug only happens with Zoom NavigationTransition and does not occur when using a button tap to navigate back. import SwiftUI struct test: View { @Namespace private var namespace var body: some View { NavigationStack { NavigationLink { Image("img1") .resizable() .navigationTransition(.zoom(sourceID: 1, in: namespace)) .toolbar { ToolbarItem(placement: .bottomBar) { Text("destination noDisappear") } } } label: { Image("img1") .resizable() .frame(width: 100, height: 100) .matchedTransitionSource(id: 1, in: namespace) .toolbar { ToolbarItem(placement: .bottomBar) { Text("source toolbar") } } } } } }
Replies
2
Boosts
0
Views
349
Activity
2w
SearchFieldPlacement.navigationBarDrawer in NavigationSplitView detail ignores sidebar width on first rendering.
When a NavigationSplitView detail column shows a View that uses .searchable(text: $searchText, placement: .navigationBarDrawer), the search bar extends under the sidebar region, on the first View render only. After any event that triggers a View refresh (such as switching away and back to the View, editing the search text, or resizing the window) the search field is positioned correctly in the detail column’s navigation area. var body: some View { NavigationSplitView { List { Text("Sidebar") } .navigationTitle("Sidebar") } detail: { Text("Detail") .navigationTitle("List") .searchable( text: $searchText, placement: .navigationBarDrawer ) } } FB22559713 has been opened.
Replies
0
Boosts
0
Views
71
Activity
2w
-applicationDockMenu: method on NSApplicationDelegate doesn't work when attached to debugger
When I add a simple menu to the dock via the NSApplicationDelegate method -applicationDockMenu: and run the app from Xcode it doesn't work. -(NSMenu*)applicationDockMenu:(NSApplication*)sender { NSMenu *dockMenu = [self buildDockMenu]; if (dockMenu != nil) { NSLog(@"Returning dock menu."); return dockMenu; } else { NSLog(@"Not ready to build dock menu"); return nil; } } When I run the app, my main app window shows up but nothing logs out in -applicationDockMenu: until I click outside my app's window (so if I click the desktop background, or a Finder window, or whatever). Then after I click outside my app's main window this logs out: Returning dock menu. The "Not ready to build dock menu" message does not log out. But...when I right click on the dock icon, the menu doesn't show up. But if I stop the app from Xcode and just run it not attached to the debugger, the dock menu does show up. But this makes the debugging/testing situation not ideal.
Replies
4
Boosts
0
Views
255
Activity
2w
Increase Contrast reduces List selection contrast in dark appearance in SwiftUI NavigationSplitView
[Submitted as FB22200608] With Increase Contrast turned on, the selected row highlight in a List behaves inconsistently between light and dark appearance on iPad. In light appearance the blue selection highlight correctly becomes darker, but in dark appearance it becomes lighter instead. The text contrast ratio drops from about 3:1 to about 1.5:1, well below accessibility guidelines. This reproduces both in the simulator and on a physical device. The sample uses a standard SwiftUI List inside NavigationSplitView with built-in selection styling. No custom colors or styling are applied. REPRO STEPS Create a new Multiplatform project. Replace ContentView with code below. Build and run on iPad. Select an item in the list. Turn on Dark appearance (Cmd-Shift-A in Simulator). Turn on Increase Contrast (Cmd-Control-Shift-A in Simulator). Observe the selected row highlight. ACTUAL In light appearance, the blue selection highlight becomes darker when Increase Contrast is on, improving contrast as expected. In dark appearance, the blue selection highlight becomes lighter when Increase Contrast is on, reducing contrast between the selection background and the white text. EXPECTED Increase Contrast should consistently increase contrast. In dark appearance, the selection highlight should become darker—or otherwise increase contrast with the foreground text—not lighter. SAMPLE CODE struct ContentView: View { @State private var selection: String? var body: some View { NavigationSplitView { Text("Sidebar") } content: { List(selection: $selection) { Text("Item One") .tag("One") Text("Item Two") .tag("Two") } } detail: { if let selection { Text(selection) } else { Text("Select an item") } } } } SCREEN RECORDING CONTACTS The Contacts app behaves correctly. When Increase Contrast is turned on, the selection blue becomes darker, improving contrast. PASSWORDS The Passwords app, however, exhibits the issue. With Increase Contrast turned on, the selection blue becomes lighter instead of darker, reducing contrast.
Replies
5
Boosts
1
Views
442
Activity
2w
SwiftUI View Not Initialized on Background Relaunch (CoreBluetooth / Cold Start?)
I have a question regarding cold start and pre-warming behavior on iOS. I’m developing a SwiftUI app that continuously receives data from a BLE device in the background. We’ve observed that after the BLE stream stops, the OS often terminates our app. Later, when the sensor comes back into range, iOS appears to relaunch (or reinitialize) the app. In our app, we use a WindowGroup like this: WindowGroup { AppView(store: store) } We’ve placed our BLE reconnection logic inside a .task modifier in AppView. What’s confusing is this: Most of the time, when the app is relaunched, AppView is created and the .task runs as expected. However, in about 1 out of 10 cases, AppView is not created at all, so the .task does not execute. I’m trying to understand: Under what conditions does iOS relaunch an app without fully initializing the SwiftUI view hierarchy? Is this related to pre-warming or background relaunch mechanisms (e.g., CoreBluetooth state restoration)? What determines whether the WindowGroup and root view are actually instantiated? Any insight into the system’s relaunch behavior or lifecycle in this scenario would be greatly appreciated.
Replies
2
Boosts
0
Views
150
Activity
2w
Why is the .opacity AnyTransition is marked as nonisolated(unsafe)
Because of this, in Swift 6 mode, Xcode complains about the access, and ask me to use unsafe keyword. To fix it, I need to do this: Anyone can explain this abrupt nonisolated(unsafe) change?
Replies
1
Boosts
0
Views
110
Activity
2w
TipKit: showing a popover tip on a SwiftUI toolbar button
Hi folks, there's currently a known issue in TipKit due to which it won't show popover tips on buttons that are inside a SwiftUI ToolbarItem. For example, if you try this code, the popover tip will not appear: ToolbarItem { Button(action: {...}) { Label("Tap here", systemImage: "gear") } .popoverTip(sampleTip) } There's an easy workaround for this issue. Just apply a style to the button. It can be any style. Some examples are bordered, borderless, plain and borderedProminent. Here's a fixed version of the above code: ToolbarItem { Button(action: {...}) { Label("Tap here", systemImage: "gear") } .buttonStyle(.plain) // Adding this line fixes the issue. .popoverTip(sampleTip) } Hope this helps anyone running into this issue.
Replies
11
Boosts
11
Views
6k
Activity
2w
SwiftUI Catalyst Resizable Sheet
I am porting a macOS app to SwiftUI Catalyst and have run into a usability issue. On macOS, presented sheets are user resizable. On SwiftUI macOS, they are also resizable, but on Catalyst, they are not. Does anyone have a good reference on how to make a sheet resizable under SwiftUI Catalyst?
Topic: UI Frameworks SubTopic: SwiftUI
Replies
0
Boosts
0
Views
166
Activity
2w
NSOutlineView / NSTableView's Setting lineScroll to a somewhat absurd value of 304 in -tile
So I'm working on adding another component to my app that uses NSOutlineView, as we do in AppKit. There will probably always be less than 25 rows here. One row is much larger than the others. Not sure if any of this matters. What I know is I noticed scrolling it is very jank. It's going way too fast. So I took a peek and see lineScroll is getting is 304 in Interface Builder. Not sure how that happened. I changed it to like 24. Then Interface Builder automatically changes it back to 304. So in -viewDidLoad I just set it: NSScrollView *scrollView = self.outlineView.enclosingScrollView; scrollView.verticalLineScroll = 24.0; scrollView.lineScroll = 24.0; But scrolling still is busted. So I subclass NSScrollView and override the setters. For some reason, NSTableView's -tile method is deciding to change the lineScroll to 304, all on its own. So every time tile is called. line scrolls get reset to 304.
Replies
1
Boosts
0
Views
212
Activity
2w
View Navigation Title Disappears on watchOS Target When Built With Xcode 26+
I have a SwiftUI view in a watch companion app, and when I build my app with Xcode 26.2 or 26.3, the navigation title on a presented screen disappears after the watch screen goes dark. So, the navigation title is only visible when the screen is first presented and not again after the watch screen goes dark, for example when the user lowers their arm. Please see the screenshots for a better understanding. Notice that the "Bench Press" text is not visible in the third image. Also, I’ve confirmed that this does not happen when the app is built with Xcode 16.4. First Image (initial presentation of the screen): Second Image (watch screen goes dark): Third Image (watch screen goes back on, title missing): Although I've confirmed that this is related to Xcode versioning, and it happens on multiple screens, here is the redacted version of this SwiftUI view that is shown in the screenshots, in case it helps: var body: some View { NavigationStack(path: $viewModel.pushedViews) { TabView(selection: $selectedTab) { ... ZStack { List { ForEach(Array(viewModel.setModels.enumerated()), id: \.element) { index, setModel in VStack(spacing: 8.0) { SetContentView() } } ... } .listStyle(.plain) .buttonStyle(.plain) VStack { WatchRestTimerView(viewModel: viewModel.restTimerViewModel) Spacer() } } .tag(WatchExerciseLoggingTab.logExercise) // HERE IS THE TITLE SET .navigationTitle(viewModel.name) NowPlayingView().tag(WatchExerciseLoggingTab.nowPlaying) } .tabViewStyle(PageTabViewStyle()) .navigationDestination(for: WatchWeightAndSetExerciseSummaryPushedView.self, destination: { _ in RedactedView() }) } } This prevents me from migrating to Xcode 26, I would also appreciate if anyone has a work around until there is a fix for this, I mean I can stop using navigation title and add a Text at the top but it is not quite the same UI experience we get from the navigation title in a watch app.
Replies
0
Boosts
0
Views
44
Activity
2w
Embedded Collection View in SwiftUI offset issue
I have a collection view that covers all the screen and it is scrolling behavior is paging. This collection view is embedded in a UIViewRepresentable and used in a SwiftUI app. The issue is that when users rotate the devices, sometimes the CollectionView.contentOffset get miscalculated and shows 2 pages. This is the code that I'm using for the collectionView and collectionViewLayout: class PageFlowLayout: UICollectionViewFlowLayout { override class var layoutAttributesClass: AnyClass { UICollectionViewLayoutAttributes.self } private var calculatedAttributes: [UICollectionViewLayoutAttributes] = [] private var calculatedContentWidth: CGFloat = 0 private var calculatedContentHeight: CGFloat = 0 public weak var delegate: PageFlowLayoutDelegate? override var collectionViewContentSize: CGSize { return CGSize(width: self.calculatedContentWidth, height: self.calculatedContentHeight) } override init() { super.init() self.estimatedItemSize = .zero self.scrollDirection = .horizontal self.minimumLineSpacing = 0 self.minimumInteritemSpacing = 0 self.sectionInset = .zero } required init?(coder: NSCoder) { fatalError("init(coder:) has not been implemented") } override func prepare() { guard let collectionView = collectionView, collectionView.numberOfSections > 0, calculatedAttributes.isEmpty else { return } estimatedItemSize = collectionView.bounds.size for item in 0..<collectionView.numberOfItems(inSection: 0) { let indexPath = IndexPath(item: item, section: 0) let attributes = UICollectionViewLayoutAttributes(forCellWith: indexPath) let itemOrigin = CGPoint(x: CGFloat(item) * collectionView.frame.width, y: 0) attributes.frame = .init(origin: itemOrigin, size: collectionView.frame.size) calculatedAttributes.append(attributes) } calculatedContentWidth = collectionView.bounds.width * CGFloat(calculatedAttributes.count) calculatedContentHeight = collectionView.bounds.size.height } override func layoutAttributesForElements(in rect: CGRect) -> [UICollectionViewLayoutAttributes]? { return calculatedAttributes.compactMap { return $0.frame.intersects(rect) ? $0 : nil } } override func layoutAttributesForItem(at indexPath: IndexPath) -> UICollectionViewLayoutAttributes? { return calculatedAttributes[indexPath.item] } override func shouldInvalidateLayout(forBoundsChange newBounds: CGRect) -> Bool { guard let collectionView else { return false } if newBounds.size != collectionView.bounds.size { return true } if newBounds.size.width > 0 { let pages = calculatedContentWidth / newBounds.size.width // If the contentWidth matches the number of pages, // if not it requires to layout the cells let arePagesExact = pages.truncatingRemainder(dividingBy: 1) == 0 return !arePagesExact } return false } override func invalidateLayout() { calculatedAttributes = [] super.invalidateLayout() } override func shouldInvalidateLayout(forPreferredLayoutAttributes preferredAttributes: UICollectionViewLayoutAttributes, withOriginalAttributes originalAttributes: UICollectionViewLayoutAttributes) -> Bool { guard let collectionView, #available(iOS 18.0, *) else { return false } return preferredAttributes.size != collectionView.bounds.size } override func invalidateLayout(with context: UICollectionViewLayoutInvalidationContext) { guard let customContext = context as? UICollectionViewFlowLayoutInvalidationContext else { return } if let collectionView, let currentPage = delegate?.currentPage() { let delta = (CGFloat(currentPage) * collectionView.bounds.width) - collectionView.contentOffset.x customContext.contentOffsetAdjustment.x += delta } calculatedAttributes = [] super.invalidateLayout(with: customContext) } override func prepare(forAnimatedBoundsChange oldBounds: CGRect) { super.prepare(forAnimatedBoundsChange: oldBounds) guard let collectionView else { return } if oldBounds.width != collectionView.bounds.width { invalidateLayout() } } override func targetContentOffset(forProposedContentOffset proposedContentOffset: CGPoint) -> CGPoint { guard let collectionView, let currentPage = delegate?.currentPage() else { return .zero } let targetContentOffset = super.targetContentOffset(forProposedContentOffset: proposedContentOffset) let targetPage = targetContentOffset.x / collectionView.frame.width if targetPage != CGFloat(currentPage) { let xPosition = CGFloat(currentPage) * collectionView.frame.width return CGPoint(x: xPosition, y: 0) } return targetContentOffset } // This function updates the contentOffset in case is wrong override func finalizeCollectionViewUpdates() { guard let collectionView, let currentPage = delegate?.currentPage() else { return } let xPosition = CGFloat(currentPage) * collectionView.bounds.width if xPosition != collectionView.contentOffset.x { let offset = CGPoint(x: xPosition, y: 0) collectionView.setContentOffset(offset, animated: false) } } } The full implementation is attached in the .txt file: RotationTestView.txt
Replies
6
Boosts
0
Views
182
Activity
2w
EXC_BAD_ACCESS in drawHierarchy(in:afterScreenUpdates:) on iOS 26.3.1+ — IOSurface CIF10 decompression crash
We're experiencing an EXC_BAD_ACCESS (SIGSEGV) crash in UIView.drawHierarchy(in:afterScreenUpdates: false) that occurs only on iOS 26.3.1 and later. It does not reproduce on iOS 26.3.0 or earlier. Crash Stack Thread 0 (Main Thread) — EXC_BAD_ACCESS KERN_INVALID_ADDRESS 0 libvDSP.dylib vConvert_XRGB2101010ToARGB8888_vec 1 ImageIO IIOIOSurfaceWrapper_CIF10::CopyImageBlockSetWithOptions 2 ImageIO IIOImageProviderInfo::CopyImageBlockSetWithOptions 3 ImageIO CGImageReadGetBytesAtOffset 4 CoreGraphics CGAccessSessionGetBytes 5 CoreGraphics img_data_lock 6 CoreGraphics CGSImageDataLock 7 CoreGraphics ripc_AcquireImage 8 CoreGraphics ripc_DrawImage 9 CoreGraphics CGContextDrawImage 10 UIKitCore -[UIView(Rendering) drawHierarchy:afterScreenUpdates:] The crash occurs during 10-bit CIF10 → 8-bit ARGB8888 pixel conversion when the IOSurface backing a UIImageView in the view hierarchy is deallocated mid-render. How to Reproduce Display a scrollable list with multiple UIImageViews loaded via an async image library Call drawHierarchy(in: bounds, afterScreenUpdates: false) on visible cells periodically Scroll to trigger image recycling Crash occurs sporadically — more likely under memory pressure or rapid image recycling What We've Tried Both UIKit off-screen rendering approaches crash on iOS 26.3.1: Approach Result drawHierarchy(afterScreenUpdates: false) EXC_BAD_ACCESS in CIF10 IOSurface decompression view.layer.render(in:) EXC_BAD_ACCESS in Metal (agxaAssertBufferIsValid) iOS Version Correlation iOS 26.3.0 and earlier: No crash iOS 26.3.1 (23D8133)+: Crash occurs (~5 events per 7 days) We suspect the ImageIO security patches in iOS 26.3 (CVE-2026-20675, CVE-2026-20634) may have changed IOSurface lifecycle timing, exposing a race condition between drawHierarchy's composited buffer read and asynchronous IOSurface reclamation by the OS. Crash Data We sampled 3 crash events: Event 1 (iOS 26.3.1): 71 MB free memory — memory pressure Event 2 (iOS 26.3.1): 88 MB free memory — memory pressure Event 3 (iOS 26.3.2): 768 MB free memory — NOT memory pressure Event 3 shows this isn't purely a low-memory issue. The IOSurface can be reclaimed even with ample free memory, likely due to async image recycling. Question Is this a known regression in iOS 26.3.1? Is there a safe way to snapshot a view hierarchy containing IOSurface-backed images without risking EXC_BAD_ACCESS? Should drawHierarchy gracefully handle the case where an IOSurface backing store is reclaimed during the render? Any guidance or workarounds would be appreciated. We've also filed this as Feedback (will update with FB number after submission).
Replies
2
Boosts
0
Views
287
Activity
2w
AppKit - Legal to Change a View's Frame in -viewDidLayout?
I have (had) a view controller that does a bit of manual layout in a -viewDidLayout override. This was pretty easy to manage - however since introducing NSGlassEffectView into the view hierarchy I sometimes am getting hit with "Unable to simultaneously satisfy constraints" and Appkit would break a constraint to 'recover.' It appears translatesAutoresizingMaskIntoConstraints is creating some really weird fixed width and height constraints. Here I wasn't doing any autolayout - just add the glass view and set its frame in -viewDidLayout. At runtime since I do manual layout in -viewDidLayout the frames are fixed and there is no real "error" in my app in practice though I wanted to get rid of the constraint breaking warning being logged because I know Autolayout can be aggressive about 'correctness' who knows if they decide to throw and not catch in the future. In my perfect world I would probably just prefer a view.doesManualLayout = YES here - the subviews are big containers no labels so localization is not an issue for me. Rather than playing with autoresizing masks to get better translated constraints I decided to set translatesAutoresizingMaskIntoConstraints to NO and make the constraints myself. Now I get hit with the following exception: "The window has been marked as needing another Layout Window pass, but it has already had more Layout Window passes than there are views in the window" So this happens because the view which now has constraints -- I adjusted the frame of it one point in -viewDidLayout. My question is - is not legal to make changes in -viewDidLayout - which seems like the AppKit version of -viewDidLayoutSubviews. In UIKit I always thought it was fine to make changes in -viewDidLayoutSubviews to frames - even if constraints were used - this is a place where you could override things in complex layouts that cannot be easily described in constraints. But in AppKit if you touch certain frames in -viewDidLayout it can now cause this exception (also related: https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/806471) I will change the constant of one of the constraints to account for the 1 point adjustment but my question still stands - is it not legal to touch frames in -viewDidLayout when autolayout constraints are used on that subview? It is (or at least was if I remember correctly) permitted to change the layout in -viewDidLayoutSubviews in UIKit but AppKit seems to be more aggressive in its checking for layout correctness). What about calling -sizeToFit on a control in viewDidLayout or some method that has side effect of invalidating layout in a non obvious way, is doing things like this now 'dangerous?' Shouldn't AppKit just block the layout from being invalidated from within -viewDidLayout - and leave whatever the layout is as is when viewDidLayout returns (thus making -viewDidLayout a useful place to override layout in the rare cases where you need a sledgehammer?)
Replies
4
Boosts
0
Views
514
Activity
2w
Keyboard greyed issue
I am facing weird keyboard issue when building the app with Xcode 26 recently. Actual behaviour I need is: But one below is the issue as the keyboard keys are greyed out: Please tell how to resolve this issue
Replies
4
Boosts
0
Views
219
Activity
2w
Technical risks of swapping between UITableViewDiffableDataSource and UITableViewDataSource on UITableView
I am currently migrating an app from the classic UITableViewDataSource to UITableViewDiffableDataSource. In certain complex cases, I find myself needing to toggle between the UITableViewDataSource and UITableViewDiffableDataSource on a single UITableView instance. Apple's official documentation for UITableViewDiffableDataSource contains a strict warning: "Do not change the dataSource on the table view after you configure it with a diffable data source. If the table view needs a new data source after you configure it initially, create and configure a new table view and diffable data source." I’m seeking clarification on: Internal State: What specific UIKit caching or internal state is corrupted if we nil out the diffable source and re-assign a classic one? Background Processes: Does the background diffing engine pose a risk (race conditions/crashes) if the source is swapped while a diff is calculating? The "Safe" Reset: If swapping is truly necessary, is there a verified cleanup sequence (e.g., clearing snapshots first) that avoids the need to recreate the UITableView entirely?
Replies
0
Boosts
0
Views
94
Activity
2w
TabView's Tab Label Image symbolEffect not allowed?
Hi, I'm using a TabView and for a given case I wish to have the icon of the Tab animated by symbolEffect to signify a state. The symbolEffect however doesn't seem to have an effect when used on a tab's label image. Is it really not possible? Tab(value: .hello) { EmptyView() } label: { Image(systemName: "hand.wave.fill") .symbolEffect(.wiggle, options: .repeating) } I still wish to use the TabView because it's amazing.
Replies
2
Boosts
0
Views
96
Activity
2w
macOS 26: NSTokenField crashes due to NSGenericException caused by too many Update Constraints
This example application crashes when entering any text to the token field with FAULT: NSGenericException: The window has been marked as needing another Update Constraints in Window pass, but it has already had more Update Constraints in Window passes than there are views in the window. The app uses controlTextDidChange to update a live preview where it accesses the objectValue of the token field. If one character is entered, it also looks like the NSTokenFieldDelegate methods tokenField(_:styleForRepresentedObject:) tokenField(_:editingStringForRepresentedObject:) tokenField(_:representedObjectForEditing:) are called more than 10000 times until the example app crashes on macOS Tahoe 26 beta 6. I've reported this issue with beta 1 as FB18088608, but haven't heard back so far. I have multiple occurrences of this issue in my app, which is working fine on previous versions of macOS. I haven't found a workaround yet, and I’m getting anxious of this issue persisting into the official release.
Replies
5
Boosts
1
Views
439
Activity
2w
Keyboard Toolbar Padding iOS26
When I create a SwiftUI toolbar item with placement of .keyboard on iOS 26, the item appears directly on top of and in contact with the keyboard. This does not look good visually nor does it match the behavior seen in Apple's apps, such as Reminders. Adding padding to the contents of the toolbar item only expands the size of the item but does not separate the capsule background of the item from the keyboard. How can I add vertical padding or spacing to separate the toolbar item capsule from the keyboard?
Topic: UI Frameworks SubTopic: SwiftUI
Replies
10
Boosts
8
Views
1.2k
Activity
2w
iOS 26 UITabBar Layout Glitch: Custom Appearance vs. Liquid Glass Effects during Rotation
Hello, I am encountering a UI layout issue on iOS 26 where UITabBar items become squashed or overlapping during device rotation (from Portrait to Landscape). This glitch occurs specifically when a custom UITabBarAppearance is applied. 1. "Liquid Glass" and UITabBar Customization According to TN3106, Apple states: "Starting in iOS 26, reduce your use of custom backgrounds in navigation elements and controls. While the techniques in this document remain valid for iOS 18 and earlier, prefer to remove custom effects and let the system determine the navigation bar background appearance. Any custom backgrounds and appearances you use in the navigation bar might overlay or interfere with Liquid Glass or other effects that the system provides, such as the scroll edge effect." Does this guidance also apply to UITabBar? Specifically, could setting a custom background color via UITabBarAppearance interfere with internal layout constraints required for the Liquid Glass effect to adapt correctly during orientation changes? It appears that the internal UIStackView may fail to recalculate width in time when these system effects are active. 2. Validation of the Layout Workaround To maintain our app's visual identity while resolving this squashing issue, I implemented the following fix within the transition coordinator of my UITabBarController: Code Implementation (Objective-C) [coordinator animateAlongsideTransition:^(id<UIViewControllerTransitionCoordinatorContext> _Nonnull context) { // Forcing a layout refresh to synchronize with the rotation animation [weakSelf.tabBar invalidateIntrinsicContentSize]; [weakSelf.tabBar setNeedsLayout]; [weakSelf.tabBar layoutIfNeeded]; } completion:nil]; Is manually invalidating the intrinsic content size an acceptable practice for iOS 26? Or is there a more "system-native" approach to ensure UITabBar layout remains stable and compatible with Liquid Glass, especially when custom appearances are necessary?
Topic: UI Frameworks SubTopic: UIKit Tags:
Replies
1
Boosts
0
Views
254
Activity
2w