Post

Replies

Boosts

Views

Activity

Reply to are new radio player effectively banned from appstore? guideline 5.2.3
At the current format shown in your screenshot, your app is unlikely to be accepted because the user would not be able to tell where your radio station list comes from. Even after you manage to tell where your data comes from, whether your submission will be accepted depends on the reviewer. There are difficult reviewers who literally play by the book. Sometimes, it will only take luck not to face these difficult people.
Sep ’26
Reply to Appeal Guidance Request – Terminated Developer Account (Section 3.2(f)) – Case ID: 20000149214883
I may have read one or two successful stories where they said they had their account status reinstated. There are hundreds of topics if you search for 'Termination,' if not thousands. Why do you want to wait for someone to share their experience that may never come? I could help you find those topics. But I won't. helping someone who doesn't help themselves won't pay my bills.
Sep ’26
Reply to Guideline 4.3(a): Spam rejections for music app. App Review seems to be auto-rejecting, not responding to questions.
Keywords: apple music,player,library,playlists,smart playlist,radio,dj,discover,albums,artists,spotify,songs I know it has something to do with music. And I have only heard of its name and have no clue as to how Spotify works. Yet, you are simply asking the reviewer to compare your app with it. It may be too late, but I would remove it if I were you. You should never enter apps that are to compete with yours in the keyword list.
Aug ’26
Reply to 4.3 Rejection
I'm afraid you are not helping yourself at all. There is no store description. There is no list of store keywords. You don't even bother to mention the category where your software title is supposed to sit. You don't mentions the development platform. Basically, all you say is you have gotten your submission rejected and mention a few aspects without even telling what it's about.
Aug ’26
Reply to pp rejected under Guideline 4.3 (Spam) dating app with unique BaZi engine
There have been several topics of the same nature (dating app rejected) this year alone. Have you searched and read them? The app is already live on the Google Play Store and has been getting downloads daily since launch How does that come into play with your rejection at Apple's App Store? If that truly matters, you should file your appeal to Google Play Store, shouldn't you? I am afraid you are not helping yourself at all. Basically, all you write is that you have gotten your dating app rejected. Nobody gives you a dime about how unique your app is. You don't state your app description at App Store. You don't show the list of keywords you are using. You don't even mention your development platform or the exact rejection statement. the dating app market is saturated. Okay. Which one isn't? By the way, nobody knows what 'pp' stands for.
Aug ’26
Reply to are new radio player effectively banned from appstore? guideline 5.2.3
At the current format shown in your screenshot, your app is unlikely to be accepted because the user would not be able to tell where your radio station list comes from. Even after you manage to tell where your data comes from, whether your submission will be accepted depends on the reviewer. There are difficult reviewers who literally play by the book. Sometimes, it will only take luck not to face these difficult people.
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Sep ’26
Reply to Appeal Guidance Request – Terminated Developer Account (Section 3.2(f)) – Case ID: 20000149214883
I may have read one or two successful stories where they said they had their account status reinstated. There are hundreds of topics if you search for 'Termination,' if not thousands. Why do you want to wait for someone to share their experience that may never come? I could help you find those topics. But I won't. helping someone who doesn't help themselves won't pay my bills.
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Sep ’26
Reply to Guideline 4.3(a): Spam rejections for music app. App Review seems to be auto-rejecting, not responding to questions.
Keywords: apple music,player,library,playlists,smart playlist,radio,dj,discover,albums,artists,spotify,songs I know it has something to do with music. And I have only heard of its name and have no clue as to how Spotify works. Yet, you are simply asking the reviewer to compare your app with it. It may be too late, but I would remove it if I were you. You should never enter apps that are to compete with yours in the keyword list.
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Aug ’26
Reply to 4.3 Rejection
I'm afraid you are not helping yourself at all. There is no store description. There is no list of store keywords. You don't even bother to mention the category where your software title is supposed to sit. You don't mentions the development platform. Basically, all you say is you have gotten your submission rejected and mention a few aspects without even telling what it's about.
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Aug ’26
Reply to pp rejected under Guideline 4.3 (Spam) dating app with unique BaZi engine
There have been several topics of the same nature (dating app rejected) this year alone. Have you searched and read them? The app is already live on the Google Play Store and has been getting downloads daily since launch How does that come into play with your rejection at Apple's App Store? If that truly matters, you should file your appeal to Google Play Store, shouldn't you? I am afraid you are not helping yourself at all. Basically, all you write is that you have gotten your dating app rejected. Nobody gives you a dime about how unique your app is. You don't state your app description at App Store. You don't show the list of keywords you are using. You don't even mention your development platform or the exact rejection statement. the dating app market is saturated. Okay. Which one isn't? By the way, nobody knows what 'pp' stands for.
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Aug ’26