I replied in the review thread with a point-by-point response to each 4.3(a) factor and asked which app mine is believed to resemble You've asked what!? Which app of yours? You've said it's your only app. These days, they let a bot reject your submission a few seconds after they start reviewing it if the category you have chosen is very crowded. They are out of hand. I guess you have to tell them under the App information section how unique your app is, which sounds totally absurd, though, because you have to know how other apps similar to yours work.

Unless you show the description and the list of keywords, there is little that someone knows why your 10-year-old desktop application has been rejected. But let me suppose that the description says that you can create an official password photo size. If that's the case, it should raise a red flag unless you have proof that you are representing a government. Also, somebody mentioned that their passport app or application had been rejected at Reddit or somewhere several days ago. You probably want to run a search.

Your app may be different from other dating apps. But your topic is pretty much the same as those of dating apps being rejected as spams. There is no app description. There is no list of keywords. You don't state the exact rejection statement. You don't seem to have read other topics under the same circumstances.

At the current format shown in your screenshot, your app is unlikely to be accepted because the user would not be able to tell where your radio station list comes from. Even after you manage to tell where your data comes from, whether your submission will be accepted depends on the reviewer. There are difficult reviewers who literally play by the book. Sometimes, it will only take luck not to face these difficult people.

It may continue to get stuck until they finish reviewing iOS 27 since they use their own army of reviewers to review new OS releases since 2011. But the release date for iOS 27 is already set, which suggests that the wait time won't be long.

You are using a wrong email address for TestFlight. That's probably why. I mentioned that a few months ago somewhere. Being new is one story. Not reading old topics to catch up with others is another.

Have you run a search about NWConnection? I opened a ticket about it two, three or four years ago with some old lines of code involving DispatchQueue if I remember correctly.

I may have read one or two successful stories where they said they had their account status reinstated. There are hundreds of topics if you search for 'Termination,' if not thousands. Why do you want to wait for someone to share their experience that may never come? I could help you find those topics. But I won't. helping someone who doesn't help themselves won't pay my bills.

Your product identifier is problematic because it doesn't necessarily and uniquely point to your software product. That doesn't mean that's the root of the issue, though.

Anyone dealt with 4.3(a) after an account transfer? Or seen this instant rejection thing? Have you run a search? If you have, you should know that you are not the only person with one or more software titles rejected at the same time. Is that all you want to know? It seems that they have been cracking down on vibe coders lately.

Has anyone faced a similar rejection What's stopping you from running a search with 'dating app' or equivalent at this site? There are a dozen similar topics of the same nature this year alone.

Keywords: apple music,player,library,playlists,smart playlist,radio,dj,discover,albums,artists,spotify,songs I know it has something to do with music. And I have only heard of its name and have no clue as to how Spotify works. Yet, you are simply asking the reviewer to compare your app with it. It may be too late, but I would remove it if I were you. You should never enter apps that are to compete with yours in the keyword list.

Nobody can tell because you don't even mention the development platform or the framework you are using. If I were you, I would check if the code points to the right product identifier.

I'm afraid you are not helping yourself at all. There is no store description. There is no list of store keywords. You don't even bother to mention the category where your software title is supposed to sit. You don't mentions the development platform. Basically, all you say is you have gotten your submission rejected and mention a few aspects without even telling what it's about.

A misconduct? A mistake can happen to anyone, probably, except you. If you insist that an IAP is correctly implemented, I would request a screenshot showing that it doesn't appear.