I just added a .systemLarge widget to my app, but I can't get Links to work. I want the user to be able to tap one of the four rows in my widget - like the EmojiRangers example - but I can't get it to work. I watched a Developer video from WWDC20: https://developer.apple.com/videos/play/wwdc2020/10036?time=223 The guy, Izzy, 'simply' embeds an HStack in a Link, and hey presto! It all works. But that doesn't happen for me. There's clearly some code in the background that runs. I already have .widgetURL working for .systemSmall and .systemMedium widgets, and I don't need to use Links on those two types. Those work by sending a URL to .onOpenURL { incomingURL in ... All good there, no issues. I've wrapped each row in the large widget in a Link with the URL of something like myappurlscheme://widgetTapped/widgetId (it's the same url as that used in the small and medium widgets). I build & run. I tap a row. It doesn't act as though a row is tappable (it doesn't go slightly transparent), and just opens the app without hitting .onOpenURL or anything else. Nothing in my scene delegate is triggered. Is there a specific delegate method that gets called? Do I need to set up some awful intents? I'm not using any sort of NavigationStack here; that model doesn't fit my app. Any ideas? Thanks.

How would you go about handling this sort of situation? An app has two tiers of non-consumable in-app purchases. The IAP simply unlocks a certain level of access in the app: The first tier for $1.99 allows the user to add up to 50 things. The second tier for $3.99 allows the user to add up to 200 things. If the user has not bought an IAP the app will show the two tiers available for purchase. The user then buys Tier 1 and happily goes about adding some things to the app. The app now only shows Tier 2 available for purchase, because Tier 1 has been purchased. A few weeks go by and they realise they need to add more than 50 things. Would the user have to suck it up and just accept they should've paid the $3.99? Or, could a new Tier 1.5 be added that's a kind of upgrade price of $2.00 (the difference between the two original tiers) to unlock the higher 200 things level? I doubt this would work properly, because although I can control that tier being displayed or not in the app, I cannot control it in the App Store product pages, and it would be displayed among the Tier 1 and Tier 2 levels, so people would just buy that rather than the full priced Tier 2. How should I handle this situation? Just have the one tier (Tier 2) and make it simpler?

I'm adding my first in-app purchase to an app, and I'm finding the process incredibly frustrating. Aside from the Apple Developer Documentation not being clear enough, and kind of glossing over the technical steps required (and their sample code being woefully inadequate), App Store Connect and the testing sandbox simply don't work as they say they do. For example, in my app I've purchased the IAP and now I want to request a refund. I select the purchase, I choose a refund reason, and this page says, "To set up a test for approved refunds, select any refund reason on the refund request sheet, and submit the sheet. The App Store automatically approves the refund request in the testing environment." Well, when I re-launch the app the purchase is still there. I can't request a refund again because it says this is a duplicate refund request, so it knows that the purchase has had a request, and it's supposed to have automatically refunded it, but it clearly hasn't. So, I try clearing the purchase history via the Settings app > Developer > Sandbox Apple Account. Same thing. Purchase remains. Try clearing purchase history in App Store Connect. Same thing. How on Earth does anyone get an in-app purchase to work when the entire testing environment is so badly executed? How do I get past this? The IAP is the last part of the app that needs to be implemented, and I've lost a week on this already.

I'm trying to update an app of mine to have a more modern look, and the last part of it is the Action Extension in Safari. My info.plist file has the correct NSExtension details to use a storyboard, but storyboards look so old and I'd like to use a nicer SwiftUI-based look. Is this even possible? This is the relevant bit from the Info.plist: <dict> <key>NSExtensionAttributes</key> <dict> <key>NSExtensionActivationRule</key> <dict> <key>NSExtensionActivationSupportsWebPageWithMaxCount</key> <integer>1</integer> </dict> <key>NSExtensionJavaScriptPreprocessingFile</key> <string>GetURL</string> </dict> <key>NSExtensionPointIdentifier</key> <string>com.apple.ui-services</string> <key>NSExtensionActionWantsFullScreenPresentation</key> <false/> <key>NSExtensionMainStoryboard</key> <string>MainInterface</string> </dict> I see I can use NSExtensionPrincipalClass instead of NSExtensionMainStoryboard but then I get stuck. If I remove this: <key>NSExtensionMainStoryboard</key> <string>MainInterface</string> and replace it with this: <key>NSExtensionPrincipalClass</key> <string>$(PRODUCT_MODULE_NAME).ActionViewController</string> I get this error when I run the extension: Rejecting view controller creation request due to invalid extension storyboard or principal class: Error Domain=NSCocoaErrorDomain Code=967223 "(null)" UserInfo={Invalid Configuration=Either NSExtensionMainStoryboard or NSExtensionPrincipalClass must be specified in the extension's Info.plist file but not both.} According to that error the two keys are mutually-exclusive, which is fine as I'm using just one of them, so why do I get this error? Is it something to do with the actual code in ActionViewController? I have this, and nothing here ever runs: class ActionViewController: UIViewController { var theUrl: String = "" @objc override func viewDidLoad() { super.viewDidLoad() if let inputItem = extensionContext!.inputItems.first as? NSExtensionItem { if let itemProvider = inputItem.attachments?.first { itemProvider.loadItem(forTypeIdentifier: UTType.propertyList.identifier as String) { [unowned self] (dict, error) in let itemDictionary = dict as! NSDictionary let javaScriptValues = itemDictionary[NSExtensionJavaScriptPreprocessingResultsKey] as! NSDictionary self.theUrl = javaScriptValues["URL"] as! String // Build the SwiftUI view, wrap it in a UIHostingController then send to the main thread to update the UI let contentView = ActionExtensionView(theUrl: self.theUrl, clickedCancel: self.cancel, clickedDone: self.done) let childView = UIHostingController(rootView: contentView) self.view.addSubview(childView.view) // Set the place where your view will be displayed let constraints = [ childView.view.topAnchor.constraint(equalTo: view.topAnchor), childView.view.bottomAnchor.constraint(equalTo: view.bottomAnchor), childView.view.leadingAnchor.constraint(equalTo: view.leadingAnchor), childView.view.trailingAnchor.constraint(equalTo: view.trailingAnchor), childView.view.widthAnchor.constraint(equalTo: view.widthAnchor), childView.view.heightAnchor.constraint(equalTo: view.heightAnchor) ] childView.view.translatesAutoresizingMaskIntoConstraints = false view.addConstraints(constraints) DispatchQueue.main.async { self.present(childView, animated: true) } } } } } Apple really don't make it easy to develop for their platforms, do they?

In my content blocker I have a bunch of rules that block some content in Safari, but I want my users to be able to whiltelist a website so the blocker rules don't apply on that site. I have something like this: { "action": { "type":"css-display-none", "selector":"a[href*='Bobbins']" }, "trigger": { "url-filter":".*" } }, { "trigger": { "url-filter": ".*", "if-domain": ["*mydomain.com"] }, "action": { "type": "ignore-previous-rules" } } I think that should block any a link where the href includes Bobbins but not if the site is mydomain.com. However, that simply doesn't work. It doesn't matter what I put in the array of domains to whitelist, it just doesn't apply it. In every case, the a link is blocked. How do you actually whitelist a website in a Safari content blocker?

Following on from this thread: https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/805037 my list of items is now correctly maintaining state (no more disappearing rows), but I'm now hitting a really annoying issue: Every time something changes - even just changing the dark mode of the device - the entire list of items is refreshed, and the list jumps back to the top. A simple representation: // modelData.filteredItems is either all items or some items, depending on whether the user is searching List { ForEach(modelData.filteredItems) { item in ItemRow(item: item) } } When the user isn't searching, filteredItems has everything in it. When they turn on search, I filter and sort the data in place: // Called when the user turns on search, or when the searchString or searchType changes func sortAndFilterItemsInModelData() { modelData.filteredItems.removeAll() // Remove all items from the filtered array modelData.filteredItems.append(contentsOf: modelData.allItems) // Add all items back in let searchString: String = modelData.searchString.lowercased() switch(modelData.searchType) { case 1: // Remove all items from the filtered array that don't match the search string modelData.filteredItems.removeAll(where: { !$0.name.lowercased().contains(searchString) }) ... } // Sorting switch(modelData.sortKey) { case sortKeyDate: modelData.sortAscending ? modelData.filteredItems.sort { $0.date < $1.date } : modelData.filteredItems.sort { $0.date > $1.date } // Sorts in place ... } } The method doesn't return anything because all the actions are done in place on the data, and the view should display the contents of modelData.filteredItems. If you're searching and there are, say 10 items in the list and you're at the bottom of the list, then you change the search so there are now 11 items, it jumps back to the top rather than just adding the extra ItemRow to the bottom. Yes, the data is different, but it hasn't been replaced; it has been altered in place. The biggest issue here is that you can simply change the device to/from Dark Mode - which can happen automatically at a certain time of day - and you're thrown back to the top of the list. The array of data hasn't changed, but SwiftUI treats it as though it has. There's also a section in the List that can be expanded and contracted. It shows or hides items of a certain type. When I expand it, I expect the list to stay in the same place and just show the extra rows, but again, it jumps to the top. It's a really poor user experience. Am I doing something wrong (probably, yes), or is there some other way to retain the scroll position in a List? The internet suggests switching to a LazyVStack, but I lose left/right swipe buttons and the platform-specific styling. Thanks.

I use the following bit of code to snapshot a View as a UIImage, but it's causing a memory leak: extension View { @ViewBuilder func snapshot(trigger: Bool, onComplete: @escaping (UIImage) -> ()) -> some View { self.modifier(SnapshotModifier(trigger: trigger, onComplete: onComplete)) } } fileprivate struct SnapshotModifier: ViewModifier { var trigger: Bool var onComplete: (UIImage) -> () @State private var view: UIView = .init(frame: .zero) func body(content: Content) -> some View { content .background(ViewExtractor(view: view)) .compositingGroup() .onChange(of: trigger) { generateSnapshot() } } private func generateSnapshot() { if let superView = view.superview?.superview { let render = UIGraphicsImageRenderer(size: superView.bounds.size) let image = render.image { _ in superView.drawHierarchy(in: superView.bounds, afterScreenUpdates: true) } onComplete(image) } } } fileprivate struct ViewExtractor: UIViewRepresentable { var view: UIView func makeUIView(context: Context) -> UIView { view.backgroundColor = .clear return view } func updateUIView(_ uiView: UIView, context: Context) { // No process } } Taking the snapshot is triggered like this: struct ContentView: View { @State private var triggerSnapshot: Bool = false var body: some View { Button("Press to snapshot") { triggerSnapshot = true } TheViewIWantToSnapshot() .snapshot(trigger: triggerSnapshot) { image in // Save the image; you don't have to do anything here to get the leak. } } } I'm not the best at Instruments, and this is what the Leaks template produces. There are no method names, just memory addresses: Is this leak in an internal iOS library, is there something wrong with Instruments, or am I missing something obvious in my code? Thanks.

Right, this is getting on my nerves now. iOS app installed on iPhone via Xcode. Watch app installed on Watch via Xcode. Both apps are running and are in the foreground. iOS app launches on iPhone and reports: WCSession.isSupported = YES theDelegate.session.isPaired = YES theDelegate.session.watchAppInstalled = NO theDelegate.session.activationState = Activated I press a button in the Watch app. It reports: session == activated and reachable iOS app delegate receives a message from the Watch app: didReceiveMessage (from Watch): message = {     action = giveMeUpdatedItems; } The apps must be installed on the devices in order for the Watch app to have used sendMessage (which is only available if the session is reachable, which it is). iOS app delegate passes that through as a notification to another bit of code that collates the info and sends it back to the Watch app. watchNotificationUpdateData; userInfo = {     action = giveMeUpdatedItems; } That bit of code in the iOS app checks whether we can send data to the Watch app, and doesn't send the data because: WCSession.isSupported = YES theDelegate.session.isPaired = YES theDelegate.session.watchAppInstalled = NO theDelegate.session.activationState = Activated If I remove the check for watchAppInstalled, I get this: Error sending Watch application context: Watch app is not installed. {     NSLocalizedDescription = "Watch app is not installed.";     NSLocalizedRecoverySuggestion = "Install the Watch app."; } I've deleted and reinstalled the app on both devices countless times. I've rebooted the devices, plus the Mac. I've reinstalled Xcode. I've cleaned builds. I've deleted DerivedData. And still it says the companion app isn't installed.

I recently raised this post explaining how I couldn't seem to get watchOS 9 complications to work, and I've figured out a partial fix. The original post details the issues with complications - and some are still valid - but this fix applies to both my complications and Home Screen / Lock Screen widgets. I was following the various WWDC 2020/2022 videos and the Emoji Rangers sample code, adding bits here and there, and assuming they were completely valid. Sadly, this bit of code in the widget's dynamic intents IntentTimelineProvider getTimeline really just banjaxed everything: // Create entries for one day, 15 minutes apart let currentDate = Date() for minuteOffset in stride(from: 0, to: 60 * 60 * 24, by: 15) { let entryDate = Calendar.current.date(byAdding: .minute, value: minuteOffset, to: currentDate)! entries.append(EventEntry(date: entryDate, event: event)) } If I remove that, and generate a different timeline with specific dates and times (for example: now, in 10 mins, in 2 hours, in a day, etc.) the complications appear correctly, as do Home Screen and Lock Screen widgets. The outstanding issues with complications are: The previews all use the same data, but getSnapshot() is supposed to return the data specific to that event from the configuration, i.e. if let theId = configuration.event?.identifier. "Christmas" is correct, but "Gallery Opening" is using Christmas's data. Once I've selected the event I want to use in a complication the edit screen shows it as totally blank, not even a placeholder: I hope this little fix works for you guys. And, if you know how to fix the above issues, let me know. (iOS 16.1 beta 1, Xcode 14.1 beta 1)

I've been happily building and deploying my app to my iPhone and Watch S8, and the app was ready to submit to App Store Connect last night. However, when archiving it I got an error saying that my DynamicEventSelectionIntent was in multiple extensions. It was, kind of. When I started working on the complications I copied the Widgets intents into the complications, and left the name the same, but they were not in multiple targets. It looks like the info plist only had one item in the IntentsSupported (because they're the same name), so I decided to rename them so I had a widget one and a complications one. The problem I have now is that I can't deploy to my iPhone and Watch anymore because I'm getting this error: This app contains a WatchKit app with one or more Siri Intents app extensions that declare IntentsSupported that are not declared in any of the companion app's Siri Intents app extensions. WatchKit Siri Intents extensions' IntentsSupported values must be a subset of the companion app's Siri Intents extensions' IntentsSupported values. All I've done is rename one intent, and locate every instance of it in the info plist files, and add the appropriate new one into the right places. Here's what I've got. Main App contains Widget and WidgetIntentHandler, plus Watch App, which contains Complications and ComplicationsIntentHandler. Target: Main app: (I've removed everything that has no bearing on extensions.) Target: Widget: Target: WidgetIntentHandler: Target: Watch App: Target: Complications: Target: ComplicationsIntentHandler: Please, can someone tell me what should and should not be in the various parts, as I've tried for 12 hours now and I cannot get this to deploy to my iPhone anymore :( Thanks.

I have a List which acts like a form where you can enter values. It uses a custom View struct SectionArea to separate the various sections and cut down on code duplication, like this: List { SectionArea(title: "Section One", height: 176, horizontalPadding: 0, roundCorners: (0, 0, 0, 0)) { VStack { Button { print("Pressed Button One") fullScreenViewChoice = .optionOne showSubView.toggle() } label: { HStack { Text("Button One") Spacer() Image(systemName: "chevron.right") } } .frame(height: 40) Divider() Button { print("Pressed Button Two") fullScreenViewChoice = .optionTwo showSubView.toggle() } label: { HStack { Text("Button Two") Spacer() Image(systemName: "chevron.right") } } .frame(height: 40) Divider() } } } .listStyle(.plain) .listRowSpacing(0) It works fine, but regardless of which button I press it always acts as though both buttons have been pressed. Say I press Button One, the console will display: Pressed Button One Pressed Button Two Can someone tell me where I'm going wrong here, please? Thanks! EDIT: Actually, it doesn't look like it's because of the SectionArea struct, because I've taken the code from there and wrapped it around the content directly, rather than using that struct, and it still does it. I've removed everything and just put this: List { VStack { ButtonOne ButtonTwo } } It still presses both buttons.

According to this Apple page, if you make any money from your apps in the EU you have to provide your email address, phone number and address, and they will be displayed on your App Store page for all and sundry to see, use, and likely, abuse. I don't want anyone and everyone to know those details; they are private. I thought Apple was all about privacy? I understand they have to adhere to the DSA, but Apple hasn't raised a single objection to this. Apple has consistently said that not sharing a user's email address with a developer is a part of being in the App Store, i.e. Spotify can't contact someone who downloaded their app; but a user can now contact the developer? I barely make any money from my apps - not even enough to cover the annual developer program fee - but I keep developing to stay current. I cannot afford a PO Box or business address and phone number to shield me from this, so I'm likely to remove my apps from the EU market. You might think I'm being overly-cautious, or having a knee-jerk reaction, but these are my personal, private details, and they should not be available publicly just because I barely clear £1.50 a month from my apps.

I have a content blocker that generally works correctly, but I need to block an element that has certain text in it. For example, <span id="theId">Some text</span> is easy enough to block because I can locate the id and block that, but what if there is no id, or the id is completely random? What if it's just <span>Some text</span>? How do I block that? Let's say this is my only content blocker rule: [ { "action": { "type": "css-display-none", "selector": ":has-text(/Some text/i)" }, "trigger": { "url-filter": ".*" } } ] No errors are seen when the rule is loaded, so it's syntactically correct, it just doesn't block the HTML. I gather this is because :has-text() works on attributes, not contents, so it works on alt, href, aria-label etc. but not on the contents of the element itself. How do I block Some text in my example above? Thanks!

I'm trying to implement my first in-app purchase, and I've created the IAP in App Store Connect, and created a sandbox account. When I open Settings > Developer in the iPhone Simulator, there is a "Sandbox Apple Account" option at the bottom. If I click the blue "Sign In" link I'm asked for the email and password, so I enter the correct credentials for the sandbox account. The "Sign In" text goes grey for a few seconds, then it goes blue again. It never changes to show that I'm signed in. Should it? (I think so.) Do I need to sign into the Simulator's Apple Account, too? (I don't think so.) Anyway, aside from that, in my app the IAP is listed and I have a button to purchase it. When I click it I'm asked for the email and password to sign into the Apple Account. I enter the correct sandbox email and password (they are definitely correct) and I see this in the Xcode console: Purchase did not return a transaction: Error Domain=ASDErrorDomain Code=530 "(null)" UserInfo={client-environment-type=Sandbox, NSUnderlyingError=0x600000d0c7b0 {Error Domain=AMSErrorDomain Code=100 "Authentication Failed The authentication failed." UserInfo={NSMultipleUnderlyingErrorsKey=( "Error Domain=AMSErrorDomain Code=2 \"Password reuse not available for account The account state does not support password reuse.\" UserInfo={NSDebugDescription=Password reuse not available for account The account state does not support password reuse., AMSDescription=Password reuse not available for account, AMSFailureReason=The account state does not support password reuse.}", "Error Domain=AMSErrorDomain Code=0 \"Authentication Failed Encountered an unrecognized authentication failure.\" UserInfo={NSDebugDescription=Authentication Failed Encountered an unrecognized authentication failure., AMSDescription=Authentication Failed, AMSFailureReason=Encountered an unrecognized authentication failure.}" ), AMSDescription=Authentication Failed, NSDebugDescription=Authentication Failed The authentication failed., AMSFailureReason=The authentication failed.}}} Why is it talking about password reuse? AFAIK, I have only one sandbox account for this app (and none for any of my other apps), and this is the only one of my apps that has an IAP. Any ideas on how to get an IAP working? Thanks!

I have two sandbox users in App Store Connect, as I'm trying to test in-app purchases and Family Sharing. They're set up fine; I can make purchases in the app. The issue is that the refund request sheet in my app sometimes shows properly and lets me request a refund, but I'd say >80% of the time the sheet just shows "Cannot Connect" with a "Retry" button. Hitting that button doesn't ever result in the sheet showing the refund page. The only fix for this is to delete the app from the device, and restart the device. This has to be a joke, right? I need to be able to test this IAP, and the sandbox environment is useless most of the time. Why? Anyone experiencing this sort of issue?