Our company is going to develop an iOS library of functionality for inclusion in several apps, some of the apps will be developed in-house and some externally. When the library is included in external apps the source code shouldn't be visible. When the library is included in internal apps, having the option to view and step through the code within the library will be invaluable for debugging. How could I set things up so that two forms of the library can be easily generated - one exposing source code and the other not. Ideally they should be capable of being incorporated within the apps in the same manner regardless of if the source code is expose or not Is that possible? I looked at Swift Packages, but it seems its for distribution of source code only, and its not possible to hide the source code. However, conversely, a framework only contains binary and no source code. Is there any other option?

I've got a custom run script build phase in my Xcode iOS project, however I want it to run before the items in the Target Dependencies section get built. So I added a Pre-Actions phase to the target's build scheme and pasted the contents there. However, during a build, there's no way to see if the stuff in the pre action is successful or not. It's possible to put echo statements into a run script build phase which is useful to print values such as file paths etc. but these don't work when part of a scheme pre action. Also if I deliberately put garbage into the scheme pre action, then I can see Xcode is still running the pre action, but as its full of garbage it should fail, but Xcode doesn't report any errors anywhere. So, is there any way to see and confirm if a scheme pre-action was successful or not, or to output logging statements from it to verify values its using are as expected?

If an app with a Message Filter Extension is run on an iPhone with iOS 18 installed then there's no logging output to the console (using print or NSLog), however there is logging in all previous versions of OS. Being able to view logging at run time for this component is essential as a debugging aid to see, for example, if the extension launches, if a text is handled locally or deferred to the network, to see if there's a network error, to examine the server response etc. Is there a specific reason it was disabled or is it accidental? Thank you

I've got a 2023 M2 MacBook Pro and used to get great battery life out of it (> 6 hours when using it for development purposes). Now however, all of a sudden, that has dropped off a cliff, and the only thing that has changed is Xcode 16 has appeared. As I'm compiling a project I can literally see the % amount of the battery charge remaining tick down in front of my eyes as I watch. I just compiled a project twice and during that time the battery dropped from from %89 to %79 and Xcode is listed as a culprit using significant battery drain. Anybody else noticed anything similar? Anything that can be done to to decrease Xcode's battery drain?

I've got a bit of code which is making a HTTPS GET request. On an iPhone it runs as expected, however when running on the simulator there's a HTTP 400 response. I've logged the url and my http headers that I'm adding, and in both cases they are identical for the simulator and iPhone (there is no http body content). Therefore, as everything is identical, I'm wondering how it could work with hardware and not with the simulator? Does the OS append any additional HTTP headers before the request goes out (such as User-Agent for example) and might those be different between iPhone/simulator?

If a new (iOS) project is created in Xcode then a default set of deployment targets and values gets automatically created and set as follows: If the iPad, Mac, and Apple Vision supported destinations are deleted from the Xcode general section, these deployment targets still remain. If the app is then built using Xcode 16 and uploaded to TestFlight/App Store then the following issue is reported: TMS-90899: Macs with Apple silicon support issue - The app isn‘t compatible with the provided minimum macOS version of 11.0. Why is XCode populating the macOS deployment target with a value that that results in this issue? Why is Xcode even populating all 6 of these targets at all when its for an iOS app and hence 5 of them are redundant? Can the macOS deployment value simply be increased to silence this issue? Or can these that aren't relevant to iOS be deleted (if so how)? TIA

Over the past few weeks I've seen several people mention pushes sent via the sandbox haven't been getting delivered. Today I'm also seeing that (though pushes sent via production are fine). So it would appear to be down again. What's going on recently, any reason it's so unstable these last few weeks?

I want to release a Framework F, containing several other frameworks (such as Realm, Appetitive, Cocoalumberjack, PhoneNumberKit) for use by app A. According to this article: https://medium.com/@bittudavis/how-to-create-an-umbrella-framework-in-swift-ca964d0a2345 They write, without referencing a source: "Although Apple discourage creating umbrella framework". Is that true, do Apple discourage umbrella frameworks, if so why and is it a very strong discourage or a mild one? If not discouraged, then how can this be achieved with Xcode 16? I've been attempting to follow a few tutorial to achieve this, such as https://medium.com/john-lewis-software-engineering/adding-a-third-party-framework-inside-a-first-party-framework-in-xcode-3ba58cfd08da however so far without any success. This last article mentions the Link Binary With Libraries section, which doesn't exist in Xcode 16. There's the Frameworks, Libraries, and Embedded Content section where I have been attempting to add the frameworks into my Framework F (choosing Embed without Signing). I'm able to successfully build Framework F, but when app A attempts to use it (adding F to the Frameworks, Libraries, and Embedded Content section with option embed and sign, or embed and don't sign, makes no difference) then I get run time errors about the umbrellaed frameworks not being able to be found.

If I define some values in an .xcconfig then I can use those to supply a value to an element within Info.plist, but if I try to do the same for a .plist with any other name then it doesn't work. Is this some sort of hard-coded constraint? (I can't move the elements out of the custom .plist into Info.plist as its being read by a 3rd party framework)

When a user gets added to the Apple developer account, its possible to specify specific or all apps. However if they are added as a developer, they don't have access to the certificates/profiles etc. for the app(s). The only way to do that is to give them app manager status and then its possible to tick the box that grants access to the certs/profiles. But giving them manager status rather than developer status gives them access to all apps, not a limited sub section. Is there anyway to add somebody to the developer account with elevated privileges which are restricted to just a single app?

Hello the documentation for message filtering has been offline for a few days now, is it possible to get it back, or is there somewhere else it can be viewed in the meanwhile? https://developer.apple.com/documentation/sms_and_call_reporting/sms_and_mms_message_filtering (I just chose topic/tags at random, there aren't any relevant for this)

If I run an app with a Message Filter Extension on a handset with iOS 18.2 then it runs fine, however if I run the exact same app with no changes on a different phone which has iOS 17.6.1 installed then the following error occurs when the extension is enabled within Settings: dyld[631]: Symbol not found: _$sSo40ILMessageFilterCapabilitiesQueryResponseC14IdentityLookupE21promotionalSubActionsSaySo0abI6ActionVGvs

I've got an app with several app extensions (call extension, action extension, notification service extension, message filtering extension, notification content extension). If I need to interactively debug these then I can select the scheme and run the extension within Xcode for all of them except for the notification content extension, with that I get an error dialog summary saying: Failed to install the app on the device / The provided item to be installed is not of a type that CoreDevice recognizes. Which when expanded has the blumpf posted below. Why can I not run the notification content extension, when I can run any other type of app extension? Failed to install the app on the device. Domain: com.apple.dt.CoreDeviceError Code: 3002 Failure Reason: The provided item to be installed is not of a type that CoreDevice recognizes. User Info: { DVTErrorCreationDateKey = "2024-12-27 16:39:54 +0000"; IDERunOperationFailingWorker = IDEInstallCoreDeviceWorker; NSURL = "file:///Users/Me/Library/Developer/Xcode/DerivedData/XFinity-celiagrvtevxcagztrguseawvjkl/Build/Products/Debug.Ceq.QA-iphoneos/NotificationContentExtension.appex"; } -- Event Metadata: com.apple.dt.IDERunOperationWorkerFinished : { "device_identifier" = "00008101-00115D623460001E"; "device_isCoreDevice" = 1; "device_model" = "iPhone13,3"; "device_osBuild" = "18.2 (22C152)"; "device_platform" = "com.apple.platform.iphoneos"; "device_thinningType" = "iPhone13,3"; "dvt_coredevice_version" = "397.28"; "dvt_coresimulator_version" = "993.7"; "dvt_mobiledevice_version" = "1759.40.2.100.1"; "launchSession_schemeCommand" = Run; "launchSession_state" = 1; "launchSession_targetArch" = arm64; "operation_duration_ms" = 7; "operation_errorCode" = 3002; "operation_errorDomain" = "com.apple.dt.CoreDeviceError"; "operation_errorWorker" = IDEInstallCoreDeviceWorker; "operation_name" = IDERunOperationWorkerGroup; "param_debugger_attachToExtensions" = 0; "param_debugger_attachToXPC" = 1; "param_debugger_type" = 1; "param_destination_isProxy" = 0; "param_destination_platform" = "com.apple.platform.iphoneos"; "param_diag_113575882_enable" = 0; "param_diag_MainThreadChecker_stopOnIssue" = 0; "param_diag_MallocStackLogging_enableDuringAttach" = 0; "param_diag_MallocStackLogging_enableForXPC" = 1; "param_diag_allowLocationSimulation" = 0; "param_diag_checker_tpc_enable" = 1; "param_diag_gpu_frameCapture_enable" = 0; "param_diag_gpu_shaderValidation_enable" = 0; "param_diag_gpu_validation_enable" = 0; "param_diag_guardMalloc_enable" = 0; "param_diag_memoryGraphOnResourceException" = 0; "param_diag_mtc_enable" = 0; "param_diag_queueDebugging_enable" = 1; "param_diag_runtimeProfile_generate" = 0; "param_diag_sanitizer_asan_enable" = 0; "param_diag_sanitizer_tsan_enable" = 0; "param_diag_sanitizer_tsan_stopOnIssue" = 0; "param_diag_sanitizer_ubsan_enable" = 0; "param_diag_sanitizer_ubsan_stopOnIssue" = 0; "param_diag_showNonLocalizedStrings" = 0; "param_diag_viewDebugging_enabled" = 1; "param_diag_viewDebugging_insertDylibOnLaunch" = 1; "param_install_style" = 2; "param_launcher_UID" = 2; "param_launcher_allowDeviceSensorReplayData" = 0; "param_launcher_kind" = 0; "param_launcher_style" = 0; "param_launcher_substyle" = 2; "param_runnable_appExtensionHostRunMode" = 0; "param_runnable_productType" = "com.apple.product-type.app-extension"; "param_structuredConsoleMode" = 1; "param_testing_launchedForTesting" = 0; "param_testing_suppressSimulatorApp" = 0; "param_testing_usingCLI" = 0; "sdk_canonicalName" = "iphoneos18.2"; "sdk_osVersion" = "18.2"; "sdk_variant" = iphoneos; } -- System Information macOS Version 14.7 (Build 23H124) Xcode 16.2 (23507) (Build 16C5032a) Timestamp: 2024-12-27T08:39:54-08:00

I've noticed issues with logging in the Mac's console app for a very long time now (from Xcode 15?) but have just spent several hours trying to objectively observe and monitor what's going on and try to set up reliable logging. But I've totally been unable to and my conclusion is that logging just absolutely cannot be relied upon at all, its so chronically bad as to be unusable. If I for example add some logging lines right at the start of didFinishLaunchingWithOptions() and use a variety of logging mechanisms NSLog(), print(),os_log_with_type(), OSLog() (AppDelegate is in Obj-C and calls Obj-C logging, then calls a swift function for Swift logging), then none of them are reliable. If the app is build/installed via Xcode then logging is reliable within Xcode's console and also within the Mac's console app. But then if the app is uploaded/installed via Testflight it's a very different matter. Sometimes, but not very often, the logging is as expected, but more often than not, some of it is missing. How much is missing seems totally random, sometimes its a little, sometimes its a lot, and something else that very very often happens is there's lots of duplicate logging, each logging line will appear 2 or three times. Here's a very simple example to illustrate what happens (in this example for simplicity I'm just showing using NSLog, don't focus on that as I know NSLog is "old", its the exact same result regardless of how the logging is actually performed). - (BOOL)application:(UIApplication *)application didFinishLaunchingWithOptions:(NSDictionary *)launchOptions { appDelegate = self; NSLog(@"Log line 1"); NSLog(@"Log line 2"); NSLog(@"Log line 3"); NSLog(@"Log line 4"); NSLog(@"Log line 5"); When the app is downloaded from Testflight then only very rarely will I see 5 lines of logging, sometimes it'll be 4, sometimes 2, sometimes none. And quite often the logging is duplicated i.e. I might see for example in the Console app: Log line 1 Log line 1 Log line 2 Log line 2 Log line 3 Log line 3 In general it's just totally unusable and unreliable. It just cannot be be used at all. Why is it this bad? What can be done to make logging reliable and useful? I've spent days and days reading the recommended approaches, trying things out, including the new stuff like OSLog etc. But it remains dreadful. What is the recommended approach to make logging 100% reliable? There's never any problem with Xcode's console, it's only with the Mac's console app. However, when an app is being tested which has been installed from Testflight then using Xcode's console can't be used. So If a QA team find problems with a Testflight build and attach the Console log its utterly useless as its contents are effectively random.

One of the questions Apple ask regarding iOS apps is "Does your app provide end-to-end encryption?" But without defining exactly what they mean by end-to-end encryption specifically. Isn't HTTPS basically etee? Therefore any app that contacts a server using https provides end-to-end encryption? Or does the question mean something additional above and beyond https?