Hello Apple Developer Community, We are developing a full-tunnel VPN app for macOS that utilizes a packet tunnel network system extension (via NEPacketTunnelProvider). We're committed to using a system extension for this purpose, as it aligns with our requirements for system-wide tunneling. The app is sandboxed and intended for distribution on the Mac App Store. Here's the workflow: The app (running in user context) downloads a VPN profile from our server. It generates private keys, appends them to the profile, and attempts to save this enhanced profile securely in the keychain. The packet tunnel system extension (running in root context) needs to access this profile, including the private keys, to establish the VPN connection. We've encountered challenges in securely sharing this data across the user-root boundary due to sandbox restrictions and keychain access limitations. Here's what we've tried so far, along with the issues: Writing from the App to the System Keychain: Attempted to store the profile in the system keychain for root access. This fails because the sandboxed app lacks permissions to write to the system keychain. (We're avoiding non-sandboxed approaches for App Store compliance.) Extension Reading Directly from the User Login Keychain: Tried having the extension access the user's login keychain by its path. We manually added the network extension (located in /Library/SystemExtensions//bundle.systemextension) to the keychain item's Access Control List (ACL) via Keychain Access.app for testing. This results in "item not found" errors, likely due to the root context not seamlessly accessing user-keychain items without additional setup. Using Persistent References in NETunnelProviderProtocol: The app stores the profile in the user keychain and saves a persistent reference (as Data) in the NETunnelProviderProtocol's identityReference or similar fields. The extension then attempts to retrieve the item using this reference. We manually added the network extension (located in /Library/SystemExtensions//bundle.systemextension) to the keychain item's Access Control List (ACL) via Keychain Access.app for testing. However, this leads to error -25308 (errSecInteractionNotAllowed) when the extension tries to access it, possibly because of the root-user context mismatch or interaction requirements. Programmatically Adding the Extension to the ACL: Explored using SecAccess and SecACL APIs to add the extension as a trusted application. This requires SecTrustedApplicationCreateFromPath to create a SecTrustedApplicationRef from the extension's path. Issue 1: The sandboxed app can't reliably obtain the installed extension's path (e.g., via scanning /Library/SystemExtensions or systemextensionsctl), as sandbox restrictions block access. Issue 2: SecTrustedApplicationCreateFromPath is deprecated since macOS 10.15, and we're hesitant to rely on it for future compatibility. We've reviewed documentation on keychain sharing, access groups (including com.apple.managed.vpn.shared, but we're not using managed profiles/MDM) as the profiles are download from a server, and alternatives like XPC for on-demand communication, but we're unsure if XPC is suitable for sensitive data like private keys during tunnel creation. And if this is recommended what is going to be the approach here. What is the recommended, modern approach for this scenario? Is there a non-deprecated way to handle ACLs or share persistent references across contexts? Should we pursue a special entitlement for a custom access group, or is there a better pattern using NetworkExtension APIs? Any insights, code snippets, or references to similar implementations would be greatly appreciated. We're targeting macOS 15+. Thanks in advance!

Development environment Xcode 26.0 Beta 6 iOS 26 Simulator macOS 15.6.1 To verify TLS 1.3 session resumption behavior in URLSession, I configured URLSessionConfiguration as follows and sent an HTTP GET request: let config = URLSessionConfiguration.ephemeral config.tlsMinimumSupportedProtocolVersion = .TLSv13 config.tlsMaximumSupportedProtocolVersion = .TLSv13 config.httpMaximumConnectionsPerHost = 1 config.httpAdditionalHeaders = ["Connection": "close"] config.enablesEarlyData = true let session = URLSession(configuration: config, delegate: nil, delegateQueue: nil) let url = URL(string: "https://www.google.com")! var request = URLRequest(url: url) request.assumesHTTP3Capable = true request.httpMethod = "GET" let task = session.dataTask(with: request) { data, response, error in if let error = error { print("Error during URLSession data task: \(error)") return } if let data = data, let responseString = String(data: data, encoding: .utf8) { print("Received data via URLSession: \(responseString)") } else { print("No data received or data is not UTF-8 encoded") } } task.resume() However, after capturing the packets, I found that the ClientHello packet did not include the early_data extension. It seems that enablesEarlyData on URLSessionConfiguration is not being applied. How can I make this work properly?

Hi Team, when our customers turn on bluetooth connectivity whether Apple creates a profile of the user or their locations and if it is used for any other purpose. Could you please clarify this? we are getting the below message in the Bluetooth permissions popup below the map "Information from Bluetooth devices can be used to determine your location and create a profile of you." What is this profile? and what is the purpose of creating it while the user uses Bluetooth in ios app.

Dear Apple App Store Review Team, We are currently developing an application focused on user data asset management, aimed at helping users better protect and manage their personal data. One of the core features of our application is to allow users to access files stored on their mobile devices from other devices within the same local network. At present, our implementation works as follows: once the application is launched, it starts an HTTP service in the background to support access from other devices within the local network. However, we have encountered a technical challenge in the iOS environment: when the application is moved to the background or the device screen is turned off, the system imposes strict limitations on the runtime of background tasks. Our testing has shown that, typically after about 30 seconds, the background HTTP service is suspended by the system, which prevents other devices from continuing to access the files. As developers, we would like to clarify the following: What specific technical steps are required to enable a continuous background HTTP service under iOS? During development, which aspects (e.g., system permission configurations, App Store review guidelines) need to be addressed to support such functionality? What qualifications or requirements (e.g., entitlement requests, compliance documentation) are necessary for an application to provide unrestricted HTTP service in the background? If such behavior is not officially supported, we kindly request that you provide the relevant official guidelines and documentation so that we can fully understand the applicable policies and requirements. Thank you very much for your time and guidance.

We are develop an application with corebluetooth framework. we connect to device with ble. and open two l2cap channels. it can transfer data with stream. but when it close the second l2cap channel, it always close the first l2cap channel.

When submitting an app for review, will any unreviewed auto-renewing subscriptions within the app be reviewed simultaneously? I own an app that has passed review and offers an auto-renewing subscription A within the app that has also passed review. To test a new service, I plan to create a new auto-renewing subscription B, which I do not intend to submit for review. After creating Subscription B, I plan to submit the app for review as part of an app update. In that case, is there a possibility that Subscription B will also be reviewed?

A user of my app noticed that when using it to move a file to the trash on an USB drive, the trash doesn't show the file until unmounting the drive and mounting it again. I was able to reproduce it with one of my own USB drives, but with another USB drive it doesn't reproduce. All USB drives are formatted APFS. When moving a file to the trash from the Finder, both USB drives immediately list it in the trash. Is this a macOS bug, or am I doing something wrong? I created FB19941168. let openPanel = NSOpenPanel() openPanel.runModal() let url = openPanel.urls[0] do { var result: NSURL? try FileManager.default.trashItem(at: url, resultingItemURL: &result) print(result as Any) } catch { fatalError(error.localizedDescription) }

I'm struggling to understand what the impact of this flag is. Docs only say: For devices running iOS 18 and iPadOS 18 or later, you can add input-push-token: 1 to your payload to start a Live Activity and receive a new push token. After you receive a new push token, you can use it to send updates to a Live Activity. But things were working fine for iOS 17. Right? Does it somehow make the OS emit update tokens faster/more successfully? Should I include in all start, update, end events?

Hi guys! OK, reaching out for some help here. I am having all kinds of trouble with OSDeclareDefaultStructors. I have seriously been at this for nearly a week now and have come to the conclusion that I need to reach out for help from people that are more experience using Xcode. I believe entirely that my issue is just that I can't for whatever reason see how to set up includes and libraries and things like that. I have this line: OSDeclareDefaultStructors(NukeVirtualGamepad) No matter what I do, Xcode will not recognize OSDeclareDefaultStructors. The project builds a DriverKit > Driver extension. I have literally tried absolutely everything with this. I am at a loss for words. I even set up a new blank project and it still will not recognize OSDeclareDefaultStructors. I did a lot of research and it looks like expo needs OSDeclareDefaultStructors in order for the extension to build with a binary in it instead of being just a codeless extension. Here is the code with the issue: #pragma once #include <DriverKit/OSMetaClass.h> #include <HIDDriverKit/IOUserHIDDevice.h> #include <DriverKit/OSData.h> class NukeVirtualGamepad : public IOUserHIDDevice { OSDeclareDefaultStructors(NukeVirtualGamepad) // The problem is right here! This line! public: // Keep it minimal; no 'override' keywords since the .h types may not mark them virtual bool init(); void free(); kern_return_t Start(IOService* provider); void Stop (IOService* provider); OSData* newReportDescriptor(); // (Optional) helper you’ll use later to inject input matching your report kern_return_t PostInput(uint16_t buttons, int8_t x, int8_t y); }; I do have to mention to everyone that I am still very new with Xcode. So there is a ton that I don't know yet or might be misunderstanding. Has anyone seen this before? Thank you in advance.

iOS Development environment Xcode 16.4, macOS 15.6.1 (24G90) Run-time configuration: iOS 17.2+ Short Description After having successfully established an NWConnection (either as UDP or TCP), and subsequently receiving the error code: UDP Connection failed: 57 The operation couldn't be completed. (Network.NWError error 57 - Socket is not connected), available Interfaces: [enO] via NWConnection.stateUpdateHandler = { (newState) in ... } while newState == .failed the data connection does not restart by itself once cellular (RF) telephony coverage is established again. Detailed Description Context: my app has a continuous cellular data connection while in use. Either a UDP or a TCP connection is established depending on the user settings. The setup data connection works fine until the data connection gets disconnected by loss of connection to a available cellular phone base station. This disconnection simply occurs in very poor UMTS or GSM cellular phone coverage. This is totally normal behavior in bad reception areas like in mountains with signal loss. STEPS TO REPRODUCE Pre-condition App is running with active data connection. Action iPhone does loss the cellular data connection previously setup. Typically reported as network error code 57. Observed The programmed connection.stateUpdateHandler() is called in network connection state '.failed' (OK). The self-programmed data re-connection includes: a call to self.connection.cancel() a call to self.setupUDPConnection() or self.setupConnection() depending on the user settings to re-establish an operative data connection. However, the iPhone's UMTS/GSM network data (re-)connection state is not properly identified/notified via NWConnection API. There's no further network state notification by means of NWConnection even though the iPhone has recovered a cellular data network. Expected The iPhone or any other means automatically reconnects the interrupted data connection on its own. The connection.stateUpdateHandler() is called at time of the device's networking data connection (RF) recovering, subsequently to a connection state failed with error code 57, as the RF module is continuously (independently from the app) for available telephony networks. QUESTION How to systematically/properly detect a cellular phone data network reconnection readiness in order to causally reinitialize the NWConnection data connection available used in app. Relevant code extract Setup UDP connection (or similarly setup a TCP connection) func setupUDPConnection() { let udp = NWProtocolUDP.Options.init() udp.preferNoChecksum = false let params = NWParameters.init(dtls: nil, udp: udp) params.serviceClass = .responsiveData // service type for medium-delay tolerant, elastic and inelastic flow, bursty, and long-lived connections connection = NWConnection(host: NWEndpoint.Host.name(AppConstant.Web.urlWebSafeSky, nil), port: NWEndpoint.Port(rawValue: AppConstant.Web.urlWebSafeSkyPort)!, using: params) connection.stateUpdateHandler = { (newState) in switch (newState) { case .ready: //print("UDP Socket State: Ready") self.receiveUDPConnection(). // data reception works fine until network loss break case .setup: //print("UDP Socket State: Setup") break case .cancelled: //print("UDP Socket State: Cancelled") break case .preparing: //print("UDP Socket State: Preparing") break case .waiting(let error): Logger.logMessage(message: "UDP Connection waiting: "+error.errorCode.description+" \(error.localizedDescription), available Interfaces: \(self.connection.currentPath!.availableInterfaces.description)", LoggerLevels.Error) break case .failed(let error): Logger.logMessage(message: "UDP Connection failed: "+error.errorCode.description+" \(error.localizedDescription), available Interfaces: \(self.connection.currentPath!.availableInterfaces.description)", LoggerLevels.Error) // data connection retry (expecting network transport layer to be available) self.reConnectionServer() break default: //print("UDP Socket State: Waiting or Failed") break } self.handleStateChange() } connection.start(queue: queue) } Handling of network data connection loss private func reConnectionServer() { self.connection.cancel() // Re Init Connection - Give a little time to network recovery let delayInSec = 30.0. // expecting actually a notification for network data connection availability, instead of a time-triggered retry self.queue.asyncAfter(deadline: .now() + delayInSec) { switch NetworkConnectionType { case 1: self.setupUDPConnection() // UDP break case 2: self.setupConnection() // TCP break default: break } } } Does it necessarily require the use of CoreTelephony class CTTelephonyNetworkInfo or class CTCellularData to get notifications of changes to the user’s cellular service provider?

If Cloudkit is enabled, SwiftData @Query operation hangs when the View scenePhase becomes active. Seems like the more @Query calls you have, the more it hangs. This has been first documented some time ago, but in typical Apple style, it has not been addressed or even commented on. https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/761434

Hi, I am having a ton of issues with the new multicast/network entitlements requirements on MacOS. Basically, since my app didn't request these new entitlements until recently, if the app had been installed without these permissions enabled, it will not pick up the new permissions once they are enabled. The only options I had were to create a new user, and install the app under the new user, which works, but is not a real solution for users. This is really problematic, as there is no way currently to remove or change these network permissions once they are established. Is there a way to fix this? Or some other workarounds I am missing? Thanks Also via the documentation: TN3179: Understanding local network privacy | Apple Developer Documentation "There's no guarantee that it'll actually trigger the alert” And "On macOS there’s no way to reset your program’s Local Network privilege to the undetermined state (FB14944392). One alternative is to run your program in a virtual machine (VM). To retest, restore the VM from a snapshot taken before you installed your program.”

I just saw another post regarding bookmarks on iOS where an Apple engineer made the following statement: [quote='855165022, DTS Engineer, /thread/797469?answerId=855165022#855165022'] macOS is better at enforcing the "right" behavior, so code that works there will generally work on iOS. [/quote] So I went back to my macOS code to double-check. Sure enough, the following statement: let bookmark = try url.bookmarkData(options: .withSecurityScope) fails 100% of the time. I had seen earlier statements from other DTS Engineers recommending that any use of a URL be bracketed by start/stopAccessingSecurityScopedResource. And that makes a lot of sense. If "start" returns true, then call stop. But if start returns false, then it isn't needed, so don't call stop. No harm, no foul. But what's confusing is this other, directly-related API where a security-scoped bookmark cannot be created under any circumstances because of the URL itself, some specific way the URL was initially created, and/or manipulated? So, what I'm asking is if someone could elaborate on what would cause a failure to create a security-scoped bookmark? What kinds of URLs are valid for creation of security-scoped bookmarks? Are there operations on a URL that will then cause a failure to create a security-scoped bookmark? Is it allowed to pass the URL and/or bookmark back and forth between Objective-C and Swift? I'm developing a new macOS app for release in the Mac App Store. I'm initially getting my URL from an NSOpenPanel. Then I store it in a SQLite database. I may access the URL again, after a restart, or after a year. I have a login item that also needs to read the database and access the URL. I have additional complications as well, but they don't really matter. Before I get to any of that, I get a whole volume URL from an NSOpen panel in Swift, then, almost immediately, attempt to create a security-scoped bookmark. I cannot. I've tried many different combinations of options and flows of operation, but obviously not all. I think this started happening with macOS 26, but that doesn't really matter. If this is new behaviour in macOS 26, then I must live with it. My particular use requires a URL to a whole volume. Because of this, I don't actually seem to need a security-scoped bookmark at all. So I think I might simply get lucky for now. But this still bothers me. I don't really like being lucky. I'd rather be right. I have other apps in development where this could be a bigger problem. It seems like I will need completely separate URL handling logic based on the type of URL the user selects. And what of document-scoped URLs? This experience seems to strongly indicate that security-scoped URLs should only ever be document-scoped. I think in some of my debugging efforts I tried document-scoped URLs. They didn't fix the problem, but they seemed to make the entire process more straightforward and transparent. Can a single metadata-hosting file host multiple security-scoped bookmarks? Or should I have a separate one for each bookmark? But the essence of my question is that this is supposed to be simple operation that, in certain cases, is a guaranteed failure. There are a mind-bogglingly large number of potential options and logic flows. Does there exist a set of options and logic flows for which the user can select a URL, any URL, with the explicit intent to persist it, and that my app can save, share with helper apps, and have it all work normally after restart?

I have an iOS app with a main target and an app extension. I want the app extension to write data to the SwiftData in App Groups, while the main target reads the data. However, currently, the app extension only has permission to read data, not to write it.Is the issue due to my incorrect configuration or an Apple-imposed restriction?

If I use <FetchRequest.returnsDistinctResults> with unique "identifier" property, and there happened to be multiple NSManagedObjects in Core Data that contains the same "identifier", does the FetchRequest retrieve the latest modified/created object? Is there a way to define the <FetchRequest.returnsDistinctResults> logic to be based on another property (e.g. "creationDate" / "modifiedDate") and the ascension order?

We are experiencing intermittent 403 Forbidden errors during Apple Pay on web merchant validation in our production and sandbox environment. Has anyone else started seeing 403 Forbidden errors recently (since mid-2025)? Why would merchant validation be sometimes successful and sometimes fail with 403? Could this be related to new Apple Pay gateway changes or stricter validation rules? Any additional debug steps or permanent solutions we should try? Thank you.

Connect with ios in android

Hi, We’re seeing our build system (Gradle) get stuck in sendto system calls while trying to communicate with other processes via the local interface over UDP. To the end user it appears that the build is stuck or they will receive an error “Timeout waiting to lock XXX. It is currently in use by another Gradle instance”. But when the process is sampled/profiled, we can see one of the threads is stuck in a sendto system call. The only way to resolve the issue is to kill -s KILL <pid> the stuck Gradle process. A part of the JVM level stack trace: "jar transforms Thread 12" #90 prio=5 os_prio=31 cpu=0.85ms elapsed=1257.67s tid=0x000000012e6cd400 nid=0x10f03 runnable [0x0000000332f0d000] java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE at sun.nio.ch.DatagramChannelImpl.send0(java.base@17.0.10/Native Method) at sun.nio.ch.DatagramChannelImpl.sendFromNativeBuffer(java.base@17.0.10/DatagramChannelImpl.java:901) at sun.nio.ch.DatagramChannelImpl.send(java.base@17.0.10/DatagramChannelImpl.java:863) at sun.nio.ch.DatagramChannelImpl.send(java.base@17.0.10/DatagramChannelImpl.java:821) at sun.nio.ch.DatagramChannelImpl.blockingSend(java.base@17.0.10/DatagramChannelImpl.java:853) at sun.nio.ch.DatagramSocketAdaptor.send(java.base@17.0.10/DatagramSocketAdaptor.java:218) at java.net.DatagramSocket.send(java.base@17.0.10/DatagramSocket.java:664) at org.gradle.cache.internal.locklistener.FileLockCommunicator.pingOwner(FileLockCommunicator.java:61) at org.gradle.cache.internal.locklistener.DefaultFileLockContentionHandler.maybePingOwner(DefaultFileLockContentionHandler.java:203) at org.gradle.cache.internal.DefaultFileLockManager$DefaultFileLock$1.run(DefaultFileLockManager.java:380) at org.gradle.internal.io.ExponentialBackoff.retryUntil(ExponentialBackoff.java:72) at org.gradle.cache.internal.DefaultFileLockManager$DefaultFileLock.lockStateRegion(DefaultFileLockManager.java:362) at org.gradle.cache.internal.DefaultFileLockManager$DefaultFileLock.lock(DefaultFileLockManager.java:293) at org.gradle.cache.internal.DefaultFileLockManager$DefaultFileLock.<init>(DefaultFileLockManager.java:164) at org.gradle.cache.internal.DefaultFileLockManager.lock(DefaultFileLockManager.java:110) at org.gradle.cache.internal.LockOnDemandCrossProcessCacheAccess.incrementLockCount(LockOnDemandCrossProcessCacheAccess.java:106) at org.gradle.cache.internal.LockOnDemandCrossProcessCacheAccess.acquireFileLock(LockOnDemandCrossProcessCacheAccess.java:168) at org.gradle.cache.internal.CrossProcessSynchronizingCache.put(CrossProcessSynchronizingCache.java:57) at org.gradle.api.internal.changedetection.state.DefaultFileAccessTimeJournal.setLastAccessTime(DefaultFileAccessTimeJournal.java:85) at org.gradle.internal.file.impl.SingleDepthFileAccessTracker.markAccessed(SingleDepthFileAccessTracker.java:51) at org.gradle.internal.classpath.DefaultCachedClasspathTransformer.markAccessed(DefaultCachedClasspathTransformer.java:209) at org.gradle.internal.classpath.DefaultCachedClasspathTransformer.transformFile(DefaultCachedClasspathTransformer.java:194) at org.gradle.internal.classpath.DefaultCachedClasspathTransformer.lambda$cachedFile$6(DefaultCachedClasspathTransformer.java:186) at org.gradle.internal.classpath.DefaultCachedClasspathTransformer$$Lambda$368/0x0000007001393a78.call(Unknown Source) at org.gradle.internal.UncheckedException.unchecked(UncheckedException.java:74) at org.gradle.internal.classpath.DefaultCachedClasspathTransformer.lambda$transformAll$8(DefaultCachedClasspathTransformer.java:233) at org.gradle.internal.classpath.DefaultCachedClasspathTransformer$$Lambda$372/0x0000007001398470.call(Unknown Source) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(java.base@17.0.10/FutureTask.java:264) at org.gradle.internal.concurrent.ExecutorPolicy$CatchAndRecordFailures.onExecute(ExecutorPolicy.java:64) at org.gradle.internal.concurrent.ManagedExecutorImpl$1.run(ManagedExecutorImpl.java:49) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(java.base@17.0.10/ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1136) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(java.base@17.0.10/ThreadPoolExecutor.java:635) at java.lang.Thread.run(java.base@17.0.10/Thread.java:840) A part of the process sample: 2097 Thread_3879661: Java: jar transforms Thread 12 + 2097 thread_start (in libsystem_pthread.dylib) + 8 [0x18c42eb80] ...removed for brevity... + 2097 Java_sun_nio_ch_DatagramChannelImpl_send0 (in libnio.dylib) + 84 [0x102ef371c] + 2097 __sendto (in libsystem_kernel.dylib) + 8 [0x18c3f612c] We have observed the following system logs around the time the issue manifests: 2025-08-26 22:03:23.280255+0100 0x3b2c00 Default 0x0 0 0 kernel: cfil_hash_entry_log:6088 <CFIL: Error: sosend_reinject() failed>: [4628 java] <UDP(17) in so 9e934ceda1c13379 50826943645358435 50826943645358435 ag> 2025-08-26 22:03:23.280267+0100 0x3b2c00 Default 0x0 0 0 kernel: cfil_service_inject_queue:4472 CFIL: sosend() failed 22 The issue seems to be rooted in the built-in Application Firewall, as disabling it “fixes” the issue. It doesn’t seem to matter that the process is on the “allow” list. We’re using Gradle 7.6.4, 8.0.2 and 8.14.1 in various repositories, so the version doesn’t seem to matter, neither does which repo we use. The most reliable way to reproduce is to run two Gradle builds at the same time or very quickly after each other. We would really appreciate a fix for this as it really negatively affects the developer experience. I've raised FB19916240 for this. Many thanks,

Hello, I am trying to utilize the Critical Messaging API to allow my user to message 1 or multiple pre registered contacts automatically. An issue I am having with this in testing is that when the application attempts to fire off texts to the phone numbers the success rate changes from trial to trial, with no variable changing. Sometimes I can send a Critical Message to multiple phone numbers in rapid succession, sometimes the message is only sent to 1 contact, and sometimes I get no successes. Each failure always returns the MSCriticalMessaging.notSupported error. The API documentation states, "The send(_:to:) method only works if the app is backgrounded, if it’s called from foreground the framework returns a MSCriticalMessagingError.notSupported error." If my app is always backgrounded in these tests, what other issues may cause this notSupported error return, and why does the outcomes success rate vary?

I have an app with lots of networking calls that are currently done through URLSession. We would like to implement the new carried constrained entitlements and begin moving data through the ultra constrained network path for core features of our application. I have successfully implemented the NWPathMonitor to identify when the current network path is ultra constrained and I have been consistently on a physical device in a real world environment. I'm aware that we will not be able to use URLSession to do this from other posts in this forum like this one. Because of this problem with URLSession I am attempting to fallback to using NWConnection when the current path is ultra constrained. I have setup a NWConnection with the NWParameters.allowUltraConstrainedPaths set to true. The request works perfectly when connected to wifi or cellular. However, it does not work at all when the current path is ultra constrained. When attempting this request through my NWConnection I receive an error that says: The operation couldn’t be completed. (Network.NWError error 50 - Network is down) Is this expected? I have confirmed my physical device is connecting to carrier provided satellite and I have been able to load data in other ios apps from Apple like the music app while on this carrier constrained connection. If this is not the correct way to move data when the path is ultra constrained what is the correct way?