I'm posting this here after reading Quinn's post here: https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/799000 The above entitlement is mentioned in IOUSBHostControllerInterface.h. It isn't an entitlement one can add using the + button on the Capabilities panel in Xcode. If I try to add it by hand, Xcode complains that it isn't in my profile. Is this a managed entitlement? We'd like to create a local USB "device" to represent a real device reachable over a network.

Hello, We have a working application with several entitlements - com.apple.developer.endpoint-security.client and com.apple.developer.team-identifier. Recently, the Developer ID signing certificate expired and we created a new one according to the instructions on the website. Also the provisioning profile for those entitlements expired so we edited it to use the new certificate. We built using xcodebuild in a script and signed with codesign, We supply the certificate id and the entitlement in a plist file like this : codesign --timestamp --force --sign "${application_signature}" --options=runtime "${obj}" --entitlements "${SR_ENTITLEMENT_PATH}" (those env vars hold the correct values for the cert id and plist path as far as we checked). The signing works and looks ok with "codesign -dvvv": (XXXX replaces the real file name for privacy) Signature size=9050 Authority=Developer ID Application: XXXXXX. (XXXXX) Authority=Developer ID Certification Authority Authority=Apple Root CA Timestamp=16 Oct 2025 at 11:09:53 AM Info.plist=not bound TeamIdentifier=XXXXX Runtime Version=14.5.0 Sealed Resources=none Internal requirements count=1 size=184 [Dict] [Key] com.apple.application-identifier [Value] [String] XXXXX.com.XXXX.XXXX [Key] com.apple.developer.endpoint-security.client [Value] [Bool] true [Key] com.apple.developer.team-identifier [Value] [String] XXXXXX` But when the app need to run it is killed and the console shows the following: amfid: /private/tmp/XXXXX not valid: Error Domain=AppleMobileFileIntegrityError Code=-420 "The signature on the file is invalid" UserInfo={NSURL=file:///private/tmp/XXXXX, NSLocalizedDescription=The signature on the file is invalid} kernel: mac_vnode_check_signature: /private/tmp/CybereasonSensor: code signature validation failed fatally: When validating /private/tmp/XXXXX: Code has restricted entitlements, but the validation of its code signature failed. We didn't change any code or build differently (it's done by a CI jenkins job. So if the file is signed and the and has the entitlements why does it fail? what should be done? Thanks, Boaz

I am a professor at the Mercer University School of Medicine (Macon, GA) and I teach a stress reduction course for first year medical students. I am developing an app to allow the students to trace their mediations as well as time them. Using ChatGPT with Xcode, I was able to get all the features in the app working except that the stopwatch timer would not continue when the iPhone goes to sleep. When ChatGPT made some changes, the build failed because automated signing failed and the com.apple developer.activity kit entitlement is missing I don’t see Live Activities in the capability section of signing & Capabilities and I don’t know how to fix the provisioning profile. How can I get help for this? Thank you!

Hi, I am using a carrier account and have been able to use com.apple.CommCenter.fine-grained entitlement successfully for the past few years. Currently I am trying to use this entitlement in an app clip. but recieving the following error: Validation failed (409) Invalid entitlement. App clip 'xyz.app/AppClips/appClip.app' contains a code signing entitlement 'com.apple.coretelephony.SimAuthentication.allow' that is not supported. Remove the 'com.apple.coretelephony.SimAuthentication.allow' entitlement. (ID: 87f67652-0e22-441d-b7ec-ea4baacab39e) NSUnderlyingError : Validation failed (-19241) Invalid entitlement. App clip 'xyz.app/AppClips/appClip.app' contains a code signing entitlement 'com.apple.coretelephony.SimAuthentication.allow' that is not supported. Remove the 'com.apple.coretelephony.SimAuthentication.allow' entitlement. status : 409 Is it possible to use com.apple.CommCenter.fine-grained entitlement in an app clip? if so do you have any suggestion how to resolve this error?

I’m working on an iOS VPN app and looking into using NETunnelProvider (Packet Tunnel) for the VPN implementation. From the documentation it seems that Packet Tunnel is required for VPN protocols like OpenVPN, but the Packet Tunnel capability doesn’t appear to be available by default. Does using NETunnelProvider / Packet Tunnel require a special entitlement to be enabled by Apple for App Store apps? If so, what is the general process for requesting or enabling that entitlement?

I have been updating some NSXPCConnection code in my macOS 26 app (not sandboxed) to use XPCSession and friends instead. And it is working well and the experience has been generally good. But I have run into a problem when using XPCSession.setPeerRequirement() which I really want to use. It works well when I use something simple like XPCPeerRequirement.isFromSameTeam() but I want to check some more requirements and also use the code from multiple apps (but same team). That is, I want to check for multiple identifiers and team ID and version (and perhaps also in the future that the certificate is a Developer ID). And previously I would use SecRequirementCreateWithString with an entitlement string conceptually like this: var entitlement = "anchor apple generic and (" entitlement += "identifier idA" entitlement += " or identifier idB" entitlement += ")" entitlement += " and certificate leaf[subject.OU] = TeamID" entitlement += #" and info [CFBundleShortVersionString] >= "1.0""# and it works just as it should when creating and using that SecRequirement so I don't think that there is anything particularly wrong with the entitlement. And I had hoped that I could use the same string with XPCPeerRequirement.hasEntitlement(entitlement) but it doesn't work (I get a general "Peer forbidden" error). So I think that I don't really understand what sort of entitlement that hasEntitlement() wants. And also I don't really understand the other ways available to create a XPCPeerRequirement. I have also tried to use a XPCDictionary with XPCPeerRequirement(lightweightCodeRequirements:) but I can't get that to work either (and it seems a bit wrong to have to drop down to use e.g. xpc_object_t with new modern API:s). So my question is: is it possible to create a XPCPeerRequirement with an entitlement like above and, in that case, how? Or is there some other work-around to use XPCSession.setPeerRequirement() with a more complex requirement, e.g. is there a way to combine multiple XPCPeerRequirements into one? Thank you for reading this. /Peter

I’m attempting to use a Locked Camera Capture Extension (created from Xcode’s template / following Apple’s “Creating a camera experience for the Lock Screen” guidance). The extension builds, embeds, and installs on a physical device, but I cannot get it provisioned with the required entitlement com.apple.developer.locked-camera-capture. Environment Xcode: 26.0.1 (17A400) iOS: 26.2.1 (device) Apple Developer Program: paid Individual (Team ID: FT55UW9363) Key issue: provisioning profile for the ExtensionKit appex lacks the locked-camera entitlement The locked camera capture target is embedded as an ExtensionKit extension: .../DirectionalCamera.app/Extensions/LockedCapture.appex I decoded the embedded provisioning profile inside that .appex and printed its Entitlements dictionary: security cms -D -i ".../DirectionalCamera.app/Extensions/LockedCapture.appex/embedded.mobileprovision" > /tmp/locked_profile.plist /usr/libexec/PlistBuddy -c "Print:Entitlements" /tmp/locked_profile.plist Entitlements present in the embedded profile: Dict { com.apple.developer.avfoundation.multitasking-camera-access = true application-identifier = FT55UW9363.arp.geocam.LockedCapture keychain-access-groups = Array { FT55UW9363.* com.apple.token } get-task-allow = true com.apple.security.application-groups = Array { group.arp.geocam } com.apple.developer.team-identifier = FT55UW9363 } Critically, the required entitlement is absent: /usr/libexec/PlistBuddy -c "Print:Entitlements:com.apple.developer.locked-camera-capture" /tmp/locked_profile.plist Print: Entry, ":Entitlements:com.apple.developer.locked-camera-capture", Does Not Exist Build behavior If I manually add com.apple.developer.locked-camera-capture to the extension’s .entitlements, Xcode refuses to sign with: “Provisioning profile failed qualification: Profile doesn't include the com.apple.developer.locked-camera-capture entitlement.” Notes The only other embedded extension is a widget/control extension under .../DirectionalCamera.app/PlugIns/... with a separate profile (expected). Question Has anyone successfully provisioned a Locked Camera Capture Extension on a standard paid developer account? Is com.apple.developer.locked-camera-capture gated/restricted (requiring Apple to enable it for a specific Team ID / App ID), or is there a specific capability in the Developer portal that maps to it? If it’s restricted, what is the official process to request enablement for a team/app-id? Any pointers appreciated.

In the Developer portal, I'm attempting to add the "DriverKit UserClient Access" to an App ID that is assigned to a DEXT that we are developing. Once I have filled out the form and clicked "Submit" the screen goes bank and stays blank even after a long delay. The original Capability Request tab's entry for "DriverKit UserClient Access" never changes from "No Requests". I have tried this on two successive days, with the same result.

I'm building a content filtering app using NEURLFilterManager and NEURLFilterControlProvider (introduced in iOS 26). The app uses a PIR server for privacy-preserving URL filtering. Everything works with development-signed builds, but App Store export validation rejects: Entitlement value "url-filter-provider" for com.apple.developer.networking.networkextension — "not supported on iOS" I have "Network Extensions" enabled on my App IDs in the developer portal, but the provisioning profiles don't seem to include url-filter-provider, and I don't see a URL filter option in the Capability Requests tab. What I've tried: Entitlement values: url-filter-provider, url-filter — both rejected at export Extension points: com.apple.networkextension.url-filter, com.apple.networkextension.url-filter-control — both rejected Regenerating provisioning profiles after enabling Network Extensions capability My setup: iOS 26, Xcode 26 Main app bundle: com.pledgelock.app URL filter extension bundle: com.pledgelock.app.url-filter PIR server deployed and functional Is there a specific request or approval process needed for the url-filter-provider entitlement? The WWDC25 session "Filter and tunnel network traffic with NetworkExtension" mentions this entitlement but I can't find documentation on how to get it approved for distribution. Any guidance appreciated. Thanks!

Hello, I am attempting to request the endpoint-security.client entitlement for my app using the following form: https://developer.apple.com/contact/request/system-extension/ After submitting the form, I consistently receive an HTTP 500 error from Apple’s servers. Could you please provide guidance on whether this is a known issue or if there is something I may be doing incorrectly? I appreciate your assistance.

Two months ago I requested the subject entitlement. I'm still waiting for it to be added to our account. Who or how can I find out what going on with it. I have no correspondence from Apple yet saying it was denied and why. https://developer.apple.com/documentation/bundleresources/entitlements/com.apple.developer.persistent-content-capture?language=objc Thank you.

We've got an in-house Swift macOS desktop app with a FileProvider extension, which has been working fine on various machines up through Sonoma (and still does). We've just installed it on a Sequoia machine, and on it the FileProvider extension has lost the ability to access the shared app group. It can neither log to the Group Containers folder under ~/Library, nor access the pipe to the main app. The group name is formatted as group.XXXXXXXXXX.com.orgname.appname in both targets. I'm not sure why it combines the iOS and macOS conventions, with both the group prefix and the teamIdentifier one -- it was first built some time before the point in 2025 when macOS supported iOS-style groups -- but again, it's been working. For the record, The provisioning profile for EMPFileProvider has the App Groups capability enabled, and the App Groups capability is present in both build targets in Xcode. The existing group identifier is registered on the website; I've also manually registered the team-ID-less group name, so I can migrate. The question is, is this actually the right approach? Will such a change break the app on pre-Sequoia machines? And if I proceed, what do I need to do to complete the migration? The app was built back in Xcode 12.5; will I need to update the entire build environment to take advantage of Xcode 16.3's explicit support for iOS-style group names, or can I get away with it since I've manually registered the new group?

I have gotten all necessary entitlements for all my extensions,

Hi everyone, I recently submitted the Family Controls request form and received the following request IDs: 429MKWT5VX
 KNL6T2DC7A
 N62KV78DKC However, I haven’t received any updates yet and I’m not sure how these requests are tracked or when we’ll know if they’re approved. Our app is almost ready to launch and this capability is critical for us. Both the main app and an extension depend on Family Controls, so we’re currently blocked from moving forward. I also raised a support ticket with Apple Developer Support (Case ID: 102838723073), but I haven’t received any response there either. To be honest, this is becoming really stressful. Months of work are stuck at the final step and we’re unable to move forward without this approval. This isn’t just a small personal project and we’re building a production app and were hoping to launch very soon. If anyone has been through this process or has any guidance on the approval timeline, or if someone from Apple could help look into these request IDs, it would genuinely mean a lot to us.

 Thank you

Hi, I’m hoping someone can help clarify the correct entitlement format for the Enhanced Security capability in a macOS App Store build. Context Our app is a sandboxed macOS app built with Xcode 26.4. We enabled the Enhanced Security capability in Signing & Capabilities, and we configured the entitlements based on the current documentation. What’s confusing me The Xcode 26.4 release notes say apps that already adopted Enhanced Security should remove: com.apple.security.hardened-process.enhanced-security-version com.apple.security.hardened-process.platform-restrictions and replace them with: com.apple.security.hardened-process.enhanced-security-version-string with value 1 com.apple.security.hardened-process.platform-restrictions-string with value 2 Reference: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/xcode-release-notes/xcode-26_4-release-notes The entitlement reference pages also seem consistent with that: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/bundleresources/entitlements/com.apple.security.hardened-process.enhanced-security-version-string https://developer.apple.com/documentation/bundleresources/entitlements/com.apple.security.hardened-process.platform-restrictions-string So our app currently uses the new -string entitlements with values "1" and "2". Our App Review rejection said: The app incorrectly implements sandboxing, or it contains one or more entitlements with invalid values. Entitlement "com.apple.security.hardened-process.enhanced-security-version-string" value must be boolean and true. Entitlement "com.apple.security.hardened-process.platform-restrictions-string" value must be boolean and true. That’s the part I can’t reconcile with the documentation. Questions For a Mac App Store submission built with Xcode 26.4, should these two entitlements use the new string-based form, or Boolean true? If the expected format has changed, is there any updated guidance beyond the Xcode 26.4 release notes and current entitlement reference? If Apple staff or anyone familiar with this can clarify what format is currently expected, I’d really appreciate it. Thanks.

A signed DriverKit extension fails OSSystemExtensionRequest activation on macOS 26.4.1. The user-facing error is OSSystemExtensionErrorDomain code 4 ("Extension not found in App bundle") — but the dext is in the bundle, the identifier matches, and sysextd confirms it received the request: sysextd: [com.apple.sx:XPC] client activation request for com.arqitekta.bluefield.rshim.driver sysextd: attempting to realize extension with identifier com.arqitekta.bluefield.rshim.driver …and then nothing further. systemextensionsctl list reports 0 extensions. Question: Which log subsystem/category surfaces the kernel-side reason that sysextd aborts after "attempting to realize"? com.apple.sx only shows the request was accepted; whatever vetoes the realize step isn't in that subsystem (or isn't at info/debug level). Is there a separate predicate for the kernelmanagerd / dext-loading path I should be capturing? Environment: macOS 26.4.1 (25E253), Apple Silicon Mac Studio Xcode 26.2 (17C52), DriverKit SDK 25.2 SIP disabled, systemextensionsctl developer on Apple Developer Program, signed "Apple Development: …" DriverKit entitlement request 264CFJJU36 approved; profile includes com.apple.developer.driverkit, allow-any-userclient-access, transport.pci Already verified: Dext at Contents/Library/SystemExtensions/RshimDriver.dext CFBundleIdentifier matches the request, CFBundlePackageType=DEXT codesign --verify --deep --strict passes on app + dext embedded.provisionprofile parses, contains the expected entitlements Three IOKitPersonalities (BF2 / BF2-alt / BF3) using Apple's placeholder IOPCIPrimaryMatch Installer app entitled with com.apple.developer.system-extension.install only spctl -a -vv on the dext reports "rejected" — expected for development signing, should be bypassed under developer mode Minimal repro: https://github.com/jfabienke/bluefield-macos-toolkit/tree/dev-stub-entitlements/rshim-dext — build.sh produces the failing app dext. Captured artefacts (build output, embedded profile dump, signing report, repro shell script) under rshim-dext/dts-artifacts/. Looking for either (a) the right log show predicate to find the actual refusal reason, or (b) an environmental requirement on macOS 26 I'm missing.

I have a macOS app that captures screen images. The first time I run this application, a dialog is shown directing the user to give my app Screen Recording permission. Is there a way I can trigger this dialog earlier and detect whether the permission was granted?

We were recently approved for the "User Assigned Device Name" for a specific app Identifier. The "Additional Capabilities" tab isn't present on that App ID. I am an admin in the developer portal, and this does not appear for the account holder as well. Any help would be appreciated.

Hello, I went through the verification process to get the Tap to Pay on iPhone entitlement, and after a couple of corrections I was finally assured that I was granted the entitlement for production use. However, in App Store Connect, I can only see "Development" for "Provisioning Support" of the entitlement, and I'm not able to publish the app to Testflight because the profile doesn't support the entitlement (I'm using automatic code signing with XCode). Where is this going wrong? The Tap to Pay support assured me they granted the right entitlement and pointed me to the developer support. Thank you, Johannes

We've been trying to get the CarPlay Navigation Entitlement for a couple years now without much luck. Did you have a similar experience? How did you succeed getting the entitlement? Part of the form requires us to submit Screenshots. Did you provide screenshots of your on-device experience or wireframe for CarPlay? How was your experience?