I commented 3 times today, wondering how such an appreciative reply (automated probably) could be done on a spam. Problème is that it removes credibility to other (serious) Apple's engineers replies. Big sigh.

3 spam, and the same appreciation message. Bizarre…

Problem: I consistently get the build error 'buildExpression' is unavailable: this expression does not conform to 'View' pointing to the lines inside the .setup and .game cases of the switch statement in ContentView. No problem with WelcomeView ? Do you still get the problem if you replace .transition(.asymmetric(insertion: .move(edge: .trailing), removal: .move(edge: .leading))) by .transition(.opacity) in SetupView ? Could you also show how you declare the environment var in struct TheApp: App { }

Yet another spam from the same account.

@App Store Connect Engineer The OP is clearly a spam. Do we really appreciate to have the forum polluted by such messages ?

You have defined, in the Targets, in Identity section, a version number and a build number (which should appear during archiving). Is it 5.0 ?  If so, What number will be returned by "infoDictionary?["CFBundleShortVersionString"]"? it should return 5.0. But, why having 2 different version numbers ? Is it a mistake or on purpose ?

I have an iPhone I was able to run the app there and take screenshots, Why would you take screenshots on the iPhone device ? That's not the way to do it. Just run the app from Xcode in a simulator (iPhone 6.9", iPhone 6.5" and iPad 13"), command-S to capture the screenshot you need, and you're done.

As we have no details, that can only be a guess. The reviewer does not if there are any legal classes set by Teltonika to interface with their products and probably "control" them. So they are cautious on this. What you could do: write to Teltonika and explain what your app is doing ask them if there are any limits (technical, legal or just a notice to write in your app) tor your app. ask them to provide a written letter confirming that your app is compliant with their rules. Attach this letter to your submission file. Hope that helps.

Just relooking the UI is not enough. That often what spam are. My advice would be to add some specific features to X2. It could be additional capabilities, an Apple Watch companion app (even very simple), …  Then, state clearly in the comments to reviewer what are the differences between X1 and X2. Provide this information both for X1 and X2 submission. Add this message on any future update of your app.

My guess for the first is that the compiler in the first performs type inference and analyses ["hello", "world"] as array of optional. let result = ["hello", "world"].contains(Optional("hello")) // ✅ Works fine But in the second, let stringArray = ["hello", "world"] let result = stringArray.contains(Optional("hello")) // ❌ Compile-time error you explicitly declare stringArray to be [String]. Then in second line, compiler balks at it.

10 years later… with Xcode 16.2, same error message. I do not call snapshotView.

Found it. My mistake. I had a test for iPad in the viewDidload. I inadvertently put the register in the iOS section ; so it did not apply for iPad !

Many thanks ffor the information.

You cannot beyond 1 hour after posting. If it is critical to get it deleted, ask forum administrator. You may try to just mark your own post as 'Duplicate', or 'other cause' (not spam, nor inappropriate, that could cause you problems later) ; usually, post is rapidly deleted.

@DuBu error messages are, IMHO, a real weakness of SwiftUI. Messages are at best not helpful, at worst misleading.