When making a GET request to the ABM Account API at https://mdmenrollment.apple.com/account, we receive a response that includes an org_email field. However, we’ve noticed that the value of org_email varies. Sometimes it corresponds to an account with the role of Administrator, while other times it comes from account with roles Device Enrolment Manager, Content Manager and People Manager. We seek clarification on the following points: Which roles determine the org_email sent in the response? Is the org_email coming in API response always same or does it change when we hit the APIs in multiple times. org_email in this response: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/devicemanagement/accountdetail

I'm reaching out to discuss a significant issue related to how iOS handles app login sessions, particularly in the context of MDM (Mobile Device Management) and the Outlook app. In our organization, we use MDM to distribute applications, including Outlook, with certificate-based authentication for BYOD (Bring Your Own Device) devices. This setup allows users to log in seamlessly to their accounts. However, we've encountered a concerning behavior: when a user unenrolls from MDM, which automatically removes the distributed apps and certificates, they can later reinstall the app from the App Store and find themselves automatically logged back into their previous accounts without any authentication prompts. Here’s a detailed breakdown of the situation: Initial Installation: Users enroll their devices in MDM, which installs the necessary apps and certificates on those devices. Session Storage: After the initial login, the app stores the session locally on the device. App Deletion: When users un enroll their devices from MDM, it automatically removes the distributed apps and certificates. Reinstallation: Days or weeks later, when they reinstall the Outlook app from the App Store, they find themselves automatically logged back into their accounts. This behavior raises important concerns: Lack of Authentication: The app retaining user sessions even after deletion allows users to access their accounts without re-authentication, which could lead to potential unauthorized access and undermines the effectiveness of certificate-based authentication and two-factor authentication (2FA). Note: This issue is not limited to Outlook; we've observed similar behavior with many other apps. Need for a Solution - Given the implications of this behavior, we are looking for effective solutions to prevent it. Specifically, we need options within the MDM framework to: Restrict Session Retention: Implement settings that ensure any app deleted via MDM will lose all stored sessions and require re-authentication upon reinstallation. Default Settings for MDM-Distributed Apps: Ideally, this would be a default feature for all apps distributed through MDM, ensuring that user sessions are not retained after app deletion. Has anyone else experienced this issue? Are there any existing settings or workarounds within MDM platforms to mitigate this problem? Your insights and experiences would be invaluable as we navigate this challenge. Thank you!

Dear Apple Team, As an MDM (Mobile Device Management) service provider, we are writing to bring attention to an issue that is affecting many of our customers who manage large fleets of iOS devices. Specifically, we have encountered challenges with the app update process via MDM, which is impacting both kiosk devices and non-kiosk devices in a variety of use cases. Issue 1: App Updates Delayed on Kiosk Devices Many of our customers are deploying kiosk devices that are used 24/7 independently with no attendants. In these cases, when an app update is sent through MDM via the installApplication command, the installation does not begin immediately. Instead, the update starts only after the device is locked. However, since these kiosk devices are running continuously, they are rarely locked, preventing the app update from occurring. To force the update, administrators need to manually remote lock or physically lock the device, which is a time-consuming process. This becomes even more challenging for devices like Apple TV, where remotely locking and unlocking the device to complete app updates is especially difficult, making it hard to keep the apps up to date in a timely manner. Issue 2: User Cancellations of Critical Updates on Non-Kiosk Devices In the case of non-kiosk devices, customers are encountering another challenge: when a critical update is pushed during business hours, users are often prompted to install the update. However, many users tend to cancel the update, leaving devices unpatched and potentially vulnerable. This behavior can delay the deployment of important security patches, which is a critical concern for organizations managing sensitive data or business-critical apps. Request for a Solution Our customers have expressed the need for a more reliable and forceful app update mechanism. Specifically, we are requesting the following features to improve the app update experience: Scheduled app updates: The ability to schedule app updates, similar to the way OS updates are handled. If the user does not install the update within a specified timeframe, the update should begin automatically or prompt the user with a stronger reminder. Force install option: A feature that would allow MDM administrators to force an app update immediately, without relying on user intervention. This would ensure that critical updates are installed promptly, improving security and system stability across all devices. These features are essential for many of our customers who rely on timely and consistent app updates to maintain security, functionality, and compliance across their managed devices. Without these options, they face challenges in ensuring devices are kept up-to-date, which can result in security vulnerabilities and operational disruptions. We kindly request that Apple consider adding these functionalities to improve the MDM app update process and provide a more reliable experience for both kiosk and non-kiosk device management. Thank you for your attention to this matter. We look forward to your feedback and any potential improvements in future iOS updates. Raised in the same manner as feedback: FB15910292

We are currently working on a SCEP server implementation that operates in FIPS-approved mode. In this mode, RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 encryption is disallowed due to compliance requirements, and only FIPS-approved padding schemes such as RSA-OAEP are permitted. However, we have observed that the SCEP client functionality on Apple devices currently does not support RSA-OAEP for CMS EnvelopedData decryption. This creates a challenge for us in ensuring FIPS compliance while maintaining compatibility with Apple devices during certificate enrollment through SCEP. We would appreciate your guidance on the following: Are there any alternative FIPS-approved encryption algorithms or configurations supported by Apple devices for SCEP CMS EnvelopedData decryption? Is there any plan or timeline for future support of RSA-OAEP on Apple platforms for this use case? Feedback raised along with sysdiagnose logs as well : FB17655410

When I try to sign in Managed Apple ID in supervised device there appears a prompt stating that "Apple ID" is a work account.This account must be signed in as a work account on this device.When I click continue it takes to VPN and device management tab where MDM profile already exists. Note:The managed Apple ID has a ICloud subscription for it. When I remove the subscription for the Apple ID and try to sign in, it works. Kindly help on this or advise on any additional steps required to enable sign in for managed Apple ID in this scenario

Description: An app update of a app store app or a enterprise app is pushed from MDM using "InstallApplication" command to an iOS device. The app is opened in foreground when an update is pushed. The device is supervised and the app is VPP purchased. When the command is sent to device, the app doesn't update automatically and shows a prompt to update the app. Kindly help us understand this case. Sample InstallApplication Request: <!DOCTYPE plist PUBLIC "-//Apple//DTD PLIST 1.0//EN" "http://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.0.dtd"> <plist version="1.0"> <dict> <key>CommandUUID</key> <string>InstallApplication;Sample=000000</string> <key>Command</key> <dict> <key>RequestType</key> <string>InstallApplication</string> <key>iTunesStoreID</key> <integer>1113153706</integer> <key>InstallAsManaged</key> <true/> <key>ManagementFlags</key> <integer>5</integer> <key>Options</key> <dict> <key>PurchaseMethod</key> <integer>1</integer> </dict> <key>ChangeManagementState</key> <string>Managed</string> </dict> </dict> </plist> Sample InstallApplication Response: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <!DOCTYPE plist PUBLIC "-//Apple//DTD PLIST 1.0//EN" "http://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.0.dtd"> <plist version="1.0"> <dict> <key>CommandUUID</key> <string>InstallApplication;Sample=000000</string> <key>Identifier</key> <string>com.microsoft.skype.teams</string> <key>State</key> <string>PromptingForUpdate</string> <key>Status</key> <string>Acknowledged</string> <key>UDID</key> <string>0000-000000-0000</string> </dict> </plist>

Issue Description: Apps that support both iOS and tvOS can have different versions in App Store for each type(iOS and tvOS) but same Bundle Identifier and iTunesStoreID/trackID. For example, the iOS version of YouTube has the latest version in App Store as 17.30.3 the tvOS version of YouTube has the latest version in App Store as 2.07.01 This can be verified from two by two specific iTunes look Up API as shown below https://itunes.apple.com/lookup?id=544007664 https://itunes.apple.com/lookup?id=544007664&entity=tvSoftware Sample contentMetadataLookup URL: https://uclient-api.itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStorePlatform.woa/wa/lookup?version=2&id=544007664&p=mdm-lockup&caller=MDM&platform=enterprisestore&cc=us&l=en Queries: What should we do to get the tvOS specific version of an app in contentMetadataLookup URL? The trackViewURL doesn't show tvOS specific version history of the app - https://apps.apple.com/us/app/youtube-watch-listen-stream/id544007664?platform=appleTV . How should we view this the apps' tvOS specific version history? Kindly help us with the queries.

Issue Description : Incase, if the app version for the iOS and iPadOS differs like iOS and tvOS how can we get the iPadOS app details in ContentMetaDataLookUp API.  sample contentMetadataURL for iOS : https://uclient-api.itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStorePlatform.woa/wa/lookup?version=2&id=544007664&p=mdm-lockup&caller=MDM&platform=enterprisestore&cc=us&l=en Kindly help us with this case.

We are testing the ACMECertificate payload in Mac 13.1 beta and getting this error. The same payload when sent to iOS works fine. Any help on this would be appreciated. Thanks. FB Raised: FB11736586 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <!DOCTYPE plist PUBLIC "-//Apple//DTD PLIST 1.0//EN" "http://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.0.dtd"> <plist version="1.0"> <dict> <key>PayloadVersion</key> <integer>1</integer> <key>PayloadUUID</key> <string>70e4b45e3c1e</string> <key>PayloadType</key> <string>Configuration</string> <key>PayloadOrganization</key> <string>NewComp</string> <key>PayloadIdentifier</key> <string>4565353a3a84</string> <key>PayloadDisplayName</key> <string>ACME</string> <key>PayloadRemovalDisallowed</key> <true/> <key>PayloadContent</key> <array> <dict> <key>PayloadVersion</key> <integer>1</integer> <key>PayloadUUID</key> <string>f84ef110e39b</string> <key>PayloadType</key> <string>com.apple.security.acme</string> <key>PayloadOrganization</key> <string>NewComp</string> <key>PayloadIdentifier</key> <string>f84ef110e39b</string> <key>PayloadDisplayName</key> <string>ACME Configuration</string> <key>DirectoryURL</key> <string>https://acmeserver/acme/acme/directory</string> <key>ClientIdentifier</key> <string>test</string> <key>HardwareBound</key> <true/> <key>KeyType</key> <string>ECSECPrimeRandom</string> <key>KeySize</key> <integer>384</integer> <key>Subject</key> <array> <array> <array> <string>1.2.840.113549.1.9.1</string> <string>test@test.com</string> </array> </array> </array> <key>SubjectAltName</key> <dict> </dict> <key>KeyUsage</key> <integer>5</integer> <key>Attest</key> <true/> </dict> </array> </dict> </plist>

Apple App Store apps that are not purchased in ABM (Non VPP apps) fails while deployed to macOS and tvOS devices from MDM. Since, we can install apps directly from App Store of macOS and tvOS devices just like iOS devices, kindly help us understand why the non VPP apps fails when distributed to tvOS and macOS from devices.

Description: <key>allowSpotlightInternetResults</key> <dict> <key>value</key> <false/> </dict> <key>allowAssistant</key> <dict> <key>value</key> <false/> </dict> I have added the restriction profile with the above restriction keys and values . along with a App Lock Policy locked to a single app. The problem am facing is, the app was locked to a particular app as per the policy . But User can able to open safari preview search view using the spotlight search. Atached Screenshot for the safarii preview in App Lock Policy Enabled Device

We have the following issues on a iPad enrolled as Shared iPad via MDM using Apple Business Manager (ABM) We are unable to use the mail app in Shared iPad. The following error message is shown “This iPad is restricted from creating mail accounts”. When checked from MDM whether any such account restriction was added, they was none added to this device. We are also unable to add accounts via Settings app as well. And also when checking the Shared iPad restriction documentation, mail app is not in the restricted list for Shared iPad https://support.apple.com/en-mt/guide/apple-school-manager/axm3a8bb0ab8/web Kindly let us know whether we can add mail accounts manually in Shared iPad device. OS Version : iPadOS 16.5

https://developer.apple.com/documentation/devicemanagement/systempreferences The Above documentation of "System Preferences" says deprecated. I assume that some of the panes are not working in latest OS due to this deprecation. My query is , Is there any other alternative to Disable or Enabled Preference Panes which was attained by SystemPreferences Payload. I couldn't find any. Is it entirely stopped and in latest OS's ,it wont allowed to restrict those panes?

Ref- https://support.apple.com/en-in/guide/deployment/dep3b4cf515/web When we deploy an Payload with identifier "com.apple.airprint" , It will add the deployed printer configurations to printers list in mac. Which additionally needs the mac user to add it from Settings -> Printers -> Add Printer -> (Deployed Printer Configuration will be listed here) Select the printer -> Click Add . Screenshot where user need to add it manually after profile association is attached below. Now the Printer is available to be used ,when an share option in any document is clicked. Why this flow requires multiple to and fro. Can it be able to deploy the printer straight to Printers available List instead of manually adding from the above screenshot

Hi Apple Team & Community, The new Introduction of Platform SSO during ADE Enrollment is Great And we tried implementing this. As a Rule mentioned in the Documentation Initially MDM Server should send 403 response with Response Body adhering to ErrorCodePlatformSSORequired when HTTP Header for MachineInfo request contains MDM_CAN_REQUEST_PSSO_CONFIG and set to true There are contradictory claims mentioned in Document, In Process Platform SSO Required Response it is mentioned that MDM Server should send body as JSON Object for ErrorCodePlatformSSORequired Example below >>>>> Response HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden Content-Type: application/json Content-Length: 558 { "code": "com.apple.psso.required", "description": "MDM Server requires the user to authenticate with Identity Provider - BY MEMDM", "message": "The MDM server requires you to authenticate with your Identity Provider. Please follow the instructions provided by your organization to complete the authentication process - BY MEMDM", "details": { "Package": { "ManifestURL": "https://platform-sso-node-server.vercel.app:443/manifest" }, "ProfileURL": "https://platform-sso-node-server.vercel.app:443/profile", "AuthURL": "https://platform-sso-node-server.vercel.app:443/auth" } } But in the same Document a Sample HTTP Response was Provided but seems to be XML format as below >>>>> Response HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden Content-Type: application/xml Content-Length: 601 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <!DOCTYPE plist PUBLIC "-//Apple//DTD PLIST 1.0//EN" "http://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.0.dtd"> <plist version="1.0"> <dict> <key>Code</key> <string>com.apple.psso.required</string> <key>Details</key> <dict> <key>ProfileURL</key> <string>https://mdmserver.example.com/psso.mobileconfig</string> <key>Package</key> <dict> <key>ManifestURL</key> <string>https://mdmserver.example.com/psso-app.plist</string> </dict> <key>AuthURL</key> <string>https://idp.example.com/authenticate</string> </dict> </dict> </plist> From Github I assume that both Response Types are welcomed hence I tried with Both Followed in JSON Mode, I redirected the HTTP request if MachineInfo contains MDM_CAN_REQUEST_PSSO_CONFIG and set to true to https://platform-sso-node-server.vercel.app/redirectedDEPJSON Followed in XML Mode, I redirected the HTTP request if MachineInfo contains MDM_CAN_REQUEST_PSSO_CONFIG and set to true to https://platform-sso-node-server.vercel.app/redirectedDEPXML In both Response Modes OS is not proceeding after and a error Stating Enrollment with Management Server Failed , Forbidden request (403) appears Can someone kindly guide on where I missed, or is this any OS Bug in Tahoe 26?