When I run my app on iOS 18, the following gets logged to the XCode console. error: Error reading commands from file lldbinit - file not found. I've never heard of that file before. What is it, why is it needed, why does the app (unbeknown to me) try to read from it, and why is it missing?

If I have an XCode project that generates a framework when built, then I've noticed that its possible to add new additional targets to the project of type app extension. However if I add some source code to an app extension and regenerate the framework, then that source code is not accessable from the resulting framework (i.e. if the framework is included into an app, then the app code doesn't have visibility of the code that was added to the extension in the framework). Is this something which is possible to achieve? Ideally I would like to package the main source code that constitutes the framework content, along with the source code for a few extensions into a single framework, so that the app(s) that use the framework can include the framework into their main app target and also include it in the app extension target. I noticed that if the scheme of the framework is changed to the extension before building, then the result is not a .framework file but a .appex file. For client apps of the framework, can they directly include/use that .appex file? If so how can that be achieved? Does

During development, before things eventually go live, if the associated server for a message filter extension has a self signed SSL then if/how can test iPhones be configured such that the OS will connect to the server when they are performing a message filter query request?

There's plenty of articles out there about programatically grouping push notifications. However I have tried setting the thread-id in the push payload when sending a push, or setting the threadIdentifier for a received push in a notification service extension to be the same for several pushes. But if within the iPhone Settings / Notifications the user selects to display pushes as List and turns off Notification Grouping, then each notification resulting from the push appears on its own separately. Is there something other than thread-id/threadidentifier that is used to programmatically group them? If not then whats the point of these as grouping and display is actually under the control of user.

I'm sending push notifications to a notification extension, and within the extension setting the threadIdentifier to be the same. But I'm observing inconsistent grouping behaviour, and behaviour that changes over time. The general iPhone settings are to display notifications as a Stack, and the app settings are to show on lock screen, notification center and banners and the notification grouping is set to by app (changing it to automatic doesn't affect the behaviour below). Pushes are displayed on the lock screen grouped together, then if the device is roused and the screen swiped down to reveal the notification center then they are still grouped. So far so good. If the iphone is active then the notifications appear at the top of the screen, one by one, but in this case if there is a swipe down to reveal the notification center then the notifications are not grouped when displayed, but shown individually. But then if one waits a few minutes and then displays the notification center for a 2nd time, sometimes now they will be grouped, but sometimes not. Why are they not (always) being displayed as grouped in the notification center?

I've used SPM to install some dependencies, however for one of them, CocoaLumberjackSwift the Embed section is blank and attempting to click in it doesn't brink up any dropdown menuetc. Why is that, how can I change it or check what its set to if its blank? (Code 16.2)

I'm creating a .xcframework in order to deliver an api/functionality to a customer for inclusion into an app. I'm doing it as a .xcframework as I want it to be a binary so that the source code isn't accessable. The xcframework has dependencies on modules which are installed via SPM (there are a few, an example is PhoneNumberKit) When I build the xcframework and then add it to a test program and invoke its api then there's a run time error saying "PhoneNumberKit/resource_bundle_accessor.swift:44: Fatal error: unable to find bundle named PhoneNumberKit_PhoneNumberKit" How can I build the xcframework so that its dependencies are included within it? (Stepping back a bit, is an xcframework an appropriate approach for this?)

I'd like to determine, definitively, if nesting of "binaries" within other "binaries" is possible with iOS. I put binaries in quotes because I've read documentation/forum posts stating things like nested frameworks isn't supported in iOS. A framework is a binary isn't it, or contains one. So does a statement such as that apply specifically and only to nested frameworks, or does it also apple to other scenarios - such as a SPM binary integrated into a framework? Here's the specific scenario I'm seeking clarity on - suppose an SDK providing an API/functionality is built as an .xcframework and that SDK contains dependencies on two other components (Firebase, AlmoFire, RealmSwift, CocoaLumberjack, whatever etc.). Lets say the SDK has two dependencies X and Y and it integrates them via SPM. Q1: If there is an app A which integrates the SDK, and A doesn't use X and Y itself, then can X and Y be embedded within the SDK and thus opague to A? Is this possible in iOS? Q2: If A integrates the SDK as above, but additionally, it itself uses X and Y independently of the SDK, then is this situation possible in iOS? Presumably in Q1 the SDK needs to embed X and Y into the framework? While presumably in Q2 it should not - because the app will be and hence that would lead to duplicate symbols and potential undefined behaviour (and therefore X and Y's SPM package spec needs to specify dynamic?) I've been trying to get a clear picture of this for literally weeks and weeks, without reaching a clear conclusion. So some definitive answer would be very much appreciated.

In this Apple documentation https://developer.apple.com/documentation/xcode/acquiring-crash-reports-and-diagnostic-logs it says "If a customer reports a crash, they can transfer the crash report to either a Mac or Windows computer. See Find device crash and energy logs on a Mac or Windows computer." In the page that links to (https://help.apple.com/xcode/mac/current/#/dev0f3181c2c) it says "When an app crashes or uses excessive CPU on a device, the operating system creates a log of that event. The next time you connect the device to your Mac, the system downloads those records (known as crash or energy logs) to your Mac. " But where on your Mac, it doesn't say where. Where does it the Mac download the crash reports to?

Hello I have a few questions regarding the Live Caller ID lookup feature First question: The documentation for Live Caller ID Lookup says that "the system does not use private relay when the application is installed directly from XCode.This allows the application & the service deployment to be tested before filling out the onboarding form and setting up private relay." What is the situation regarding development distribution signed .ipas? Would they be able to bypass the private relay too? Second question: Is there anyway an application could dynamically switch which blocking dataset gets used? The use case for this is providing the option to the user whether a set of numbers gets blocked or not. If the OS makes a blocking lookup and an identity lookup, then if these always map to the same blocking dataset then it means the blocking behaviour is the same for every user there is. That means whatever decisions the server makes as to what numbers to block applies to every user. Whether to block a number of not is a fuzzy decision, it would be good if users had the ability to decide for themselves if fuzzy numbers should be blocked or not rather than have that imposed upon them. Third question: It looks from the way things are set up that 2) is not actually possible. If that is the case then will it be permitted for two endpoints to be registered with Apple? (then the app could implement more than one Live Caller ID extension which provide different blocking behaviour)? Thank you very much.

I have account holder/admin status for an Apple developer account. I would like to add a user to the account and grant them the ability to be able to generate app ids, apply for entitlements, generate/edit provisioning profiles, register devices to an app id, upload the app to Testflgith etc. etc. for just one specific app. However it seems this isn't possible. If I add them with the App Manger role, then its possible to specify the particular app which they can manage, however the App Manager role hides the Certificates, App IDs, & Profiles section, meaning they are unable to do many of these things listed about. If I change their role to Admin, then now the Certificates, App IDs, & Profiles section is now available to them, but then the apps automatically changes to all apps and its not possible to select just one. This seems like a very common scenario that occurs, but its not possible to enable. Whereby company X wants to publish an app and sub-contracts the development of that app to company Y. It seems its not possible to register developers from company Y with the level of access required to develop the app without simultaneously limiting their powers to just one app. You have a choice, give them all access to all apps, or insufficient access to just one app. Is there something I've overlooking?

I've got an existing app using storyboards and would like to incorporate the new iOS 18 ContactAccessButton() and contactAccessPicker() into the GUI. However, how can that be done? If I try to do something like add a UIView to a view controller in the storyboard, then ContactAccessButton can't be assigned to it (even though ContactAccessButton inherits from UIView). Nor can a ContactAccessButton be used as a type within the Storyboard/the View Controller. How do I go about integrating this new iOS feature into an existing app using Storyboards and view controllers?

I just received a message upon app submission saying "Although submission for App Store review was successful, you may want to correct the following issues in your next submission for App Store review. Invalid privacy manifest - The PrivacyInfo.xcprivacy file from the following path is invalid" This is due to a 3rd party dependency being used by the app, but the thing is I was able to submit the app a few weeks ago, and a few months ago prior to that, and this warning wasn't present despite the exact same version of the 3rd party dependency being in those previous submissions as for the current submission. As the deadline for including privacy manifests was earlier this year, and as the message says " you may want to correct the following issues in your next submission", then whats the point, is there any point in this message? The wording doesn't even say must or should resubmit, it simply says "may like to". Is there therefore any need to address this or not bother if the message just says "may like to"?

I made an update to my app's code to make use of the new Contact access limited permission (CNAuthorizationStatusLimited), like so: if (@available(iOS 18.0, *)) { switch ([CNContactStore authorizationStatusForEntityType:CNEntityTypeContacts]) { case CNAuthorizationStatusLimited: <snip> However, later I discovered there's another totally unrelated issue which only manifests when the app is built with XCode 16. It isn't a trivial change to workaround, so for now I would like to make a release to the app store which makes use of the new CNAuthorizationStatusLimited status but is built using XCode 15. However, building with XCode 15 results in a "Use of undeclared identifier 'CNAuthorizationStatusLimited' error. If the code were making use of a new API, I could workaround using a selector for example, however as this is an enum, is there Is there any workaround possible for this - or its just not possible to build using XCode 15 and the source code contain references to CNAuthorizationStatusLimited?

In order to create a Message Filter Extension it is necessary to set up Shared Web Credentials. I'd like to form an understanding of what role SWC plays when the OS is making request to the associated network service (when the extension has called deferQueryRequestToNetwork()) and how this differs from when an app directly uses Shared Web Credentials itself. When an app is making direct use of SWC, it makes a request to obtain the user's credentials from the web site. However in the case of a Message Filter Extension, there aren't any individual user credentials, so what is happening behind the scenes when the OS makes a server request on behalf of a Message Filtering Extension? A more general question - the documentation for Shared Web Credentials says "Associated domains establish a secure association between domains and your app.". Thank you