Relative Date labels on WatchOS complications do not update when in the .WidgetLabel section modifier. Am I missing anything? For example if I want a .accessoryCircular complication in the top centre middle of the Infograph Watch Face, I can have maybe an Icon for the app in the circular slot and then use the .WidgetLabel modifier to display text. However, the Text(Date(), style: .relative) will not update in the WidgetLabel area, but it will update in main area. This is a bug I suspect. This same problem also exists with the .accessory corner complications and the WidgetLabel. The best example of where this works fine currently in the WatchOS system is the Heart Rate complication. Here the WidgetLabel text shows the relative date. It also has formatting options for the date (like only showing minutes), none of this is available to third party developers. Have tested this on the latest public releases of iOS, WatchOS & Xcode as well as the new iOS 17, WatchOS 10 and Xcode 15 Beta releases. Example Code: import SwiftUI import WidgetKit struct WatchWidget: Widget { let kind: String = "WatchWidget" var body: some WidgetConfiguration { StaticConfiguration(kind: kind, provider: TimelineProvider()) { entry in Text(Date(), style: .relative) .widgetLabel { Text(Date(), style: .relative) } } .configurationDisplayName("WatchWidget") .description("WatchWidget") .supportedFamilies([.accessoryCircular, .accessoryCorner]) } }

I'm looking to migrate my users ClockKit complications to WidgetKit in my next app update. I can only do this for WatchOS 10 users because the APIs are too limited for WatchOS 9 (eg. Widget corner round text not available). But I do need to do this for WatchOS 10 users in order to get in the Smart Stack. When I tried to mark my getWidgetConfiguration method in my ComplicationController.swift with: @available(watchOS 10.0, *) it complains and says: Protocol 'CLKComplicationWidgetMigrator' requires 'getWidgetConfiguration(from:completionHandler:)' to be available in watchOS 9.0 and newer I then tried modifying my WidgetKit extension to only support WatchOS 10. This seems to work for a while but at some point WatchOS 9 devices still try the migration and crash with symbolNotFound DYLD issues for the WidgetKit extension which shouldn't even be embedded in the WatchOS 9 builds! (all visible in iPhone Analytics data crashes) So I'm not sure what else to try. I've researched a lot in docs etc... but can find no official way to achieve this.

How can I open the user's Health Privacy Settings directly from my app when I'd like them to review them? I believe similar questions have been asked before like this one: https://forums.developer.apple.com/forums/thread/730434 However, I'm wondering if the situation is changed for iOS 17 or if there's a way that works for Health permissions. This is directly possible in the Garmin Connect app for example which is a major app on the store.

I've been seeing warning like the following with my Apple Watch app: === AttributeGraph: cycle detected through attribute 140952 === === AttributeGraph: cycle detected through attribute 131640 === === AttributeGraph: cycle detected through attribute 131640 === === AttributeGraph: cycle detected through attribute 131640 === === AttributeGraph: cycle detected through attribute 131640 === === AttributeGraph: cycle detected through attribute 131640 === === AttributeGraph: cycle detected through attribute 131640 === I've done some debugging with Instruments and Xcode, I've determined that its caused by adding a .toolbar { ToolbarItemGroup(placement: .topBarTrailing) { Label("Stop", systemImage: "xmark") } } to an item within my NavigationSplitView List Destination view. To aid reproduction of this issue even more, I've verified the same warning occurs with the Apple sample code from the WWDC23 Backyard Birds app. https://developer.apple.com/documentation/swiftui/backyard-birds-sample?changes=_9 If you take the Apple sample code, open it in Xcode 15.4 and run it in the Apple Watch WatchOS 10.5 simulator, then select the Bird Springs item, all is well. If you then add the above toolbar code to the BackyardSummaryTab file at the bottom of the VStack, you'll see the same AttributeGraph issues I'm seeing in my app. Is this a bug? I can't understand why adding a static ToolBarItem in WatchOS is causing this. I've seen this issue in the simulator and also on device.

I’m having an issue with my published iPad app on the App Store where a selection of users (but not all) are finding they are unable to download my app on their iPad. The app recently was updated to support only devices Running iOS/iPadOS 17 and also added iPad support as HealthKit is available there now. The App Store listing correctly shows it as compatible but for some reasons user still see incompatibility messages. This makes no sense as the app has been full built and tested on iPad and a lot of users are using it fine. All the iPads in question are running ipadOS 17 too. I can only assume this is a bug but I thought I’d post here in case maybe I had an Xcode build setting wrong or something. Thank You

I'm trying to make a Swift Chart where 24 AreaMarks an hour apart on X axis over a day display a vertical gradient. The gradient is vertical and is essentially [Color.opacity(0.1),Colour,Color.opacity(0.1] The idea here is where the upper and lower points of each AreaMark are the same or close to each other in the Y axis, the chart essentially displays a line, where they are far apart you get a nice fading vertical gradient. However, it seems that the .alignsMarkStylesWithPlotArea modifier is always set for AreaMarks even if manually applying it false. Investigating further, I've learnt that with AreaMarks in a series, Swift Charts seems to only listen to the first foreground style set in. I've created some sample code to demonstrate this. struct DemoChartView: View { var body: some View { Chart { AreaMark(x: .value("Time", Date().addingTimeInterval(0)), yStart: .value("1", 40), yEnd: .value("2", 60)) .foregroundStyle(LinearGradient(colors: [.pink, .teal], startPoint: .top, endPoint: .bottom)) .alignsMarkStylesWithPlotArea(false) AreaMark(x: .value("Time", Date().addingTimeInterval(3600)), yStart: .value("1", 44), yEnd: .value("2", 58)) .foregroundStyle(LinearGradient(colors: [.orange, .yellow], startPoint: .top, endPoint: .bottom)) .alignsMarkStylesWithPlotArea(false) AreaMark(x: .value("Time", Date().addingTimeInterval(03600*2)), yStart: .value("1", 50), yEnd: .value("2", 90)) .foregroundStyle(LinearGradient(colors: [.green, .blue], startPoint: .top, endPoint: .bottom)) .alignsMarkStylesWithPlotArea(false) } } } Which produces this: So here, all the different .foregroundStyle LinearGradients are being ignored AND the .alignsMarkStylesWithPlotArea(false) is also ignored - the amount of pink on the first mark is different to the second and third 🤷‍♂️ Has anyone encountered this. Are AreaMarks the correct choice or are they just not setup to create this type of data display. Thanks

I'm trying to create two widgets, widget A and B. Currently A and B are very similar so they share the same Intent and Intent Timeline Provider. I use the Intent Configuration interface to set a parameter, in this example lets say its the background tint. On one of the widgets, widget A, I want to also set another String enum parameter (for a timescale), but I don't want this option to be there for widget B as it's not relevant. I'm aware of some of the options for configuring the ParameterSummary, but none that let me pass in or inject the "kind" string (or widget ID) of the widget that's being modified. I'll try to provide some code for examples. My Widget Definition (targeting >= iOS 17) struct WidgetA: Widget { // I'd like to access this parameter within the intent let kind: String = "WidgetA" var body: some WidgetConfiguration { AppIntentConfiguration(kind: kind, intent: WidgetIntent.self, provider: IntentTimelineProvider()) { entry in WidgetView(data: entry) } .configurationDisplayName("Widget A") .description("A widget.") .supportedFamilies([.systemMedium, .systemLarge]) } } struct WidgetB: Widget { let kind: String = "WidgetB" var body: some WidgetConfiguration { AppIntentConfiguration(kind: kind, intent: WidgetIntent.self, provider: IntentTimelineProvider()) { entry in WidgetView(data: entry) } .configurationDisplayName("Widget B") .description("B widget.") .supportedFamilies([.systemMedium, .systemLarge]) } } struct IntentTimelineProvider: AppIntentTimelineProvider { typealias Entry = WidgetIntentTimelineEntry typealias Intent = WidgetIntent ........ } struct WidgetIntent: AppIntent, WidgetConfigurationIntent { // This intent allows configuration of the widget background // This intent also allows for the widget to display interactive buttons for changing the Trend Type static var title: LocalizedStringResource = "Widget Configuration" static var description = IntentDescription("Description.") static var isDiscoverable: Bool { return false} init() {} init(trend:String) { self.trend = trend } // Used for implementing interactive Widget func perform() async throws -> some IntentResult { print("WidgetIntent perform \(trend)") #if os(iOS) WidgetState.setState(type: trend) #endif return .result() } @Parameter(title: "Trend Type", default: "Trend") var trend:String // I only want to show this parameter for Widget A and not Widget B @Parameter(title: "Trend Timescale", default: .week) var timescale: TimescaleTypeAppEnum? @Parameter(title: "Background Tint", default: BackgroundTintTypeAppEnum.none) var backgroundTint: BackgroundTintTypeAppEnum? static var parameterSummary: some ParameterSummary { // Summary("Test Info") { // \.$timescale // \.$backgroundTint // } // An example of a configurable widget parameter summary, but not based of kind/ID string When(\.$backgroundTint, .equalTo, BackgroundTintTypeAppEnum.none) { Summary("Test Info") { \.$timescale \.$backgroundTint } } otherwise : { Summary("Test Info") { \.$backgroundTint } } } } enum TimescaleTypeAppEnum: String, AppEnum { case week case fortnight static var typeDisplayRepresentation = TypeDisplayRepresentation(name: "Trend Timescale") static var caseDisplayRepresentations: [Self: DisplayRepresentation] = [ .week: "Past Week", .fortnight: "Past Fortnight" ] } enum BackgroundTintTypeAppEnum: String, AppEnum { case blue case none static var typeDisplayRepresentation = TypeDisplayRepresentation(name: "Background Tint") static var caseDisplayRepresentations: [Self: DisplayRepresentation] = [ .none: "None (Default)", .blue: "Blue" ] } I know I could achieve what I'm after by having a separate Intent and separate IntentTimelineProvider for each widget. But this all seems unnessecary for just a simple optional parameter based on what widget its configuring.... unless I'm missing the point about Intents, Widgets or something! I've done a fair bit of other searching but can't find an answer to this overall scenario. Many thanks for any help.

I have a Health & Fitness widget that runs on iPhone and Apple Watch. As Health data access requires the device to be unlocked, the iPhone widget is already slightly limited in capability because of updates. With widgets further expanding to places like CarPlay, I know I can use the .disfavouredLocations{} API to try and prevent it being offered there. This is crucial as the widget functionality would be basically non-existent as your device is locked during CarPlay use. My problem is, on the Mac despite using the .disfavouredLocations{.iPhoneWidgetsOnMac} etc...., the widget can still be added in the "other unsupported section". And yet, in that section the Apple Fitness app widget is no where to be seen. Is there an API I am missing to completely remove a widget from the Mac widget gallery and hopefully CarPlay, Standby etc.... (all places where the device running the widget is usually locked -> No Health data)? Or does the Apple Fitness app have a private API to block it from these places where its function is not wanted and this isn't available to other apps?

I'm having a problem with Xcode 26 where a symbol bug is causing my app to crash at launch if they are running iOS 17.X This has to do with a HealthKit API that was introduced in iOS 18.1 HKQuantityType(.appleSleepingBreathingDisturbances), I use availability clauses to ensure I only support it in that version. This all worked fine with Xcode 16.4 but breaks in Xcode 26. This means ALL my users running iOS 17 will get at launch crashes if this isn't resolved in the Xcode GM seed. I'll post the code here in case I'm doing anything wrong. This, the HealthKit capability, the "HealthKit Privacy - Health Share Usage Description" and "Privacy - Health Update Usage Description", and device/simulator on iOS 17.X are all you need to reproduce the issue. I've made a feedback too as I'm 95% sure it's a bug: FB19727966 import SwiftUI import HealthKit struct ContentView: View { var body: some View { VStack { Image(systemName: "globe") .imageScale(.large) .foregroundStyle(.tint) Text("Hello, world!") } .padding() .task { print(await requestPermission()) } } } #Preview { ContentView() } func requestPermission() async -> Bool { if #available(iOS 18.0, *) { let healthTypes = [HKQuantityType(.appleSleepingBreathingDisturbances)] var readTypes = healthTypes.map({$0}) let write: Set<HKSampleType> = [] let res: ()? = try? await HKHealthStore().requestAuthorization(toShare: write, read: Set(readTypes)) guard res != nil else { print("requestPermission returned nil") return false } return true } else { return false} }

Are there any HealthKit related changes to be aware of in the new update that enables SPO2 / Blood Oxygen Saturation measurements on certain Apple Watch models within the US? I’m aware of processing happening on the phone…. But beyond that: Does this mean values are then saved to Apple Health? Do these models still take background SPO2 measurements in the same way as other models do? Are these values then visible in third party iOS apps as normal through HealthKit? Do these values sync back to the paired Apple Watch HealthKit store for third party apps to access on the Watch? For reference I have an iOS and WatchOS app that, amongst other features, provides the ability to see your SPO2 values in the Watch app, complications and in the iOS app.

I supported the Always-On display in my app complications from day one but since am continuing to find animation glitches and bugs that have never been fixed and exist currently on WatchOS 8 & 9 (I've tried Series 6 & 8 devices). I'm thinking about scrapping it and just returning the handler(nil). Does anyone have an example of where they use it and it really adds value to their app complications? And do they have any suggestions to try and work around the glitches? Thanks

I'm trying to ensure my watch app launches as quickly as possible. I'm using the @WKApplicationDelegateAdaptor because of needing to implement the BackgroundRefresh handlers. What I'm finding is that the time between the app calling the main init() and then the ExtensionDelegate calling applicationDidFinishLaunching is often > 2 seconds. I've tried using Instruments to profile the App launch but have never had any luck with the tool on a watch app. So I then created a blank project just with the elements needed to implement the same WKApplicationDelegateAdaptor and oslog calls, performance was the same... This is tested on WatchOS 9.5 & 9.5. This is on a Series 6 and Series 8 Apple Watch (FYI S6 == S7 == S8 for Apple Watch CPU performance) Interestingly, on the simulator, the time gap was less, more like 1 second between main init() and applicationDidFinishLaunching.... not sure why this would be this way. Anyway, for real world device usage, is this the best performance I can expect? Is there anything that can be done to improve this?

I'm having a problem in my app where when the use dismisses the side bar in a NavigationSplitView, the TabView on the detail view animates with a glitch to an offset page position. I've simplified the issue into a Single View which can be previewed in Xcode. This issue occurs on real hardware and in the simulator. This issue only occurs in landscape on iPad when dismissing the sidebar. Here is the code: struct ContentView: View { @State var pageIndex = 9 var body: some View { NavigationSplitView { Text("AppSidebarList") } detail: { TabView(selection:$pageIndex) { ForEach(0..<10, id:\.self) { i in ScrollView(.vertical, showsIndicators: false) { Text("Page \(i)").padding(.top,50) Rectangle().fill(Color.red) .frame(height:25).frame(maxWidth:.infinity) .padding() } } }.tabViewStyle(.page(indexDisplayMode: .never)) }.accentColor(Color.indigo) } } Here is the preview before selecting anything: This is then the expected behaviour after selecting the button top left to hide the sidebar: But instead the transition animation glitches and I get this: Note, the page is offset as indicated by the red bar. I've tried playing around with frame of maxWidth:.infinity. This issue does not happen if the iPad is in portrait, this seems to be because the sidebar in this mode overlays the detail view, where as in portrait they share the space and the detail view resizes to fill the space. Note the page index, it's the app behaviour that the TabView shows a selection of pages with the last one being the default and the user swiping backwards through. This issue does not occur if the default pageIndex is 0 Either this is a bug or there's a work around or I'm not using something correctly. It would be good to establish which. Many thanks

I'm seeing problems with the new Apple Watch Modular Ultra Watch face... This is all using the latest WatchOS 10.1 and with WidgetKit complications. (Have also tested with the new WatchOS 10.2 beta in the simulator) The Graphic Circular (accessoryCircular) complications space the numbers differently sometimes causing maximum and minimum numbers to look like one long number (see small circular complications in screenshot) The exact same complication in the accessoryRectangular on the Modular Ultra face clips text when it doesn't on any other watch face I've filed feedback FB13344580 Hopefully the screenshots show the issue well.

I've created a Snippet for my iOS app which I want to be able to run from the LockScreen via a Shortcuts widget. All works fine except when I run the shortcut and the App Snippet appears, it doesn't always render the SwiftUI view in the same way. Sometimes the width boundaries are respected and sometimes not. I've tested this on iOS 26.1 and iOS 26.2 beta 3 I think this is a bug but it would be great if anyone could see what I might be doing wrong if it's not. Incase it is a bug I've filed a feedback (FB21076429) and I've created a stripped down sample project showing the issue and added screenshots showing the issue. Basic code to reproduce issue: // Intent.swift // SnippetBug import AppIntents import Foundation import SwiftUI struct SnippetEntryIntent: AppIntent { static let title: LocalizedStringResource = "Open Snippet" static let description = IntentDescription("Shows a snippet.") // Don’t open the app – stay in the snippet surface. static let openAppWhenRun: Bool = false func perform() async throws -> some ShowsSnippetIntent { .result(snippetIntent: TestSnippetIntent()) } } struct TestSnippetIntent: SnippetIntent { static let title: LocalizedStringResource = "Snippet Intent" static let description = IntentDescription("Action from snippet.") @MainActor func perform() async throws -> some IntentResult & ShowsSnippetView { .result(view: SnippetView(model: SnippetModel.shared)) } } @MainActor final class SnippetModel { static let shared = SnippetModel() private init() { } } struct SnippetView: View { let model: SnippetModel var body: some View { HStack { Text("Test Snippet with information") Spacer() Image(systemName: "heart") }.font(.headline) } } struct Shortcuts: AppShortcutsProvider { static var appShortcuts: [AppShortcut] { AppShortcut( intent: SnippetEntryIntent(), phrases: [ "Snippet for \(.applicationName)", "Test Snippet \(.applicationName)" ], shortTitle: "Snippet", systemImageName: "barcode" ) } } You also need these lines in your main App entry point: import AppIntents @main struct SnippetBugApp: App { init() { let model = SnippetModel.shared AppDependencyManager.shared.add(dependency: model) } var body: some Scene { WindowGroup { ContentView() } } } This is correct This is incorrect