I recently updated my M1 mac to Monterey 12.5.1 and since my xcode fail to load my project. Xcode opens and hangs as seen in the picture. I have to force quit to close. The installed version of xcode is Version 13.4.1 Things I have tired: Completely removing and reinstalling xcode from the dev site Restarting device Suggestion from here https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11247008/xcode-freezes-on-startup-while-loading-project Even if I fully create a new project from the start screen, it still freezes on load Nothing seems to be working. Wondering if anyone can help Thanks

Hi, I have logged into an iCloud account on an iOS device simulator on my Mac to sync photos in order to test my app. The photos app is telling me syncing is paused as the device is in low power mode, but as this is a simulator, there's no network seatings to change this and I can't find out why it's in this mode or how to get it out. I've done exactly the same thing for years with no issues, but for some reason it's happening now. Has anyone else experienced the same? The simulator device is an iPhone 13 Pro Max running 15.5 however I've tested on other device and experienced the same issue. Many thanks, Dan

let videoURL = URL(fileURLWithPath: path ?? "") let asset = AVURLAsset(url: videoURL, options: nil) let imageGenerator = AVAssetImageGenerator(asset: asset) imageGenerator.appliesPreferredTrackTransform = true let time = CMTimeMultiplyByRatio(asset.duration, multiplier: 1, divisor: 2) // THIS LINE GIVES ISSUE: "'duration' was deprecated in iOS 16.0: Use load(.duration) instead". I CANNOT FIGURE OUT THE CORRECT SYNTAX FOR CHANGING asset.duration TO REPLACE WITH load(.duration). HELP WITH THE CORRECT SYNTAX WOULD BE HELPFUL.

Hi all. I have encountered an issue in which I failed to build the app on Xcode. It says "Provisioning profile doesn't match the entitlements file's values for the com.apple.developer.team-identifier and application-identifier entitlements". But I have checked these two values, they are exactly the same as expected.

Every time my app runs in the simulator I see this error: Warning: Error creating LLDB target at path '/Users/aaronsmith/Library/Developer/Xcode/DerivedData/Babylist-ahvzjxxrpawwqhecszqeyvjstfca/Build/Products/Debug-iphonesimulator/Babylist.app'- using an empty LLDB target which can cause slow memory reads from remote devices: the specified architecture 'arm64--' is not compatible with 'x86_64-apple-ios13.2.0-simulator' in '/Users/aaronsmith/Library/Developer/Xcode/DerivedData/Babylist-ahvzjxxrpawwqhecszqeyvjstfca/Build/Products/Debug-iphonesimulator/Babylist.app/Babylist' What is this? I'm on an M1, no build issues. It makes me think the simulator is running under rosetta with x68_64. But I didn't choose to do that. Mac OS Ventura. Xcode 14 RC.

Hi, a few weeks ago I received this email: "Notification of Apple Developer Program License Agreement (PLA) violation" by app_notification @apple.com. Content was: "We are writing to inform you that your company is not in compliance with the Apple Developer Program License Agreement (PLA). Section 11.2 (Termination) states: (g) if You engage, or encourage others to engage, in any misleading, fraudulent, improper, unlawful or dishonest act relating to this Agreement, including, but not limited to, misrepresenting the nature of Your Application (e.g., hiding or trying to hide functionality from Apple’s review, falsifying consumer reviews for Your Application, engaging in payment fraud, etc.). Be aware that manipulating App Store chart rankings, user reviews or search index may result in the loss of your developer program membership. Please address this issue promptly." and indeed, there was a problem with an app, which I then fixed. But then it started to become a little bit weird, which makes me think it could be a phishing attempt. I asked them for more information, which app they are talking about, etc., but I only received this reply: "Hello, We would like to speak with you about your apps on the App Store.  Please provide a number where you can be reached and we will contact you at our next opportunity.  Sincerely,  Apple" I replied to them I am currently on holiday and would like to clarify this via email and that I fixed the problems (they didn't tell me which app or what exactly was wrong, but I checked it by myself) What was their reply? Exactly the same as above: "Hello, We would like to speak with you about your apps on the App Store.  Please provide a number where you can be reached and we will contact you at our next opportunity.  Sincerely,  Apple" So, I replied again and asked them if they could just tell me what is wrong and if this problem still exists, etc. Their reply: "Hello, We would like to speak with you about your apps on the App Store.  Please provide a number where you can be reached and we will contact you at our next opportunity.  Sincerely,  Apple" They basically sent me the exact same email 3x in a row without answering any of my questions or telling me any details. At this point, I am really not sure anymore if this legit or not. I opened a support ticket with Apple and ask them if it's legit, but no reply so far. Did someone made any similar experience on here?

Apple’s library technology has a long and glorious history, dating all the way back to the origins of Unix. This does, however, mean that it can be a bit confusing to newcomers. This is my attempt to clarify some terminology. If you have any questions or comments about this, start a new thread and tag it with Linker so that I see it. Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = "eskimo" + "1" + "@" + "apple.com" An Apple Library Primer Apple’s tools support two related concepts: Platform — This is the platform itself; macOS, iOS, iOS Simulator, and Mac Catalyst are all platforms. Architecture — This is a specific CPU architecture used by a platform. arm64 and x86_64 are both architectures. A given architecture might be used by multiple platforms. The most obvious example of this arm64, which is used by all of the platforms listed above. Code built for one platform will not work on another platform, even if both platforms use the same architecture. Code is usually packaged in either a Mach-O file or a static library. Mach-O is used for executables (MH_EXECUTE), dynamic libraries (MH_DYLIB), bundles (MH_BUNDLE), and object files (MH_OBJECT). These can have a variety of different extensions; the only constant is that .o is always used for a Mach-O containing an object file. Use otool and nm to examine a Mach-O file. Use vtool to quickly determine the platform for which it was built. Use size to get a summary of its size. Use dyld_info to get more details about a dynamic library. IMPORTANT All the tools mentioned here are documented in man pages. For information on how to access that documentation, see Reading UNIX Manual Pages. There’s also a Mach-O man page, with basic information about the file format. Many of these tools have old and new variants, using the -classic suffix or llvm- prefix, respectively. For example, there’s nm-classic and llvm-nm. If you run the original name for the tool, you’ll get either the old or new variant depending on the version of the currently selected tools. To explicitly request the old or new variants, use xcrun. The term Mach-O image refers to a Mach-O that can be loaded and executed without further processing. That includes executables, dynamic libraries, and bundles, but not object files. A dynamic library has the extension .dylib. You may also see this called a shared library. A framework is a bundle structure with the .framework extension that has both compile-time and run-time roles: At compile time, the framework combines the library’s headers and its stub library (stub libraries are explained below). At run time, the framework combines the library’s code, as a Mach-O dynamic library, and its associated resources. The exact structure of a framework varies by platform. For the details, see Placing Content in a Bundle. macOS supports both frameworks and standalone dynamic libraries. Other Apple platforms support frameworks but not standalone dynamic libraries. Historically these two roles were combined, that is, the framework included the headers, the dynamic library, and its resources. These days Apple ships different frameworks for each role. That is, the macOS SDK includes the compile-time framework and macOS itself includes the run-time one. Most third-party frameworks continue to combine these roles. A static library is an archive of one or more object files. It has the extension .a. Use ar, libtool, and ranlib to inspect and manipulate these archives. The static linker, or just the linker, runs at build time. It combines various inputs into a single output. Typically these inputs are object files, static libraries, dynamic libraries, and various configuration items. The output is most commonly a Mach-O image, although it’s also possible to output an object file. The linker may also output metadata, such as a link map (see Using a Link Map to Track Down a Symbol’s Origin). The linker has seen three major implementations: ld — This dates from the dawn of Mac OS X. ld64 — This was a rewrite started in the 2005 timeframe. Eventually it replaced ld completely. If you type ld, you get ld64. ld_prime — This was introduced with Xcode 15. This isn’t a separate tool. Rather, ld now supports the -ld_classic and -ld_new options to select a specific implementation. Note During the Xcode 15 beta cycle these options were -ld64 and -ld_prime. I continue to use those names because the definition of new changes over time (some of us still think of ld64 as the new linker ;–). The dynamic linker loads Mach-O images at runtime. Its path is /usr/lib/dyld, so it’s often referred to as dyld, dyld, or DYLD. Personally I pronounced that dee-lid, but some folks say di-lid and others say dee-why-el-dee. IMPORTANT Third-party executables must use the standard dynamic linker. Other Unix-y platforms support the notion of a statically linked executable, one that makes system calls directly. This is not supported on Apple platforms. Apple platforms provide binary compatibility via system dynamic libraries and frameworks, not at the system call level. Note Apple platforms have vestigial support for custom dynamic linkers (your executable tells the system which dynamic linker to use via the LC_LOAD_DYLINKER load command). This facility originated on macOS’s ancestor platform and has never been a supported option on any Apple platform. The dynamic linker has seen 4 major revisions. See WWDC 2017 Session 413 (referenced below) for a discussion of versions 1 through 3. Version 4 is basically a merging of versions 2 and 3. The dyld man page is chock-full of useful info, including a discussion of how it finds images at runtime. Every dynamic library has an install name, which is how the dynamic linker identifies the library. Historically that was the path where you installed the library. That’s still true for most system libraries, but nowadays a third-party library should use an rpath-relative install name. For more about this, see Dynamic Library Identification. Mach-O images are position independent, that is, they can be loaded at any location within the process’s address space. Historically, Mach-O supported the concept of position-dependent images, ones that could only be loaded at a specific address. While it may still be possible to create such an image, it’s no longer a good life choice. Mach-O images have a default load address, also known as the base address. For modern position-independent images this is 0 for library images and 4 GiB for executables (leaving the bottom 32 bits of the process’s address space unmapped). When the dynamic linker loads an image, it chooses an address for the image and then rebases the image to that address. If you take that address and subtract the image’s load address, you get a value known as the slide. Xcode 15 introduced the concept of a mergeable library. This a dynamic library with extra metadata that allows the linker to embed it into the output Mach-O image, much like a static library. Mergeable libraries have many benefits. For all the backstory, see WWDC 2023 Session 10268 Meet mergeable libraries. For instructions on how to set this up, see Configuring your project to use mergeable libraries. If you put a mergeable library into a framework structure you get a mergeable framework. Xcode 15 also introduced the concept of a static framework. This is a framework structure where the framework’s dynamic library is replaced by a static library. Note It’s not clear to me whether this offers any benefit over creating a mergeable framework. Earlier versions of Xcode did not have proper static framework support. That didn’t stop folks trying to use them, which caused all sorts of weird build problems. A universal binary is a file that contains multiple architectures for the same platform. Universal binaries always use the universal binary format. Use the file command to learn what architectures are within a universal binary. Use the lipo command to manipulate universal binaries. A universal binary’s architectures are either all in Mach-O format or all in the static library archive format. The latter is called a universal static library. A universal binary has the same extension as its non-universal equivalent. That means a .a file might be a static library or a universal static library. Most tools work on a single architecture within a universal binary. They default to the architecture of the current machine. To override this, pass the architecture in using a command-line option, typically -arch or --arch. An XCFramework is a single document package that includes libraries for any combination of platforms and architectures. It has the extension .xcframework. An XCFramework holds either a framework, a dynamic library, or a static library. All the elements must be the same type. Use xcodebuild to create an XCFramework. For specific instructions, see Xcode Help > Distribute binary frameworks > Create an XCFramework. Historically there was no need to code sign libraries in SDKs. If you shipped an SDK to another developer, they were responsible for re-signing all the code as part of their distribution process. Xcode 15 changes this. You should sign your SDK so that a developer using it can verify this dependency. For more details, see WWDC 2023 Session 10061 Verify app dependencies with digital signatures and Verifying the origin of your XCFrameworks. A stub library is a compact description of the contents of a dynamic library. It has the extension .tbd, which stands for text-based description (TBD). Apple’s SDKs include stub libraries to minimise their size; for the backstory, read this post. Use the tapi tool to create and manipulate stub libraries. In this context TAPI stands for a text-based API, an alternative name for TBD. Oh, and on the subject of tapi, I’d be remiss if I didn’t mention tapi-analyze! Stub libraries currently use YAML format, a fact that’s relevant when you try to interpret linker errors. If you’re curious about the format, read the tapi-tbdv4 man page. There’s also a JSON variant documented in the tapi-tbdv5 man page. Note Back in the day stub libraries used to be Mach-O files with all the code removed (MH_DYLIB_STUB). This format has long been deprecated in favour of TBD. Historically, the system maintained a dynamic linker shared cache, built at runtime from its working set of dynamic libraries. In macOS 11 and later this cache is included in the OS itself. Libraries in the cache are no longer present in their original locations on disk: % ls -lh /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib ls: /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib: No such file or directory Apple APIs, most notably dlopen, understand this and do the right thing if you supply the path of a library that moved into the cache. That’s true for some, but not all, command-line tools, for example: % dyld_info -exports /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib [arm64e]: -exports: offset symbol … 0x5B827FE8 _mach_init_routine % nm /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib …/nm: error: /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib: No such file or directory When the linker creates a Mach-O image, it adds a bunch of helpful information to that image, including: The target platform The deployment target, that is, the minimum supported version of that platform Information about the tools used to build the image, most notably, the SDK version A build UUID For more information about the build UUID, see TN3178 Checking for and resolving build UUID problems. To dump the other information, run vtool. In some cases the OS uses the SDK version of the main executable to determine whether to enable new behaviour or retain old behaviour for compatibility purposes. You might see this referred to as compiled against SDK X. I typically refer to this as a linked-on-or-later check. Apple tools support the concept of autolinking. When your code uses a symbol from a module, the compiler inserts a reference (using the LC_LINKER_OPTION load command) to that module into the resulting object file (.o). When you link with that object file, the linker adds the referenced module to the list of modules that it searches when resolving symbols. Autolinking is obviously helpful but it can also cause problems, especially with cross-platform code. For information on how to enable and disable it, see the Build settings reference. Mach-O uses a two-level namespace. When a Mach-O image imports a symbol, it references the symbol name and the library where it expects to find that symbol. This improves both performance and reliability but it precludes certain techniques that might work on other platforms. For example, you can’t define a function called printf and expect it to ‘see’ calls from other dynamic libraries because those libraries import the version of printf from libSystem. To help folks who rely on techniques like this, macOS supports a flat namespace compatibility mode. This has numerous sharp edges — for an example, see the posts on this thread — and it’s best to avoid it where you can. If you’re enabling the flat namespace as part of a developer tool, search the ’net for dyld interpose to learn about an alternative technique. WARNING Dynamic linker interposing is not documented as API. While it’s a useful technique for developer tools, do not use it in products you ship to end users. Apple platforms use DWARF. When you compile a file, the compiler puts the debug info into the resulting object file. When you link a set of object files into a executable, dynamic library, or bundle for distribution, the linker does not include this debug info. Rather, debug info is stored in a separate debug symbols document package. This has the extension .dSYM and is created using dsymutil. Use symbols to learn about the symbols in a file. Use dwarfdump to get detailed information about DWARF debug info. Use atos to map an address to its corresponding symbol name. Different languages use different name mangling schemes: C, and all later languages, add a leading underscore (_) to distinguish their symbols from assembly language symbols. C++ uses a complex name mangling scheme. Use the c++filt tool to undo this mangling. Likewise, for Swift. Use swift demangle to undo this mangling. For a bunch more info about symbols in Mach-O, see Understanding Mach-O Symbols. This includes a discussion of weak references and weak definition. If your code is referencing a symbol unexpectedly, see Determining Why a Symbol is Referenced. To remove symbols from a Mach-O file, run strip. To hide symbols, run nmedit. It’s common for linkers to divide an object file into sections. You might find data in the data section and code in the text section (text is an old Unix term for code). Mach-O uses segments and sections. For example, there is a text segment (__TEXT) and within that various sections for code (__TEXT > __text), constant C strings (__TEXT > __cstring), and so on. Over the years there have been some really good talks about linking and libraries at WWDC, including: WWDC 2023 Session 10268 Meet mergeable libraries WWDC 2022 Session 110362 Link fast: Improve build and launch times WWDC 2022 Session 110370 Debug Swift debugging with LLDB WWDC 2021 Session 10211 Symbolication: Beyond the basics WWDC 2019 Session 416 Binary Frameworks in Swift — Despite the name, this covers XCFrameworks in depth. WWDC 2018 Session 415 Behind the Scenes of the Xcode Build Process WWDC 2017 Session 413 App Startup Time: Past, Present, and Future WWDC 2016 Session 406 Optimizing App Startup Time Note The older talks are no longer available from Apple, but you may be able to find transcripts out there on the ’net. Historically Apple published a document, Mac OS X ABI Mach-O File Format Reference, or some variant thereof, that acted as the definitive reference to the Mach-O file format. This document is no longer available from Apple. If you’re doing serious work with Mach-O, I recommend that you find an old copy. It’s definitely out of date, but there’s no better place to get a high-level introduction to the concepts. The Mach-O Wikipedia page has a link to an archived version of the document. For the most up-to-date information about Mach-O, see the declarations and doc comments in <mach-o/loader.h>. Revision History 2025-08-04 Added a link to Determining Why a Symbol is Referenced. 2025-06-29 Added information about autolinking. 2025-05-21 Added a note about the legacy Mach-O stub library format (MH_DYLIB_STUB). 2025-04-30 Added a specific reference to the man pages for the TBD format. 2025-03-01 Added a link to Understanding Mach-O Symbols. Added a link to TN3178 Checking for and resolving build UUID problems. Added a summary of the information available via vtool. Discussed linked-on-or-later checks. Explained how Mach-O uses segments and sections. Explained the old (-classic) and new (llvm-) tool variants. Referenced the Mach-O man page. Added basic info about the strip and nmedit tools. 2025-02-17 Expanded the discussion of dynamic library identification. 2024-10-07 Added some basic information about the dynamic linker shared cache. 2024-07-26 Clarified the description of the expected load address for Mach-O images. 2024-07-23 Added a discussion of position-independent images and the image slide. 2024-05-08 Added links to the demangling tools. 2024-04-30 Clarified the requirement to use the standard dynamic linker. 2024-03-02 Updated the discussion of static frameworks to account for Xcode 15 changes. Removed the link to WWDC 2018 Session 415 because it no longer works )-: 2024-03-01 Added the WWDC 2023 session to the list of sessions to make it easier to find. Added a reference to Using a Link Map to Track Down a Symbol’s Origin. Made other minor editorial changes. 2023-09-20 Added a link to Dynamic Library Identification. Updated the names for the static linker implementations (-ld_prime is no more!). Removed the beta epithet from Xcode 15. 2023-06-13 Defined the term Mach-O image. Added sections for both the static and dynamic linkers. Described the two big new features in Xcode 15: mergeable libraries and dependency verification. 2023-06-01 Add a reference to tapi-analyze. 2023-05-29 Added a discussion of the two-level namespace. 2023-04-27 Added a mention of the size tool. 2023-01-23 Explained the compile-time and run-time roles of a framework. Made other minor editorial changes. 2022-11-17 Added an explanation of TAPI. 2022-10-12 Added links to Mach-O documentation. 2022-09-29 Added info about .dSYM files. Added a few more links to WWDC sessions. 2022-09-21 First posted.

Im using Version 14.0 (14A309) In Xcode 13 i used the keybinding Control ⌃ + Option ⌥ + Command ⌘ + F to fix all errors in scope, for example an enum with missing cases. It is not possible in Xcode 14 since the "Fix All Issues" button is disabled all the time. You can navigate to "Fix All Issues" from: Editor -> "Fix All Issues" but its not possible to tap the button.

Hi, I have a problem with making a swift playgrounds app walkthrough. I followed the steps exactly and modified my Package.swift a bit (in the targets section): .executableTarget(name: "App", dependencies: ["Guide"], path: "App"),         .target(             name: "Guide",             path: "Guide",             resources: [             .process("Guide.tutorial"),             ]) Now when I open the project in Playgrounds I get this error: public headers ("include") directory path for 'Guide' is invalid or not contained in the target Any help would be appreciated. Thanks

I am not able to load my Apple Developer account details in Xcode in my new MacBook. After going to preferences in Xcode and signing in with Apple ID, after few seconds, it prompts the following error “Unexpected nil property at path: 'Actor/relationships/providerid’”. How can I fix this.

I have an iPhone 14 running iOS 16.1 and my series 5 watch running watchOS 9.1. I was able to turn on Developer Mode on the phone by going to Settings--> Privacy & Security --> Developer Mode. On the watch however (I'm doing this directly on the watch and not on the watch app on the phone) once I'm in Privacy & Security, there is no option to select Developer Mode. How do I get my watch in Developer Mode in order to get a successful build in xCode?

About technotes Technotes are focused, timely documents from Apple Developer Technical Support. They explore a wide range of development topics and provide guidance for developers creating apps and accessories for all of Apple’s platforms. Learn about specific development topics through these in-depth technical articles. You can subscribe to this RSS feed to get notified when new technotes are published. We encourage you to discuss the technotes here in the forums and share your feedback via Feedback Assistant. Let us know if a technote is helpful, or what we can do to improve it. We would appreciate it if you include a Feedback Assistant (FB) number in your forums post, so we can easily track your feedback, and let you know when it’s resolved. Tagging your post When tagging your post, please add the relevant tags for the technology area it applies to. You can also add the Technotes tag, if you wish. Providing feedback To create new feedback about a specific technote (or technotes as a whole) using Feedback Assistant, use the following path: What are you seeing an issue with? Developer Tools Which area are you seeing an issue with? Developer Documentation What does the documentation issue you are reporting involve? Technotes Please provide the URL of the content you reporting an issue with: The complete URL of the technote. For example, https://developer.apple.com/documentation/technotes/tn3102-http3-in-your-app. If you wish to leave feedback on Technotes in general, use https://developer.apple.com/documentation/technotes for the URL. Then complete the remaining fields appropriately. We appreciate and look forward to your feedback.

I've been happily building and deploying my app to my iPhone and Watch S8, and the app was ready to submit to App Store Connect last night. However, when archiving it I got an error saying that my DynamicEventSelectionIntent was in multiple extensions. It was, kind of. When I started working on the complications I copied the Widgets intents into the complications, and left the name the same, but they were not in multiple targets. It looks like the info plist only had one item in the IntentsSupported (because they're the same name), so I decided to rename them so I had a widget one and a complications one. The problem I have now is that I can't deploy to my iPhone and Watch anymore because I'm getting this error: This app contains a WatchKit app with one or more Siri Intents app extensions that declare IntentsSupported that are not declared in any of the companion app's Siri Intents app extensions. WatchKit Siri Intents extensions' IntentsSupported values must be a subset of the companion app's Siri Intents extensions' IntentsSupported values. All I've done is rename one intent, and locate every instance of it in the info plist files, and add the appropriate new one into the right places. Here's what I've got. Main App contains Widget and WidgetIntentHandler, plus Watch App, which contains Complications and ComplicationsIntentHandler. Target: Main app: (I've removed everything that has no bearing on extensions.) Target: Widget: Target: WidgetIntentHandler: Target: Watch App: Target: Complications: Target: ComplicationsIntentHandler: Please, can someone tell me what should and should not be in the various parts, as I've tried for 12 hours now and I cannot get this to deploy to my iPhone anymore :( Thanks.

After not happening to me for a few months, this issue has started hitting me again with currently %100 reproducability. If turn on VPN on my Mac then instantly the developer certificates within the keychain become untrusted. But that's not all, if VPN is then turned off the certificates do not revert to their trusted status but remain untrusted. The consequence of this is that if VPN is turned on and then a build is perform, it fails, and the only way to fix things is to delete the cert(s) from they keychain and re-install them. As a remote worker, having this happen several or even dozens of times a day is incredibly annoying and frustrating. This issue has been occurring for literally years, sometimes it occurs very often, others while its quiet for a while, and has spanned multiple versions of Xcode and Mac OS. So whatever the cause is its endemic. It doesn't just affect myself, but all the members in my development team. I'm currently using Xcode 14.1 RC 2 and Monterey but I've seen this issue occur with many versions of Xcode and Mac. (I'm using Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client). If the VPN is somehow interfering/affecting the connectivity aspect when an attempt is made by Xcode to validate the certificate, then why does it not rectify itself after turning off VPN? This is so so so so annoying. Can somebody please comment on why this happens and if there's a way to prevent it.

Hello, in the past couple of weeks I've been experience some problems with xcode regarding the signing & capabilities. I work in a company that makes customized apps for every of our clients and beacause of that we have about 200 targets in our project. In the past couple of weeks, I have been hanving trouble with the signing & capabilities in xcode. Some times is taking too long to load the poart where i select the team were the app will be upload and when it does it got stuck with the massege updating provisioning . There is anything that could have been done to not take too much time to the target get ready to be publiched? Thanks in advanced for any help.

It's maddening. I just opened a file and now it's gone because I had the audacity to open another file. I've learned that I can double click the tab of the first file to make it a permanent tab... but, of course, I'll need to do that every time I ever open any file ever, and if I close that file and come back to it later I'm going to be constantly having to double click tabs just to make Xcode stop replacing my tabs for me. It's nuts. It's driving me insane. Please. Is there any way to just DISABLE the temporary tabs behavior? I don't find it helpful in any way and I find it to be destructive to my development workflows.

Recently, I have trouble with my Xcode Cloud builds, where they seemingly complete, but the very final step does not happen. I am building from the same codebase for both macOS and iOS (I have two “Archive” steps in my workflow, one for iOS and one for macOS). The iOS one usually completes fast without problems. The macOS log ending looks like this, and remains stuck forever, with the macOS build in the “spinning progress” state and never completing. Is there something I can do on my end to make this work better? I would not want to go back to manual builds, Xcode Cloud is convenient and was working well for a while, but this is really annoying lately.

hello developers, First priority I couldn't find a proper title for the question :( The reason why I open a topic here is not to find the answer by direct point shooting; My goal is what do Apple, Developer, Companies and Devops teams think and comments about the subject I'm going to ask here? We use Jenkins as the Devops CI/CD tool at our company, and in Macos/Apple/iOS development, we use a lot of Mac Mini devices. Since we build/compilers on a project-based, version-based basis, we cannot get 100% efficiency from our devices. (For example, because the dependencies of a project are different from other projects; we dedicate only 1 Mac Mini to that project. (As the dependecys of the projects are too many and large, the migration process is very difficult for us, the cost of moving to a lower-level Mac Mini device is high / but this is just an example)) While researching, I saw that there is no docker container image for MacOs X (enterprise or legal) and I know about the Apple EULA. (For virtualization, Apple hardware must be used as a basis. Because the MacOs system is paid for on a device-based basis.) What I want to ask here is can I find or create a MacOs docker container image legally? How is the structure of other companies in their CI processes? If I install MacOs with more than one VMware/VirtualBox on Mac Mini, What harm could it do me in Jenkins? (I'm curious about people's comments on this.)

Today I got stuck with a weird behaviour with my c++ project. There is the code which doesn't catch exception from standard library (the same snippet works well on intel mac and under linux machines). Code snippet: #include &lt;exception&gt; #include &lt;stdexcept&gt; #include &lt;iostream&gt; #include &lt;string&gt; int main() { try { std::stod("notanumber"); } catch (const std::invalid_argument&amp;) { std::cerr &lt;&lt; "Caught std::invalid_argument" &lt;&lt; std::endl; } } Compilation command: clang++ -fno-rtti main.cpp -o main &amp;&amp; ./main Clang versions: clang++ --version Homebrew clang version 15.0.3 Target: arm64-apple-darwin21.6.0 Thread model: posix InstalledDir: /opt/homebrew/opt/llvm/bin Also tried: Apple clang version 14.0.0 (clang-1400.0.29.102) Target: arm64-apple-darwin21.6.0 Thread model: posix InstalledDir: /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/bin Output: libc++abi: terminating with uncaught exception of type std::invalid_argument: stod: no conversion [1] 65643 abort ./main Expected output: Caught std::invalid_argument Other info: Chip: Apple M1 OS: 12.6

Each year I get my renewal email from Apple, however, since 2019 (yes, this is the 4th year in a row) I've been unable to renew due to this infamous "Please enter fewer characters" error message. Each time I've had to open a support case, talk to someone on the phone, they take all of my details along with screenshots, etc. and manually renew my subscription. Once they've charged my card I never hear from them again and issue never gets resolved. IDK if any Apple Dev Support folks actually use this forum but this is ridiculous.